January 13, 2012
Abortion.com – Find a Provider for Abortion Care
Posted by Elena Carvin under Abortion, Abortion Blog, Abortion Discussion, Abortion Medical, Abortion Pill, Methotrexate | Tags: Abortion, Abortion Pill, Late Abortion, Medical Abortion |[2,050] Comments
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information 
January 28, 2011 at 3:59 pm
I am ProLife,
and I do not believe Abortion should be legal.
LikeLike
January 29, 2011 at 9:10 am
So, how many children have you already adopted, Ashley? If you haven’t adopted, how many foster children are you caring for? If not that, how many hours do you volunteer as a Family Court guardian ad litem, a Big Sister, a classroom aide in a public school?
Or are you the usual so-called “pro-lifer” for whom the closer it gets the less sacred human life becomes? If so, why is there such a disconnect between what you believe and what you practice?
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 3:11 pm
Hi,
I don’t know your name.
I have adopted 3 girls and one boy.
I hope we are not having a contest here because that is as much as I can do.
I work two jobs and volunteer at their school about 6 hours a week, and volunteer for some organizations that do good work for parents of children with cystic fibrosis, and so on.
I don’t know what the Guardian thing is, but it sounds like it probably is a good thing to do.
There are just only so many hours in a day! 🙂
I hope you have a blessed day.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 6:08 pm
Ole Chuckles jumped the gun on you, didn’t he, Ashley.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:32 pm
Huh?
Duh?
Wa?
Illiterate?
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:34 pm
Firstly,
I don’t know what chuckles is.
Secondly,
Dunkle, I find you to be the most repulsive character on this site.
I cannot believe you are even a real person.
At first I started reading what you wrote.
Then I learned over the past few ads what a menace you are.
LikeLike
January 29, 2011 at 2:29 pm
Ashley, can you explain your reasoning?
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 3:14 pm
I do not believe I could explain as detailed as all you all would like.
It is very complicated.
I almost feel like I would have to write a book.
And I do not have that ability.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 6:09 pm
This is a beautiful answer.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:31 pm
Thank you John,
I wish I did not know now what a disgrace you are to our cause.
You are wretched. Go away you squiggly worm.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 7:38 am
Ashley, here’s a quick catch-up to help you better understand this blog:
1. All humans are aware that they will die.
2. This knowledge is paralyzing. It would have us living in fear every second of our life unless we had a coping strategy.
3. Many of us adopt a religious or philosophical viewpoint– e.g., a loving God or a cosmological constant into which we will once again be enfolded– that helps us push our fear of death into a corner and bottle it up.
4. Some of us can’t. We believe in our framework– God, whatever– but not firmly enough. Reminders of death– such as the reality of abortion– scare us horribly because they let the monster out of that corner, threatening to paralyze us.
5. In order to put the monster back in the corner, we try to prove to ourselves that we– personally– can transcend Death by becoming a hero. If we do that, we reason, we will live forever in memory, like Caesar or Jesus.
6. At the same time, we need proof in this world that we are heroes– we need to have people who agree with us or who yield to our opinion. If we can’t get those, we will settle for people who are angry at us for what wwe believe in.
7. We need further proof of our heroism by practical works (“faith without good works is nothing”). Therefore, we need to show that we are fighting Death.
8. However, to admit that we are trying to cope with our personal fear of Death would be to admit a weakness in our psychological armor. For us, that would be too risky. We really are fragile, and we can’t afford to show it.
9. So instead of dealilng with our own problem directly, we deal with it indirectly, by creating an allegory (a situation in which things represent something else). We pick a victim to represent us and a force to represent Death; then we play the role of the hero. By acting this out, we try convince ourselves that God will be our hero.
10. Every time we “win,” it proves to us that yes, we will transcend Death. Nothing else matters.
The man on this blog who has a lot of attention focused on him is, in his construct, “winning.” He is what people find when they look under the “pro-life” rock.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:28 am
We’re gonna die?????
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 12:11 pm
How do you feel about it?
LikeLike
January 28, 2011 at 6:20 pm
Great,
go out and vote!
You live in the USA!
That is why you have a choice.
Don’t worship Murderer’s like the Dunkle does.
Just don’t be a Dumbkle!
That is an infectious term!
LikeLike
January 28, 2011 at 6:35 pm
See? See?
LikeLike
January 28, 2011 at 6:36 pm
“See? See?”
