The Oxford English Dictionary cites selfless as an adjective to describe the relationship a servant has to God and a way of being that has little to no regard for the self. Similarly, other dictionaries define selfless as having little regard for fame, wealth or position; as having higher regard for the greater good. In my experiences, selflessness is a common denominator found in those in the pro-choice community. From lobbyists to legislators, volunteers to friends, counselors to nurses and from doctors to directors, these self-sacrificing individuals work for the greater good of women in need of safe, compassionate abortion services. They endure despite the vitriol of a well-funded, misogynistic minority Hell-bent on returning women to draconian servitude. Every single day, at home, at work, or in their church, doctors and clinic directors know they are the potential target of an unknown ‘prolife’ terrorist intent on killing them. Professional counselors recognize and must negotiate with the imposters, errant anti abortion moles attempting to discredit the clinics. The mother of a mother-daughter duo bumbled her way through a counseling session with directives and questions that not only revealed her anti abortion agenda but the (alleged) daughter’s lack of interest in the charade.
Even landlords have been the object of the fiendish anti abortion activists. When the MD Coalition for Life was upset with abortion clinic landlord Todd Stave because he refused their demands, they began protesting at Stave’s daughter’s middle school. But, rather than cave in to their demands to oust his tenant, a Germantown, MD abortion clinic, Stave turned the focus to the maliciousness of the MD Coalition for Life and others anti abortion zealots across the nation.
A common tactic, calling abortion-minded women selfish, is ironic when you consider that
the name-callers, the anti abortion activists, are the epitome of selfishness. They demand their free speech rights, their rights to hand out literature, their God-given right to save ‘babies’ (and sometimes women), and their right to impose their religious views on others. They are a bundle of self-serving, self-centered egotists. The evidence comes from frivolous lawsuits about imagined conspiracies and emotional harm (with NO regard for the emotional harm they inflict on women), from their constant boastful but unfounded claims of rescues, and from their slanderous attempts with police and human relations commissions to frame themselves as victims who are simply saints on a mission.
But the good news is that the selflessness of men and women across this nation who believe in women’s reproductive health rights lives on in the hearts and minds of millions. No amount of malevolent actions from the anti abortion-minded will thwart the fortitude, the compassion and the love for women who are in need of an abortion.

April 6, 2012 at 9:07 am
Pat, you totally missed their self-centeredenss when it comes to actually caring for human life:
1. They only commit to their so-called “unborn humans” insofar as it is not a demand on their time, talents or money.
2. They do not adopt at a rate greater than “pro-choicers” do.
3. They by and large support tha politicians who would deliberately damage the prospects of single mothers (and fathers, for that matter).
4. They do not rise above the general rate of serving as Big Brothers and Sisters, guardians ad litem for children, public school classroom volunteers or foster parents.
Finally, they are noted for their desire to inulcate fear in children under the name of “religious education.”
Have a good Friday.
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 9:08 am
Oops, RESPONSIBLE Right to Life is “anonmymous” here.
cgregor
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 9:22 am
Oh, you’re so right. I’ve commented on some of what you offer here but what you offer is so Spot On. Appreciate the additional thoughts.
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 10:56 am
I am continuously amazed that Christians do not rise to their rhetoric in actions. They like to talk about the work they do, but they really don’t do very much.
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 5:31 pm
it is as kate always says: “there are those who talk, and those who DO.”
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 11:08 am
I didn’t write this, Anonymous!
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 11:48 am
I wrote this column, not Pat.
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 10:22 am
Cardinal George of Chicago made a remarkable statement recently: “I’ll die in my bed, my successor will die in jail, and his successor will be martyred in the public square.” Coming from one of the remaining few believing Catholic prelates that remark would have been dismissed as hyperbole, but coming from “ol’ lukewarm” it has to be taken seriously.
Kate Ranieri teaches and frequently writes in the Allentown, Pa, area promoting the “pro-choice” agenda. In four short paragraphs on the 4/6 abortion.ws blog she manages to include all eight of these anti-pro life curses: “the vitriol of a well-funded, misogynistic minority Hell-bent on returning women to draconian servitude”; “doctors and clinic directors know they are the potential target of an unknown “prolife” terrorist intent on killing them”; “imposters, errant anti abortion moles”; “fiendish anti abortion activists”; “the maliciousness of the MD Coalition for Life and others anti abortion zealots across the nation”; “the anti abortion activists are the epitome of selfishness”; “They are a bundle of self-serving, self-centered egotists”; and “No amount of malevolent action from the anti abortion-minded will thwart . . .”
