January 13, 2012
Abortion.com – Find a Provider for Abortion Care
Posted by Elena Carvin under Abortion, Abortion Blog, Abortion Discussion, Abortion Medical, Abortion Pill, Methotrexate | Tags: Abortion, Abortion Pill, Late Abortion, Medical Abortion |[2,050] Comments
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information 
October 6, 2011 at 7:35 am
I just love watching you two beat up each other.
LikeLike
October 6, 2011 at 9:16 am
Elena, it makes him feel important. It also helps him deal with his fear of death (he has already stated here that he’s not going to die). His opposition to abortion is an allegory of his own battle against death. He has the fetus play himself and he plays the role of God. Every time he succeeds in forcing a woman to forego an abortion, he proves to himself that God will have him live on in the memory of mankind. That’s what intentional heroism (unlike real heroism) is all about. It’s on the website.
LikeLike
October 6, 2011 at 9:39 am
Now he’s back trying to remember what he thought he’d learned. Boring.
LikeLike
October 6, 2011 at 12:14 pm
If you’re a decent man underneath, you’ll lose sleep over it tonight.
LikeLike
October 6, 2011 at 1:46 pm
No fear of that, I’ll sleep good.
LikeLike
October 6, 2011 at 1:58 pm
There was a recent set of blogs here about CPCs. Check this out
OPINION | October 06, 2011
Op-Ed Contributor: When I Needed Help, I Got Propaganda
By KATIE STACK
Just copy all three lines, past into Google and read the article.
LikeLike
October 6, 2011 at 4:39 pm
voice claims a self-proclaimed “pro-lifer” has saved HUNDREDS of lives though the generations by saving one life, and totally ignores whether the child who was born ever had a chance to live a good life. Apparently to the true believer, it’s quantity, not quality that counts.
Which of course makes her “pro-life” role a lot easier. She prefers to be the chicken processor rather than the USDA inspector, and if a little salmonella gets by her station, what’s the dif?
voice, if you were hired to spend your working year interviewing one family per hour, and if you got two weeks paid vacation every year, and if you never saw the same family twice, it would take you over two and a half years to match the number of families whose needs I dealt with in my professional life. What I did in my personal life with kids whose parents wouldn’t or couldn’t care for them took another 600 hours and 8% of my gross annual income for over two decades. I’m just an average schlub, too. So if I can do it, you could too.
Only there’s no evidence that you can. Aborticentrism has a lot to do with that: your focus on propagating children no matter what they might face says you’re pretty heavily gripped by it.
LikeLike
October 6, 2011 at 5:05 pm
“What I did in my personal life with kids whose parents wouldn’t or couldn’t care for them took another 600 hours and 8% of my gross annual income for over two decades. I’m just an average schlub, too.”
What am I gonna do with this boy. You try your best to protect him from himself, but he dives head first into the shallow swamp of egotism anyway. I give up.
LikeLike
November 15, 2011 at 2:27 pm
Abortion is simply wrong.
Can any Pro Choice person tell me they would Not place ANY restrictions at all on Abortion as mandated by legislation?
LikeLike
October 7, 2011 at 1:08 pm
Once again Chuckie. You make a lot of assumptions about things you know nothing about.
LikeLike
November 15, 2011 at 2:29 pm
Voice,
Can any Pro Choice person tell me they would Not place ANY restrictions at all on Abortion as mandated by legislation?
I have not seen them answer that question yet.
LikeLike
November 15, 2011 at 6:01 pm
Andrea, I’m not exactly sure what you’re asking here but if you are asking if any pro-choicer would support restrictions on abortion, I’ve already written that I do. I agree/think that there should be restrictions on abortions in the third trimester.
LikeLike
October 7, 2011 at 9:35 am
Somewhere up above, John indicated that he may have “saved” one baby over the years. I just wonder, John, you seem to have a lot of energy, wouldn’t you rather spend that time being just a little more productive and helpful to your fellow human beings? I mean, you could be helping so many people right now who have so many needs!
LikeLike
October 7, 2011 at 10:06 am
Pat, Chuck, everybody, nobody, nobody, nobody does more than I to help his fellow man. Nobody!. I am far and away the greatest benefactor to humanity who’s ever lived. Now leeme lone
LikeLike
October 7, 2011 at 10:23 am
Leave him alone, Pat. He’s a hero according to his own declaration.
LikeLike
October 9, 2011 at 7:37 am
Yikes, sounds like he is in a bad mood, huh Charles?
