It’s quite possible that I met Lee Ann Nichols just a few weeks before she was killed at an Abortion office..
As a staff person for the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, in early December, 1994, I had gone up to the Boston area to visit a number of member clinics. One of my first stops was the Preterm Clinic on Commonwealth Avenue. As always, I was escorted around by the administrator and introduced to all the staff people. Lee Ann was the receptionist but I just can’t remember if I met her.
Just a few months after Paul Hill murdered Doctor Baird Britton and his bodyguard, pro-life terrorist John Salvi also took the law into his own hands in a shooting spree at two clinics in the area. Witnesses had testified that Salvi had been a somewhat regular presence in front of Preterm and the Planned Parenthood clinics. As for his mental state, letters released after his arrest indicated his belief in conspiracies by the freemasons, the Vatican and the KKK, which he thought was targeting Catholics. Salvi’s mother later said that her son had told her that he “was the thief on the cross with Jesus.” He also told her that “…the mafia and KKK are out to get me.”
On Decebmer 30, 1994, John Salvi calmly walked into the Planned Parenthood facility and shot Shannon Lowney, the receptionist. He then walked over to Preterm where he killed Nichols and engaged the security guard, Richard Seron, in a gun battle. After that, Salvi dropped a bag containing a second gun and 700 rounds of ammunition and fled the city. A nationwide alert was put out and the NCAP office was inundated with calls from clinics all along the east coast asking what security precautions they should take. The next day, 1,200 miles away in Norfolk, Virginia, the Reverend Donald Spitz and his followers ended their regular protest outside the Hillcrest Clinic and fifteen minutes later, Salvi suddenly appeared at the building’s main entrance. He sprayed the lobby with a hail of bullets but no one was hurt. Within 10 minutes, police surrounded a pick-up truck and Salvi was arrested.
At one point, the Boston Globe reported that Salvi had a piece of paper with Donald Spitz’ name on it. Spitz was “follower” of Paul Hill and espoused the “justifiable homicide” theory. Spitz was never charged with aiding Salvi in any way but Salvi’s trial gave Spitz a lot of national attention because he stood outside the courtroom defending Salvi’s actions.
I had met Spitz a few times and I always thought that, like Paul Hill, he loved the media spotlight. So, this particular case was ripe for him and his ego. He knew folks would be outraged if he said he supported Salvi and some pro-choice folks were apoplectic that he was out there applauding Salvi’s rampage. Still, I was one of the few that suggested that he was within his Free Speech rights and that we should just ignore him and not give him the attention he desired.
About two years later, after he was convicted of murder, Salvi was found dead in his prison cell. The official report said that his death was a suicide but there was some controversy because other reports claimed that he was found with his hands and feet tied together, cotton shoved in his mouth and a bag placed and tied over his head.
For the abortion provider community, this new outrage upped the ante even more because now someone had just decided to walk into a clinic and start shooting. He was not necessarily targeting a doctor. Indeed, I remember talking to some clinic line staff who very privately expressed some “comfort” that the assassins until then had “just” been targeting the doctors. But this was different. Suddenly, parents and loved ones of clinic staff were asking their loved ones to leave the potentially dangerous situation.
It seemed that no one was safe anymore.
Related articles
- MATT CONNOLLY: Not all killers treated alike (enterprisenews.com)



October 8, 2012 at 7:53 am
“he was found with his hands and feet tied together, cotton shoved in his mouth and a bag placed and tied over his head.” Little did Salvi know he’d wind up in Guantanamo…
Is Spitz still active, or is he sidetracked by trying to determine which he’d rather have our next vice-president fight for– stopping abortions (Paul Ryan) or defending his Social Security (Joe Biden)? What sort of a “single issue” voter is he?
LikeLike
October 9, 2012 at 2:20 pm
Very funny, Charles! Interesting question about Spitz. I haven’t heard anything about him in years and when I googled him everything was kinda old. I think he really got off telling the media that Salvi was a “hero”. He saw them express outrage and that just fed Spitz…
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 12:08 pm
It’s all about knowing when your poersn is distracted. Timing is everything. You also need to plan a time when they don’t tuck their chair in. They work great stools. You got to get all fours on the table for the best advantage to getting the most food ~ Casey
LikeLike
October 8, 2012 at 8:14 am
What ever happened to Salvi, he deserved worse.
