My twenty year old son is an amazing kid. He graduated number three in his high school class, he is an accomplished musician (he has played with the National Symphony Orchestra) and he is a great golfer (shoots in the 70’s). In his first two years of college, he made the Dean’s List every semester. Knock on wood, has never gotten into any serious trouble. And, having said all of that, I feel a need to add that he is not a nerd! Indeed, he is 6’4” tall, blond hair and blue eyes. The girls love him. This fall he will be attending the University of Virginia where he is majoring in political science.
For the last few months, my son has been dating a woman his age who attends the University of Maryland. She is majoring in music (she plays the harp). She is a carbon copy of my son, just another kid who has an incredible future.
Although they don’t want to admit it, come this fall they will probably start to go their separate ways. Despite the future (or perhaps because of it), it is obvious that things are heating up for them sexually. Indeed, my son has told me as much. It’s his first real serious affair. Several weeks ago, when she visited our house overnight, they slept in the same room. Yes, it made me feel very weird. No, check that. I was FREAKED OUT. But, I told myself that they are both twenty years old and I gotta just get used to the idea that they are going to have some kind of sex. So, I didn’t say anything.
Okay, I can hear you born again types screaming: “They should not be having sex! What kind of parent are you?” Well, until you are in my shoes, don’t give me any crap. Maybe in your day it was normal to not have sex until you married that person but get real, folks.
Actually, my son learned a lot about sex in high school, certainly more than I ever did. Because they taught him so much, my spouse and I never really had “the talk” with him because he is light years ahead of where I was at his age. Yes, I have told him that if he ever gets his girlfriend pregnant I will absolutely kill him and he just laughs, as if to suggest that it’s something that would never happen.
The other night he informed us that he was going to her house and that he had to buy some condoms. I almost lost my lunch, but I kept my cool, being the 21st century hip parent, and just mumbled something like “well, go to the pharmacy.” He hesitated and asked how did he actually buy the condom, that is, was it on the shelves or did he have to ask the pharmacist? We told him he could just pick them off the shelves and he left to get them. I had a quick gin and tonic.
Now, I don’t know if anything happened that night. And I didn’t ask. I remember him telling me that his girlfriend was on birth control pills, so I was proud of him that he would be using “double protection.” But then I started thinking….
What if 7 weeks later, he came to me and said that his girlfriend was pregnant? For one thing, I know he would be in tears while he told me the news. But, as we know, accidents do happen. And, yes, I know, I know, I know – they probably should not be having sex to begin with but these are two amazing kids who, like so many others, are merely acting on their urges and who took extraordinary precautions. They actually felt they were being responsible.
And the anti-abortion movement would have me look into my son’s eyes and tell him that he is going to be a father and so he better start thinking about leaving school and finding some kind of job? Of course, the decision would ultimately be up to his girlfriend, but what if her parents had the same opinion? It would mean that these two young children who, yes, took a risk, but also took extraordinary precautions would now have their lives changed forever. And that would happen because some people out there think that a 7 week fetus is worth “saving?”
Are you folks out of your friggin minds?

August 8, 2010 at 6:34 am
Yorkie at #19– If anything, human life is a spectrum; it doesn’t automatically get provided a free pass to humanity in the delivery room. People who insist that other people have babies had better be prepared to raise them, or the results for both the child and the greater society can be tragic. You would do will to link on my “name” and hunt down the stories of the Abortion Store and the Baby Store to see what happens to the kids you insist be born but do not care for.
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 8:57 am
I have to admire Charles. I don’t think I’ve ever come across before someone who is so good at avoiding the reality of child killing. Back in the days he avoided it by calling someone before she’s born a humanoid. Now he avoids it altogether. But he can’t escape. He has to write “people who insist that other people have babies” even though he knows that a pregnant woman already has a baby. Just watch him twist and squirm over that one; i.e., unless I can bring him around.
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 3:23 pm
I have raised to adulthood every child I have wanted born, which is more than I can say for Dunkle. Dunkle accuses me of aoviding abortion, but he can’t get past it to face his responsibility for avoiding care for human life. He won’t lift a finger to raise the next potential Bundy properly, and he can’t imagine, much less acknowledge, what three to five dozen families have been put through because Louise Cowell never made an appointment in Allentown.
Dunkle fights abortiion at maximum convenience to his time, his talents and his wallet. If he sank 8% of his gross income and 600 hours a year into his advertising, he’d have his wife all over his case in a minute. He’s a summer soldier.
He insists that other people have babies, and he walks away. He is incapable of understanding what children need, and he is only acting out to meet his own needs. Every time I see his picture, I think, “Scary grandpa.”
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 3:50 pm
#2, or is it 3? What was #1, anyway?
LikeLike
August 9, 2010 at 6:12 am
John, have you just had a TIA? Your two most recent posts, including this one, make absolutely no sense. Please consult your doctor. Seriously.
LikeLike
August 9, 2010 at 5:19 pm
Remember my saying you offer three utterly irrational arguments for keep baby killing legal: 1) Baby killing must remain legal because sickos like John Dunkle and my father are pro-life, 2) No one may try to save another’s life unless he is willing to support that person until death, 3) (This one I can’t remember other than it is equally inane.)
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 10:44 am
What’s a TIA?
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 1:55 pm
Tranisent ischemic attack, Pat; in short, a mini-stroke. Common among the elderly. My dad probably had close to two dozen before he died. A tiny clot in the brain kills off a few cells; the neuronal disruption might affect a couple hundred synapses, and the only thing the victim will notice is a slight glitch– maybe forgetting the name of a longtime friend or the day of the week. In its slightly more complex form, the victim will think he’s performing as usual, but doing or saying something that is, while not completely odd, just enough off to make observers concerned.
You get up to 66, and you start realizing that Death is like that intractable Customer Complaints clerk you hate, only a lot worse. Once you realize rage doesn’t work, you are able to fall back on your history as a “rescuer” to soften the rest of the ride….
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 2:01 pm
John, I encourage you to write down those three points and refer to the note when you argue them. The #1 you specify in your above post is named as #2 in your sub-post in #17: “killing babies should remain legal because the people who want to make again illegal are sickos..”
If you can’t stay consistent, not only does it make your whole position look untenable from the start, but it also puts the burden on me to try argue with a jellyfish….
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 3:00 pm
You’re obviously better at numbers than I am, Charles. You keep track. If I say this is Charles’s endlessly repeated second inane child-killing-supporting argument, and it is actually the third, correct me.
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 5:30 pm
It’s not at all an inane argument, John. You misrepresent it in order to make it appear so, I must point out. The core of the matter is that you are so emotionally tied to becoming a hero by your own definition that you cannot afford to address my points on their merits.
This is the sort of behavior shown by alcoholics: when challenged by family and friends, they have to deny the facts in order to maintain their addiction. Aborticentrism is very much like that.
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 6:33 pm
1) John Dunkle and my father are sickos; therefore, baby-killing must remain legal.
LikeLike