January 13, 2012
Abortion.com – Find a Provider for Abortion Care
Posted by Elena Carvin under Abortion, Abortion Blog, Abortion Discussion, Abortion Medical, Abortion Pill, Methotrexate | Tags: Abortion, Abortion Pill, Late Abortion, Medical Abortion |[2,050] Comments
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information 
June 5, 2012 at 12:32 pm
John, read my words very carefully please. It’s the first step towards constructive communication. I did not say that “this never happens.” In second trimester abortions, yes, the doctors perform a D&E, where they use forceps to take out the fetal parts. YES, that happens. What I am saying that that DOESN’T happen in the vast vast majority of cases because the fetus is not that developed and they use a vaccuum instead. And of course, you will focus on the later cases even though the majority of those women walking past you will not have the “legs and arms ripped off.” But what do we care about being accurate, huh? The hyperbole is all for the cause and, yes, both sides are guilty of it.
LikeLike
June 5, 2012 at 4:03 pm
Goldangit, Pat. You would make me go there and get sick.
Anyway, here’s what I found:
“Suction aspiration, or “vacuum curettage,” is the abortion technique used in most first trimester abortions. A powerful suction tube with a sharp cutting edge is inserted into the womb through the dilated cervix. The suction dismembers the body of the developing baby and tears the placenta from the wall of the uterus, sucking blood, amniotic fluid, placental tissue, and fetal parts into a collection bottle.”
Oooch, “fetal parts” have to include arms and legs, right?
Aside from that, embryocide is a hundred times more common than feticide, and morally, even worse. But know how effective it would be to display a murdered embryo?
Of course we pick and choose what we show — murdered fetuses that resemble infants. And of course we exaggerate — our picture of the victim is a hundred times larger than she is. But just as you have to shout to the deaf, you have to draw large for the blind. That’s just the way wars have to be fought.
LikeLike
June 5, 2012 at 4:58 pm
Okay, John. A test. Where did you get that quote that describes the process? Be honest.
LikeLike
June 6, 2012 at 3:49 am
I googled abortion and chose a few to read from several hundred. I started retching. I’m sure the above quote was from a prolife source — “sharp cutting edge,” “developing baby,” but find me a neutral source!.
LikeLike
June 6, 2012 at 9:02 am
Of course, that was a pro-life source, John. The vaccuum does not have a “sharp cutting edge.” They make it sound like in the early abortions where they use them, women are being scratched to death or something. I know this will have nothing to do with your ultimate position, but it frys my butt when folks on BOTH sides just take everything their national groups put out for granted. If you are a pro-choice, you think every protester is a terrorist, capable of murder. If you are a pro-life, you think women are being killed every day in the clinics. That’s the problem in general with this country. We dont think for ourselves, we are lambs that just look at the one minute commercial and decide who to support for President. It’s sad, very sad….
LikeLike
June 6, 2012 at 11:27 am
Of course I think prolife arguments are “neutral,” or truthful. You’re the closest I’ve come to finding someone “neutral” on the prodeath side. But look at the world of difference between us. You think we should continue killing young people legally, and I don’t.
LikeLike
January 15, 2013 at 6:08 am
You had a very interesting shift, Barbara. Thank you for srihang this. As you document so well, educating people who pass by is part of our pro life work. When we are not on the sidewalk, education grinds to a halt. Sally Brunn
LikeLike
July 1, 2012 at 2:54 pm
What is all the fuss about? Abortion is Safe, and Legal.
Now for decades.
It will stay that way no matter what the lunatic fringes of society think.
People like this Dunkle are far out there they should just be ignored. They are just old egotistical mongrels trying to control women through their fetishes and lack of anything else in their lives to give them any sense of self importance.
It really is sad.
LikeLike
July 2, 2012 at 2:27 pm
You don’t sound sad. You sound angry.
LikeLike
July 2, 2012 at 3:42 pm
For a friend:
“You cannot compromise with evil because evil will not compromise with you, no matter what it promises.
“Hell is out to take it all, not to compromise.”
– Kevin B. Shearer
LikeLike
September 20, 2012 at 6:17 pm
This is the best blog on Abortion issues, TX!!!!!!!!!!
LikeLike
July 2, 2012 at 7:32 pm
Jenny, Mr. Dunkle needs a glorious cause to fight for. That is why he wants to consider abortion an evil. In order to do that, however, he has to make the fetus into a little innocent girl (never a boy for him!). Then he can more easily sell the gullible on the idea that he is a rescuer. He point-blank refuses to consider what real children need, because to do so would force him to make a connection between the continued existence of a fetus and the real needs of a child.