What does that mean?
LikeLike
January 28, 2011 at 6:24 pm
Why don’t these Pro Lifers just vote?
Why do they break the law instead?
Most people in America believe Abortion is OK sometimes.
That is why, as someone mentioned earlier we are going to enter a fifth decade of Roe, nearly half a century!
Most prolifers will get an abortion if THEY need one. Bunch of Dumbkle’s they are!
LikeLike
January 28, 2011 at 6:36 pm
See? See? See?
LikeLike
January 28, 2011 at 6:37 pm
What do you mean?
I cannot understand you?
LikeLike
January 28, 2011 at 6:39 pm
Ashley,
That is a Dumbkle statement.
It does not mean anything . . .
He is mean,
but has no meaning . . .
LikeLike
January 28, 2011 at 9:42 pm
Ashley, you have to read the earlier statements. You can’t just jump in and expect to understand everything. See, Chuckles had tried to warn these literates about stupid comments. He said they play right into my game. I responded, “Hey, now this is not bad. Chuckles, I’m amazed. Of course you’ll get nowhere because you’re talking to illiterates.”
So, after the next stupid comment I told him, “See?” I tried to say that again after another one, but this blog wouldn’t let me (no duplicate comments, or something). So I added a “see,” and so on. Get it?
LikeLike
January 29, 2011 at 2:31 pm
Personally, I grow weary of these folks who just call Dunkle names. Not that I feel sorry for him but how boring…I’d like to see a good dialogue here, not just some hit and run name calling….
LikeLike
January 29, 2011 at 5:05 pm
Absolutely. On one side — Pat, Kate, Rog, and Chuckles; on the other — me. If you are not named, just listen.
LikeLike
January 30, 2011 at 11:01 am
I’m not sure if Rog would agree with your categorization as with “us”….I would say he is the civil, thinking man’s pro-lifer…
LikeLike
January 30, 2011 at 7:45 pm
Yeah, I know them. They’re on your side.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 8:15 am
Pat
Dunkle does the same thing, he doesn’t have real dialogue.
His comments are stupid, and people are sick of his boring worthless remarks.
Like his
See! See!
Thing,
or tell in others not to participate in conversation.
He is often after very direct questions and evades them by stupid remarks.
He tells people to go away?
I think he needs to be chastised or not remark at all.
In fact, anyone that supports the murder of innocent people, as Dunkle does and does not answer to that question should be noted for their lack of civility. Even if that means calling them a name.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:23 am
Crystal, say nothing more. You’re allowed only to read what’s on here.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 11:25 am
Look at that Dunkle remark. How horrible.
Dunkle, if you cannot keep up with the pro choicers don’t behave like a child, you embarrass all of us that have worked for decades.
You should only read what is written here.
You destroy our cause!
It is embarrassing to have to chastise you like a child, please say nothing more, until you can prove you are not a demonic inspired fool.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 11:29 am
I agree with Crystal and the Pro Lifer (Harriet?) even though the have different beliefs, the Dunkle guy is an absolute nuisance.
There is always one gigantic Dunkle like uneducated person on every blog, and this one happens to actually BE the Dunkle himself.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 11:22 am
Personally,
as a Pro Life Person,
I am weary of this monster representing himself as the voice of Pro Life when he is in the Minority.
His constant avoidance of questions, the way he demeans people, destroys the work of thousands of Pro Lifers that have made any gains.
He makes us all appear to be illiterate Monsters.
LikeLike
January 29, 2011 at 6:04 pm
You can tell which ones have actually researched aborticentrism.
LikeLike
January 29, 2011 at 8:18 pm
But don’t listen to everything.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 3:21 pm
John,
Sorry, but I am even more confused now by what you wrote.
Who is Chuckles? That sounds like you are teasing someone?
Who here is illiterate?
I’m not the smartest person around, but it appears for the most part, everyone can read and write.
Then your are saying something about stupid comments which sounds offensive.
And then you said you added “see.”
And then you asked if I got it?
The answer is I am more confused after you explained it than before.
Are you calling me an illiterate person?
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 3:42 pm
Ah, never mind.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:24 pm
John,
Sadly,
Of all these people,
I have come to the conclusion that you likely the least educated,
The most dimwitted,
The most unlikely to answer a question.
All these things basically make you a worthless contribution to discussion.