LikeLike
October 9, 2011 at 1:45 pm
He knows his position is indefensible. The major work in his life is to convince the general public that abortion is torture, and the chief weapon in his armamentarium is the ripping off of arms and legs, the sort of thing he used to do to flies and beetles as a kid. ‘As flies to wanton boys are we to the gods/ They kill us for their sport.’ We live in fear of death, and we do what we can to deal with it. His way is just the least caring.
LikeLike
October 7, 2011 at 3:56 pm
voice, the only assumptions I make about self-proclaimed “pro-lifers” is based on what I see: they are passionate about fetal life, and they’re no better than run-of-the-mill people in choosing to care beyond the ordinary for children.
This is not an assumption; it is indisputable that this is strange behavior, totally unlike that of most people who understand that if a pregnancy is going to produce a child, the child will require almost two decades of attention.
To call it an assumption is either a deliberate lie or an attempt to divert attention from the core issue– that so-called “pro-lifers” don’t care for children as passionately as they care about the fetus.
They thereby open themselves to legitimate speculative inquiry as to the basis of their odd behavior, and that’s where assumptions are justifiable. In science, they’re called “hypotheses,” and need only be disproven to be dismissed.
LikeLike
October 7, 2011 at 5:00 pm
“and they’re no better than run-of-the-mill people in choosing to care beyond the ordinary for children.”
How would you know what I do?
Your conclusions are based on assumption. Better be careful what goes around comes around. Someone might assume something about you.
LikeLike
October 9, 2011 at 1:36 pm
“You can’t prove a thing! Her mother told me she was eighteen, and besides, I left the five quid on the dresser!”
Major Dennis Bloodknock,
The Goon Show, 1956
LikeLike
October 16, 2011 at 8:32 am
I just noticed on the home page that we are close to hitting 200,000 “visitors.” Not sure exactly how that number is computed but it sounds pretty cool. Thanks to everyone who not just reads my stuff but also comments on it.
LikeLike
October 20, 2011 at 6:46 am
Dear Pro-Life Folks: I need to start thinking of my next blog. Do you have a simple question for me that you would like me to answer in the form of a blog? Or, for that matter, do the pro-choicers want me to discuss something in particular?
LikeLike
October 20, 2011 at 8:07 am
Do pro-lifers have the right to break the laws that protect the killers and their helpers?
LikeLike
October 20, 2011 at 12:12 pm
Very interesting, John. I just might take a crack at it!!!
LikeLike
October 25, 2011 at 8:47 am
And, so, I did take a crack at it!
If any other pro-lifers have some issues they’d like me to address, swing away!
LikeLike
October 25, 2011 at 12:39 pm
I think you have a lot of great points if people do things that they know it is wrong they will never stop doing it, people will always break the laws no matter what we live in an inperfect world. As much as people disagree of abortions and are against then it wont stop women from getting them.
LikeLike
October 25, 2011 at 3:52 pm
Lysette, you focus on people breaking the law and getting away with it. What about women needing to be able to provide for the children they already have?
LikeLike
October 26, 2011 at 8:51 am
Good point, Lysette. As history has shown, you can make abortion illegal but it won’t stop women from having them. That’s the one thing I dont get about pro-lifers – it’s like they are totally ignoring history…
LikeLike
October 26, 2011 at 2:04 pm
You’re way off here, Pat. Making child killing illegal will reduce by the hundreds of thousands annually the number of the them tortured to death.
LikeLike
October 27, 2011 at 2:51 pm
But, John, dont you care one iota about the women who will be harmed or die???
LikeLike
October 27, 2011 at 4:04 pm
No! Women will be better off too. (Now that’s bathos.)
LikeLike
October 27, 2011 at 6:44 pm
How can one human being not care about some women who may die? Wow, John, are you that mean???
LikeLike
October 28, 2011 at 4:25 am
Thousands more women die now from child killing than when it was illegal, and, if you take into account the young ones, millions more.
LikeLike
October 27, 2011 at 2:52 pm
Hey, folks. I normally post once a week on Monday mornings but I’m going up to the Big Apple tomorrow for four days so I’ve just posted my next award winning, soon to be a movie, blog!!!
LikeLike
October 27, 2011 at 4:05 pm
You’re not going to do anything funny up there, are you Pat?
LikeLike
October 27, 2011 at 6:42 pm
Nope, John. I was hoping to see the Yanks in the World Series but…. just hanging in the east village, eating, art gallering, eating, etc….Oh, maybe I’ll open up an abortion clinic while I’m up there!
LikeLike
October 28, 2011 at 7:32 am
Get the wording right — child killing mill.