LikeLike
July 3, 2012 at 4:25 am
There you have it, J. You can accept the crap Chuckles slings here, or you can say, “It’s wrong to tear people apart.”
LikeLike
July 3, 2012 at 12:23 pm
Is it true, John, that it’s always a girl?
LikeLike
July 3, 2012 at 2:23 pm
most of the time, I’m told
LikeLike
July 3, 2012 at 9:24 pm
Having lived through the reality of fathering five boys, Mr. Dunkle knows what it would mean to “rescue” an “unborn boy.” This is why he has consistently fantasized that it’s a girl he’s rescuing, because he doesn’t have to face the reality that he knows follows the birth of a boy.
Like all so-called “pro-lifers,” he defines his area of struggle for his convenience rather than the welfare of a real child.
And the aborticentrism site is now dead. God has a sense of humor.
LikeLike
July 4, 2012 at 3:38 am
Chuck misses the mark here with me, but he does add to his already extensive self-revelation. Let ’em talk, I say.
LikeLike
July 11, 2012 at 5:06 am
I missed this — the aborticentrism site is dead. Devastating! What will I read now after my third martini! Find me something else that reads then same as it does cold sober.
LikeLike
July 11, 2012 at 10:11 am
Wow, that is interesting. Why would he take it down? Chuck, if you are reading this, what is going on? As for you, John, Three martinis? How the heck can you function after three? My father once had two and got so drunk that he drove our car into a lake.
LikeLike
July 11, 2012 at 4:04 pm
He probably hadn’t had enough practice — drinking martinis.
LikeLike
August 11, 2012 at 5:59 am
The aborticentrism site host discontinued its arrangement with the party to which my computer was connected. I am waiting for someone to tell me how to do another one for free.
LikeLike
August 11, 2012 at 5:06 am
So, Chuck, is aborticentrism still dead? I tried to read it only once but I enjoyed trying to spell it.
LikeLike
August 15, 2012 at 5:13 am
Remember my telling you folks that Kate and those like her would soon be calling us prolifers “Numbnuts for Neonates”? Read today’s (8/15) New York Times (where all horrors begin) article, “In Preemies, Better Care Also Means Hard Choice.”
The writer doesn’t advocate overtly the legal killing of neonates, but he sets the stage. The advocate will arise in about two years. Nothing ever stands still. Horror, or its opposite, grows.
All like me who do not do enough to oppose this particular horror (legally killing young people) will suffer. That’s what the Church teaches – “in what I have done and what I have failed to do.”
One tiny bright spot: infanticide will occur in seconds, not minutes, as in feticide.
LikeLike
August 16, 2012 at 6:03 am
Look at this:
Shock: Writer Wishes Her Mother Had Had an Abortion
English writer Lynn Beisner is drawing gasps from readers across the world today over a column she wrote in the London Guardian saying she wishes her mother had had an abortion, because it would have supposedly made her mothers life better.
Titled, I wish my mother had aborted me, Beisner writes: This is no I wish Id never been born howl of angst. I love my mother, and having an abortion would have given her a better life. There is no way my love-starved, trauma-addled mother was in a position to raise a child.
And I thought Chuckles was alone:
LikeLike
August 18, 2012 at 12:15 pm
Well, Lynne Beisner expresses far better than I am able to just how desperate people can get. There are a large number of people who wish they’d never been born, and quite a few of them are more than happy to make others feel the same way– the school bully, the tyrannical teacher, the spiteful parent. It’s already too late for them, unless they can afford therapy and close law enforcement surveillance. Parents-to-be should think about this.
LikeLike
August 19, 2012 at 4:51 am
I think Chuck exaggerates the number of people with this malady, but an interesting comment nevertheless.
LikeLike
February 10, 2014 at 10:05 am
Thank you dedicated efofrt to putting this blog together and running! 🙂 I wish there are some ways people could have helped you with the blog, but I understand needing to move on with life.
LikeLike
August 19, 2012 at 8:28 am
The concluding paragraphs of Beisner’s story, which have not moved Mr. Dunkle a bit:
“With that constellation of factors, there was a very high statistical probability that my mother would be an abusive parent, that we would spend the rest of our lives in crushing poverty, and that we would both be highly vulnerable to predatory organizations and men. And that is exactly what happened. She abused me, beating me viciously and often. We lived in bone-crushing poverty, and our little family became a magnet for predatory men and organizations. My mother found minimal support in a small church, and became involved with the pastor who was undeniably schizophrenic, narcissistic, and sadistic. The abuse I endured was compounded by deprivation. Before the age of 14, I had never been to a sleep-over, been allowed to talk to a friend on the phone, eaten in a restaurant, watched a television show, listened to the radio, read a non-Christian book, or even worn a pair of jeans.
