January 13, 2012
Abortion.com – Find a Provider for Abortion Care
Posted by Elena Carvin under Abortion, Abortion Blog, Abortion Discussion, Abortion Medical, Abortion Pill, Methotrexate | Tags: Abortion, Abortion Pill, Late Abortion, Medical Abortion |[2,050] Comments
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information 
December 8, 2010 at 9:12 pm
And you folks, fortunately, will chemichalize yourselves out of existence.
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 9:26 pm
Is that “chemicalize”?
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 10:58 pm
Both were dumb remarks.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:11 pm
Why, Karen?
LikeLike
December 8, 2010 at 9:41 pm
This is so hilarious,
Prolifers around the world are morons.
They reply with moronic statements.
On FB we see it all the time.
Instead of addressing an issue pro lifers respond with cretin brained comments about punctuation or grammar. If they are not smart enough to meet the challenge of discussion why do they bother?
They don’t understand computers – people type on little phones that are hard to see, so people make spelling errors. Big deal – has nothing to do with the issue. Just a stupid prolifer avoiding their inability to answer a question intelligently.
Just murder loving prolifers evading the issues – because they are the poster brand for pure evil – and are dangerous and violent.
Is there a prolifer that does not support murdering innocent people, or that can respond with intelligence instead of stupidity?
The Rogelio seems like a reasonable person.
The murderer worshipers, they should be placed in jail.
LikeLike
December 9, 2010 at 5:44 am
I have this strange feeling, A, you’re referring here to Dunkle.
LikeLike
December 9, 2010 at 8:10 am
And let me add this: I talk to my audience, and on this blog I talk to adolescents, mostly. I would be wasting my time if I tried talking to them as if they were adults. However, if you are capable of understanding, and if you do want to hear, adult arguments about why we should not continue to kill others, go to Thekeatsstreetchronicles.
LikeLike
December 10, 2010 at 8:38 am
I guess we’re “adolescents” because we disagree with you. Of course, if we agreed with you we’d be “adults”?
LikeLike
December 10, 2010 at 8:40 am
Got me there. I didn’t mean you, Kate, Rog, or Chuckles. Just the others, and they seem to form the large majority of readers here.
LikeLike
December 9, 2010 at 8:12 am
Sorry, that’s Keats Street Chronicles
LikeLike
December 10, 2010 at 10:07 am
I don’t know who is using my name to make these comments but I never made that remark posted above, so whoever is using my name to make statements like this, please stop. If you have something to say, stop being a coward and using other peoples names to say it.
LikeLike
December 10, 2010 at 8:00 pm
Perhaps if you have a common name you should add an initial or anything, like a letter after your name just to distinguish yourself?
There are a lot of people with the same first and last name.
Like Amy is common, so I just added a bunch of ggggggs after my name
LikeLike
December 10, 2010 at 10:48 am
Linda, don’t blame you for setting the record straight there.
LikeLike
December 11, 2010 at 5:11 pm
???????
LikeLike
December 12, 2010 at 5:24 am
Linda denied writing #10. Can you blame her?
LikeLike
December 12, 2010 at 11:30 am
Abortion is a Woman’s right.
LikeLike
December 12, 2010 at 4:24 pm
Succinct and to the point – or is that redundant?
LikeLike
December 12, 2010 at 11:35 am
Where’d you hear that, Henry?
LikeLike
January 7, 2011 at 6:39 pm
Before the bottom post disappears, I want to find out who the folks mentioned are, I mean the ones with question marks after their names. Besides this post’s been idle for a long time, needs a little action.
George Tiller(killed by bullet), Susan Hill (killed by birth control pill), Bill Knorr (?), David Gunn (killed by bullet), Bart Slepian (killed accidentally by bullet), Baird Britton (killed by shotgun), Myron Chrisman (?), Jerry Campagna (?), Michael Nauert (?), Harold Tickten (?), Norma and Carl Stave (?), Curtis Stover (?), Robert Kisner (?), Buck Williams (?), Jim McMahon (?), Jim Barrett (?), Eugene Glick (?)
LikeLike
January 8, 2011 at 10:49 am
Knorr, Campagna, Mauert, Stave, STover, Kisner, Williams, McMahon and Glick were doctors. Chrisman, Tickten were owners. Barrett was Britton’s bodyguard.
