A few weeks ago, a reader asked me to delve a little more into the group of anti-abortion folks who claim that it is “justifiable homicide” to kill a doctor who performs abortions. The theory suggests that if you believe that it is a “baby” or “person” in the uterus and someone is going to terminate it, then you are justified in stopping the “killer,” just like you would stop someone from killing a real, already-born person.
Let me first say that this group is clearly a fringe group of the pro-life movement. I have participated in a lot of discussions with those who oppose abortion and the vast, vast majority of them believe these folks are a bunch of kooks. But then there are a few out there…
The first time I heard about this theory was after the murder of Doctor David Gunn in March, 1993. The murder was front page news everywhere as it was the first time an abortion doctor had been killed. Things became extremely tense all across the country, abortion providers were on high alert and we were all waiting for someone else to blast away. Then, out of the blue comes a soft spoken minister from Pensacola named Paul Hill. I later learned that right after the murder, perhaps sensing an opportunity to get some exposure, he called a producer at “The Donohue Show” (the pioneer of talk shows) and told her that he actually believed that Michael Griffin, Doctor Gunn’s assassin, was “justified” in doing what he did. Of course, the producer, always looking for something sensational, immediately booked him on the show. Paul Hill sat right next to me on the show that day and told the crowd point blank that it was okay to kill Doctor Gunn and other abortion doctors.
Soon thereafter, Paul and a few others saw an opportunity to scare the crap out of abortion providers, no doubt hoping that many of them would leave the field. So, they formed a loose knit group called “Defensive Action.” They gathered about 30 names on a petition from people who believed in the “justifiable homicide” defense. But they were careful. They never said “I will kill a doctor” because that would have landed them in jail. Instead, they just said it was “okay” to kill an abortion doctor, no doubt hoping that they would inspire some less-than-stable person to take up the cause.
Right after the first murder, a number of abortion doctors left the field and when word got out about this group, others fled. They were the ones who had always been on the edge anyway, so they were ripe to leave. Others, however, bought guns, bullet proof vests and other defensive devices. They were ready to do battle. One doctor out west walked me through his clinic and showed me how he had hidden a Magnum 357 in EVERY room in his clinic. “If they come in here shooting, I’m taking them all with me,” he vowed. Of course, the Defensive Action crowd got a lot of publicity. After all, fear sells newspapers, right? And Paul Hill and his crowd fed off of the hysteria.
But, while I cannot prove it, I believe to this day that they never all got together in one room and plotted murders. They were too smart for that, they knew they were being watched. Meanwhile, I had an interesting reaction to this theory. I was talking to Paul Hill one day in a hotel and told him “you know, Paul, in some weird way I think your theory is consistent with your belief. If you firmly believe that the woman is carrying a ‘baby’ or a ‘person’, then I can see how you believe you should defend it from its impending death.” I added that it was a ridiculous notion in real life, of course, but “if we’re just talking about a non-actionable idea, then I hear what you are saying.” The next day, Paul held a press conference to let the world know that I, a staffer at the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, “supported the ‘justifiable homicide’ theory.” So much for a casual discussion about a ridiculous theory.
Of course, months later Paul picked up a gun and killed Doctor Baird Britton and he attempted to make his defense the “justifiable homicide” theory. The judge did not allow him to offer it. The movement, and that’s a stretch to call it that, quickly died down when their leader was executed in the chair a short while later.
Related Articles
- SD Rep. on Justifiable Homicide Bill: “This Has Got Nothing to Do With Abortion” (alternet.org)
- South Dakota’s Anti-Abortionists Attempting to Justify ‘Justifiable Homicide’ (craigconsidine.wordpress.com)
- Defending Unborn Kids: ‘Justifiable Homicide’? (abcnews.go.com)
- Lawmaker Behind South Dakota’s ‘Justifiable Homicide’ Bill Defends Measure, Makes Changes (huffingtonpost.com)
- South Dakota Bill Would Make Killing To Stop Harm To A Fetus Justifiable Homicide (alan.com)
- South Dakota GOP Propose Killing Abortion Doctors is &Ldquo;justifiable Homicide” (socyberty.com)
- The Battle Over South Dakota’s Justified Homicide Bill (omnipotentpoobah.com)
- S. Dakota Republicans Want to Legalize Killing Abortion Providers (littlegreenfootballs.com)
- South Dakota legislator backs down from ‘pro-life’ bill to legalize murder (alternet.org)
- SD bill ‘license to kill’ abortion providers? (seattletimes.nwsource.com)






February 17, 2011 at 5:08 pm
Notice how completely the so-called “pro-lifers” stay away from the little matter of caring for the real child? They do a masterful job of keeping their memes in front of the public– “killing,” “torture,” castigating those who insist it takes more than tissue to make a human being. Very smoothly done! And it’s why they’ve been so successful all these decades. They are masters of PR.