“If this were an anti-choice story, this is the part where I would tell you how I overcame great odds and my life now has special meaning. I would ask you to affirm that, of course, you are happy I was born, and that the world would be a darker, poorer place without me.
“It is true that in the past 12 years, I have been able to rise above the circumstances of my birth and build a life that I truly love. But no one should have to make such a Herculean struggle for simple normalcy. Even given the happiness and success I now enjoy, if I could go back in time and make the choice for my mother, it would be abortion.”
–He cannot be moved, because he is gripped by aborticentrism.
LikeLike
August 19, 2012 at 1:22 pm
I’m not moved. Hey, you should hear what happened to me.
LikeLike
August 19, 2012 at 2:18 pm
So, why did your childhood experiences not move you to protect others from being as mistreated as you were? Obviously, being anti-abortion isn’t it, because you weren’t aborted, which puts you in the position of compelling children to endure the same as you did and even worse without you lifting a finger in their defense…
LikeLike
August 19, 2012 at 3:07 pm
I kind of understand your question, Chuck, but then, as usual, your following comments wipe out any understanding.
LikeLike
August 27, 2012 at 7:32 pm
Thank you for such a wonderful Blog!!
LikeLike
August 28, 2012 at 6:40 am
Thanks, Jayl. We hope you’ll consider chiming in every once in a while on our articles!
LikeLike
August 28, 2012 at 9:32 am
especially if you’re pro-life
LikeLike
August 28, 2012 at 10:27 am
Actually, we could use more pro-lifers chiming in. we love ya John, but some more voices would be most welcome….
LikeLike
August 28, 2012 at 11:02 am
We won’t get many, that’s for sure. Who wants to associate with someone who thinks that Justice cries out for us to oppose this continuing holocaust forcefully (and that means breaking the law)?
LikeLike
August 31, 2012 at 1:19 pm
Or with someone like Rev. Bray: ” We are happy to urge folks to follow the calling God has placed on their lives regarding the rescue of the innocents issue. Some are called to talk, others to serve women in crisis pregnancies, some to blow the damn places up, and others to terminate the terminators.
Give thanks for His wonderful gifts and callings.”
LikeLike
September 14, 2012 at 9:06 pm
I was perusing your wonderfully informative website and came upon the very clinic that I had an abortion at–more than 2 decades ago. How cool is that? I hadn’t thought of the name or looked it up since I was young. I’m glad the clinic continues to operate and provide safe, legal abortions to women. They have an art exhibit about pro-choice. Check it out! http://www.4000yearsforchoice.com/ (Not sure if this link will go active so you may have to cut and paste — it’s worth it). –Daylily
LikeLike
September 15, 2012 at 1:40 pm
Daylily, would you mind telling us which clinic it was? I know ’em all!!
LikeLike
September 16, 2012 at 10:24 am
I had my first abortion at the Preterm Clinic in Cleveland, OH. I was 17 years old and the doctors, counselors and nurses were very professional. I especially remember the caregivers after the procedure being so kind. My mother is a strong feminist, supported my decision and was with me at the clinic.
In my early 20’s I made the choice again to have an abortion at a clinic in Brookline MA, Preterm Health Services. This clinic became well-known back in 1994 because of an abortion terrorist going on a killing spree. I don’t think it is still in operation. At the time, I had to walk through a picket line. I accepted a piece of literature and recall reading it and thinking “Who are these people to tell me what God thinks?” I don’t believe they were true Christians because in church I learned to love thy neighbour as thyself.
I’ve undergone many female reproductive procedures, including laparoscopy, hysteroscopy, hysterometry, d&c, egg retrievals, embryo transfers, hyperstimulation of the ovaries, artifical insemination, IVF and vaginal ultrasounds and NONE were comfortable for me, physically or emotionally. The abortion procedure is similar in all regard except that christian fundamentalists cast their judgement on my choice to have the abortion. It is my body, my legal right to do as I wish with it.
Let me just say, I received excellent care at both abortion clinics. The offices were clean, inviting and very much like any other doctor’s office.