Meanwhile, John, what do you mean Susan Hill was killed by “birth control pill”? and Bart was “accidentally” killed? What the frig???
LikeLike
January 8, 2011 at 11:58 am
He is hoping they’re also been killed. You provided the wrong information. If they’re still alive, please give him their present address.
LikeLike
January 8, 2011 at 7:00 pm
Paragraph 1, Pat: oh yeah, Barrett (shotgun),but those other guys, did we get them too?
Paragraph 2 — Susan was a big advocate of the poison pill and she died of breast cancer. I just put two and two together.
Slep, I know for a fact that the shooter aimed for the shoulder. The bullet caromed to the lung. bye-bye.
LikeLike
January 9, 2011 at 4:04 pm
Tell me, John, that you are making these comments with tongue in cheek and are just trying to get a rise out of me. Think very carefully before you answer and keep in mind that Susan and Bart were very close friends of mine…
LikeLike
January 10, 2011 at 5:52 am
Not tongue in cheek, even though you might think so by my stupid “bye-bye.”
LikeLike
January 11, 2011 at 2:14 pm
Prove to me that Kopp was only aiming at Bart Slepian’s shoulder.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:11 am
Did Pat ever get this question answered about Kopp?
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 5:08 pm
The Dunkle guy tried, but he did not prove he knew that Kopp did not purposefully murder the innocent doctor.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:02 pm
He never proved it. Just a know nothing writing things he knows nothing about.
LikeLike
January 8, 2011 at 8:10 am
Notice that he doesn’t ask about what happened to Eddie Tyler, Richard White, Chas. Stuart, the Yates brothers, J.D. Autry or Eileen W.
LikeLike
January 8, 2011 at 7:01 pm
Who are these guys, Chuckles?
LikeLike
January 9, 2011 at 9:38 am
Since Eddie Tyler, Richard White, Chas. Stuart, the Yates brothers, J.D. Autry or Eileen Wouronen have already been born, so-called “pro-lifers” don’t care about them; they only care about fetuses. Actually, the proper plural would be “feti,” which sounds rather charming.
LikeLike
January 9, 2011 at 12:59 pm
I’d care more about them if their parents could kill them legally. They can’t yet, can they?
LikeLike
January 9, 2011 at 5:38 pm
Eddie Tyler was the Little Brother of a friend of mine. He went to jail for 2 years because he wasn’t smart enough to be more than a common thief. That didn’t have to happen. Richard White was an ex-convict who returned to the town he was jailed in and murdered the girl he used to watch from his cell window. He didn’t have to grow up that way. The five Yates brothers were drowned by their mother, Andrea, who was denied birth control and psychiatric services by hger pastor, congregation and husband. That was not pre-ordained, so to speak. Charles “shot and a spalsh” Stuart killed his wife, shot himself for an alibi, blamed it on a “black guy,” and jumped off a bridge when the scheme unraveled. He didn’t have to grow up that way. J.D. Autry was the first man executed in Texas after they got rolling on Death Row. He killed five people in a convenience store holdup, including a cop. His life was so bad (his parents stayed together “for the good of the children”) that he needed intervention. He didn’t have to grow up that way.
For far too many people, life is a job, not a joy. Where are the so-called “pro-lifers” for those who are following in the footsteps of the people listed above? Trying to pry names and addresses of abortion providers out of Pat.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:03 pm
This Rogelio writes a lot better then the DunkleMonster.
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 8:10 am
You would say that, I mean YOU would say that.
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 11:31 am
I see what you are saying Karen. I agree with you.
LikeLike
January 14, 2011 at 11:52 am
“For far too many people, life is a job, not a joy.” And your solution to this problem is to kill ’em while they’re young. Is that it, Chuckles?
LikeLike
January 14, 2011 at 12:33 pm
And your job is to never help them after you compel their birth! The essence of aborticentrism! “Nunc dimittus, Domine. . .”
LikeLike
January 14, 2011 at 1:00 pm
No, that is not my job. I help them after birth as well. But talk about not answering questions. Does silence mean that you do approve of killing people (oh let’s use your word, “children”) when they are young so that they don’t grow up to be bad?
