January 13, 2012
Abortion.com – Find a Provider for Abortion Care
Posted by Elena Carvin under Abortion, Abortion Blog, Abortion Discussion, Abortion Medical, Abortion Pill, Methotrexate | Tags: Abortion, Abortion Pill, Late Abortion, Medical Abortion |[2,050] Comments
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information 
February 2, 2011 at 6:01 am
Schools these days must be dreadful.
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 8:40 am
What does that have to do with Abortion?
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 1:40 pm
Dunkle,
Why do you always make stupid comments,
When you could actually be answering questions?
You act like you think you are intelligent.
If you were intelligent you would be able to answer questions persuasively. Furthering your cause.
But you do not.
Why? That is a paradox.
LikeLike
February 3, 2011 at 5:29 pm
Gary, to understand him and gain some command over what you want, check out aborticentrism and then come back here to deal with him.
LikeLike
February 7, 2011 at 6:17 am
They are graduating so many illiterates.
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 8:57 am
That Dunkle,
1) Believes Homicide is Justifiable?
2) Yet he still lies when he need not if he admits to #1
3) He is friends with Murderers
4) He has helped them in their past, editing literature, talking to them about violence, burnt American Flags, tried to defraud charities
5) He presently intimidates people at their homes, including people that have nothing to do with Abortion
6) he harasses women at Dr. Offices
7) When one believes Homicide is justifiable, and you hang around with and help the people that Committ Murder …
Isn’t that a crime that gets you in jail?
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 1:41 pm
Dunkle,
Did you disappear?
Where is your literate, coherent, intelligent reply?
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 2:05 pm
Coming up, babes — here in Reading the electricity was out from 8 a.m. till five minutes ago
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 4:12 pm
Chuckles, I told you you were wasting you time. Not Gary above but look at the other comments from the adolescent illiterates since you warned them about appearing foolish. I guess they’re here forever; I’ll just have to learn to live with them.
LikeLike
February 3, 2011 at 12:02 pm
Same question again,
Where is your literate, coherent, intelligent reply?
You failed.
Try again.
LikeLike
February 2, 2011 at 8:39 pm
Gary from MA, Jeremy, Harriet, Sonia, Doubting Thomas, Ashley, Courtland, Arthur Henley, Kate (not Ranieri), Harland, Catherine Morist, Kalia, Cameron, et al.,
First I tried to discourage you: “Will you young folks please say something I can respond to? Hasn’t anyone told you that making fun of your opponent or cursing him kills your own argument? It’s known as an ad hom (to the man rather than to the topic) and it’s something people who have already lost the argument resort to. Now I know you can do better than that. Try it.”
Then Pat did: “Sonia, the problem is you and others just pepper John with question after question and then throw in your little comments about “Dumbkle”. If you really want a better “conversation,” just ask a simple question without the childish commentary and John will answer it. As I said earlier, I find some of these posts annoying. The minute I see an exclamation point, I stop reading…”
Then Chuckles (and notice, Pat and Chuckles are my enemies): “There are a lot of people who are falling into the trap laid for them by a so-called “pro-lifer,” who encourages their ad hominem and vindictive comments. What they provide for him is evidence that his is the right side, as he can judge by people who respond at his level.
It is necessary for the continued well-being of a so-called “pro-lifer” to project– to impose on another his faults for purposes of catharsis– and engaging in gutter-sniping merely provides him with an easier job of it.
Far better is to simply ask him a question repeatedly, without getting personal or losing your cool, until he answers it satisfactorily. You deprive him of mastery over your emotions.”
So please, please, don’t comment. I love this blog, but I love it a little less when you start in.
LikeLike
February 3, 2011 at 7:48 am
Same stupid rant.
The Dunkle must be falling apart.
See a doctor Dunkle for your own mental health.
LikeLike
February 3, 2011 at 9:15 am
Why do you kids insist on making me look smarter than I am.
LikeLike
February 4, 2011 at 11:46 am
I have a funny feeling that some of these “kids” are in some cases the same person just using a different name, don’t you, John?
LikeLike
February 4, 2011 at 12:02 pm
You’re right again. I remember coming to that same conclusion months ago, but I forgot about it. I’ll bet they’re all Kate Ranieri. (She’s obsessed with me.)
LikeLike
February 4, 2011 at 9:30 am
CharlesGregory?
Is that your name.
Thank you for your intelligent commentary it is a relief from the stupid comments that the majority of ProLifers make.
LikeLike
February 4, 2011 at 11:58 am
You’re welcome, Art. Aborticentrism compels dissonant behavior, so go easy on them.
LikeLike
February 4, 2011 at 12:05 pm
Comments here have been skewed.
LikeLike
February 5, 2011 at 7:56 am
“Helen, as for your attitude toward human life, it is widely understood that people like you and John Dunkle have a great concern for life in the womb. What have you personally done to protect it?”
What is there about me that scares Chuckles half to death? Why couldn’t he have asked me this clear and straightforward question? Why, when dealing with me, does he continually evade, excoriate, lie, belittle, and run? Will somebody please tell me? (Not you, Chuckles; your response will either be incomprehensible or vindictive.)
