January 13, 2012
Abortion.com – Find a Provider for Abortion Care
Posted by Elena Carvin under Abortion, Abortion Blog, Abortion Discussion, Abortion Medical, Abortion Pill, Methotrexate | Tags: Abortion, Abortion Pill, Late Abortion, Medical Abortion |[2,050] Comments
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information 
April 23, 2011 at 10:24 am
Why am I not answering the question? Because I don’t know the question.
LikeLike
May 4, 2011 at 5:27 pm
Let’s fool around here. Chuckle charges me with seven crimes. I respond:
*Denial — explain
*Feigned ignorance — explain
*Narrow-mindedness — innocent
*Intellectual laziness — guilty
*Scholarly dishonesty — explain
*Lying — only when I have to
*Egocentrism — guilty
And about being the best all-around representative of the movement — I think most pro-lifers would agree more with you killers’ helpers than with me.
LikeLike
May 14, 2011 at 7:24 pm
Pat, what the heck is happening to this blog? I blame myself for being so tough on the AI’s (but all I did was quote what you, Liggets, and Chuckles said about them). But look, Adolescent Illiterates, I don’t care how stupid are the things you say. From now on I promise to keep my mouth shut. So get back on here and say something stu…, oops, I mean intelligent.
LikeLike
May 15, 2011 at 7:38 am
John, I’ve been sick for the last two days, couldn’t even look at my computer. What exactly are your referring to? Thanks
LikeLike
May 15, 2011 at 8:34 am
Pat, in ten days nobody responded to his post #32, and he missed the sensation of being the center of attention, so he’s trying another angle to get people to focus on him. He’s simply trying to meet one of his needs.
LikeLike
May 15, 2011 at 10:13 am
Well, not exactly, but close.
LikeLike
May 16, 2011 at 8:02 am
Care to elaborate, John? How is CG “close”? Talk to us, Johnny boy!
LikeLike
May 16, 2011 at 10:50 am
Well I don’t think I’m as bad as Chuckles paints me, but they say others know you better than you know yourself.
LikeLike
May 24, 2011 at 5:10 am
Over a week’s gone by! Chuck, Rog, AIs, say something.
LikeLike
May 24, 2011 at 7:13 am
Yeah, what’s going on? Dont worry, John, I will be posting another award winning, thought provoking blog today or tomorrow!! Or maybe its just the heat…
LikeLike
May 24, 2011 at 12:38 pm
Yeah!
LikeLike
June 1, 2011 at 7:28 am
Pat, Pat, what happened to “My Friends, The November Gang”? It was your best yet! And then it disappears?
LikeLike
June 1, 2011 at 8:02 am
John: I am a technological moron. I was playing with some new buttons this morning and accidentally trashed the whole thing!!! Oy vey…. It was a good thread we had going there. I plan to write another one today or worse case tomorrow morning…..ugh…..
LikeLike
June 1, 2011 at 8:39 am
oy vey
LikeLike
June 28, 2011 at 12:59 pm
I wish the stupid Anti Abortionists would keep their attempts at legislation of my body.
I read that in Kansas the politicians are trying to break federal law and keeping the right for a woman to choose abortion away from her.
LikeLike
June 28, 2011 at 2:25 pm
e had wait a month for this response. Wasn’t worth it.
LikeLike
June 28, 2011 at 2:26 pm
We had wait a month for this response. Wasn’t worth it.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 11:41 am
This guy John gets the illiterate comment creator of the year award.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 11:55 am
I agree. He does not even seem like a real person. Is he a made up pro life character? Just to try and mimic the idiotic views of ProLifers?
LikeLike
June 28, 2011 at 6:39 pm
Annie in #36, the two main reasons they are doing that in Kansas:
1. Many of the politicians are playing to the angry and disaffected by appealing to their weakness for hate and fear. If they can keep them hating and fearful about abortion, they can distract them from their very real economic misery. Read Kansas native Thomas Frank’s book, “What’s the matter with Kansas?” to get an understanding of how cleverly the electorate has been schnookered.
2. Being anti-abortion has NO COSTS apparent to the taxpayer! If you want your children to have good schools and affordable college; if you want good roads and street lights and an honest and capable police department; if you want fire protection and good water and sewerage, why those things cost MONEY! But if you say, “I hate abortion,” it doesn’t cost your constituents a cent– in the short run. (in the long run, it’s VERY expensive.) So you can be a hero on the cheap when you run for office.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 4:01 am
Neither was this.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 9:56 am
The reason why they are imposing more regulations on the clinics is because they can, plain and simple. That’s how they closed a few clinics years ago in South Carolina. It’s actually a very smart strategy if the regulations are upheld. And, of course, they have nothing to do with enhancing women’s health. It’s just a way to close abortion clinics but it wont stop the abortions.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 11:39 am
More poor women will die obtaining illegal abortions (they can buy the medicines themselves on the Black Market).