LikeLike
January 16, 2011 at 6:12 am
talk about not answering a question!
LikeLike
January 16, 2011 at 11:13 am
“I help them after birth as well.’
Please specify.
LikeLike
January 16, 2011 at 2:19 pm
You’re trying to drag me down to your level, aincha Chuckles. You know, where you tell everybody how great you are.
Now for the legitimate question: Do you, Charles Gregory, aka Chuckles, approve the practice of killing certain people when they are young to prevent them from growing up to be bad?
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:05 pm
That was another dumb comment Dunkles.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:15 pm
Now you’re bothering me, Karen. Go away.
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 11:33 am
Who cares?
John I am here to stay as long as this blog allows me.
Who do you think you are trying to command someone to leave?
You reveal more of your lack of ability to address the issues.
LikeLike
January 20, 2011 at 7:16 am
Now you’re bothering me too, George. Go away.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:26 am
Pat and Tamira, up there in #21. I meet Jim Kopp when we in jail together in Atlanta in the late ’80s. We became good friends. I’ve read everything he’s ever written, and edited much of it, and I’ve read everything written about him, the most comprehensive being the book “Sniper.” I can’t be more specific than that but it’s how I know that Bart Slepian was killed accidentally.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 4:56 pm
Seriously,
How could you (Dunkle) know what that murderer kopp was doing at that exact moment, when he murdered?
I bet when he is burning in hell for an eternity he will not be so happy about that stupid choice he made.
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 11:18 pm
Jeremy, from the tone of your comment I would say this — either Kopp will burn in hell for eternity, or you will. Know whee my money lies?
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 8:40 pm
My opinion is Dunkle and Kopp will go to hell.
God does not like murderers like Kopp or people that support murderers like Dunkle.
Easy bet, any day.
Dunkle writes like a child.
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 11:06 am
If God doesn’t “like” these folks, why doesnt he just “smite” them down?
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 2:32 pm
Re: Dunkle n #25: I commit myself to seeing that every child I insist come into existence is given all the nurture needed at my expense of money, talent and time in order to have a chance at a happy (in the Socratic sense) adulthood.
I have noticed many, many times that he has not made and refuses to make this commitment, and I have often postulated that this is because he is aborticentric in the full sense of the term,
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 2:42 pm
paragraph #1 — I do too
paragraph #2 — nonsense
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 4:59 pm
Who is this nutty Dunkle?
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 8:49 am
It’s such a long story, Cori. Go up to the top of this blog and read “Dunkle”. bottom line is he is the only pro-lifer who comments on this page…
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 9:31 am
Wow, I didn’t realize someone agreed with me about Rog!
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 11:07 am
Oops, I forgot about Rogie!!! Maybe cause sometimes I actually think that Rogie is a closet pro-choicer!
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 11:13 am
me too too
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 7:14 am
Dunkle is a fairly typical so-called “pro-lifer.” He focuses on death, not on life. This is evident by his lack of commitment to children who are born to people he has only challenged on a sidewalk and by his lack of commitment to ensuring women have access to a healthy pregnancy. He engages in “magical thinking,” believing that because he says something is so, it is so.
He delights in attention and relies greatly on people’s near-irresistible impulse to “get back” at him, the way zoo-goers have an impulse to throw things back at a caged chimp hurling poop at them. This explains why so many of his comments are only one or two words and none of them are attempts to clarify his position or establish an argument.
His participation in this site meets some of his needs as a so-called ‘pro-lifer’: the attention he gets here is an intimation of the immortality he hopes to achieve by being a “hero” for his imagined “pre-born innocents.” Like a good carny huckster, he knows how to keep the rubes coming. Just be glad he’s not raising your child.
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 7:46 am
Cori, bet you’re sorry you asked that question.
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 8:44 pm
Thank you RESPONSIBLE.
You write intelligently and with clarity. Dunkle – is an embarrassment to the pro life community as I read here in these pages.
He will probably have a 3rd grade response as usual.
He is a distraction from conversation with intelligent people.
LikeLike
January 27, 2011 at 5:35 pm
The Dumbkle,
How do we know he is even real?
Know one can be that stupid?
Can they?
LikeLike