I tried.
No wonder the pro choicers think you are crazy.
The pro lifers think the same way.
Just go away.
Shut up. No one want to hear your worthless slinger.
You are an egotistical nuisance.
Our cause has no use for you.
I thank the prchoicers for outing you as the worthless detritus there is.
You are a you have behaved, a person that likes murderers. Satan loves you, you embrace Satan with your venom of hate.
There is no room in in a civil world for animals like you.
LikeLike
January 30, 2011 at 10:38 am
Dunkle,
Do you believe it is OK to break the law in a non civil, violent level?
LikeLike
January 30, 2011 at 7:44 pm
I do think it is not only OK but necessary to break some laws. For example, you would have been morally required to protect Jews when that was against the law. And might you use force (not violence) to protect them? Yes.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 8:18 am
Skip your useless metaphors and examples as they do not apply as well as using the actual situation we are talking about.
Dunkle,
do you believe it is presently OK to murder innocent doctors and staff, or to have done so in recent history?
Do you believe that is OK?
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:00 am
I’m always in a quandry about this “is it okay to break the law” question. That’s because I came very, very close on several occasions to breaking the law when I was protesting against the Vietnam War. Personally, I do support CIVIL disobedience.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 11:31 am
The question was breaking the law with violence i believe.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 3:29 pm
Franklin,
I am trying to understand.
There is a lot of conversation here.
I’m trying to summarize to see if I understand.
I understand your question to John.
John didn’t answer you question.
Crystal tries to to make your already clear question clearer and mentions the metaphor John used that had nothing to do with answering your question.
Then Pat talks about civil disobedience, but you specifically said non civil, so I don’t understand how that is relevant.
Then Katie clarifies the same simple question again.
And John doesn’t answer?
What is going on here?
This blog is confusing.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:26 pm
John,
Franklin asked you an easy question.
Do you not have the brains to answer.
The more I read here the more I realize what you are.
I must call an exorcist.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:30 am
OK, Crystal, I relent; at least you asked a coherent question: “Dunkle, do you believe it is presently OK to murder innocent doctors and staff, or to have done so in recent history?”
No, Crystal, I do not believe that. I do not believe it is ever OK to murder innocent doctors and staff.”
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 11:37 am
1) Dunkle that is inconsistent with what I read you said in earlier posts.
You are just a lier. Why do you lie? How can you support murder’s actions, yet at the same time believe they are wrong in their actions?
You cannot have it both ways.
How about the same question, but answer it by exchanging Murder to
Commit Violence Upon . . .
2) Is it OK to commit violence upon Doctors or staff or anyone related to the process of performing an Abortion?
LikeLike
February 4, 2011 at 11:50 am
Katie, I stopped reading after the first curse, so I missed this: “Is it OK to commit violence upon Doctors or staff or anyone related to the process of performing an Abortion?”
I think maybe you got to the core here, but first, allow me to rewrite it just a little: “Is it OK to use force to try to stop killers and those who are helping them kill?”
The answer: “Not only is it OK, it is required.”
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 11:48 am
Dunkle is just not educated enough to answer these questions folks.
Let some real Pro Lifers answer them for you.
No,
Violence,
Force (which is often violent and illegal in nature),
Murder are NOT OK.
Nor are any other of the Dunkle type hypocrisy I see all over this site (by Dunkle himself). His mantra is NOT OK.
It is wrong.
Dunkle is wrong.
Very wrong on almost all comments he makes.
As a ProLifer I apologize for Dunkle and his kind to the rest of you.
He does not represent 99% of people who are ProLife.
The thought of that hideous being screaming and demeaning a young women walking into a doctor’s office to get a pap smear is revolting!
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:17 pm
You are just plain right.
How do we get the voices of the Duncle illiterates off our cause Harriet.
All these pro Choicers think we are dumb because of him…
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 2:27 pm
Aw, Ash, they’d think that anyway.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 12:37 pm
John: If you do not believe it is “okay” to kill a doctor or staff, why do you basically applaud the actions of folks like James Kopp? Or do I not understand your position?
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 12:54 pm
Holy smoke! After the deluge above I finally run into some dry weather!
Let’s change that, though, Pat, to folks like Paul Hill, for obvious reasons.
I applauded the action of Paul because that man he shot was no longer a doctor. He had left the practice of medicine to become a killer, a serial killer; and one may use force to stop a killer, especially if it is not you he is coming to kill.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:31 am
So, John, you basicall support the “justifiable homocide” position, right?
