January 13, 2012
Abortion.com – Find a Provider for Abortion Care
Posted by Elena Carvin under Abortion, Abortion Blog, Abortion Discussion, Abortion Medical, Abortion Pill, Methotrexate | Tags: Abortion, Abortion Pill, Late Abortion, Medical Abortion |[2,050] Comments
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information 
December 1, 2010 at 7:20 am
Maria Victoria in #13: My problem with the so-called “pro-life” movement is their gross disregard for human life, as evidenced by their intense focus on fetal life. You have to Google around “aborticentrism” to understand just how bad the problem is.
Dunkle and I had an off-forum conversation, and he displayed psychopathic traits– shifting definitions, ignoring realities of human suffering, pretending ignorance in order to avoid unpleasant admissions and so forth. I have stopped communicating with him as a result.
Unfortunately, while you consider yourself “pro-life,” you are not aware of what those people expect from you– Dunkle is just short of the volently lunatic stage most of them aspire to and secretly admire.
I challenge your people to demonstrate care for real human life– and they fall way too short in virtually every case. I maintain this is because abortion symbolizes a threat to their own existence and thus is more important for them to address than the needs of actual children. I could go on at length, but I encourage you to look it up for yourself. Be sure to check out the comparison between the Abortion Store and the Baby Store.
LikeLike
December 1, 2010 at 7:39 am
MV, Chuckles is obsessed with mental illness (because of personal issues). His overwhelming argument is that since all prolifers (including you, MV) are mentally ill, we should continue allowing older folks to pull apart younger ones. He offers three other arguments, too, but they are equally absurd. So give him some slack not only because of the reason above but because he’s usually not vituperative.
LikeLike
December 1, 2010 at 8:06 am
Just so you know, John, about once every five days the abortion.com Facebook page posts something about you on it and there are a few comments. That page now has over 100,000 “friends”, which makes is a very powerful instrument. Unfortunately, I think you’d actually enjoy the attention1
LikeLike
December 1, 2010 at 8:53 am
I certainly would enjoy it if I could find it.
LikeLike
December 1, 2010 at 9:59 am
I went there again, Pat — abortion.com Facebook. I saw your name. You refer readers to this blog if they want to find out more about me. An ignorant comment or two, and that’s it! Why would I go there when I have this?
LikeLike
December 1, 2010 at 10:41 am
How did you see my name there, John? I do not use my name on Facebook.
LikeLike
December 1, 2010 at 10:58 am
Well you’re right, it’s not there now! But, believe me, an hour ago I googled abortion.com Facebook and there you were, about six steps down, followed by a comment or two, You referred people to abortion.ws! And you know I don’t lie unless I really have to. So,good-bye Facebook, stupidest blog on the planet.
LikeLike
December 1, 2010 at 11:07 am
John, you know I have no reason to lie. You have never seen someone named “Pat Richards” post on that facebook page. How, I know that the moderator puts my articles on there but I have never commented…
LikeLike
December 1, 2010 at 4:52 pm
Maria Victoria at #16: That Dunkle is right about my obsession, but wrong about its focus as mental illness. My obsession is with the cruelty in all its forms that children face every day, both perceived and unperceived. If you are a so-called “pro-lifer,” there is a 75% chance that you cannot identify the three forms of child abuse and correctly identify the most pernicious, insidiious and enduring. Dunkle cannot. In our private correspondence, he admitted that his concern for the welfare of children did not extend beyond his closest kin, and the farther from him any child lived, the less likely he was to be concerned about its welfare. Yet he will do what he can to force women (and he can’t admit he’s trying to force them) to bear children he won’t care about.
Is he mentally ill? Only in the way an alcoholic who keeps his job and meets his financial obligations– he’s functioning, but he is still an alcoholic. Similarly, Dunkle, who is representative of far more of the movement than you would be comfortable with, functions, but in ways that are definitely sociopathic (his inability, chosen or otherwise, to care for children) and borderline psychopathic– he evades, lies and excuses, all in the name of making other people angry and unhappy.
I’ll be posting our correspondence at the aborticentrism website and let you know when it’s up.
If I had not seen so many children stultified and destroyed in my lifetime, I would not be obsessed about the indifference with which so-called “pro-lifers” treat the ones they claim to have “rescued.” Ted Bundy was born in my state, at a home for unwed mothers….
LikeLike
December 1, 2010 at 7:35 pm
See what I mean?
LikeLike
December 2, 2010 at 9:25 am
Again it is endless.
