The Internet is an amazing tool. We all owe Al Gore a debt of gratitude.
Remember years ago when a woman seeking information on abortion services had to pick up her local Yellow Pages and sort through all of the listings under “Abortion?” Not much information except for the simple listings with the clinic phone number. Today, as we all know, the Yellow Pages are a dinosaur. Now, a person looking for abortion services will do a Google search or go to websites like www.abortion.com, a comprehensive listing of abortion clinics throughout the country. So, to get up to speed, I recently did a Google search and, while there was a lot of information, some of the results were a little disturbing.
I typed in the phrase “abortion clinics.” I was immediately greeted with a number of references to clinics here in Northern Virginia. High in the listings was also a link to www.abortion.com. But then I noticed some other listings prominently displayed that were of concern to me.
Indeed, the first listing up top, in the “sponsored links” section, was a listing for American Women’s Medical Services. To get a listing under “sponsored links,” you basically pay Google. Every time someone clicks onto your ad, you “pay per click.” The fee per click for a phrase like “abortion clinics” can be very, very expensive. Putting that aside, AWMS is a chain of clinic that are owned and operated by the notorious Doctor Stephen Brigham. Brigham lost his New Jersey medical license in 2010 after regulators discovered an arrangement under which he would begin second- and third-trimester abortions in New Jersey and then have the patients drive themselves to Maryland the next day to complete the procedures. Before that, his license was revoked in New York in 1994 after a board found him guilty of gross negligence. The authorities have been after him for years.
Then, in the non-paying section of Google I saw a listing for the Orlando Women’s Center, a small chain of clinics run by Doctor James Pendergraft. A short while ago, a jury awarded $36.7 million to a woman who brought a lawsuit against him for malpractice. It seems that the woman went to his clinic for an abortion in November 2001, was given drugs to induce labor, but was never seen by a doctor. When she began inquiring about the doctor, she was told to “change her attitude or get the hell out of the clinic.” The woman left while in active labor and later gave birth to a disabled girl, now 10, who suffers “severe cerebral palsy” and never will walk, speak or be able to care for herself.
Meanwhile, in the same Google search, I noticed several more sponsored links for “clinics” that, after a little research, I determined were actually anti-abortion facilities otherwise known as “crisis pregnancy centers.” While some of these facilities are up front about what they do, many of them are known to pretend to be an abortion facility, the idea being that if they can get a woman who is considering abortion into their facility, they will hopefully talk her out of it and “save a baby.” Interestingly, these listings were paid for, meaning that these facilities are willing to spend very big bucks (like Brigham) to get unsuspecting women into their office.
Years ago, the same anti-abortion centers listed under “Abortion Services” in the Yellow Pages, until the Yellow Page Publishers Association got wise to the deceptive practices and prohibited them from advertising under that category. It’s too bad that the Internet has not caught up with this deception. And it’s too bad that there are doctors like Brigham and Pendergraft can advertise as well.
Caveat Emptor.
Related articles
- Mississippi’s Lone Abortion Clinic May Have To Close On July 1 (thinkprogress.org)
- In Unexpected Move, Virginia Medical Board Shoots Down Unnecessary Abortion Clinic Provisions (thinkprogress.org)
- Michigan House Passes Sweeping Abortion Bill (huffingtonpost.com)
- Five Reasons Why Michigan’s Anti-Abortion Bill Is The Nation’s Worst (thinkprogress.org)


June 17, 2012 at 2:17 pm
This has little to do with your post today, Pat, but I just have to tell you what happened this morning. I was standing in front of baby killer John Roizin’s house in Easton when several cars stopped in a line. The lady passenger in
the first car started in, “He’s not a killer. He saved my daughter’s life.” She continued for about ten minutes (somewhere in there she told me she and her driver were teachers at Lafayette, the near-by college). I never interrupt.
Finally she ran out of steam and maybe got curious, “So what would you do if your daughter was raped by a big black man. Would you take care of the situation or would let the child live?”
“I’d let the child live,” I said, and they drove off.
I thought I’d heard the last of that particularly vicious pro-death argument, around 1978. But it came back. They all come back.
LikeLike
June 18, 2012 at 7:24 am
When I left Johnny’s house and got to Jen’s, I saw drawings of a skunk and a raccoon on a sign owned by the Lehigh Valley Wildlife Removal Company. I guess Jen had a little problem because you call LVWR when, as the sign states, you want the “Humane Removal of Nuisance Wildlife.”
Oh, the irony! Jen, owner and operator of the largest baby-killing business between New York City and Harrisburg, will do for skunks and racoons what she won’t do for people. No, she pays someone to get rid of non-human animals humanely, and she pays someone else to get rid of human beings violently, horribly.
LikeLike
June 18, 2012 at 10:07 am
And, John, if you had raccoon’s in your attic, you would not “murder” them? And please dont tell me you would adopt them!
LikeLike
June 19, 2012 at 2:21 pm
Is it solipsistic here or is it just Dunkle?
LikeLike
June 19, 2012 at 3:17 pm
?
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 12:45 pm
?
LikeLike
June 18, 2012 at 10:05 am
I find that argument disgusting but, as you well know, we cannot account for every person who is pro-choice.
LikeLike
June 17, 2012 at 7:56 pm
I was just reading, not too long ago, about the enormous amount of taxpayer money that goes to these “crisis pregnancy centers,” so it’s pretty safe to assume that we’re also footing the bill for their misleading ads. I wonder if there’s anyone at the IRS I can talk to about a refund…
LikeLike
June 18, 2012 at 10:08 am
Tracy, I know under Bush the feds were giving them some money but I believe that has stopped under Obama. But I know there are certain states that use tax dollars for the cpcs.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 11:09 am
I definitely do not want my money going to those horrible CPC Mills!
