It seems that every once in a while, we get a new, energized abortion rights advocate who starts screaming about how every pro-lifer is a “terrorist.” They usually also add how the Catholic Church has murdered more people than any other religion in the world, but I don’t have the time or energy to research what the Catholic Church has done over the centuries so I don’t opine on those comments. However, I do have some experience in the world of abortion, so I would like to chat a little about whether or not all pro-lifers are “terrorists.”
I guess the first thing one needs to do is define “terrorist.” In my head, the true terrorists are, of course, the folks who fly crowded airplanes into buildings, who blow themselves up in crowded market squares and who plot the death of innocent civilians or government workers. You know who I am talking about: Bin Laden, Timothy McVeigh, and that nut ball up in Norway who recently killed all of those kids. Then there are the Micheal Griffins, James Kopps and Paul Hills of the world. True terrorists, they.
But then, way on the other end of the spectrum, are those pro-lifers who just sit in their house, avoiding all demonstrations and who rarely opine about their position on the abortion issue. They might pray at home or in church for an end in abortion and send some money to their local pro-life organization, but I have a very tough time calling them “terrorists” and I suspect that most pro-choicers would also be reluctant to affix that label to them.
Where I get stuck is when I think of those folks who go to their local abortion clinic on a regular basis and publicly demonstrate. Are they “terrorists?” Let’s talk about their motivations and their actions.
I guess your average protestorgoes to the clinic in the hopes of stopping an abortion, whether it is by engaging in prayer (don’t even ask me how that would work) or, if they chance, talking one on one with the women as they approach the
abortion facility. Once they identify the woman, they might start screaming at them. Some even resort to the use of a bullhorn. Now, a woman who has made an appointment for an abortion usually is warned by clinic staff that there may be protestors outside so when she sees the anti-abortion folks out front, she knows they smell blood. Then scream at her that she is “killing your baby!” They may make a crying baby sound and shriek “Mommy, don’t let them pull my legs off!” Sometimes it is just a simple “Murderer!” The woman may have been warned, she may have seen demonstrations on television, but she is rarely prepared for this scene. And, to top it off, she doesn’t want to be at the clinic in the first place.
Over the years, I have seen this scenario played out in the front of many clinics. The unique perspective that I have, however, is that on a number of occasions, I have walked with the women passed the protestors into the actual clinic. Some gave me permission to accompany them through the entire abortion process. I have seen (and the protestors haven’t) how upset the women are when they sign in, whose blood pressure has risen because they are so angry at these strangers outside the clinic who don’t know her or anything about her personal situation. I’ve seen women who have already shed a few tears as she contemplated her decision shed even more tears in the waiting room. And then, after all of the theatrics outside, I’ve then seen them have their abortion.
Not all pro-lifers are terrorists. That’s a silly statement. But I would conclude that to the women who walked the anti-abortion gauntlet, who could feel the hatred, who heard the screaming, who would prefer to be just with alone with their loved ones – I would say that those particular women were indeed “terrorized.”
Related articles
- Are All Pro-Lifers “Terrorists?” (abortion.ws)
- Pro-lifers become papist: three stories (insightscoop.typepad.com)
- 60-40 Nation: (brothersjuddblog.com)
- Toss Out the Bumper Stickers for a Moment! (abortion.ws)
- Why are so many prominent pro-lifers becoming Catholic? (osv.com)
- ‘Pro-life’ terrorists name themselves ‘most peaceful social movement of all time’ (dailykos.com)
- No One Cares About the Science (abortion.ws)
- Twin reduction abortions: Why do they trouble pro-choicers? (slate.com)
- It’s Time for a Pro-Quality-of-Life Movement (crooksandliars.com)
- How much of Pro-Choice is About the Money? (chariotofreaction.blogspot.com)
August 19, 2011 at 1:52 pm
Well, at the risk of knowing the gloating that will ensue from the antichoicers, I admit to having made remarks that include personal information (however, I’m not the Fashion Police).
From here forward, I will refrain from any further postings that include specific personal information.
My apologies.
LikeLike
August 19, 2011 at 3:32 pm
I’ll accept your apology and I thank you. I don’t speak for the others. They’ll have to answer for themselves. Now how about the derogatory comments?? Although I’ve come to accept your endearing remarks, i.e., J-dog and Walrus (and of course your less than endearing remarks such as bitch) – they are getting old. Now let’s move on shall we? Must you hate me because I disagree with you and think that abortion is a grave evil? After all – I don’t hate you. Let’s just agree to disagree.
LikeLike
August 19, 2011 at 3:53 pm
Me too, but I won’t agree to disagree. I will try to get you to believe what I believe, and I hope you will return the compliment.
LikeLike
August 19, 2011 at 4:30 pm
I don’t know who you are. Your name says nothing. But I’ll agree that I disagree with the protesters at the clinic. But I don’t hate them. I hate their behaviors when they spread medical/psychological misinformation, when they shame women, when they tell women lies about medical establishments and when they call escorts deplorable names.
Just to provide an example, three of the protesters claimed that there was a conspiracy to block THEIR constitutional and civil rights with the use of tarps, human scrums and nonverbal vocal noises. While they asked for damages for the deprivation of THEIR rights and THEIR emotional distress, I wondered if they EVER considered the emotional distress they caused the staff, volunteers and the patients. There’s no evidence that they ever felt any regret, any embarassment, or any shame for what they do to innocent women. I find that problematic.
