Okay, right up front – a confession. Had a great day today, beautiful outside, just opened up a nice bottle of Southern Comfort and have imbibed generously. So, if you catch some typos in this slightly unusual blog, too bad…
Anti-abortion folks like to argue that when we abort a fetus, we could be aborting the next Mozart or Einstein or Britney Spears. They say the next abortion could have been the person who found the cure for cancer or who assassinated the founder of Fox News. Of course, they fail to mention that we also could be aborting the next Hitler or Sarah Palin, but that’s beside the fact, right?
But this got me to thinking about aborting real people. What if I could go back in time, like in “Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure” and convince the mother of some person to abort them? Who would I pick? Go back, go back, go……..
So, to begin with, and in the interests of being politically correct, I’d pick Charles Manson, the 9-11 terrorists and their buddy Bin Laden, Lee Harvey Oswald, Ted Bundy, the guy who started the plague and Mark David Chapman. Sure, there are probably hundreds of others and I welcome your input, but that’s my first team off the top of my head. Okay, now let’s get really personal.
Mrs. Bell, my third grade teacher. You’re outta here! She made that year at Captree Elementary School a living hell for me. She screamed and yelled and generally terrorized me and my classmates for the whole year. She made me stand in the corner of the room for 4 straight hours because she thought I was talking too much. She would regularly come up behind me and – WHAM – slap me on the head with her ruler. I woke up every morning with a stomach ache because of her. Abort Mrs. Bell.
Then let’s abort that Board of Directors that fired me years ago from a wonderful job where I thought I was doing wonderful work. Totally out of the blue, no warning, nothing. Just a mysterious morning email that said “Pat, we need to talk to day. It’s serious.” The Board had decided it was time for a change. I was making good money, had been there forever, was really making a difference and – WHAM – you’re outta there! Had to go home that night and tell the family that I was out. Horrible, horrible, stuff. Abort them all. Well, not all of them cause since then I’ve made up with a few of them. But there are a few….
While we’re at it, abort Sandy Koufax. For years and years, my beloved New York Yankees won World Series after World Series, giving me neighborhood bragging rights. But in the first game of the 1963 World Series, we faced Koufax, who was pitching for the Los Angeles Dodgers. And in that first game he beat us handily, breaking the record for most strikeouts in a World Series game. He totally embarrassed my team and, by extension, me. We never recovered and lost the Series in four straights friggin games. The Yanks didn’t recover for years. Sure, he’s a nice guy but – Abort Koufax.
Abort anyone who smokes. Growing up in New York, my house was a virtual smokehouse. Everyone smoked, including the dog. They smoked at the dinner table, they smoked in bed, they smoked in the hospital while they were visiting a relative dying of lung cancer. Smoke, smoke, smoke. I was the only one who didn’t smoke. But I know the secondhand smoke is gonna get me one day, I just know it. The Big C. Adios, amigos.
Anyone who goes slow in the left lane – abort those turkeys! I mean, who the hell was their driving instructor? There they are, going 50 miles an hour in the “passing lane,” in a virtual coma, with me and twenty other cars ready to put it into fifth gear. But they are oblivious. I honk my horn till I’m blue in the face and they are in la – la land. Abort them, abort those suckers while they’re driving.
I could go on and on: the creator of reality shows, anyone who likes cats, people who read their blackberries while they’re talking to you, the inventor of the Pet Rock, the entire cast of “Mamma Mia,” and, yes, Rush Limbaugh.
Oh, there are so many others. Maybe I’ll copy Neal Horsley and start my own hit list.
July 2, 2010 at 5:41 pm
OK
It was cool until Sandy Koufax!
I know this is tongue in cheek.
I hope the incapacitated get it.
Yet, even with the cerebral enhancing properties of Southern Comfort,
it addresses the issue quite clearly, with beautiful irony.
It has nothing to do with what shoulda, coulda, or woulda been.
Abortion is the Women’s choice. And that is it.
Delightful Post,
Tx!
LikeLike
July 2, 2010 at 9:12 pm
This would be just as good as the others except for the fact that these days killing young folks before they are born is no joke.