Rich women will fly to France.
And the ProLife morons will have only achieved more killing in the wars they create, and murdering innocent doctors and office staff.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 11:44 am
AI
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 12:03 pm
I attend a prestigious State University in the Midwest with over 20,000 undergraduates.
95% of the 90% of respondents (statistically sig. P <.01) support reproductive rights.
This study has been done at other large universities with similar results.
Pro Life is a cause lost on the old and decrepit. The new more intelligent generation, already coming of age to run for legislature will replace the dying ProLifers. There may be one more round of voting, and the Christian idiots and their false gods will start withering away as all the other mythic characters have over the millennia.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 2:57 pm
“I attend a prestigious State University. . .” and this is how you write: “95% of the 90% of respondents (statistically sig. P <.01) support reproductive rights." That prestige can't come from educating.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 1:27 pm
I take great offense to the remarks that priests have been pedophiles.
There is no evidence of this.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 1:29 pm
DeAnna, John, other ProLifers care to make a comment?
or will you just ignore this comment by this member of the Catholic Cult?
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 2:59 pm
Here’s all I know: we Catholics accepted masturbation, solo and mutual, in the ’50s and ’60s. Then all hell broke loose. That’s all I know.
LikeLike
June 29, 2011 at 7:52 pm
Dwanna,
no reply to Father McHon?
LikeLike
June 30, 2011 at 3:59 am
“Bet McHon is one of you AIs, or Kate Ranieri.
LikeLike
June 30, 2011 at 6:03 am
Yo! Fr. McHon~~
Don’t read periodicals much, do you?
LikeLike
June 30, 2011 at 10:45 am
NOt sure what is going on. Everytime I try to reply to someone’s reply, the box comes up, i can type my witty reply but there is no “enter” or “post comment” to enter it?
But if I go to the bottom of all the comments, I can comment so….
If that Father is a real priest, then I”m Mother Theresa…
LikeLike
June 30, 2011 at 12:11 pm
You’re experiencing the same problem I mentioned somewhere else in this blog, Pat. Off to Arlington for the weekend to spit on the former headquarters of Students for Life from my relatives’ penthouse condo.
LikeLike
July 3, 2011 at 3:20 pm
Why do Anti Abortion people write their opinions in such an immature, illiterate and position of no knowledge fashion?
LikeLike
July 3, 2011 at 4:33 pm
“. . .and position of no knowledge fashion” — hey I like that! You AI’s might have trouble with reading and writing but you do come up with some original stuff. I’ll say that for you.
LikeLike
July 4, 2011 at 8:22 am
Touche, John…
LikeLike
July 12, 2011 at 6:32 pm
You Pro Lifers are such retards.
It is unbelievable what I have read here.
LikeLike
July 15, 2011 at 5:32 pm
Boy, Dave, you are one tough guy to argue with. You get right to the point.
LikeLike
July 16, 2011 at 8:22 am
His argument is impeccable, isn’t it John? I mean, how can you rebut such a simple statement? 🙂
LikeLike
July 16, 2011 at 9:31 am
Dave in #46: Consider this: they claim to be very, very passionately concerned about fetal life. They describe it in glowing terms and attempt to make it as fully human as you are. They scold bitterly against people who who choose to have an abortion or see no wrong in others having abortion, and they attempt to prevent women from having abortions.
At the same time, they know almost nothing about human development: what it means, how it happens, what promotes it, what hinders it, and why it’s necessary. For them, their concern “human life” stops at the door of the delivery room.
They’re like firefighters who focus on the hose, cops who focus on littering ordinances, doctors who can’t see beyond band-aids– totally useless to real children.
They won’t take on the child they don’t want to have, yet they won’t grant that same choice to pregnant women. They say they advocate for adoption, but their actions (as in the adopt-an-embryo program) show that their advocacy only goes as far as other people’s money and time. They are the opposite of the Catcher in the Rye– instead of saving children from harm, they let them toddle right past, oblivious to the chasm ahead. They don’t care if children go to Hell, and they don’t want to grant that the souls of aborted fetuses go to Heaven (they will even supply you with dummy Internet references in an attempt to snow you with that argument).
Many of them are brutal, some homicidal. They willingly and knowingly lie in behalf of their cause, and they are so focused on death that if you point out Ted Bundy didn’t have to grow up to be a serial killer, they will AUTOMATICALLY respond, “So you think he should have been ABORTED?” They cannot turn themselves toward the responsibility implied in caring for life beyond the fetal stage.
And the question is, what motivates them to be so bizarre? Why this weird focus, focus, focus on abortion to the detriment of human life?
Answer: it is their way of acquiring potency in their lives. When they score a point in their constructed argument, they get the satisfaction they seek, a tiny triumph in their search for confirmation of their importance.
And that is not being “retarded.” So watch your language.