–Daylily
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 9:17 am
Daylily, the Preterm clinic in Cleveland is a wonderful clinic. I’m glad you went there. And if i remember correctly, Johnny, they are a non profit clinic! Also, the Preterm clinic on Commonwealth Ave in Boston has closed. I actually visited that clinic about three weeks before John Salvi went on his shooting spree.
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 1:18 pm
I was at the Preterm Clinic in Brookline (on Beacon Street which runs parallel to Comm Ave) about 10 years before the shootings. But when I saw the news I was shocked to see that the clinic was the exact one I used. There can be no debate that what Salvi did was murder and against the law.
LikeLike
September 15, 2012 at 10:34 am
” I hadn’t thought of the name or looked it up since I was young.” Don’t blame you for that, Lil. I wouldn’t have either.
But what “clinic” are you talking about. And is this note for me, John Dunkle?
LikeLike
September 15, 2012 at 1:03 pm
No, John Dunkle, I wouldn’t expect you to be interested in the art exhibit. I am writing to people visiting this blog who are supportive of a woman’s right to chose abortion. I know you are here to cause trouble and I have no interest in fighting with you.
–Daylily (Who assumes you refer to me as “Lil” because your fingers are too tired to type my entire name).
LikeLike
September 15, 2012 at 1:20 pm
Oh no, another Rog! First you attack me. Then you want me to address you as so and so.. Hutzpah!
And I am only here to cause trouble to the killers’ helpers. And the killers too if any of them are interested. I doubt that, though; they’re interested in only one thing — $$$.
LikeLike
September 15, 2012 at 1:45 pm
I always loved that stuff about the doctors only being in it for “the money.” The average cost of an abortion is about $350. If inflation were taken into account, it should be more like $700 but they keep the price low to make it accessible. And, oh yeah, the doctor could get killed at any minute. And, what about those tv evangelical types with their shows on Sunday morning begging for a contribution?? Are they not in it “for the money”?
LikeLike
September 15, 2012 at 2:28 pm
Lots of us are in it for the money. Some killers make a pile. Most though just can’t make it as they want through regular medicine, so they turn to killing.l
LikeLike
September 16, 2012 at 5:27 am
It’s absurd to talk about money and physicians. So many specialists make tons more than a doctor who specializes in abortion. A general surgeon, a cosmetic surgeon, a periodontist, or a neurosurgeon are just a few examples.
No, if you really want to see greed in action, turn to the Catholic or Mormon church or to any mega church. They’re all about money. In fact, spend some time in Utah residential areas and you’ll see young Mormon men knocking on doors to collect tithes. They’re quite serious about money they believe is owed them.
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 4:50 am
How many times do I have to tell you, Kate? There is no such thing as “a doctor who specializes in abortion.” Doctors heal, abortionists kill.
LikeLike
September 16, 2012 at 9:11 am
Wow, I’m surprised to learn that an abortion costs what it did 30 years ago. Although I was young, I do remember having to pay for my own abortion and it was 300 dollars. The boyfriend at the time helped me and I used my own money from an after-school job. Back then, it seemed like a lot and to a young woman/couple it probably still does. But, everything else has gone up with the cost of living so I could see why it should be $700 now.
The doctor’s that perform abortions are obviously not in it for the money. What an asinine comment.
–Daylily
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 4:53 am
In spite of what you’ve said, Lil, you seem to remember a lot about what happened when you paid someone to pull apart a little girl.
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 6:12 am
I’m not sure what you are insinuating. Of course I remember. I would never tell anyone abortion is an experience I forgot but I haven’t looked back on it in years. Perhaps that is what you are confused about. I’m new to “debating” the issue and so learning the current cost and finding the name of the clinic that I used 30 years ago are things I have not looked into for a long time. Despite what you believe, I moved on with my life after an abortion.
The way in which you fixate on death and horrific images can’t be good for you. I wish I could teach you how to let go of the issue. I sincerely believe you would benefit from psychological counseling.
-Daylily
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 7:21 am
Lil, psychology is for those who won’t or can’t understand artists like
Shakespeare, Rubens, Roth, et al. Psychologists are probably partly responsible for your participating in a murder.
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 1:05 pm
I want to laugh at your fixation on gore but it is no laughing matter. You throw descriptive words all over this blog; words like “murder,” “infanticide,” “holocaust,” “legs and arms ripped off,” “feticide,” and “tearing people apart” to name but a few. The reason it is not a laughing matter is you are exhibiting symptoms of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder and that can be quite debilitating.
I will continue to suggest you seek psychological counseling because your constant fixation on what a woman legally chooses to do with her body constitutes an obsession, a word which psychologists use to mean a troubling thought that occurs again and again and causes severe distress in a person.