LikeLike
July 3, 2010 at 11:44 am
I feel sorry for you, John, that you just can’t laugh at this stuff sometimes. Gimme a break. Chill out, my friend
LikeLike
February 11, 2014 at 2:06 pm
Wow, fantastic blog luayot! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is excellent, as well as the content!. Thanks For Your article about Baby twins die after abortion blunder | The LifeLeague .
LikeLike
July 2, 2010 at 9:33 pm
Pat you are hilarious and i enjoyed the reading tonight.
I agree about aborting Hitler. I love the movie “Little Nick”, i think that is the name, where they have an actor as Hitler in hell and somebody put a pineapple in his &*@#% bottom……… hahahahahaha
Anyways sometimes before a long weekend is good to have something to laugh about it.
I hate myself for what i am about to say, but i got to agree with John as well. But John, please can you get a joke from time to time? Come on!
LikeLike
July 3, 2010 at 11:45 am
Thanks, Sonia. I’m glad someone gets it. sometimes we just take ourselves way too seriously (like John). Anyway, have a great weekend my friend!
LikeLike
July 3, 2010 at 9:56 am
Sonia, you have to understand that it is important for John to characterize fetuses as “young folks.” If he did not have that image, he would not be able to see himself doing a hero’s work, nor would he be able to sell himself to society as a hero.
He does this in order to deal with his issues about his own mortality. If he can become a hero, then his life will transcend death. Unfortunately, so-called “pro-lifers” for the most part don’t have enough energy left from their struggle to repress their fear of oblivion, and as a result, they can’t help real children.
LikeLike
July 3, 2010 at 10:17 am
Yes, Sonia, it’s important for me to call the human fetus a young person, and it is important for Charles to call the human fetus a kangaroo. Take your pick.
LikeLike
July 3, 2010 at 11:46 am
Both of you guys are boring. I was really hoping that we’d have a discussion about who we would not want on the earth today, who we would have prevented from being born. Now that would have been funny.
LikeLike
July 4, 2010 at 10:09 am
Pat, Lenin, Hitler, Washington and Caesar weren’t life of the party guys, either. The fact that you’d like to joke about this only goes to show that you have a real life!. . . .
LikeLike
July 4, 2010 at 3:10 pm
NONE
LikeLike
July 4, 2010 at 4:23 pm
Sonia, it’s importatn for John to dodge his responsibility for the nurture of a child he inissts be born.
LikeLike
July 5, 2010 at 5:36 am
Sonia, Pat — it’s taken me a while but notice Charles now calling a child what he formerly called a humanoid? So stick with me. I’ll bring both of you around too.
LikeLike
July 5, 2010 at 10:00 am
Sonia, after a fetus is born it is a child. John has never taken responsibility for the welfare of any child who was born as a result of his clinic blockading. I doubt that he’s ever paid the pregnancy costs for any woman whom he has dissuaded from an abortion, and all his commentary is devoted to avoiding the issue of his responsibility for the welfare of the lives he claims to be so so concerned about.
This is a normal feature of aborticenrism. As a mother, you know how demanding it is to raise children! The so-called “pro-lifers” as a rule do not have sufficient energy to attempt their self-therapy AND meet the needs of a child.
LikeLike
July 5, 2010 at 2:42 pm
Ah, still, no more humanoid, just child. The first step on the road to recovery.
LikeLike
July 3, 2010 at 12:30 pm
Pat, you don’t know the half of it. You should see our email conversation! Almost 150 exchanges so far, and counting. And you and Sonia, come-on, you know my position. How ’bout if we change the real ages of those people we would like to have done away with from three months to three years. At least we’re not killing three year olds yet.
And in that case my choices would be most of the neocons, Henrich Hertzberg (or however he spells it), Norman Mailer, Al Gore, and Hillary Clinton.
LikeLike
July 4, 2010 at 3:09 pm
Oh John, come on……. you went a little bit too far don’t you think?
To compare a fetus to a 3 years old that is absurd!!!