Anyway, suppose he had asked me. Here’s how I’d answer: For forty years I have been protesting outside many of the little auschwitzes in this country that Satan uses to replace the larger one he lost in Germany. I have gone to jail dozens of times (but for never longer than three weeks). I stand outside killers’ houses holding this sign — A KILLER LIVES HERE. I track down killers’ helpers like Chuckles to listen to their rants and raves and to point out to them where they are wrong. I track down prolifers like Rogelio who are even less effective than I am (and that’s saying something) to point out where they are wrong. I support the prolife cause financially. Etc. In other words, I am probably more responsible than all of you for the fact that in this country we are still pulling the arms and legs off of about five thousand young people every day.
LikeLike
February 5, 2011 at 8:52 am
And not one child was born free of spina bifida because he stopped the mother from binge drinking in the first two weeks of pregnancy; not one was saved from IUGR because he provided her with the incentive to adopt and stick to a good diet; not one of them was born free of trisomy-13 due to his efforts; not one was born at a healthy birth weight because he convinced the woman to give up smoking or drugs; not one was born into a smoke- and drug-free household thanks to him; not one was born into a safer neighborhood than she grew up in, thanks to him. Nor because of his activities was one real child given a better education; one family enrolled in a parenting education group; did one child get all the health care he needed to grow up healthy; nor was one child given the hope of a better future. Heck of a job!
LikeLike
February 6, 2011 at 11:00 am
This entire thread has just degenerated into a nanny-nanny-poo-poo discussion.
LikeLike
February 6, 2011 at 12:35 pm
I beg your pardon?
LikeLike
February 8, 2011 at 9:45 am
Right here,
I refuse to participate with people, like Dunkle that advocate murder,
and
lie on this very website by playing childish word games.
People like Dunkle cannot converse.
So there really is no bother trying.
LikeLike
March 8, 2011 at 11:05 am
Helen, there are more non Christian ProLifers harming the ProLife cause under the Life Dynamic article.
LikeLike
February 8, 2011 at 9:48 am
Pat,
what is hit and run?
What are you talking about?
LikeLike
February 9, 2011 at 9:40 am
Dunkle does not seem to answer any questions really.
let’s see:
Dunkle,
Is it ever OK to do an Abortion?
LikeLike
February 9, 2011 at 10:59 am
no
LikeLike
February 27, 2011 at 12:28 pm
no absolutely not just go on u tube and see the videos and u will see why its not! God did not give us the wonderful gift as women to have children to kill them and cause them pain!I have 2 beautiful little girls and although i had them young and never got to finish hight school and im always broke i have struggled to take care of them and turned my life around i am going back to school and i would not change the fact i had them for anything.I have also had to expierence 2 miscarages and it felt as if my life would end because i had to have a dnc i felt as though it was my fault somehow!But i would never be the sole cause of killing my unborn child that would mean i would burn in hell for sure!These sites will try to full u but it hurts the baby u will never forgett it and its wrong!
LikeLike
February 9, 2011 at 10:06 am
John,
Is it ever OK to do an Abortion?
LikeLike
February 9, 2011 at 11:00 am
no, no
LikeLike
February 9, 2011 at 2:45 pm
You would not allow an abortion for a Partial Molar Pregnancy?
Why not John?
LikeLike
February 9, 2011 at 11:37 pm
I don’t know much about this, but that never stopped me from mouthing off before; so, here goes.
Sounds as if the baby is dying or has already died. Keeping her in the woman’s body, threatens the woman’s life. Therefore, you may remove the baby.
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 10:42 am
If it is alive can one kill the baby?
In this situation the answer is yes, but John avoided answering the question again as he always does.
Grow up John and answer an easy straightforward question.
Only God knows what the future holds.
—–
Do you believe the living baby can be killed in this circumstance?
—–
Removing the living baby is a form of killing.
Removing? Your semantic games are obvious to everyone and only diminish your ability to keep up.
If you pontificate, use the words “kill” & “baby” as you do all the time, why change the words now?
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 11:00 am
Vilma, let me make your question literate, below where I have more room. I’ll also, of course, omit the crap.
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 11:05 am
John is right.
Not knowing anything never stopped him from mouthing off never stopped him before.
When he does not have an answer, he calls people illiterate.
Good response John! Not!
He still has not provided an an answer that is so simple to such a simple question.
He never will.
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 6:48 pm
Dunkle is mouthing off, he doesn’t know much for someone with a big mouth and sign.
LikeLike
February 27, 2011 at 12:31 pm
It is never ok to remove an unborn child with a brain a heart hands feet and no different from u or me!They feel pain and have the potential to become anyone one day!I dont care what may be wrong with that child!
LikeLike
February 28, 2011 at 12:28 pm
they are VERY different, jamie! For one thing, there’s no guarantee that they will grow up to be human, but rather like Ted Bundy. It takes more than a fetal state to make a human being.