No one will contradict Kate since I am afraid to go on that blog anymore. Moreover, a soon-to-be majority of Americans would applaud her. That’s why George’s statement is on the money.
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 10:54 am
It is alarming to me how little good work Catholics do.
They take more from society then they give.
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 11:14 am
Patty, I work with the local Catholic church in my neighborhood and I can tell you that there are many catholics who do a lot of good things. I dont know how you can say they “take more” than they give. How does one prove that?
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 4:35 pm
Simple, the Church takes $X in donations.
Less than $X (and I would guess far less than X since they use a lot of that money to build churches, pay for propaganda, more fundraising and so on) is given to people who need money for food and other essential items.
Do you agree that this is simply true?
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 9:51 am
I miss my grandfather too. He thgaut me what a honey wagon was. A big tank on wheels full of human shit. A big thing in europe. He went to France in WWI(the war to end all wars) as a blacksmith. He learned his trade at the oil strike at Spindletop. In France, he shoed the horses and mules that pulled the big cannons and supply wagons. He was covered in mustard gas twice. Probably why he died at 65. His lungs were gone. Don’t forget how much older I am than most of you kids. I still think of him often with both pride and sadness.
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 4:37 pm
Pat, how many Catholic Children from your church have been molested?
LikeLike
April 7, 2012 at 1:50 pm
Pat, what do you think?
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 6:09 pm
i hear so many choicers say that the catholic church spends donated money on building new churches and paying for propaganda that would be better spent feeding the poor.
i hear so many antis say that planned parenthood spends donated money on building new buildings and paying for propaganda that would be better spent offering poor women free pap smears and actually performing mammograms rather than mere breast exams and referrals for mammograms.
i hear so many choicers point out about molestation by clergy and of the coverups within the catholic church.
i hear so many antis point out about human trafficking of minors and breaking parental consent laws that lead to further molestation by planned parenthood.
i hear people in both camps make defenses of their own camp that sound remarkably the same as those in the opposing camp.
what i seldom hear is people actually addressing the flaws within their own camp.
i am not by any means trying to dismiss your points, patty, because they are quite valid, and as an anti and a religious zealot, i want the issues you pointed out to be addressed and corrected, and i am tired of those issues being dismissed.
it’s just that it is uncanny how much people in opposing camps sound to me at times.
LikeLike
April 11, 2012 at 2:21 pm
Everybody needs to get their points at least recognized, and then they may be happier to listen to points from opposing points of view.
I leaned that from discussions at the family dinner table. 😛
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 11:13 am
Geez, John, do you folks really think that “we” are out to get Catholics? Personally, I could care less about Catholics, Jews, Anarchists, whatever, as long as they leave me alone. I’ve got a lot more to do than to “get” Catholics. I think the statement of the cardinal is hyperbole, it’s an excuse to raise money. Just like I’ve criticized our side when a clinic is bombed and the fundraising letters go out. This statement is the same ole crap. It probably ended with “and dont forget to tithe!”
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 11:50 am
For someone who is anal retentive about grammar your sentence “No one will contradict Kate since I am afraid to go on that blog anymore. ” is a real doozy.
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 4:44 pm
Mr. Dunkle has Ripped a part every argument on here, its just to say that his, continually copied, over bearing nonsensical ideologies dont do much for anyone.
In defense of people, not religion, Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Atheists, can all get along no matter the differences aligned, but with Extremists like dunkle, we have the hurdle of understanding his logic to adapt our own.
Its not that Catholics dont do anything for anyone, because thats not true, im sure there is a Catholic out there that believes they are doing more by remaining neutral, attending PTA meetings, investing in their children instead of trifling others unborn. or Wasting TIME.
LikeLike
April 7, 2012 at 1:52 pm
The radicals should be ignored in the discussion because they do not represent reality.
However Pro Life Radicals cannot be ignored as we have seen many of them turn into rampaging murdering Christian Terrorists.
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 6:12 pm
i think that pro-life leaders should speak out more loudly about the terrorism that you refer to, evan.
sometimes, remaining silent equates to support of certain acts.
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 7:27 pm
I just put up a ceiling fan in the kecihtn. Thank God I’m not a electrican. The zappy stuff makes me nervous. Looks great too. That cat looks like a Lynx.
LikeLike
November 25, 2014 at 8:33 am
Good to see a talent at work. I can’t match that.
LikeLike
April 6, 2012 at 5:17 pm
Women have always been the gatekeepers of life. It is not just our right, but our responsibility to decide when and whether to bring new life into the world through our bodies.–Charlotte Taft
LikeLike
April 7, 2012 at 1:54 pm
Whoever CT is, she is right.