This Dunkle must be made by this Blog to make ProLife people look like idiots.
No one can be consistently this dumb.
LikeLike
December 2, 2010 at 11:13 am
Is that pronounced shneeder or schnyder
LikeLike
December 2, 2010 at 12:36 pm
Terry,
That Dunkle does not even deserve the courtesy of conversation.
He cannot even write properly.
No wonder what I read about him was portraying him exactly like how he is. It was hard to understand until I came over here and looked.
He wouldn’t survive a day on the FB page!
No wonder he avoids it.
LikeLike
December 4, 2010 at 1:05 pm
Two days gone by and still you’re giving me the last word? You should be able to prevent that ’cause I’m outnumbered here three to one.
LikeLike
December 6, 2010 at 6:11 am
Pat, #17. I just went to Abortion.com Facebook and there you are again. Numbers 4 and 5 down I think. Click on one of them and there you are too! What’s going on? I’m supposed to be THE ONE there and I’m nowhere. (I think killers’ helpers have learned how to crush my ego,)
LikeLike
December 6, 2010 at 3:43 pm
What you see, John, is a reference to my blog, but that’s it. You never see me actually participating in the “conversations.”
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 6:07 am
That’s right, it’s just your name I see. Where’s mine?
LikeLike
December 6, 2010 at 11:07 am
I have to wonder why it is that so many people are responding to Mr. Dunkle’s posts. Whomever John Dunkle is, he or she obviously is enjoying the attention everyone is heaping upon his rhetoric. He needles people into becoming his pawns in a game of words that ends with you all you looking like mad, angry idiots.
Ignore the man. He’ll go away eventually. Let him have the last word, if it means so much to him. It is clear he is very much enjoying these interactions he precipitates by making rude comments on this site. And you all fall right into the trap, and let him needle you into his game. It’s silly, manipulative, and childish.
Ignore him. He’ll go away eventually.
LikeLike
December 6, 2010 at 3:44 pm
I totally agree with your assessment, Liggins, but for some reason I have to keep responding….
LikeLike
December 6, 2010 at 4:58 pm
You don’t agree with “Whomever John Dunkle is . . .”, do you, Pat?
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 1:27 pm
OK, folks, this rabbit wants you to run. Gonna?
LikeLike
December 6, 2010 at 5:50 pm
to Liggins in #22: Pat is professionally obligated to respond to that man in order to keep a semblance of dialogue going between true pro-lifers and the so-called “pro-life” movement. He is as good as they come, quite upfront with his fetal focus and his neglect of the needs of real children. True, he’s off his peak in terms of expressing himself, but he’s Randy Terry’s equal in putting forth what’s most important to the movement– the incessant drumming of the message that they are heroes, rescuers, righteous and Christians. The constant repetition of that message hides the fact that they don’t care for children anywhere near as much as they care for a vicim whom they have endowed with characteristics of their own choosing. It’s aborticentrism, pure and simple, and they engage in it to rescue themselves from the oblivion they face in Death…
LikeLike
December 6, 2010 at 6:37 pm
Newcomers, this is Chuckles’ first (and the forty-third time he’s repeated it) argument for continuing the legal killing of young people: we must continue to kill them because John Dunkle and his ilk are sickos. He has three, actually four, others that I’ll send to you if you want.
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 7:15 am
One of the signs of the successful aborticentric (able to maintain everyone’s focus on his work as a hero) is the ability to obscure the fact that he does not, indeed, care for real human life. The would-be hero of post #24 has never explained why he has never adopted, fostered, volunteered in a public school classroom or family court, or directly contributed at least 8% of his gross annual income for the welfare of a child not of his kin, religion or social circle. He instead creates a diversion: he accuses his accuser.
If that’s not aborticentrism, then what is it?
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 9:11 am
There’s proof: Dunkle is a lousy human being; therefore, I can continue to help kill young people.
Notice that Chuckles also tucks his third reason in there: you were not a “real human life” during the nine months you spent in your mother’s womb. Press him and he’ll say you were a humanoid. Yup, that’s what he’ll say.
LikeLike
December 11, 2010 at 5:09 pm
Well that was another ridiculous reply.
This ProLifer thinks he is smart?
I am Pro Life and I feel like giving up, when I see I have to battle the garbage that extremists ProLifers do.
I feel bad for the proLifers out there trying to actually do good things, this one does nothing, and hurts all the other Pro Lifers.
Promoting Murder? That was my take on what was said.