Do you know that they day after Paul killed Britton, the women were sent to Mobile to get their abortions?
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 11:52 am
Yes, justifiable homicide. too bad about those women
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 3:42 pm
Pat,
I am really trying to understand the people on this site, as I read down this page.
I looked up on the internet, and apparently it said that Paul Hill murdered a Doctor.
But John says the person Paul Hill murdered was not a Doctor.
Everything I read says he was.
I know the Internet is not always the truth, but everything I read pretty much said the same thing.
So my first question is who is telling the truth here?
My second question is the person Paul Hill murdered in my reading was not trying to murder Paul Hill.
John says something about it’s especially ok to kill someone if they are Not trying to kill you?
I think it is especially OK to kill someone if they ARE trying to kill yourself. That’s just self defense.
If you kill someone who is harming someone else you might be killing the person saving a woman from a rapist, or an undercover police officer. That is a dangerous way to go about things?
Who is right in these discussions, they are really confusing, but I do not see why they need to be?
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 3:45 pm
time to disappear, Ashley
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:08 pm
Why are you so mean and nasty,
The more I read what you write I believe that to be possibly true.
Are you as mean as you write?
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 5:01 am
go away
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 5:05 am
Dunkle,
Do you believe in vigilante justice?
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 7:57 am
Please explain, Harland.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:03 am
Do you know the definition of vigilante?
The question needs no explaining.
I’ll answer for you.
“No”
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:34 am
Ashley: DOCTOR Britton was killed by Paul Hill. John argues that he was not a DOCTOR because he performed abortions. So, instead, he thinks Britton was a “serial killer”. So, in other words, the over one million women a year who are seeking out these DOCTORS really aren’t seeing a DOCTOR.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 11:52 am
So Dunkle lied.
Dr. Britton was a real doctor.
That is just plain lying on Dunkle’s part.
How can anyone have a conversation with a person that lies like that?
That also means Dunkle is lying in his answer. He believes it is OK to murder a Doctor. He said he did not believe it is OK.
He is just a plain old fashion lier.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 12:04 pm
Suppose, Tina(and Pat), that Britton had made a living as a fisherman. A company comes along that wants to drain the body of water, fill it in, and build a housing project. They pay Britton to kill the fish as step one in their project. Would you say he was still a fisherman?
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 11:54 am
rxactly
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 11:55 am
oops, exactly
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:15 pm
John
Why don’t you answer Pat’s question.
Real pro Lifers can answer questions.
We are not self proclaimed lying cowards like you.
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 2:29 pm
I only lie when I really have to.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 1:54 pm
My vote for the nastiest voice on this blog?
Harriet (kind of thought that would be a pro-lifer). And that’s saying something considering Sonia Pataki’s still around. But so far here’s the clincher: “The thought of that hideous being screaming and demeaning a young women walking into a doctor’s office to get a pap smear is revolting!” Sonia, you’re up.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 3:47 pm
John,
You are really confusing me.
Are you saying it is OK to demean and scream at a women going to get her Pap Smear?
That cannot be true.
No decent person would do that.
Don’t you agree that a person that has done that to a women is revolting?
What do you mean?
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 5:42 pm
If I told you, you would pretend not to understand.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:11 pm
You never make any sense.
No one seems to understand you.
Are you ill, on medications that disturb your thoughts? It’s ok, at least we know the demon that you are then.
Go away foul beast.
Speak no more.
I would say more, but the more you write about the illiteracy of others the more illiterate you write.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 6:13 am
illiterately
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 9:24 am
John why are you telling us how you write, it’s obvious already.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 9:13 pm
Why do you not answer the question?
You are what everyone says you are.
ProLifers around the world disavow you, as you harm us all.
We are all ashamed of you you old wretched fool.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 6:44 am
It’s true.
I am pro Life, I think Dunkle is just an attention seeker as he has no other value in his life.
I will answer questions and not avoid the like the coward Dunkle.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 6:55 am
Helen, do you think it is morally permissible to defend someone forcibly when a man is approaching to kill her?
LikeLike
February 3, 2011 at 5:32 pm
Helen, as for your attitude toward human life, it is widely understood that people like you and John Dunkle have a great concern for life in the womb. What have you personally done to protect it?
