Well, here’s a new one…
It seems that a bill has been introduced in the Georgia legislature that would make it a crime “to solicit a woman to have an abortion based on the race or sex of the unborn child.” And, to promote the legislation, the Georgia Right to Life Committee has posted billboards throughout the state with a picture of a black baby and a caption reading “Black children are an endangered species.” It then mentions a website entitled www.toomanyaborted.com.
So, when I read this, then read it again, I sat back, looked out the window and started to think….
Do women really abort because of race? In fact, when an ultrasound is performed, can you even tell the race of the baby? If that were even possible, would a white woman who has had sex with a black man ask about the race and abort it if she did not want a black baby? Or visa versa with a black woman and a white man? Is that what happens in the real world?
What about an abortion based on sex? Now that is one that I presume might happen as there are some cultures that prefer one sex over the other. Do abortion doctors even ask the woman why she is aborting?
And, the more I look at the language of the bill, it says it is illegal “to solicit a woman…..” Are there abortion doctors out there who are “soliciting” women to have abortions based on race or sex?
I am not sure what Georgia Right to Life is trying to do here. Do they really care that the majority of abortions in their state are performed on minorities? Or are they trying to promote some kind of race war? It’s all very strange to me. Still, I would rather have them waste their time on silliness like this than some legislation that would truly harm the pro-choice movement. And I would love to hear from a supporter of the bill to give me more details.

February 16, 2010 at 5:55 pm
Good luck, Pat! I don’t think any aborticentric is going to even look for this site, much less respond to it.
Red states have a certain capacity for looniness far above other states. Georgia’s neighbor, South Carolina is a present debating two bills– one to prevent implantation of identification chips into humans (based on the Apocalyptic reference to “the mark of the beast”) and to compel terrorist organizations to register with the state. Both winners, you may be sure!
The Georgia bill is promoted by sincere but psychologically needy people whose self-therapeutic approach to their underlying neurosis is to fashion a world of fears which they can then address. The fears have to appear terrible enough to be mastered, yet impotent enough to be easily conquered. (This is a necessary condition, because they don’t have the inner strength to combat an actual evil.) Thus, they imagine that doctors solicit abortion clients. This of course after moving heaven and earth to portray abortion as the quintessential evil (never mind the next Ted Bundy being born, but that’s a whole nuther phillippic.)
Unfortunately, while their effort appears “silly,” it is far from that. It has direct impact on men and women who pay attention to how well they can raise the number of children they want, on children who are born unwanted or neglected during the crucial years of childhood, and on society, which pays the price when damaged children grow old enough to avenge their trauma.
If you were of a professional bent in the field of psychiatry or sociology, you’d probably have a far different take on this particular nuttines.
LikeLike
February 16, 2010 at 8:57 pm
Actually, the bill is totally “silly” in that it could never pass constitutional muster. So, let them spend their time on this one versus something more serious, like regulating clinics out of business. As a former lobbyist, we always wanted our opponents to pursue the most extreme of measures….
LikeLike
February 17, 2010 at 3:04 am
Pat,
thank you, very interesting.
Cgregor,
you are a little confusing, but I think you have the correct position,
These bill writers are idiots. And if they waste their time like this, that is great.
The bottom line is like a man,
A woman wants the right to control her own body,
and no one shall legislate that right away from her.
Pat has a different, deeper understanding of the issue.
Cgregor , you seem very literal in response but , maybe, get it, I am not sure.
It just as simple as
Women control what happens to their bodies
everybody, hands off!
LikeLike
February 17, 2010 at 11:08 am
WOW, I think people are going to far now or maybe people have always been this nutty, really not sure.
Instead of spending money on campaigns like this why not spend it educating people on how no to get pregnant if that is not on their plans, because when it comes down to it, it is plain and simple EDUCATION IS THE KEY. If black children are an endangered species, give the black community something to fight against that. EDUCATION.
LikeLike
February 17, 2010 at 11:09 am
WOW, I think people are going to far now or maybe people have always been this nutty forever, really not sure.
Instead of spending money on campaigns like this why not spend it educating people on how no to get pregnant if that is not on their plans, because when it comes down to it, it is plain and simple EDUCATION IS THE KEY. If black children are an endangered species, give the black community something to fight against that. EDUCATION.
LikeLike
February 21, 2010 at 1:53 pm
More ridiculous Georgia minority. Thankfully they do not represent but a tiny minority of us that live here.
We are still in effort to gain respect for our pathetic stances as recent as the civil right’s movement.
We do not need legislators to move use 100 years backwards.
Abortion is a choice. Like any other private medical choice.
LikeLike
March 5, 2010 at 7:30 pm
Anonymous, if you think about why the so-called “pro-life” movement won’t support birth control (thus preventing abortions), you will come to this conclusion:
Their puzzling stance only makes sense if they are acting out an allegorical struggle about their own eternal “rescue,” an allegory in which the fetus they “rescue” represents their own soul.
If birth control is used, then there is no fetus to represent them in the struggle. They need to have pregnant women to serve their ends!
LikeLike
November 8, 2010 at 11:31 am
I’d have to come to terms with you on this. Which is not something I usually do! I really like reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment!
LikeLike
November 8, 2010 at 11:52 am
Thanks for commenting, Mathilda. I hope when you get a chance that you look at some of my other more recent posts. As you will see, I”m pro-choice but I have a heck of a lot of questions and I’m not afraid to criticize my pro-choice colleagues when appropriate.
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 4:31 am
Resources like the one you brought up here will be incredibly valuable to me personally! I will certainly publish a link to this web page on my personal website. Read my website visitors will find that really useful.
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 9:45 am
Thanks, Homepage. Hope you have a chance to read all my other stuff.
LikeLike