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 10:29 am
A large percentage of of the thngis you articulate is astonishingly appropriate and it makes me ponder the reason why I had not looked at this in this light previously. Your article truly did switch the light on for me personally as far as this subject goes. However at this time there is actually just one position I am not too comfy with and whilst I try to reconcile that with the actual core theme of your point, let me see what the rest of the subscribers have to point out.Nicely done.
LikeLike
April 7, 2012 at 2:08 pm
This is brilliant. I fully agree with it. The idea that women have a responsibility to carry babies to term upoun becoming pregnant is totally derived from a male dominated society where we were totally supressed both sexually and reproductively.
The idea that an embryo or foetus is more deserving of empathy or compassion than a sexually active women is absolutely disgusting. Especially when our bodies are the only reason an embryo or foetus is there in the first place…(well and the fact that we had sex with a man lol)
LikeLike
April 7, 2012 at 2:26 pm
No doubt this is true Clare. If one looks at the legislature that votes against women’s rights it is clearly dominated by a vast majority of Men.
LikeLike
April 7, 2012 at 3:32 pm
They are still being taught to reject their own feminine sides so they are scared of us because we can embrace both feminine and masculine qualities. Especially in this modern society.
LikeLike
April 7, 2012 at 5:13 pm
Hi,
Many Men support Women’s rights. It is the men who are conservative imbeciles that endanger all of our civil liberties, agreeably, mostly Womens’.
Trust me, you will find me voting for the candidate that supports Women’s issues, without doubt, this November!
LikeLike
April 7, 2012 at 7:17 pm
Oh yeah I’m sorry I did not mean to imply that there are no men who support women’s issues.
It’s mostly just the conservative imbeciles as you say, yes. 🙂
LikeLike
April 7, 2012 at 8:32 pm
I just spent my whole goddamn night having a bunch of anti-choicers attack me personally for not agreeing with them. I’m a baby killer, I have a warped view of motherhood…I actually got told that I have a thirst for the blood of the unborn at one point.
They all make me sick sitting up on their pedestals. They need to be knocked right back down.
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 6:05 am
I am so sorry for you Claire!! I have been in that situation numerous times and it is very scary…#1 especially if you are by yourself!! You have to be very careful…you never know what they are capable of when they are in a group!!
Once at a “county council meeting” they attacked me personally and security had to escort me from the building for my safety…They had gone out ahead of time and covered my car with catsup!! (kind of shows their mentality!!) But you can’t ever let them see you blink!! Because if they do…they will go after you unrelentlessly!!
It is really hard to be around a bunch of idiots…that have been led down a path…without using any common sense…
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 9:14 am
Oh well it was online, but it was still fairly horrible. At one point I said that most women I know of who experience miscarriage do not feel that they had a baby who died, but rather that they lost a potential baby and tried to point out that if you are pregnant and think of what is inside you as your ‘baby’ that is more of a concept than a reality. Then one of them posted what I said on her own facebook page where her and all her friends started talking about how sick I was and that I had a ‘God complex’.
I am fortunate enough to have never encountered any kind of physical attack or intimidation of that kind.
They are truly a horrible bunch of egotistical, self-righteous pricks who cause suffering with no care whilst preaching compassion and respect for ‘all human life’. It’s insanity. I wish I could do more to change people’s attitudes towards them. They have far too much power here in Ireland where I live.
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 1:31 pm
Clare,
Don’t hold your breath waiting for too much intelligent conversation from a pro lifer. You will go Blue pretty quickly!
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 1:42 pm
In my experience as soon as you make an intelligent point against them that refutes their claims they start with the personal jabs and ad hominem statements.
Then they go on to state that you have not provided any facts that have supported your claim, as though just saying that makes it true…
LikeLike
May 23, 2012 at 11:28 pm
Posted on incredible, that was a very good read. In cscolunion, someone who actually thinks and understands what they are blogging about. Quite difficult to find of late, especially on the web . I bookmarked your web blog and will make sure to keep coming back here if this is how you always write. thank you, keep it up! .
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 1:48 pm
Also Evan, die-hard pro-lifers are clearly lost causes, but there are a lot of people in the middle and those are the people whose attitudes we need to change. If not women will never have their full rights as human beings.
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 2:32 pm
The GOP candidates are a bunch of screwballs.
They want to get rid of Birth Control!!
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 6:45 pm
lorriepoo, any man who would terrorize a lady in the manner that those po’dunks did you is seriously lacking in masculinity.
and as far as a certain woman who terrorized you and targeted your family, well she is just criminally insane.
but for what it’s worth, i think it was very brave of you to be willing to relive the abuse you encountered at their hands.
when i dealt with the threats last year, i thought about what you went through and realized that my own situation was shortlived and i didn’t have to deal with the helplessness that you must have felt at knowing that someone i loved was targeted.
sharing your story helped me to remember that i wasn’t alone, and i am very grateful that you did.