You can do better than that…
I will give you this, i agree with you that abortion it is a horrible thing in some cases but instead doing pickets in front of clinics you don’t go to schools and give condoms??? or contraceptives??? teach girls that having unprotected sex is a “problem” that can not be solved only because the clinics are open and running… what about that? don’t you think that educating this people would be a much better solution?
LikeLike
July 4, 2010 at 5:41 pm
In your first paragraph, Sonia, you imply that someone older is more valuable than someone younger (I don’t say “fetus” because today it’s a curse word, like “nigger). I think just the opposite.
In your second paragraph you say that contraceptives would reduce the killings. I, though, think they led to the killings. So you see, even though we both think that killing children is horrible in some or all cases, we are miles apart.
LikeLike
July 5, 2010 at 10:05 am
John brings out another important point about aborticentrism– the need to avoid being seen as a champion for some being less than perfect: If he were to defend migrant workers or run a halfway house for substance-abusing teens, he’d run the risk of having people criticize him for dealing with such trash. Because they need to become heroes (not be known as champions for migrant workers or recovering teens), they need the Perfect Victim– which the “unborn human” fits marvelously well. Obvious to call it a “fetus” is to less the perfection they impute to their victim-to-rescue. Sonia, which would you rather be known for? Rescuing “unborn angels” or fetuses?
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 3:51 pm
Greetings from Idaho! I’m bored at work so I decided to bsrowe your website on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the knowledge you provide here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m shocked at how fast your blog loaded on my mobile .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, great blog!
LikeLike
May 12, 2014 at 4:33 am
Alright alright alright that’s exactly what I needed!
LikeLike
July 5, 2010 at 10:16 am
holy moly
LikeLike
July 6, 2010 at 8:46 am
Do you understand him, Mr Dunkle?
LikeLike
July 6, 2010 at 10:27 am
It’s hard because he’s even more cryptic than I am, but I do understand his overall thesis: killing little kids should remain legal because people like me who want to make it again illegal are sorry excuses for human beings. Even though his argument stinks, I do agree with him about me, and he doesn’t even know the half of it.
LikeLike
July 7, 2010 at 9:28 am
Mr Dunkle, why would you agree with CG that you are a “sorry human being?” I think what you do is very admirable. This CG guy thinks because we want to save babies, we also on the other end have to adopt twenty kids, work in homeless shelters 25 hours a week, etc., etc. We’re not forcing women to not abort, we’re tyring to convince them not to and also to convince the abortionists to not do it…
LikeLike
July 7, 2010 at 12:51 pm
Of course, Bruce, of course. It’s probably just exaggeration (“sorry excuse”). I just to like to highlight Charles’ stupidity on this matter, you know his saying you can’t try to save someone’s life unless your super good, like him, and promise to then care for that person forever.
LikeLike
July 7, 2010 at 1:31 pm
Bruce–see my response at #11.
LikeLike
July 7, 2010 at 10:04 am
Bruce, see my reply at #10
LikeLike
July 6, 2010 at 10:43 am
Dunkle misses my point completely, because it is very threatening to his need to be a so-called “pro-lifer.”
There is absolutely nowhere in any of my writings where I have urged abortion; I have always said the primary caretaker is the only one capable of making that decision, and it is her (or if he’s a pregnant male, his) absolute right. So-called “pro-lifers” are so fixated on abortion they assume that I fit their stereotype of baby hunter-killer.
My position is that he who wants a child to be born had better be ready to nurture it to adulthood. Bruce has done this for at least one adopted child. Dunkle has not, although he has fathered five and raised them.
To insist that someone else bear a child and then walk away from it is highly irresponsible, but so-called “pro-lifers” do that as a matter of course. When Dunkle adopts, I shall congratulate him for turning toward a healthier mode of pro-lifing.
LikeLike
July 7, 2010 at 9:30 am
To reitereate my point above, we are not “insisting” that someone bear a child, we are giving them the facts about abortion in the hopes that they will consider not aborting. We obviously cannot stop them and I am smart enough to realize that we cannot make abortion illegal in this country….