LikeLike
August 19, 2011 at 9:02 pm
you will never understand. I appreciate the apology too never thought you would apologize. I guess we could all try to get along better but I gotta admit, it is so very hard to even pray for you all. I am being honest here. You are supporting the killing of babies. yes, they are babies..so innocent and they rely on us, because they have no voice to speak for them. We are THE only voice. I speak for myself as, I don’t give a hoot what you think of me…there are lives that are at stake here and if we are not there to speak for them..who will? You are all about justifying the reason you are there, you HAVE to know how wrong you are and how wrong abortion is. I just can’t fathom people with that kind of coldness in their hearts that you can say it is ok to kill a baby (no matter how young. yes, we were all that little once) there just is no excuse that makes it ok. I am prolife with NO exceptions. Even for the life of the mother, as I would gladly give my life for my child.
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 4:37 am
amen
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 5:53 pm
And you have rescued how many by adopting them? Or have you just abandoned them to the fates awaiting them outside the Baby Store?
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 8:26 pm
All right, look, Chuck, time for you to shut up. I hate to say this because you don’t cuss, you’re not afraid to write more than seven words, you’ve had a tough life — sure — I understand. But your inability to get beyond the few silly cliches you mouth over and over is getting to me. Take a sabbatical and read Aquinas. Take a year.
LikeLike
August 19, 2011 at 6:34 pm
I just want folks to know that for two days I have been trying to remove a post in a different piece that I wrote where someone referred to a blog of some pro-lifers daughter. Anyway, I could not remove the individual post so I have taken off the entire piece. Of course, that would have been the one that they selected for the Pulitzer!
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 8:27 pm
They’ll find another.
LikeLike
August 19, 2011 at 8:49 pm
you should watch this with the sound off. It is “something else” picture all these people saying how they want to kill the most innocent among us. as they justify it! so very, very sad! God help this nation.
We love you precious little ones!
Even better after a few martini’s. 🙂
LikeLike
August 19, 2011 at 8:51 pm
don’t know why the video posted all the way up on the page. My apologies. I thought I posted on the end of this page. oh well. nite nite all.
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 5:25 am
August 19, 2011 at 3:32 pm
I’ll accept your apology and I thank you. I don’t speak for the others. They’ll have to answer for themselves. Now how about the derogatory comments?? Although I’ve come to accept your endearing remarks, i.e., J-dog and Walrus (and of course your less than endearing remarks such as bitch) – they are getting old. Now let’s move on shall we? Must you hate me because I disagree with you and think that abortion is a grave evil? After all – I don’t hate you. Let’s just agree to disagree.
– – – – – –
You pro-aborts must like to have fun messing with people’s names that you threaten they must have or you’ll ban them from this site. kate, one of your little minions just punked you on this one! So sorry.
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 12:33 pm
Do you know why there is so much God ordered Infanticide in the Bible?
I see this question asked and no one ever seems to answer it.
Tx!
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 2:51 pm
With “God ordered” you’re beyond your depth, Jon. Course in one sense you’re right: it is God’s creation and, therefore, everything that happens happens because he allows it.
But you’re profoundly wrong when you conclude from that that he causes the evil. He created us and others with free will. We cause the evil, prompted by that evil force we sometimes call Satan, who, incidentally, was also created with free will. Sure, there’s lots more to it than that. Read Origen and other early Fathers.
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 5:44 pm
So, are you unfocused enough on abortion to raise to adulthood even one “unborn innocent” you wanted “rescued”?
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 11:34 am
http://www.citypaper.net/cover_story/2011-08-18-real-alternatives-pennsylvania-abortion-taxpayer-money.html
Pro Info on Pregnancy Center Mills.
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 2:20 pm
FREE TO A GOOD HOME! 2 Year old child. I just got a puppy, so I no longer have time for a child. Worried that the child may bite the puppy. Child is currently kept in crate. Needs home by tomorrow or it’ll be put to sleep.
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 5:45 pm
No bites from the so-called “pro-lifers,” eh? It’s in keeping with their character.
LikeLike
August 20, 2011 at 5:54 pm
Pat, we could use an article about denying Federal funding to facilities that fail to deliver a fairly comprehensive range of ob services.
LikeLike
August 21, 2011 at 4:11 am
Elena, Pat, fix this blog. Comments are no longer appearing under the comment of the the person you’re trying to respond to.
LikeLike
August 21, 2011 at 8:02 am
http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/07/19/38257.htm
LikeLike
August 22, 2011 at 7:58 am
OK…Pat..write a new one!! This one has just burned itself out!!
LikeLike
August 22, 2011 at 2:21 pm
>>>Didn’t Kate post her own personal information, professional title, military service, employer, employer’s business<<<
yes
", her own first and last name, e-mail and phone number?"
no
" Or was that somebody violating her privacy?"
yes
LikeLike
September 7, 2011 at 12:00 pm
[…] Doctor Gunn’s death and the incredible amount of publicity it generated gave pro-choicer groups more ammunition to pass the FACE Act and to give the Department of Justice jurisdiction over these crimes. Congressional hearings were held, the pro-choice lobbyists worked hard to get support for the bill and ultimately the bill passed both ho…. […]
LikeLike