LikeLike
November 1, 2011 at 8:30 am
well, I’m back! And, John, you’ll be happy to know that I had no time to set up a clinic!
LikeLike
November 1, 2011 at 8:41 am
im pa seeb
LikeLike
November 15, 2011 at 2:36 pm
Mr. Dunkle,
I am a strict Catholic, and I believe it is very simple to come to the conclusion that Abortion is unethical.
I still don’t believe we need to use the word Mills though.
I think we are better served by calling things by there definitions and not using hyperbole.
I am not critiquing you.
Do you agree?
Don’t we apple ar more genuine when we do not resort to these types of discussion? The other side just turns away and does not listen. When we make good, and solid points about the immoral nature of Abortion in a diplomatic way I believe we can accomplish our task of ridding this great nation of Abortion.
I am curious what you think. You seem to be OmniPresent here. I just found this incredible Blog on FaceBook. I see it as an opportunity to save some babies and souls.
LikeLike
November 15, 2011 at 6:03 pm
Andrea, you seem very reasonable in that you are willing to use our terms. That’s why I try my darndest to keep calling you folks pro-life, even thought I consider myself “pro-life” as well. And, by the way, Dunkle quit…
LikeLike
November 4, 2011 at 9:48 am
Well, folks, I’ve been doing a lot of research and am compelled to write my next piece on this ballot question down there in Mississippi. Holy crapola! Are those folks down there serious? Will be getting back to my regular schedule and posting first thing Monday morning…..
LikeLike
November 6, 2011 at 5:12 pm
I would like to take a moment to think about Judy Widdicombe, a long time abortion rights activist, who recently died. She was an amazing force within our movement, very outspoken. I will miss her…
LikeLike
November 15, 2011 at 2:37 pm
I am sorry for your loss Pat.
I will pray that her eternal soul goes to heaven, and she may be at peace for eternity, no matter what she did.
LikeLike
November 15, 2011 at 6:06 pm
Thank you, Andrea. And I was going to be really impressed with your compassion until you had to throw in that “no matter what she did” tag. If you were trying to be nice and Christian like, it didn’t work…..
LikeLike
December 4, 2011 at 11:44 am
Well, Mr Cain, who flip flopped all over the place on the abortion issue, is out at last. If he couldn’t articulate clearly how he felt about abortion, there was no way he was going to last – even without the allegations of sexual misconduct.
LikeLike
December 5, 2011 at 6:08 am
Pat, the only viable candidates against Obama at this point are Gingrich and Romney. If the press weren’t owned by interests heavily biased to the right, both of these would be dead meat already. Whichever one gets anointed will assume the position the party’s base requires.
LikeLike
December 5, 2011 at 6:26 am
Are you saying, Charles, that the media favors the right wing? And I agree that it’s down to Newt and Mitt and I believe Newt will get it. I also believe Newt can win against Obama if the economy continues to tank…
LikeLike
December 8, 2011 at 2:10 pm
Did you know that almost half of the pregnancies among American women are unintended and about four in 10 of these are terminated by abortion? Meanwhile, twenty-two percent of ALL pregnancies (not counting miscarriages) end in abortion.
LikeLike
December 9, 2011 at 11:57 am
Did you know that at least half of American women will experience an unintended pregnancy by age 45 and one in 10 women will have an abortion by age 20, one in four by age 30 Did and three in 10 by age 45?
LikeLike
December 11, 2011 at 10:43 am
Did you know that in the vast majority of abortion clinics, the patient is counseled on the use of birth control? It is standard to give the patient free samples of birth control. The hope, of course, is that the woman does not have another unintended pregnancy.
LikeLike
December 13, 2011 at 11:47 am
Did you know that the House of Representatives could bring up a “personhood” amendment at any time if they so desired? They’re not doing it because they know it would go down by a significant margin and it would be a political nightmare for them
LikeLike
December 14, 2011 at 11:28 am
Interesting, the pro-lifers love to complain about “bad” abortion clinics but, according to a recent lawsuit, two medical clinics run by Catholic Charities provided substandard care to poor immigrants in Maryland. Any comments, pro-lifers?
LikeLike
December 19, 2011 at 6:10 pm
The conservatives want less regulation because they think it hampers “job creation.” But they want more regulations for abortion clinics. Also, they want to make abortions illegal, but they also want to make them “safer” for women under the guise of more regulations. My head is spinning…
LikeLike
December 28, 2011 at 9:50 am
Seriously, now….do pro-lifers oppose the morning after pill because they really believe that a day after unprotected sex that there is a baby floating around in there???? Gimme a break…
LikeLike