LikeLike
February 7, 2011 at 9:03 am
I think Helen is gone…another hit and run
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 2:46 pm
The Justifiable Homicide crowd are a bunch of murderers and maniacs.
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 6:43 pm
Is that nut Dunkle one of these crazy Justifiable Homicide people?
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 5:32 am
course not
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 5:35 am
Are you joking, you write like one all the time?
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 8:01 am
John,
That is not true.
John why do you lie?
You write as if you support justifiable homicide routinely.
Stop lying.
And if that is a fact, why do you disparage Andrew.
It only reveals more of what you really are.
Are you really that awful of an angry old man that cannot have a sensible discussion ?
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 9:16 am
John has said he does not support the justifiable homocide group. On the other hand, John, you do “applaud” the actions of Kopp and others, correct?
LikeLike
February 19, 2011 at 10:50 am
John, if someone was running towards one of your grandchilden with a gun, intent on killing her, you would do all you can to stop him, right? If your grandchild is the same as the “child” in the woman’s body and that doc is going to “kill” it, why not stop the doc as well?
LikeLike
February 19, 2011 at 8:23 pm
I’m a coward.
LikeLike
February 19, 2011 at 10:53 pm
No doubt.
What happened to that nut Bruce?
You like him.
Is he a JH also?
LikeLike
February 20, 2011 at 5:27 pm
Where is that nut prolifer bruce?
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 1:43 pm
What do you mean when you say you are a coward?
You write like an aggressive maniac about t.he horrible things you have done.
How does one reconcile your actions with your claim of being a coward?
LikeLike
February 22, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Ursula, he’s not a coward; if he truly were, it would be too terrible for him to admit.
Aborticentrics have to conserve their scant psychological energy, since they spend so much of it repressing their fear of obliteration when they die– nobody will remember them, they leave no sterling examples or grand edifices behind; they are leaves borne down the darkling stream. It’s imagery that they don’t want to face, so they repress it, and it uses up a lot of their energy.
Therefore, they only dedicate as much energy to being “pro-life” as they find convenient. This is why they do not adopt, they do not foster, they do not volunteer for children they never wanted to have, or to whom they are not obligated by ties of family, church or social class.
The man who says he will not kill someone who provides abortions is a man who knows the limits of his involvement, even though he philosophically is in favor of murder.
LikeLike
February 23, 2011 at 10:04 am
Here’s why I’m a coward: I think using force is the only way to end legal child killing. I’m not really talking about shooting, even killing, abortionists. I’m talking about things like paying taxes and respecting diabolical property. I do pay my taxes, however, and I don’t damage diabolical property. Because I’m a coward.
LikeLike
February 23, 2011 at 4:11 pm
How would not paying taxes stop abortion, John?
LikeLike
February 24, 2011 at 9:03 am
I don’t know but it would land me in jail and I would no longer be praying for life and paying for death.
LikeLike
February 25, 2011 at 2:48 am
Doesn’t matter, you are going straight to hell, God told me, and. Doubt you get to speak with God as I do.
LikeLike
February 28, 2011 at 1:45 pm
No, you’re wrong…I just spoke to him the other day. We had a good chat, resolved a bunch of issues…
LikeLike
March 6, 2011 at 2:41 pm
Examples?
LikeLike
March 8, 2011 at 11:52 am
sorry, Jilly, just catching up with my messages. So, are you asking for me “examples” of the issues I “resolved”? with HIM?
LikeLike
March 9, 2011 at 5:53 pm
I am so tired of the fake ProLifers on this site like Aquagirl and that stupid person Linda.
They harm the proLife cause, my compatriots and I wish they would stop placing their uneducated opinions into the mix harming the pro life cause we work so hard for!
LikeLike
March 10, 2011 at 9:51 am
Have to disagree with you, Helen. While their project was devious, it was a clever thing that they did for the cause. I gotta tip my hat to them, as much as I hated what they did.
LikeLike
March 10, 2011 at 11:04 am
Well I am on the front lines of the prolife cause and the fringe prolifers are harming our cause.
Look where we have gotten with their tactics. You even mentioned it.
Nowhere.
LikeLike
March 10, 2011 at 12:06 pm
I must agree with Helen.
The fanatical ProLifers harm the Pro Life cause, and I am sure this website is happy to let them do that.