LikeLike
July 16, 2011 at 7:20 pm
Very well said, CG…. and, by the way, feel free to advertise for your website. You are a free man!!!!
LikeLike
July 17, 2011 at 3:44 am
Oh Pat, I’m so disappointed, you fell for this charlatan! This is his “I can help kill as many people as I want because those who try to stop me are sickoes” argument! And now you’re buying it? And encouraging him?
LikeLike
July 17, 2011 at 1:08 pm
As one who didn’t understand the dangers implicit in abandoning a dog in a parking lot, your position as a “rescuer” of “human life” is vainglorious, to say the least.
LikeLike
July 17, 2011 at 1:28 pm
Any comment I make on the above gem will tarnish it.
LikeLike
July 17, 2011 at 1:38 pm
I gather you’re feeling flooded by Deanna’s output and are looking for a counter with my “book” on the origins of the “pro-life” mentality. I’m impressed by her level of energy. It would be interesting to know where that comes from.
A couple of years ago, I read Jeannette Wall’s “The Glass Palace,” her memoir of growing up. It started with her, a Manhattan gossip columnist, taking a taxi to a party and en route seeing her mother dumpster diving.
Walls had grown up with a mother who fancied herself very artsy. “In fifteen minutes I can cook a meal or I can paint a masterpiece that will endure for generations,” she often said. The kids were left to shift for themselves a lot. I wondered where her poverty-mentality mom had come from with not only that attitude, but a lifelong attachment to a man with the sense of a jackrabbit when it came to providing for his family.
Last year, Walls wrote the prequel, “Half-Broke Horses,” about her mother’s mother, raised by a brain-damaged horse breeder and settler woman in a dugout in Arizona, expelled from the only way upward for girls at the time– the girls’ academy, but with the ingenuity and perspicacity to become a schoolmarm, a horse trainer, a racehorse jockey, a ranch wife, with a little pilot time thrown in. She didn’t put a premium on either cooking or washing, limiting herself to beans and meat and feeling disgusted the one time her investment of hours in a culinary masterpiece disappeared in ten minutes. From the start, she raised her daughter to be above the ranch life– called her an artist, encouraged her to develop what talent she had, and gave her no responsibilities beyond what the girl chose for herself. It looked very much like Mom, driven by necessity to keep the ranch going, compensated for the ceaseless drugery of her life by letting her daughter be what she herself couldn’t.
So, given Deanna’s energy and commitment to being what she considers to be “pro-life,” I wonder where it comes from. Experience tells me it’s likely there’s a rigid father figure and that Deanna is not the eldest daughter, but more likely a second or fourth. Definitely not mainstream Protestantism, although what passes for Southern mainstream is a far cry from Northern Epsicopalianism or Congregationalism. ACAP or ACPAP family is probably a bit of a stretch, but her mother probably doesn’t have a reputation as a saint, so I’d discount either of those. Her take on the present administration indicates little or no education beyond high school and one of the “Christian” colleges (Regent, Patrick Henry, definitely not Pepperdine). In short, the sort of Middle American that Hammurabi would have loved to have as a citizen– willing to die for authority, be it king, Pope or clan leader. And doing her damnedest to make a mark in life! Too bad she’s stuck at Level Four.
LikeLike
July 17, 2011 at 7:43 pm
I am slowly changing my mind about this guy. I am beginning to think he doesn’t give a hoot about baby killing. What he does care about are people like the father and family who’ve upset him terribly. Because they were prolife, he attacks us prolifers to get back at them. Must be so frustrating to realize they have no idea what he’s saying or where he’s saying it. Right Chuck?, And talk about projection: “Experience tells me it’s likely there’s a rigid father figure . . .”
LikeLike
July 18, 2011 at 8:41 pm
………………..and you would be WRONG about most of that analysis. I do admit to not being the firstborn though. That one was easy to find out seeing a show my parents tried to abort me because they had a 13 month old daughter already. That little tid bit is on my blog.
The whole “die for authority” thing is laughable. Actually I did laugh! Not surprisingly I expect authority figures in my life to have character. That doesn’t go over well sometimes.
LikeLike
July 18, 2011 at 9:10 am
Yikes, that is quite the analysis, Chuck! Okay, now I’m curious: analyze me!!!
LikeLike
July 18, 2011 at 11:47 am
Sorry, but you don’t display enough discrepancies among thought/argument/behavior for me to even make a wild stab. I used to have a job where it was necessary to spot familial dysfunction in order to make a successful pitch for my business. If I could identify the motive, I could work around it. The person most would dismiss as an a*****e I find fascinating. I find so-called “pro-lifers” very fascinating. I find the true “pro-lifer” admirable. Of course, I only have met one….
LikeLike
July 18, 2011 at 1:57 pm
Chuck, I don’t call talking in the internet “meeting.”
LikeLike