I’m no doctor so I recommend you consult one. If you had therapy and the proper medication you might be able to find a way out of your obsessive thoughts that are limiting the life you lead. There is no shame in asking for help. I wish you well.
–Daylily, (or “Lil” as you like to refer to me.)
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 1:09 pm
What you’re doing here, Lil, is hiding behind words.
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 1:25 pm
No, I am stating the facts of what I see in your behavior on this blog. Why are you here on this website? If you really are 77 years old and have spent your life fighting a woman’s legal right to choose, I find that to be a psychological disorder.
I wouldn’t say that if you were fighting a battle for women that was useful such as rape. Rape is illegal and women don’t chose it. Abortion is legal and it is my right to chose to have one.
Perhaps we don’t agree but I still encourage you to get psychological help.
Lil
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 2:21 pm
like talking to a pillow
LikeLike
February 9, 2014 at 2:51 am
HHIS I should have thhgout of that!
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 7:24 am
daylily said to Mr. Dunkle: “The way in which you fixate on death and horrific images can’t be good for you. I wish I could teach you how to let go of the issue. I sincerely believe you would benefit from psychological counseling.”
Did you notice how he always fantasizes that the fetus is a “little girl/”
This is another instance of the aborticentric dodging reality in order to maintain his fantasy: Dunkle happens to be a father of five boys.
He knows what it’s like to raise boys, and the thought of “rescuing” a boy dredges up memories of what children really are like. So it’s safe for him to fantasize about rescuing “little girls,” all of whom are not in the least like Anna Nicole Smith, Paris Hilton or Lindsay Lohan. They will be cute and obedient, always eager to keep him happy and eventually becoming nuns.
I am pleased that he does such an excellent job of representing the position of the so-called “pro-lifers.”
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 7:45 am
Dang, Chuck, you’re repeating yourself again.
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 7:49 am
I will pray for you.
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 9:03 am
You might try, but killers’ helpers must first repent before God hears their prayers.
LikeLike
September 17, 2012 at 2:51 pm
You imagine the wrong God; a far less judgmental allows you to stop obsessing about your imperfections and death. You ought to try mine: a sense of humor is part of the standard package….
LikeLike
September 18, 2012 at 4:29 am
Mot had a sense of humor?
LikeLike
October 11, 2012 at 7:41 am
Are there any pro-lifers out there who would dare to tell me where Mitt Romney stands on the abortion issue? Indeed, are you as frustrated as me that you dont know what to expect from him if he becomes President?
LikeLike
October 14, 2012 at 6:13 am
Hi Pat, you know how painfully I miss not participating? It hurts. Still, I will not read anything because then I could not help responding.
I did want you and Kate though to see this entry into my December newsletter :
The first post following typifies the “peaceful, prayerful” way to oppose child-killing, the second the more forceful way. The lady who tries to control the pro-life efforts here in Reading promotes the first to the point of ostracizing someone who employs the second — “in the name of Jesus do not kill your baby.”
The fellow who says that gets into occasional scuffles, as you can imagine, but he saves babies. The “peaceful” boss does not.
#1. A prayer volunteer in Hackensack posted a note on the
40 Days for Life blog about her first time praying in front of the abortion center.
“I didn’t get there early enough to see the customers arriving, but I was there when they were exiting,”
she said. “Every woman was crying. Every one. I was not prepared for that. And this is ‘women’s rights’?”
She had another profoundly sad realization as well.
“Every woman was brought in by a man. The parking lot was full of men pacing, smoking or sitting in their cars. For every abortion, there is a man — a father presiding over the death of his child.”
She recalled the TV shows of years ago, where nervous
fathers paced in hospital waiting rooms, reacting with joy when the nurse came in to say, “It’s a girl!” or
“It’s a boy!”
“What a contrast to this scene,” she said, “where all these men were waiting to hear one thing: ‘It’s over,’
which is followed by taking a weeping woman home.
God have mercy.”
————————————————
LikeLike
October 14, 2012 at 3:00 pm
I’m sorry, John, but this is poppycock and you, with all of your experience, know it! “Every” woman coming out of the clinic was crying? Give me a break. Both you and I have been out there in front of the clinics (I’ve been inside as well) and you knonw damn well that every woman coming out is not crying. Sure, no one is happy about having to be there but let’s be real here.