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 2:41 pm
Can I make a suggestion? I beevile youve obtained something great here. But what need to you added a pair links to a page that backs up what youre saying? Or possibly you can give us one thing to look at, one thing that may connect what youre saying to 1 thing tangible? Only a suggestion. Anyway, in my language, there arene2€™t much great source like this.
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 6:57 am
ProLifers can be a really sick bunch. Their brains are warped.
Their mentality has been turned into gelatin by religion, so they usually can only regurgitate what they have been told. They have very little original thoughts, can’t answer reasonable questions and no very little about science.
More than half the Pro Lifers I talk to think the Earth is only about 6,000 years old. They are so ethnocentric they do not realize that they are in the minority of religions, and most people on Earth think their religion is crazy.
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 9:02 am
You know what’s really weird? They seem to have adapted a lot of the pro-choice side’s language and think that by doing this it actually makes their argument more valid.
Like they will oftentimes use the word ‘arbitrary’ when you try to point out that the fact a foetus needs to remain in a woman’s body to live at all and that ‘murdering’ it is still ‘wrong’. Or they will keep telling you that you are factually incorrect just because the facts you give don’t support their idea that a foetus has a ‘right to life’, as though fact and logic actually have anything to do with their argument against abortion.
Then of course when this fails they resort to insulting your character.
Pathetic.
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 1:33 pm
Pro Lifers almost never are able to state fact from the accumulated knowledge of science as represented in objective peer reviewed periodicals. They usually just rely on their Bibles. And they can’t even agree what it says!
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 1:40 pm
Well that is true. They seem to think that debates that scientists have where there are scientists who are supporting their point of view actually qualifies as scientific ‘evidence’ whilst ignoring the fact that the scientific community is continually rejecting these scientits’ theories. It is ridiculous.
Well the Bible is fairly criptic, and there are a lot of people who want to just use it to promote their own ideologies and basically suppress any differing view points.
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 4:54 pm
Pro Lifers are morons . . . look what they are doing in many states including Mississippi . . .
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 7:52 am
Soren Kierkegaard once wrote that “people demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid.”
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 8:06 am
He sounds like a very smart guy.
It’s strange how many people who support ‘freedom of speech’ spend so much time demonizing and attempting to suppress people who voice different opinions and points of view.
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 6:17 pm
clare, there are some people who simply refuse to have civilized dialogue with someone with an opposing view.
to think that they would acknowledge that the other person or people make valid points is unrealistic.
and of course they will make ad hom attacks and rationalize their own bad behavior.
in the end, some people are just nasty.
that is their problem, not yours.
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 2:37 pm
@Kelly Technically I would consider abortion to be ‘birth control’ as it directly prevents a birth. Condoms and contraceptive pills are more ‘conception control’.
The dialogue on abortion needs to be changed. The whole ‘it’s baby killing’ stuff is just ridiculous. The focus needs to be shifted back onto the women, who abortion actually affect,s, not a freaking foetus that has no awareness or capacity to feel pain.
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 7:16 pm
>>>The focus needs to be shifted back onto the women<<<
clare, i couldn't agree with you more.
if antis want to save babies, the best way to do it is by focusing on saving the mother. so very often, when she is helped to fix what is going on in her life that makes her seek an abortion to begin with, the baby is saved by default.
of course there will be times when she chooses to abort anyway, but if she is given the help that she needs to break the chains of abuse or poverty, or whatever her own trials that she is facing are, she will be far less likely to be in a situation further down the road where she is again seeking an abortion.
if the focus is put on her, some good will come of offering her the help that she needs.
but too many of us antis want to put the focus on the baby and ignore her needs.
a very wise, very kind person that i admire and respect, refers to this misplaced focus as aborticentrism.
by following simple logic, it is easy to see how aborticentrism perpetuates abortions rather than diminishes them.
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 7:21 pm
You see the problem that I have with your argument there is that there is something ‘wrong’ with a woman who does not want to have a baby. This is not true.
Remember a lot of women who are faced with an unwanted pregnancy do want kids at some point, it is just not the right time for them. Forcing them to have these kids they don’t want at that point doesn’t help either them or their children.