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 6:41 pm
Where do you find all these abortion terrorists?
Would you write another post?
Looking at Kopp and Hill is giving me the creeps.
Were all the murderers of innocent doctors executed hopefully?
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 5:28 am
It’s sad, they appear to be all over the place
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 9:35 am
The only murdered to be executed was Paul Hill. The others are in jail. John Salvi, who killed several in Boston was killed himself in prison. Did I leave any of your buddies out, John?
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 7:06 pm
Probably, but I’m drinking a martini now. Get back to you tomorrow.
LikeLike
February 19, 2011 at 5:36 am
You’re right, Pat. Just shows how pitifully weak we are.
LikeLike
February 19, 2011 at 8:46 am
The abortion terrorists and ProLifers that committ violence are not weak.
The abortion terrorists successfully assainated and murdered and drove away (from fear) a significant percentage of Innocent Doctors that perform abortion.
The abortion terrorists even drove away regular OBGYns that did not do abortions as they were labeled wrongly. The abortion terrorists are not that smart.
They had No effect on the women that desired abortion. And the women who want abortion still get abortions when they desire them.
So all the abortion terrorists did was assassinate innocent people and did not deter any abortions.
They are very, very stupid these JH people.
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 6:54 pm
i think that to be pro-life, i must also value the lives of the women seeking abortions, the lives of the doctors and staffers who perform them, and even the lives of those who kill doctors and staffers as human sacrifices.
my value for human life can’t end at the delivery room doors.
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 5:27 am
Rogelio,
You write like an intelligent pro lifer. It renews my faith, that less ProLifers are wild lunatics.
LikeLike
February 19, 2011 at 5:37 am
fewer
LikeLike
February 19, 2011 at 7:29 pm
Mary Ann I agree with you,
I am pro Life but these JH people are crazy and hurt the cause of the ProLife crowd.
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 3:39 pm
Will no one answer why the JH people are so crazy?
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 4:54 pm
Nancy: it’s aborticentrism. look it up, and you’ll understand why the general run of scpl’s is so odd. The JH’ers are even more insecure, and thus go over the top in their reaction to abortion.
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 5:53 am
I’m sorry, my goal is to make our blog as user friendly as poilsbse.If you click on Blog and scroll down to Monthly Newsletters the last two months are there.Just click and the newsletter comes up with all the sales & specialsIs there anything I can do to be more helpful?Thank you,Maria
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 10:01 am
Pat says in #13: “Well, he stopped that particular “killer’ but the next day those women went to Alabama to find another “killer”. Paul was an idiot, delusional and he accomplished absolutely nothing, John. NOTHING. Except, being the true pro-lifer (as CG would suggest), he left behind his own kids to fend for themselves wouldH would de…”
The patron saint of aborticentrics, St. Gianna Maria Baretta, chose anti-abortionism over her dying daughter’s need for her. You can read about it by researching aborticentrism. The quintessential example of a warped value system.
LikeLike
February 20, 2011 at 6:31 am
And I thought “Responsible” was “CG”! Why can’t we just use our own names?
LikeLike
February 7, 2014 at 10:14 pm
– Hi Kelly! Since your comment the other week I’ve been mnieang to come check out your site. All I can say is WOW! You’re images are amazing, and I love love love how you’ve styled your blog and your site! All the best!03/11/2011 8:22 am
LikeLike
February 21, 2011 at 10:56 am
So, yesterday i was driving back home from Orlando, and i saw this truck with huge pictures of “fetus” at 10 weeks (that is what says on the truck poster). I start to laugh about it because, yes, it is kind of like that because i have the sonogram of my grandson at 12 weeks and it looks like that but what bugs me with this kind of “advertising” is that they were on a public road where children could see it and question their families. If the “pro-lifers” are not to educate their children about contraception they also should not show this kind of images in the road!!! Come on, specially on turnpike coming from Orlando… I think this is a bit too much and that is it!