LikeLike
March 10, 2011 at 6:13 pm
I am pro Choice and I agree with you!
At least we can agree on something!
LikeLike
March 11, 2011 at 10:18 am
I think, Martha, that most of the folks on this blog agree with you! Thanks for chiming in…
LikeLike
March 13, 2011 at 8:27 am
Helen, what has been your greatest sacrifice for your cause?
LikeLike
February 24, 2011 at 3:20 pm
Dunkle is so full of s**t.
An endless misrepresentation of what he really is. Curiously, one wonders if he really has deluded himself, or he actually has the capacity of cognition to know how evil he really is, and that he will end up in hell for all his evil deeds.
He worships the murderers, supports their cause, visits them, burns flags for them, visits them in jail, advises them, of coarse force for him means murdering innocent doctors.
LikeLike
February 24, 2011 at 7:46 pm
You are a lying coward. The worst of the worst.
HELL awaits you you demon.
LikeLike
February 25, 2011 at 3:40 pm
You are the second dumbest person on this site after Bruce!!
LikeLike
February 23, 2011 at 6:30 pm
He says he’s a coward in order to conceal the real reason he will not commit murder, which is much worse. I could theorize about them, but it would serve no purpose.
LikeLike
February 23, 2011 at 4:13 pm
Arlene, Artie asked if I were one of those crazy Justifiable Homicide people. I’m not one of them (but I know they’re out there). I’m one of the sane Justifiable Homicide people.
LikeLike
February 24, 2011 at 3:14 pm
What you just wrote proves by Socratic analysis that you do not have a reasonable mental capacity. You should be investigated for possible crimes.
LikeLike
February 24, 2011 at 3:54 pm
Jilly, Dunkle inhabits that gray area between the usual “so-called ‘pro-life'” dysfunction and the rabid fringe. He is as passionate in his care for the invented object of their devotion as any of them, but he knows he is not as passionate as he should be, that is, willing to kill real people. He acknowledges his lack of commitment to what he says he stands for– protection of a being he claims is an angelic, innocent, powerless being– in that he will not kill in its behalf. He quite openly blames this on his own cowardice, and I am sure that a large number of his fellow travelers would make the same claim for themselves.
As I have pointed out previously, very few of us have sufficient emotional strength to acknowledge our worst flaws willingly, even to our therapist, and Dunkle is no exception. He does what we all do– offers up a fake excuse, one with which he is perfectly comfortable, in hopes that it will satisfy our cursory interest in exploring his defect.
What he cannot bring himself to either recognize or admit, in my opinion, is that he does not value the fetus nearly as much as he and his ilk claim to: Rather than “defend” them in the way for which he praises his fellow killers, he prefers something else instead. He is willing to let abortion continue to the extent that it does not deprive him of other things he enjoys in his life. What in his life does he value more than “rescuing” an “unborn child” by killing an abortion provider?
Well, he values more the comfort of his own home, setting his own daily schedule, eating the food he likes, watching the TV shows he enjoys, going where he wants to and when he wants to, the domestic felicity his wife provides, buying the weekly lottery ticket, reading the periodicals he’s come to depend on, and throwing his weight around in the so-called “pro-life” movement with the freedom and zest he’s always enjoyed. These are all things he would have to sacrifice if he killed a doctor– and it shows how little he really lives by his claim of “caring for hunman [his term] life.”
As I’ve said many, many times before, when you look at the gap between what they say and how loosely they adhere to their own standards, it’s clear that the movement exists for something other than protection of fetuses.
But he says he’s a coward, and “pro-choicers” don’t think about the significance behind that statement. They should all research aborticentrism.
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 2:47 pm
Helen replied to all the questions
LikeLike
February 23, 2011 at 6:22 pm
She did not reply to mine.
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 6:44 pm
??????
LikeLike
February 4, 2011 at 11:47 am
Helen: have you adopted a child?
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 6:53 am
Helen remains silent. Aborticentrism?
LikeLike
February 25, 2011 at 7:13 am
She said she did earlier.
LikeLike
February 28, 2011 at 1:11 pm
Yes, I already answered this question twice.
I am prolife but not like the justifiable murderer homicide bad people.
They are not the real Christians.
Now real prolifers can converse, I would prefer not to be on a site with criminals like Paul Hill, who them and their friends are all going to hell for an eternity.
