Okay. This one may piss off a bunch of my friends, but here it goes…
We recently commemorated the one year anniversary of the murder of Doctor George Tiller. And I think it’s kind of sucky that a number of national pro-choice organizations used the occasion to try to raise money “in honor” of this wonderful man. For example, just go to the NARAL Pro Choice America website and look at the first page. In big bold letters, there it is for all to see: “Donate in Memory of Doctor Tiller.” Then, towards the top of the page in smaller letters is another fundraiser: “Buy the ‘Trust Women’ wristband….”
In the early 1990’s, a handful of independent abortion providers got together in Washington, D.C. to form the National Coalition of Abortion Providers. Doctor Tiller was not in the original group but he quickly joined the organization. One of the main reasons why NCAP was formed was the concern that the major pro-choice groups were not representing the unique interests of abortion providers and, worse, were reluctant to associate with the doctors and the staff who actually performed the abortions. Oh, sure, they’d take their donations contributions but ask them to testify before Congress? No way. “They make their money off of abortions, so their testimony would be tainted,” one pro-choice leader told me years ago.
After NCAP was formed (to the chagrin of several pro-choice groups), abortion providers became much more vocal and aggressive. They embarked on a campaign urging their colleagues to not shy away from the “A” word. Doctor Tiller was part of that effort. Still, over the years, the groups not only continued to avoid talking about abortion but they took steps to get as far away from the issue as possible. For example, the organization that was formerly known as the National Abortion Rights Action League changed its name to the less strident “NARAL Pro Choice America.” It was always my feeling that they did that in the hope that over time people will totally forget what “NARAL” stood for and so the word “abortion” would be totally obfuscated.
Meanwhile, George Tiller and his colleagues were out there on the front lines, being unapologetic about performing abortions, sending their message through NCAP and, to some extent, the National Abortion Federation.
And now that George is dead, they are using his memory to raise money. It makes my stomach flip-flop a little, but it’s hard to articulate why. After all, I am sure that George gave money to all the groups but…
I am reminded of an incident that occurred soon after the murder of Doctor David Gunn in Pensacola in 1993. I was sitting in a restaurant in New York City with Doctor Gunn’s son, David Gunn, Jr., just before he was scheduled to do a major television interview. It was about 6 days after his father’s murder. Waiting for our coffee, I started skimming the New York Times and on the fifth or sixth page there was a full page advertisement sponsored by a major pro-choice group with a picture of Doctor Gunn and a headline that read something like “He Died to Protect Your Rights.” And, of course, it was asking for contributions for some kind of abortion provider “protection fund.” I folded the paper and handed it to David.
“Well, David, so it begins.”
David looked at the ad and started to choke up. He then said, “Who said they could do this? I didn’t give them permission. Geez, my Dad didn’t even like __________ (the national organization).”
Of course, there was nothing David, Jr. could do about the ad and we ultimately heard it raised an incredible amount of money. And it also inspired David, Jr. to do an ad for the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, the association that his father was actually associated with. Unfortunately, by the time that ad was done, other groups had jumped on the bandwagon and basically tapped out all the contributions.
Over the years, each time another doctor was killed, there were bets within the abortion provider community as to which pro-choice group would be the first to get an ad out asking for money.
And so, David, Jr., it continues.

June 7, 2010 at 1:38 pm
Excellent, again. It’s interesting about the word “abortion” that you co-opted from us (it used to refer almost exclusively to miscarriage, “spontaneous abortion”). Maybe we’ll get it back. Maybe we’ll get back “gay,” too, or is that wishful thinking.
LikeLike
June 8, 2010 at 12:13 am
John you have it backwards.
Abortion is a neutral word stigmmatized by anti abortion groups.
Spontaneous Abortion is only one of many neutral medical terms.
LikeLike
June 7, 2010 at 3:31 pm
Actually, John. I think you folks have got the monopoly on the word “abortion.” In fact, that was the point I was trying to make. The pro-CHOICE groups run away from the word and they let you define it with slogans (abortion stops a beating heart) or plain ole pictures. And our rebuttal is “choice.” That’s a very ineffective reply. If we support the right of a woman to have an abortion, then we need to say the word more or else it will just be a “dirty” word. The more you use it, the less the stigma….
LikeLike
June 8, 2010 at 6:24 am
Abortion as a word has been hijacked by anti abortion people.
Abortion should not be a “good” or “bad” word. Abortion is a medical term as John says above.
The problem is prolifers take abortion and think they are Webster’s Dictionary and make up their own definitions or similies.
LikeLike
June 8, 2010 at 7:25 am
yes, they have “hijacked” the word, Lisa, and supplied their own definitions. And the problem is that the pro-choice groups have not responded in kind with their own facts about abortion….
LikeLike
June 8, 2010 at 7:27 am
Interesting comment, Todd, that abortion is a “neutralized word” that has been hijacked by the anti-abortion movement. Makes me wonder if the word “abortion” ever really was “neutral.” When abortion was illegal, i.e., before the anti-abortion groups got organized, I had the sense that “abortion” was always a dirty word….