LikeLike
October 9, 2012 at 10:26 am
Evi, when are you going to realize you are just another Killer’s helper?
LikeLike
October 9, 2012 at 12:24 pm
Hey, the single-issue voter– Mr. Dunkle– has resolved his conflict over whether to have his Social Security cut by voting for the guys who have pledged to end abortion in America! Welcome back!!
LikeLike
October 9, 2012 at 2:22 pm
I dont know, Charles. Romney says pretty clearly that he is not going to cut SS for current recipients but has admitted that they might have to look at future recipients (like my kids). And, yes, welcome back Johnny, although that response was not up to your usual standards 🙂
LikeLike
October 10, 2012 at 7:49 am
All Romney has to do, Pat, is chain Mr. Dunkle’s SS to the Consumer Price Index, as the Catfood Commission proposed (and Obama favored), and he is screwed in his dotage. At least he’s not getting screwed the way his bishop screwed the teaching nuns on their Social Security….
LikeLike
October 9, 2012 at 7:30 pm
why dont you just admit “JD” or Dunkle, that you are no better than the killers whom inevitably ruin the lives of innocent people?
And you can stand to look at your self as you call other people killers? – to me it sounds like you endorse the actions of shelly .. and other disgusting people alike.
LikeLike
October 10, 2012 at 7:53 am
smith 23429, it makes him feel “saved” to know that he can “rescue” a fetus the way he hopes God will rescue him. The so-called “pro-life” movement is a dysfunctional self-help program in which the participants try to resolve their mortal terror of their own Death by acting out an allegory. The fetus is them, and they are God. If they can “rescue” a fetus, it gives them hope that God will ensure some form of immortality in this life– mainly, a reputation that will never die (think: Caesar, Napolean, Simon Stylites….)
LikeLike
October 10, 2012 at 8:57 am
Do you really think John is that deep, Charles? Are we giving him too much credit?
LikeLike
October 10, 2012 at 9:06 am
“If they can “rescue” a fetus, it gives them hope that God will ensure some form of immortality”
John has gone on record saying that the “work” he does is for his hope of his own redemption, obviously not that he gives two shakes of rat’s ass for the women
LikeLike
October 10, 2012 at 1:17 pm
For proper therapy, Mr. Dunkle would have to work through the significance of his statement, answering such questions as:
1. Why is his faith so weak that he does not believe that God already loves him?
2. Why does his religion require him to fear the mortality which is the lot of every living thing?
3. Why does he fear being called home to Jesus, which according to his religion, is about the best thing that could possibly ever happen?
— and then there is a raft more of questions in the secular, psychoanalytical world….
LikeLike
October 10, 2012 at 7:24 pm
Charles,
I could ask the same of all those ninnies who lurk outside abortion clinics. They don’t trust God so they act like they’re God, judging, scorning and shaming women, condemning workers and volunteers to hell, calling them names…they’re no better than anyone else. Pitiful souls.
LikeLike
October 11, 2012 at 7:44 am
It may be because I haven’t had my second cup of coffee yet, but I’m missing something here. The pro-lifers don’t trust God?
LikeLike
October 11, 2012 at 1:52 pm
Even though they proclaim otherwise, their faith is weak, Pat. To understand faith, here’s an example: Ever since you turned a year old, your mother always had a birthday party for you, and you always enjoyed it. You are now a day short of your twenty-sixth birthday, planning to have your mom show up with the cake tomorrow, and a friend says, “I bet she isn’t going to show up.”
If you know your mother well enough and are fairly certain no external factor is going to stop her, you will scoff at your friend’s disbelief. You have strong faith in your mother, and it sustains you.
But if you are unable even after 25 years of proof to believe your mother might not celebrate your birthday, you will believe your friend. And if you want desperately enough to ensure your mother’s performance, you will do all sorts of things in hopes of placating or encouraging her.
And all the time you will proclaim you love her and that she is good to you, but in the latter case, you don’t really believe she is good to you. That is weak faith.
LikeLike