LikeLike
July 7, 2010 at 10:11 am
Bruce, the point is that so-called “pro-lifers” are not doing it for the babies, they’re doing it for THEMSELVES.n Look at it this way: Which would be a faster gratification: putting a newborn all the way from birth through college, or buying a Maserati?
They both cost the same.
Now, which would be a greater service: persuading a woman not to have an abortion, or raising her child? It’s clear that in the case of one child you have chosen the latter, but after you conduct that poll of so-called “pro-life” demonstrators, you will find just how many have chosen the lesser service– and when you factor in the dangers faced by all their children (cf the story of the Baby Store), you get an idea of just how far less the value of the service they perform. It’s clear the major value of their work is being able to call themselves “pro-life,” when they actually aren’t halfway there. Notice how you yourself look down on sacrificing for the next “unborn human.”
LikeLike
July 7, 2010 at 1:38 pm
Bruce, don’t egg on John Dunkle by lying! I have never called him a “sorry human being.” I can’t imagine what about him gave you that impression, and I resent that you impute that observation to me.
John Dunkle is obtuse, either deliberately (in which case I compliment him) or out of ignorance (which reflects poorly on his membership in the movement).
His comment about me “saying you can’t try to save someone’s life unless your super good, like him, and promise to then care for that person forever” conveniently ignores the fact that if somebody had been there to provide the likes of Ted Bundy with proper nuture, at least 31 and possibly 65 women would still be alive today. And in the case of Hitler (whose mother certainly didn’t want him), it’s likely millions would have lived.
Yet Dunkle, like other so-called “pro-lifers,” likes to avoid ALL responsibility for the welfare of the children he demands be born.
LikeLike
July 8, 2010 at 10:36 am
Charles’s problem is that he knows someone is alive before he is born, but if admits that, his thesis falls apart. So what does he do instead? He attacks those who disagree with him. Or he sends them to a previous one of his comments. Mostly, though, he sends them to his blog, aborteiocallistratha, where the unlucky pursuer of truth gasps for air and has to flee before he drowns (though I will say that our great warrior, Commander, seems to have treaded water there longer than anyone else).
LikeLike
July 23, 2010 at 6:40 am
My gosh….a little light humor on who we would like to abort….I don’t know how I missed the hilarious post until today!! All the responses man they are really light and comical don’t you agree…Pat?? I would also like to abort that Board of Directors that aborted you…..
LikeLike
July 23, 2010 at 1:24 pm
Thanks, Lorraine! I struggled about saying anything about that Board but, screw it, right? Actually, in the long run it might have been the best thing for me!
LikeLike
July 30, 2010 at 12:36 am
This was great!
Ya know… if that Board of Directors hadn’t fired you, you might not be writing this blog now and offering the pearls of wisdom that you do.
In that aspect, I think your readers should be grateful.
But out of a sense of loyalty, ABORT THEM ANYWAY! 😀
LikeLike
July 30, 2010 at 8:12 am
You’re right, Sugar. Things kind of worked out for the best!!! Should we abort Katie Hutt???
LikeLike
July 30, 2010 at 9:40 am
LOLOL
From what I understand, she was aborted once.
Admin kept proof of the types of things she did, so I know it is not just heresay.
There has been a threat that she will return next week.
If that happens, then abort again. The same for the rest of her ilk as well.
Some people are like a cancer and need to be cut out to keep the rest of things healthy.
LikeLike
November 8, 2010 at 1:51 pm
This post appears to recieve a good ammount of visitors. How do you promote it? It gives a nice unique spin on things. I guess having something real or substantial to post about is the most important thing.
LikeLike
November 9, 2010 at 11:22 am
Thanks, Sal…Honestly, I dont promote it. I just write a blog and post it. Now, I”m sure the owner of the site does something on his end but that’s way beyond me. I’m glad that folks read my stuff. I do have a different perspective on things because I worked for years with the abortion doctors and they do see things very differently from their pro-choice colleagues. Indeed, that is why they formed their own organization in 1990 that I was part of for 13 years. In addition, I just have a sick, New York sense of humor as evidence by this sillly post above.
LikeLike