This is what drives me nuts about the abortion “debate.” Crap like this. And, yes, there’s crap coming out of the mouths of the other side as well. Why can’t we just tell it like it is and have an honest, open debate? That’s why I’ve appreciated your posts, you dont pull punches and you don’t bullshit us. And, I probably missed the memo, but that’s why I do hope you will continue to engage us on a regular basis!
LikeLike
October 15, 2012 at 6:21 am
Promoting violence John?
LikeLike
October 15, 2012 at 10:45 am
I dont think John “promotes” violence but he certainly doesn’t care if it goes on. As he has said, he could never pull the trigger but he would be the first to applaud someone who would shoot an abortion doctor. And by applauding the killers, he is not breaking any law…..
LikeLike
October 15, 2012 at 4:19 pm
How do you interpret this then:
“The fellow who says that gets into occasional scuffles, as you can imagine, but he saves babies. The “peaceful” boss does not.”
This John guy doesn’t want to comment because he probably is not smart enough to reply intelligently to the many well crafted Pro Choice Pro Women positions here.
LikeLike
October 16, 2012 at 8:45 am
I will say, however, that John has been commenting for several years. So, I gotta give him some credit for putting his thoughts out there. I’m not sure why he has suspended his comments, maybe just taking a break, but I do hope he continues again soon and present us with the pro-life position…
LikeLike
October 15, 2012 at 4:20 pm
He is breaking the law of his self proclaimed supreme ruler of Morality, his One True God.
Lets see where that gets this creep!
LikeLike
October 25, 2012 at 7:09 am
And now I am wondering why this blog is giving John Dunkle his own tab (see above) since he has announced he will no longer participate? I know a number of pro-life people who would jump at the opportunity to opine on a well-travelled page like this.
LikeLike
October 25, 2012 at 8:47 am
He’s worn out; it stands to reason that old age, infirmities and the toil of repressing what he knows and fears has finally started to overwhelm him. He’s winding down, involuting, contracting, getting closer to the face of the insurmountable cliff. The encounter every so-called “pro-lifer” dreads– only in his case, it’s now very,very personal.
It’s a shame, because he expounded so well (although so cluelessly) on all the memes of the dysfunctional self-help movement. He displayed for all to see the magical thinking, the irrational fears, the projection, the displacement, the denial, the repression, the near-rabid irrationality, the yearning for violent drama centered around an allegorical battle for one’s personal exemption from the oblivion of death.
All that’s left to say is, “Doesn’t he look natural?”
LikeLike
October 27, 2012 at 1:17 pm
Re his “winding down,” I wonder. I understand he still protests and he still writes that newsletter of his. He sends it to me and honestly, I just cannot read it. It is way too complicated and all over the board.
LikeLike
October 27, 2012 at 3:41 pm
Well, yeah, the mental processes deteriorate. He’s already got some of the physical stuff going on. The last to go is the limbic system functions.
LikeLike
October 30, 2012 at 1:20 pm
Meanwhile, did folks here that France’s lower house voted last week to fully reimburse all abortions and to make contraception free for minors? Now, that’s a progressive country!!!
LikeLike
November 1, 2012 at 4:20 pm
Something just dawned on me today. Romney says he favors abortion in cases of life, rape and incest. That means that he would not support abortion if the woman had a fetus that was severly deformed! So, if the fetus had two heads, if its head was over-sized, if the heart was outside the chest cavity – Romney says no abortion. You gotta give birth. I wonder why Obama didn’t go after that point?
LikeLike
February 9, 2014 at 5:07 am
Hi Adrian,I know how time seems to be capadtured by some invisadiadble net.I try to make a list everyadday, now the night before, to accomadplish. Someadtimes I have been know to stay up for three days until all was comadpleted. I found myslef getadting furadther behind so I quit tryading to comadplete the list and now only use it as an outadline. I am much more conadtent. We all have bills to pay so those things that pay the bills always take priadoradity.Thanks for responding.
LikeLike
February 21, 2015 at 1:20 am
YMMD with that anwesr! TX
LikeLike
November 5, 2012 at 2:32 pm
Planned Parenthood has gotta be pissing in their collective pants today. If Romney wins…….oy
LikeLike
November 26, 2012 at 10:22 am
I nd a close place were i cn do abortion
LikeLike
November 26, 2012 at 11:28 am
Where do you live, Mashao?
LikeLike
November 28, 2012 at 8:08 am
This is a great piece about a relatively new group that is fighting for reproductive rights:
http://jezebel.com/5957982/a-is-for-awesome-the-a-is-for-campaign-fights-for-womens-reproductive-rights
LikeLike