LikeLike
June 9, 2010 at 8:55 am
Sounds like Todd was speaking of it as a medical term.
Society grabs terms and each person places their own connotations on them.
LikeLike
June 9, 2010 at 8:24 am
The association of the word Abortion is that it got a stigma that you are killing somebody who is not born yet…
If the same word was used for something else it probably won’t matter like so many other words.
About the pro-choice groups doing the ads plus all the fund raising campaign, it all comes down to the $$$
If money is involved, either pro choice or pro life will get together and form a huge concentration of people to be able to get as much as they can… Money is what really matter to a lot of people, not ideals!
LikeLike
June 9, 2010 at 10:05 pm
ABORTION IS AGAINST NATURE…
If a woman get pregnant she should be proud of it…
LikeLike
June 9, 2010 at 10:07 pm
You can wish as you please John…
Just don’t go too crazy!!!!
LikeLike
June 9, 2010 at 10:08 pm
If abortion was to be approved by GOD it was going to be in the bible… where is the respect and old values?
LikeLike
June 11, 2010 at 7:24 am
Ricky,
Abortion is in the bible,
Infanticide is even more present and it is clearly recomended.
Abortion as a modern day procedure could not be by definition in the bible.
Should we go ahead and perform infanticide since it is in the bible? I hope not.
LikeLike
June 10, 2010 at 8:36 am
You’re right, Sonia. It all comes down to money, doesn’t it? I used to work for a large pro-choice organization and we raised millions and millions of dollars trying to defeat a constitutional amendment banning abortion. Well, we ultimately defeated it and the next day our money people were so depressed because they knew they didn’t have an issue anymore to raise that kind of money!
LikeLike
June 10, 2010 at 8:37 am
Bell, many women are proud that they got pregnant but then they realize that they can’t or shouldn’t have the baby. Indeed, I would say that abortion is a rather “natural” thing in that it has been with us for hundreds if not thousands of years.
LikeLike
June 10, 2010 at 8:38 am
Ricky, did God write the Bible? Is that what you are implying?
LikeLike
June 11, 2010 at 5:21 am
When a woman gets pregnant, Pat, she already has a baby. And, yeah, killing that baby has been going on for thousands of years. But so has every other evil you can name.
LikeLike
June 11, 2010 at 7:29 am
Abortion doctor assasination evil.
Has that gone on for thousands of years?
LikeLike
June 11, 2010 at 6:28 am
Abortion has been going on for a very long time, which tells me that women will always feel a need to have one. So, if it is illegal to have one, they’ll still do it with terrible consequences to the woman. I wish there were no need for abortion but obviously there is. If that is the case, I prefer that it be done in a safe environment that is best for the woman. Yes, a baby will die but should we compound the problem by putting the woman’s life in danger as well?
LikeLike
June 11, 2010 at 7:33 am
Pat are you impying abortion, as Dunkle does that when a sperm cell enters an egg cell, becoming one cell- that that cell is a Baby that is aborted?
LikeLike
February 10, 2014 at 7:15 pm
oh wow! both of you look fabs! now you wanna make me go on diet too! eat healthy food, lots of exsreice..Happy New Year Tiffany!xxfitty
LikeLike
June 12, 2010 at 4:14 am
Lisa, I think what you’re asking above is this, “Has the killing of those who perform abortions been going on for thousands of years too?” My answer is yes, probably; at least I know that the killing, often by execution, of those who murder has been going on as long as the murdering has.
LikeLike
June 12, 2010 at 1:21 pm
About abortion Dunkle there you are again.
Trying to be witty and failing.
Why not answer Lisa’s question?
You did not.
I don’t know the answer but I doubt that it has been going along for thousands of years.
By not answering questions and not really replying you are only fooling a few I guess.
As in the other thread I commented on about anti abortion people, they can never just answer an easy question.
These reveals, when it comes to Abortion you are just wrong. Or answer a question. What a waste, to read your comments on abortion just make’s anti abortion people sound supider then the one’s that just dissapear because they cannot answer a question.
LikeLike
June 12, 2010 at 1:42 pm
Lauren, Lisa asked me if former doctors who kill very young innocent people have ever before been killed themselves. I said I didn’t know but people like them — others who kill the innocent — have been killed themselves, throughout history. (Your last sentence is an example of the pot calling the kettle black.)
LikeLike
June 12, 2010 at 2:04 pm
Re your question, Lisa, at number 15….I dont know what you should call that thing that is growing inside the mother. I do know that the minute a woman learns she is pregnant, she talks about the baby. I don’t care what you call it, although at around 23 weeks to me it is definitely a baby. But the swords do not matter, Women will have abortions, no matter what the heck you call it…
LikeLike
June 15, 2010 at 7:58 am
God approves abortion: Ecclesiates IV, i-iii.
LikeLike
July 13, 2010 at 1:44 am
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Steph Herold. Steph Herold said: Liking this article may get me in trouble, but it's true. #prochoice needs to be more than raising $ on back of providers http://git.to/1jh […]
LikeLike