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 11:51 am
Course you’re wrong here, as usual, Sonia. It is the kids who must see the pulled apart bodies. They must ask, “Daddy, who pulled off that baby’s head?” We are a lost and brainwashed generation. The kids see what’s real.
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 7:02 am
RESPONSIBLE Right to Life is an association of pro-lifers who pledge to raise to adulthood every “unborn human” they want “rescued.” This is the benchmark of the true “pro-life” movement, as opposed to the so-called “pro-life” movement.
So far, not one so-called “pro-lifer” has taken that pledge, and it is safe to say that not a one on this site will take it either. It is telling that the only people who have taken it are “pro-choicers.”
I have been the president of RESPONSIBLE Right to life since its inception in 1993 and as such have the option of using the title of the organization when it amuses me to speak ex cathedra.
–CG
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 2:37 pm
Chuckles, why put unborn human in quotes?
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 2:54 pm
Anonymous,
Unless you are Pro Choice,
Why be Anonymous?
I understand someone who supports abortion rights being anonymous as they would not want to be targeted by The Terrorists in the Anti Abortion movement.
Why would a person who is against abortion be anonymous?
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 4:58 pm
They prefer to be anonymous because they don’t want to shoulder any burden for their actions and opinions. I tried to get 160 of them to commit 600 hours a year apiece, and they folded like wet tissue paper.
LikeLike
February 25, 2011 at 6:20 am
Boy, you are way off here, Elena. Who should be more afraid of, those who supported the killing of sixty million or those who supported the killing of seven?
LikeLike
February 25, 2011 at 7:08 am
We should always be concerned about people who minimize organized terrorism that is illegal.
That is what pro life people are doing.
Only an idiot would not recognize this importance in a republic such as ours.
LikeLike
February 9, 2014 at 1:12 pm
I have a butterfly on my left shedbuorllade, which i thought reminded me of me because I’m fairly small, a hummingbird on my right side over my ribs because Trinidad and Tobago is the land of the hummingbird, and that’s where my family is from and my favourite is a wreath of ivy around my right ankle linking four Chinese characters. The characters are two tigers (for my twin sons born in the year of the tiger), a dragon (my third son born in the year of the dragon) and the fourth character means loyalty, because I want them to stick together and be loyal to each other all their lives, no matter what I love this one around my ankle as much now as when I got it!
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 12:17 pm
Actually, folks,I have to support the right of that person to have an ugly sign on their truck. To me, it’s free speech. We see lots of ugly things in public.
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 3:01 pm
Pat,
To clarify,
Are there limits to your support?
Would you vote to allow trucks of embellished fraudulent bloody scenes (we have seen the Anti Abortionists do this already) of abortions, park their truck at an elementary school hours early to pick up their kids?
My goodness, we have ratings for movies that disallow this expression and rules of enforcement. Do you disagree with those too?
What you express must be of a degree?
LikeLike
April 21, 2011 at 8:43 am
Why are so Many pro life people violent?
The fact that most are Christians is so ironic . . .
LikeLike
April 21, 2011 at 11:21 am
Heather above says, “We should always be concerned about people who minimize organized terrorism that is illegal.”
Not really, Heather. That kind of force has resulted in fewer than a dozen deaths since Roe v Wade became law. What we relly should be concerned about is the organized terrorism that is legal. That terrorism has resulted in sixty million deaths since then.
LikeLike
April 21, 2011 at 2:14 pm
So, John, if the director of one of the clinics you picket was killed, you would just say “oh well, too bad..”? Do you care more about fetuses inside some women’s body more than you care about people who are already born? Do you care more about the fetuses than your wife???
LikeLike
April 23, 2011 at 6:37 pm
pat is right, what would you say if the fetuses were your problem john, what would you do raise them all or let someone else do the dirty work?
and referring to it as terrorism, what are you holding pickets up for, The babies? then who do you blame? The woman, who cannot afford to actuate a life with the kid? The Doctors?, what is so wrong with helping someone by ending a burden of bad decisions?
LikeLike
April 24, 2011 at 8:10 am
Would somebody put this into English so I can respond?
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 6:38 pm
I have a black henna looking tatoto on my right foot. My mom drew it and it means alot to have my moms art permanently on my body. It also has a bird in it that represents my mom because she has 2 bird tatotos. It also has a Catfish in it because my fathers clown name when he performs is Catfish. So it represents both of my parents. My mom also had it tatotoed on her so we match YAY
LikeLike
April 22, 2014 at 7:02 am
Grade A stuff. I’m unquestionably in your debt.
LikeLike