LikeLike
February 9, 2011 at 11:11 am
Helen replied in an earlier post.
Do you people actually expect someone to monitor your writings 24/7?
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 11:04 am
Vilma: If in a Partial Molar Pregnancy, the baby is still alive, may one kill her.
John Dunkle (Jacobtoo): No, one may not kill her if she is still alive. One must wait till she dies before removing her from a woman’s body.
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 11:12 am
Before you said the baby could be removed.
That would have killed the baby.
Now you change positions to fit your dissonance.
So you would rather let the mother die, than kill a fetus that will never live outside the womb?
Reconcile your inability to answer a question and give one final answer. One that does not flip flop all over the place please.
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 11:24 am
Boy this Dunkle guy is illiterate!
Why can’t he answer even the simple questions.
He doesn’t know very much about abortion.
I challenge him to answer a question without all his nonsense.
As everyone says, and witnesses, he is incapable.
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 11:27 am
How did you all know he would not answer the question and play games and respond with criticism rather than just a simple accurate answer?
I see John not answering questions in almost every comment he makes.
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 12:25 pm
In his allegorical struggle against his own death, he has to conserve his psychological energy. He has to use so much to repress what’s really bothering him that he doesn’t have enough to engage in discursive give-and-take about abortion.
So, he is constrained to making his presence known, getting his opponents to reveal an ugly side, and doing whatever else requires minimum expenditure of energy to show himself that he’s on the side of Right.
It’s a self-help program that calls itself “pro-life” as part of the therapy.
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 11:33 am
This is a great blog by the way, we are getting feeds like crazy here.
This Dunkle guy clearly has not been reading much on Abortion and could not have spent much time on the topic.
Why do people like Dunkle proffer their opinions on topics they know nothing about? At the same time they expose their uneducated Dogma of being Correct, when it is obvious they are wrong.
He writes like a smart ass teenager in his basement watching evangelical TV with a blank stare and a drool.
Dunkle, age past being a teenager, do some reading, and you will be able to have a written blog comment that is relevant.
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 12:18 pm
Hillary, research “aborticentrism” and you will become much more tolerant of his defects and much less tolerant of the whole movement. And be sure to check out the page about the Patron Saint of aborticentrics. Hatred of abortion was more important to her than her children were….
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 11:37 am
Abortion for Partial Molar pregnancy is a woman’s legal choice.
It is supported by most the country,
The vast majority of ethicists and leaders in studies on morality.
Even the Catholic Priest Anti Abortion websites say Abortion is OK for a Molar Pregnancy.
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 11:41 am
Thank you for your correspondence.
The mainstream Abortion is against all Catholic teachings.
It is correct, that the Cannon allows for the medical procedure on Molar Pregnancy.
It is morally acceptable to perform, and
Morally irresponsible not to, as one creates unneeded suffering for the mother.
LikeLike
February 27, 2011 at 12:36 pm
Well one should not be responsible for putting his hands in a woman to make sure the baby is dead so he can pull her out dead!
LikeLike
February 10, 2011 at 1:21 pm
Helen, Kerri, Leah, Vilma, Abortion is Legal, Kal, Nebraska, Hillary from NYU, ADWA, and Gary from MA (i.e., if you are all not Kate Ranieri), I do not agree with everything Liggins says here, but this is what one of your own people thinks of you:
A. Liggins Says: December 6, 2010 at 11:07 am — I have to wonder why it is that so many people are responding to Mr. Dunkle’s posts. Whomever John Dunkle is, he or she obviously is enjoying the attention everyone is heaping upon his rhetoric. He needles people into becoming his pawns in a game of words that ends with you all you looking like mad, angry idiots.
Ignore the man. He’ll go away eventually. Let him have the last word, if it means so much to him. It is clear he is very much enjoying these interactions he precipitates by making rude comments on this site. And you all fall right into the trap, and let him needle you into his game. It’s silly, manipulative, and childish.
Ignore him. He’ll go away eventually.
“Mad, angry idiots” is harsh; however, Liggins is not the only killers’ helper who finds you an embarrassment. Do you want me to post the others?
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 2:41 pm
Helen answered all your questions, what are you talking about?
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 2:45 pm
That Post on Justifiable homicide shows what a bunch of losers they are!
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 4:52 pm
Dunkle was not ever able to answer the questions about Partial Molar Pregnancy, or Salpingectomy. Why?
LikeLike
February 18, 2011 at 9:13 am
I couldn’t have answered a question on salpingectomy either since I have no idea what the hell it is
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 1:44 pm
If one is going to discuss abortion and salpingectomy they need to be educated on the topic.
Otherwise how can they discuss it?
LikeLike
April 24, 2011 at 5:49 pm
“If one is going to discuss abortion and salpingectomy they need to be educated on the topic.”
If one is going to discuss anything in print, he needs to be educated enough to realize that it is wrong to change the singular pronoun in the subordinate clause to a plural pronoun in the main clause, and he must realize that a comma is required after an introductory subordinate clause.
LikeLike