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 9:10 pm
i understand. and that was why i added: “or whatever her own trials that she is facing are”.
please forgive me. i should have been more clear.
i even know that there are some women who simply do not want to be pregnant, and as far as they go, god bless them and peace be with them.
i mean that sincerely, not in that snotty way that some of the other antis who are also religious nuts mean it. you know the type. they seem to believe that god only has a purpose for those with whom they disagree because after all, SOMEONE has to go to hell.
i believe that we antis bear a great deal of direct responsibility for abortions with the way we treat others.
what’s more, we have a moral obligation to continue to help those who choose not to abort, with the trials they face.
and as i said, for those who choose to abort anyway, god bless them, peace be with them.
i may be an anti and i may be a religious zealot, but it is still immoral for me to abuse someone who merits compassion rather than condemnation, isn’t it?
LikeLike
April 10, 2012 at 5:36 am
That’s ok, honestly I’m just getting a little touchy about this stuff these days. Especially with a lot of pro-life minded people saying to me that women who get abortions are ‘irresponsible, selfish sluts’. It makes me so angry.
Yes it would definitley be immoral for you to abuse someone who merits compassion. And all human beings deserve compassion, women who want abortions included.
Are there many other pro-lifers who think like you do?
LikeLike
April 10, 2012 at 8:47 pm
clare, the antis you were dealing with sound like the type whose respect for life ends at the delivery room doors.
their mentality of women who abort is not the only thing that is warped. they often have the same mentality towards choicers in general.
they claim that choicers hate children.
but you can’t put people in a box like that.
the choicers i know are loving devoted parents.
they also perform corporal acts of mercy that are very pro-life. such as founding organizations to help needy children, mentoring underprivileged children who are in single parent homes, feeding the homeless, rallying for the rights of others, taking in those who have no other place to go.
some of those people you can find right in this blog, my friend.
having an abortion does not make someone a bad person.
i may think that the act itself is bad, but that act does not define the person.
if it makes you feel any better, the same people who hassled you, are the same types that hassle me because i don’t spew their venom at choicers.
so i get it from both choicers who despise me and try to shove me in their box tat they have for antis, as well as the antis who i have the nerve to tell they are acting likwe skanks.
but that’s ok.
i have friends in both camps who i might or might not agree with on the topic and we encourage one another in our lives.
i don’t need those who are filled with hatred and neither do you.
this is a safe and comfortable place for anyone who is respectful to those with differing opinions.
oh, and yes, there are other antis who are also pro-life as i am.
LikeLike
April 8, 2012 at 4:26 pm
[…] A Tribute to Being Selfless (abortion.ws) Rate this: Share what you read here:StumbleUponDiggRedditTwitterLinkedInTumblrPrintEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. […]
LikeLike
April 9, 2012 at 5:29 pm
>>>But, rather than cave in to their demands to oust his tenant, a Germantown, MD abortion clinic, Stave turned the focus to the maliciousness of the MD Coalition for Life and others anti abortion zealots across the nation.<<<
what's more, the way he did it!
the people in question targeted a little girl!
SHAME!
but VOC shows utter respect for those on both sides. the rights of antis to protest is respected. it is when the protest becomes abusive that is unacceptable.
i am SO impressed with what he did.
he is a far better person than i am, because while i would like to think i would show as much tolerance and respect for someone who did to my child what was done to his, i honestly don't know for sure if i would be able to.
LikeLike
April 11, 2012 at 9:43 pm
>>>Everybody needs to get their points at least recognized, and then they may be happier to listen to points from opposing points of view.<<<
of course you are correct, my friend.
but there will always be those who will ignore and refuse to address the points of others, even if their own are recognized.
we see them come and go, both in here and on the abortion.com facebook page.
they are the fringe, and as evan pointed out, we should ignore them once we recognize them for what they are, with the exception of those who present a danger to others.
i would rather chat with someone with whom i disagree with on the issue, that is capable of civil discourse, than with someone with whom i agree on the issue that is pendejo.
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 9:18 pm
you are really a good wtemasber. The site loading speed is incredible. It sort of feels that you are doing any distinctive trick. Furthermore, The contents are masterpiece. you have performed a fantastic job on this subject!
LikeLike
February 10, 2014 at 9:49 am
Indiana Evens shluod play Cordelia and Pheobe Tonkin shluod play Tania if the cover of the book girl isn\’t an actress. And Angus Mclaren shluod play Edric. honestly right now there would only be one movie the first book, connor doesn\’t come until the fourth so there is plenty of time.
LikeLike
May 1, 2012 at 12:12 pm
[…] A Tribute to Being Selfless (abortion.ws) Rate this: Share what you read here:StumbleUponDiggRedditTwitterLinkedInTumblrPrintEmailLike this:LikeOne blogger likes this post. […]
LikeLike