LikeLike
February 28, 2011 at 4:31 pm
I’m glad you’re still around, Helen. One of the big worries I have about “pro-lifers” is their general inability to care for life once it’s a real child, rather than just a fetus. As is known, a child can grow up to be another Mother Theresa or another Ted Bundy, and it’s not absolutely predetermined; a lot of the outcome has to do with the child’s nurture.
How concerned are you about the welfare and adult of a child whose birth would be directly attributable to your intervention with the pregnant woman’s intent to have an abortion?
LikeLike
March 3, 2011 at 11:08 am
I dont think she gives a crap, CG.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:36 am
Pro-lifers “around the world” disavow him? Wow, John, I’m impressed.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:42 am
Pat,
It’s true.
I even saw on a global FaceBook page.
They tend to not like him.
LikeLike
January 31, 2011 at 10:37 pm
I am pro life.
I have been reading this blog for a while and I am disgusted to think the pro choice people see Dunkle as the voice of pro life.
I am happy to answer questions.
I will not support murderers as Dunkle does.
I will not be an egotistical fool, and harm my fellow ProLifers with insane commentary.
Please ask me anything.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 5:06 am
Is that your real name?
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 6:45 am
Is Dunkle your real name?
It sounds fake.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 5:08 am
Real ProLifers do not behave like Dunkle. I agree Arthur.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 7:08 am
Harland, while “real [so-called] pro-lifers” in general might not behave like Dunkle, the fact remains that their concern about abortion very much blinds them to the question of responsibility for the nurture of the child that they insisted be born. Dunkle actually distracts his readers on this blog from that central fact about the movement, and in doing so, protects it.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 6:47 am
Please ask a question.
I am ProLife and I won’t waste your time like Dunkle.
My Church group is happy to take on the challenge of questions and notbevade them Dunkle style.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 6:59 am
Helen, ask your church group these two questions: 1) May you use force to defend your life? 2) May you use force to defend the life of someone else?
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 7:46 am
Chuckles, ignore them. Let’s keep to ourselves. I am just so happy you’ve stopped all that talk about “humanoids,” and unreal children: “their concern about abortion very much blinds them to the question of responsibility for the nurture of the child that they insisted be born.”
I admit it, we do insist that the child be born. You say, on the other hand, that someone, usually the mother, has the right to prevent her from being born. But does it stop there? Should the primary caretaker have the right to prevent her from reaching her first birthday? Now, stay here. Don’t descend into gobbledygook. (Try this — reply in ten or fewer words.)
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:06 am
I am happy to answer any questions, except from people that worship murderers.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:09 am
Helen,
1) Is it OK to believe that people that Murder Doctors are doing a good thing?
2) Where do the people who like people that murder doctors that perform legal abortion go when they die.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:15 am
Catherine,
Thank you for your question.
It’s very simple.
Jesus has spoken to us. The good lord is very clear.
1) No it is not OK. People that Murder Doctors should be punished under the law and despised.
2) People that think it is OK to murder a Doctor that performs Abortions go straight to Hell when they die. Our Good Lord is very clear on this point.
I am pro life and these facts are straight from Jesus himself.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:40 am
Uh….when did Jesus talk about abortion?????
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 9:25 am
I think he talked about it just after he said, “Don’t kill your mother even if you really need your inheritance.” Something like that.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 5:43 pm
Better yet — “Don’t kill your father even if you really can’t afford what it would cost you to let him live.” Jesus covered every angle. I remember his telling Bill, “Hey guy, don’t let Monica into the Oval Office. Hillary’ll be pissed.”
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 8:19 am
John,
Seriously are you OK?
You are obsessed with the Monica thing.
There are a lot worse things.
Like people that believe in justifiable homicide.
Why don’t you use that as an example?
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 12:16 pm
when he skipped over Ecclesiates IV, i-iii, he dodged the whole question.
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 8:23 am
Dunkle,
The fellow above you,
Please advise me if Chuckles is his real name or you are just demeaning his real name,
Is a lot smarter than you.
It appears you are a lier also,
And help people that murder other people.
You are a horrible person.
Why aren’t you in Jail?
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 2:23 pm
He tells us his name is Charles, and I used to call him that; but then his buddy, Rog, started calling him Chuckles. I do now too.
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:17 am
Finally,
A pro lifer with some sense of decency!
LikeLike
February 1, 2011 at 8:26 am
Thanks, Steve.
LikeLike