The pro-choice movement is going bonkers today because President Obama “caved” in to anti-choice legislators in order to secure their votes in favor of the healthcare reform bill.
Gimme a break!
By now, everyone knows how hard Obama had to work to get the votes necessary to pass this landmark legislation. The day of the vote, he will still short of a majority. Meanwhile, there were five or six anti-choice Democrats who wanted to support the bill but couldn’t commit because they were concerned that it would allow federal dollars to pay for abortions.
For decades, the “Hyde Amendment” has been the law of the land. No federal Medicaid dollars are allowed to be used for abortions unless the woman’s life is endangered or the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest. The rape and incest exception was added in the early 1980’s after a very hard fought battle.
Despite the accusations of Republicans, there was no way taxpayer’s dollars were going to be used to fund abortions if the health care bill became law. Obama was clear on this point from the beginning.
Still, despite his assurances, there were some Members of Congress, prompted by the National Right to Life Committee, who were not convinced and they threatened to vote against the bill without an assurance that no abortions would be funded under the new insurance plans.
Now, Obama could have looked at them in the eye and told them to take a hike, but if he had done that the entire bill might have gone down. So, he agreed to sign an Executive Order clarifying what he had been saying all along – that no dollars would be used for abortions. That was an easy one for him and it mollified those anti-choice Democrats who ultimately voted for the bill. And, tomorrow or Wednesday, that bill will become law.
I don’t like the Hyde Amendment. Abortion is mainstream medicine and women on Medicaid – poor women – should be able to terminate a pregnancy with federal dollars. But the bottom line is we just don’t have the votes to reverse this long-standing prohibition. And we’re not going to have the votes for many years to come.
Obama did the right thing. He simply reaffirmed current law and, in doing so, picked up some valuable votes.
The pro-choice groups should stop whining, stop blaming the President and start working on picking up the votes necessary to reverse the Hyde Amendment.

March 22, 2010 at 5:16 pm
Keep cheering on the troops, Pat; just don’t let them get complacent. Obama could and should have done a lot better.
1. He took the public option off the table immediately.
2. He guaranteed the pharmaceutical industry a minimum of $80 billion in profits over the next decade.
3. He gave away the government’s right to bargain on Medicare payments for pharmaceuticals.
4. He is coercing people into buying for-profit health insurance policies.
5. He is weakening the government’s ability to reduce policy costs by having state-level “insurance exchanges,” rather than a powerful Federal exchange where buyers can get better rates (thus forcing price competition).
6. He’s left 19 million still uninsured.
I really want him to succeed, and I have to grant it’s been a very rough first year for him. His reiteration of the Hyde restrictions I can forgive– it was Kabuki theater to get Stupak and his coterie of ignoramuses on board– but his attempts to “reach across the aisle” have resulted in this monstrosity which is going to be in effect for at least 30 years, which will give the insurance companies more than enough time to pay for the man who replaces him.
I expect him to be much more savvy in the two and a half years remaining, but I am afraid he is owned, lock, stock and barrel, by the Larry Summers/Robert Rubin crowd.
Choice is safe for now; Wall Street just needs the abortion issue to keep manipulating the so-called “pro-life” crowd. However, if they feel that it’s to their advantage to have Obama back off on a woman’s right to choose, I think he would do it– He’s got 18 former Wall Street people working in the White House, including Ken Lay’s former PR woman.
By the way, on that other thread, I asked Nancy, the true “pro-lifer,” how she manages to afford raising four adopted children, which must cost her at least $62,000 a year according to “livable wage” guidelines, and she again has remained discreetly silent. Just saying…
LikeLike
March 22, 2010 at 6:38 pm
I worked on Capitol Hill for many years and, as you know, it’s a give and take proposition. No bill is ever perfect and, yes, Obama had to cave on a number of issues. But look at the glass as half full, think of the millions that will now have insurance, no pre-condition restrictions, a prohibition on gender based rates, etc.
LikeLike
March 23, 2010 at 12:26 am
I am disgusted by our legislature.
I understand the post and appreciate the perspective.
I just am deeply saddened that this is still an issue. We should be beyond this by now.
Abortion is a basic care service to women.
To carve it out, is pathetic.
I understand the politics, but it is sickening still.
LikeLike
March 24, 2010 at 7:14 am
I agree, Hilda.
Abortion is mainstream medicine. Forty three percent of women in this country will have an abortion in their lifetime.
The problem is the anti-abortion movement has successfully stigmatized the procedure to the point where even some pro-choice people (and organizations) cannot even say the “A” word when they talk about it.
We have to make abortion more comfortable for the politicians, even the pro-choice ones. That’s how you turn things around… obventry s
LikeLike