Poor Bart Stupak.
Bart Stupak is a Democratic Congressman from Michigan who happens to be pro-life. I mean, he’s got a 100% rating from the National Right to Life Committee. He’s hard core.
Months ago, when the U.S. House of Representatives considered the original healthcare bill, Mr. Stupak successfully added language to the bill declaring that no federal funds could be used to pay for abortions except in cases of life endangerment, rape or incest. He basically was reaffirming restrictions that had been in place for decades. Later, when the U.S. Senate passed its healthcare bill, it included similar, but not identical, language pertaining to abortion.
Without going into all the gory parliamentary details, at the end of this long process Congressman Stupak and a handful of other pro-life Democrats agreed to President Obama’s suggestion that he sign an Executive Order clarifying that no federal funds be used for abortions. In exchange, they voted for the healthcare bill.
The right to life movement cried foul, thinking that there are still loopholes that would result in federal funds being used to pay for “abortion on demand.” And yaddy, yaddy, yadda….
Now the healthcare bill is law and the Executive Order has been signed, but pro-life groups are incensed. Indeed, they are apoplectic and are publicly blaming Congressman Stupak. Not only that, but the anti-abortion foot soldiers are re-channeling the energy they have expended for years standing in front of abortion clinics and are deluging Congressman Stupak’s office with ugly messages. He has received threatening phone calls and faxes, including one drawing of a noose on a platform with the wording “All Baby Killers come to unseemly ends Either by the hand of man or by the Hand of God.” Last night, the Susan B Anthony List, a pro-life organization, withheld from Stupak of a “Defender of Life” award that he was going to receive at the D.C. event.
Well, well, well.
So, after all of these years of his railing against abortion, Mr. Stupak is now on the receiving end. He is now getting a small taste of what it is like to be a provider of abortion services.
I have absolutely no sympathy for him or his family.

March 25, 2010 at 4:15 pm
Actually, showing him some sympathy at this point would help open his eyes to the fact that his opponents– “pro-choicers” have a lot less psychopathological baggage than his supporters.
Fuerher Ex is the autobiography of a German neo-Nazi who did such things as beat up Jewish schoolkids, etc., in the Sixties and Seventies, but weaned himself away from the movement. One of the biggest influences in opening his eyes to what he had gotten into was a French documentary filmmaker who did one on him. The Frenchman was understanding, non-judgmental and much more equanimable than the guy’s compatriots. Over the course of years of friendship, the Kraut came to realize that he could live without all his childhood baggage among people who valued him as a person.
Stupak could probably use a few signals from the people he’s hated and feared all his life, letting him know he’s safer among us than among the people who have misled and used him all along.
By the way, that “Nancy” who claimed to be “pro-life” (adopting four kids as a single mother) has never responded as to how she manages to support a family of five while volunteering full-time in a pediatric ward. I know that in my state it would cost her $62,000 minimum to keep her head above water unless she’s heavily into public support programs like CHIP, Food Stamps, low-income housing. Her silence on the matter makes her claim suspicious to me– but I’m naturally suspicious in such “pro-life” claims. Either she is as wealthy as prominent socialite Ti-Grace Atkinson (Bill Buckley’s sister and a notorious anti-feminist and so-called “pro-lifer”), or she was peddling the typical “every pregnant woman can do what I’m doing” meme. Just thinking….
(As a poverty-level single parent myself, I have no quarrel if she’s doing it all on the public dime. If the help hadn’t been there when I was needed, I probably would have found homicide-suicide a feasible solution. (Pro-lifers ought to think about what children really need from them.))
cg.
LikeLike
March 26, 2010 at 9:15 am
I show no pity for the man.
He has worked as hard as he can to harm women.
Let’s try and vote for people that do not do that kind of stuff!
GREAT BLOG!
by the way,
LK
LikeLike
March 26, 2010 at 9:29 am
You’re right, Lisa. What it all comes down to is voting in people who support legal abortion, people who trust women. That’s what this whole debate came down to. If we had had the votes in the Congress to provide funding for abortions, Stupak would not be a household name. The interesting thing now is that his opponent, who is pro-choice is raising a crap-load of money and the anti-abortion types say they will not support him….
Thanks for the kind words! I love writing about this stuff! Indeed, see my recent post. I’d be curious about your reaction.
LikeLike
March 26, 2010 at 9:57 am
Well, not showing pity for him understandable but not to his family is a little much? What does that mean anyway? Not showing pity for his family is actually saying that if they are to get hurt from all of this is just what they deserved for being related to him.
Don’t agree with that part.
LikeLike
March 26, 2010 at 10:19 am
That may have been a little harsh, but I was thinking of the campaign of terror that has been directed towards abortion providers over the years. In too many cases, their families were terrorized as well. Anti-abortion zealots would follow their kids to school, screaming at them. They would be yelled at at supermarkets. On doctor once got a call in the middle of the night saying he needed to come to the hospital because his son had been in a car accident, which was not true. Doctor Slepian was killed in front of his two sons. Stupak, with his “baby killer” language encourages less than stable people to go off the deep end. Maybe if his family saw some of the evidence of that hateful language, he would back off. But, of course, I do not wish any physical harm on them or him or anyone for that matter. Thanks…
LikeLike
March 26, 2010 at 7:35 pm
Stupak would grow some if his opponents are nicer to him than his ex-supporters are. It does no harm to offer him solace in the face of their usual hatred; it will give him a chance to reconsider his conceptual framework, much like Barry Goldwater did in the decades after his failed presidential bid.
That said, however, there’s no need to be so compassionate as to further his campaign.
Pat’s comment about what so-called “pro-lifers” have done to innocent relatives of the people they hate is yet further proof of the aborticentrism driving the movment.
By the way, I still haven’t gotten a reply from “Nancy,” the truly “pro-life” woman who says she is a single mother with 4 adopted kids and no job. I wonder how she pulls it off? Just wondering…
cg
LikeLike
March 27, 2010 at 2:50 pm
If I were you, CG, I would forget about Nancy…
LikeLike
March 27, 2010 at 3:00 pm
Pat, it’s precisely what “Nancy” has pulled that keeps “pro-choicers” on the defensive– she makes claims about her own life that shame people into letting so-called “pro-lifers” continue to be regnant. People like her are dishonest in not giving a full account of how they manage to care for real human life, despite not having a job yet living a lifestyle that demands $62,000 annually to support themselves.
It’s not that they fool people into thinking they ought to carry that next pregnancy to term; it’s that they make it possible for others to believe that, “Well, yeah, the ‘pro-lifers’ are on the right track if there are people like Nancy out there.”
She scatters the dandelion seeds of a pernicious myth, and you try to gather them all…
cg
LikeLike