Murder is always wrong. If no one murdered anyone, for whatever reason they believed they were justified there would be no murder.
The battle wil never be won, in fact it will be lost because of the ProLife extremists.
It is already hard evidence, the extremists have harmed the ProLife movement now for decades.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 10:55 pm
He is not smart, in my opinion he writes like a real misogynist without a brain. He is slaughtered in every debate of words. Another screwball harming the ProLife cause.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:06 pm
Angie and Karen, you might be right. See if you can find somebody literate who can put your thoughts into words.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:17 pm
There he is again!
Is Dunkle illiterate?
He says the stupidest things!
Every time he writes he proves to the world that he has an opinion without any value or merit.
One need not even reply, except to have him reply back with another moronic comment. Let’s see if he can resist . . .
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 8:04 am
guess not, right?
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 11:27 am
Karen,
it appears your prediction was accurate.
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 10:20 am
Take a look at this single Thread of over 600 Comments and 900 votes, it is pretty clear that Dunkle is slaughtered by the written word everywhere.
And that is just this one Post!
Imagine if they were all added up!
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 5:57 am
Does that stand for Anthony Fullback?
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:19 pm
Anthony,
Looks like over 1,000 votes and most of Dunkle votes are in the don’t like category. Many others have high votes.
Again above another dumb Dunkle comment!
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 10:24 am
He’s been a bonehead since the first time I saw him write something.
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 12:16 pm
You hiding in my closet!
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 6:39 pm
Not worth responding to, Dunkle is an irrelevant idiot.
Afraid to go to the FaceBook page, what a loser!
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 6:52 pm
“Not worth responding to” and then you respond?
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 10:06 am
Jilly,
I see what you mean, Pro Lifers just have nothing to say,
They cannot support their positions so they revert to pathetic comments, they are not smart enough to discuss.
We have seen it constantly and routinely on all the sites, over and over again.
Thanks for showing me how these sad people are actually impossible to discuss anything with.
No wonder they are marginalized and achieve nothing.
Just attention seekers, they don’t have anything better to do- Like actually help a child, feed a child, volunteer to help the down trodden.
They waste precious Oxygen with their breaths, and pollute the atmosphere with their CO2.
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 10:41 am
“volunteer to help the down trodden” — love it
LikeLike
December 7, 2010 at 6:26 pm
Thanks for the blog info. I’d like to subscribe to your RSS.
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 11:08 am
Hispanic, what do you mean my “RSS”? I’m not good at this 🙂
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 5:57 am
me too
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 12:55 pm
Abortion is the woman’s legal right to choose.
NoOne will ever disallow that.
Roe v Wade will not only stand, but as the retarded older pro lifers die, their ancient brains and ideas will die with them.
Younger, intelligent people will continue to further civil liberties.
I laugh at the ProLifers, wasting their lives on a lost cause, they are among the stupidest people I have ever had the displeasure of speaking with.
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 9:11 pm
Carrie, I like “further.” Most of the stupids on this blog would have written “farther.” But I have lots of kids, and they have lots of grand kids.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 10:57 pm
Another never ending example of this guy being a blockhead.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:11 pm
Say that correctly. Let me help: “this is another example, and they never seem to end, of this guy being a blockhead.” Sure it’s still an “ad hom” and therefore a waste, but at least now it’s literate.
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 12:58 pm
I am using a pseudonym.
I work at a conservative media giant F** , in NYC.
I have to suppress laughter when I hear them talk to each other off camera. They don’t even believe half the stuff they say, they do it all to make $$$s.
I can’t wait to get a new job!
LikeLike
December 12, 2010 at 11:29 am
Sounds like you have some material for a book, John!!
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 1:18 pm
I have been reading through the blogs and FB pages, it is remarkable how stupid pro lifers really are.
I agree with you.
As a group, it would be hard to find a dumber cohort than the cohort of people that are defined as dumber by a population taking an instrument to measure intelligence quotients.
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 1:25 pm
This has gotta be original: “As a group, it would be hard to find a dumber cohort than the cohort of people that are defined as dumber by a population taking an instrument to measure intelligence quotients.”
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 9:02 pm
Yes Porter,
ProLifers that advocate murder are among the dumbest of them all.
They cannot even reply intelligently.
It’s funny, as they think they are smart, but in reality, they are criminals in my opinion.
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 5:02 am
Linda, think about this: “…but in reality, they are criminals in my opinion.” Does that sound right to you?
LikeLike