They are dens of Evil!
LikeLike
June 18, 2012 at 6:46 am
It seems like as long as they are allowed to “hide” behind the title “we are a church” just trying to help the poor…I think the answer is “NO”…but as “vocal & radical” as they have become…I think it should change!! How do we do that??
I think you have to change it with the “power of your VOTE” vote out all the HOLYer…than…thou…people!! You “know” the ones that “know” what is best for your personal life!! Because after all they pray about it!!
My question is do they “also pray” about the “illegal” insider trading that they do on the House & Senate floor!?!? Oh! Wait that is only illegal for “Martha Stewart” it is NOT illegal for a Senator or US Representative…I realize this doesn’t have anything to do with the issue of Abortion…or the way they are allowed to advertise… like they are a facility that provides “TRUTHFUL” information to women about how to obtain an abortion!! But it just irritates me!!
LikeLike
June 18, 2012 at 10:08 am
I can hear you Lorraine loud and clear and agree with you 100%!
Unless people start to VOTE and make sure they are heard, nothing will change.
LikeLike
June 18, 2012 at 10:10 am
Of course, the problem, Sonia, is that most folks dont even vote. But the ones that dont are usually the loudest complainers!
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 10:18 am
HA HA HA Yep that is true as well… They rather cross their arms and wait things to be done but they have no courage on taking the initiative of acting… Oh well…
LikeLike
June 18, 2012 at 10:09 am
Good point, Lorraine. It really all comes down to the votes. On the abortion issue, the pros and antis just vote in lock step with what the national organizations say. So, the key is to get the pro-chohice reps in there in the first place, and a pro-choice President and pro-choice state legislators, etc.
LikeLike
June 19, 2012 at 8:47 pm
You know sometimes I would settle for just someone who will look at a case by case basis…vote for what they think their constituents sent them there to do and NOT what there clergy tells them they must do…or they will suffer eternal damnation…
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 8:07 am
Could you please tell me what you are referring to exactly. I am adressing what you said about the clergy and suffering eternal damnation. What demonination is that?
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 8:49 am
Guess, Kate.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 11:14 am
There are many religions that promise Eternal Damnation. They all have different paths, most often mutually exclusive.
The Bugaboo is to figure out which of the thousands of Religions is the one true one to place one’s magical beliefs in.
Unfortunately the odds are against you unless you are so gullible to fall prey to one religion’s Magical Thinking based upon . . . Magical Thinking . . .
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 1:10 pm
What am I supposed to guess, Dunkle?
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 3:02 pm
Richie, you guessed wrong; Pat, you’re supposed to guess Catholicism.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 4:01 pm
Oops, I mean Kate, you’re supposed to guess Catholicism.
LikeLike
June 18, 2012 at 3:50 pm
Here’s a real gem of a find from a prolifer named Josh Brahm, talking about poor prolife arguments—-
“While surprising to some audiences, pro-lifers occasionally make arguments that are easily refutable. They also sometimes use tactics during abortion debates that are counter-productive. Josh analyzes nine examples in this presentation:
1. “Your mother chose life!”
2. “The Bible is pro-life!”
3. “Abortion is wrong because it hurts the economy.”
4. “Abortion is wrong because it hurts women / causes breast cancer.”
5. “Think of all the Beethoven’s we’ve murdered.”
6. “Abortion is wrong because it tortures babies to death.”
7. “We shouldn’t use embryonic stem cell research because adult stem cell research has more results.”
8. Endless quibbling over terms with pro-choice people.
9. Focusing on the conspiracy theory that Planned Parenthood is a racist organization.
For more details go to:
http://prolifepodcast.net/2012/02/josh-brahm-live-9-faulty-pro-life-arguments-tactics/
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 12:47 pm
I remember growing up Catholic and always being “threatened” with something. I remember the first time I said a curse word. I really expected to be struck by lightning. And then there were those terrible “mortal sins” which basically guaranteed your going to Hell. The Church scared the crap out of me – that’s why I left.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 2:46 pm
Exactly Pat!! Anonymous…many times the people we elect go to the statehouse or to Washington on personal business NOT the business that the people that voted for them..sent them there too do!! I don’t want you to VOTE the way YOUR church wants you to…I want you to vote the way you know your constituents want!! That may mean to vote for “gay marriage” never mind whether you, your family or your Baptist Minister want you too!
But as Pat said when we were growing up …we were threaten by “the church”…I remember being told that it was a “big” sin to go into a church that WAS NOT Catholic…because they were “fake” they were religion’s founded by man …We are the “only true Church”!!
LikeLike
February 10, 2014 at 7:01 am
Thanks for the great info dog I owe you biggyti.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 3:08 pm
Pat, LDM, you guys are part of the reason the Church collapsed in the USA. Partly because you left, the church dropped the threats and became nice nice, just another Protestant religion, and couldn’t stop the cannibals from running amok Common back, you’d love it now.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 3:28 pm
NO..they molest children!! I can’t support a church that hurts “little children!”
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 4:07 pm
Everybody these days molests children. You, LDM, and a million others just didn’t like being told not to. First the Church stopped threatening you, and then it joined you.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 1:17 pm
Just consider how sexual and religious experiences seem like secular and sacred, how we have a deeply ingrained horror of mixing sex and religion. In reality, the two experiences have in common characteristics conveyed by such words as desire, mystery, ritual, passion, ecstasy, and union. Ideally we go to religious services and “to bed” because we desire something beyond ourselves. There is a sense of awe and mystery associated with both experiences and certain rituals that contribute to passion and, when things go well, to ecstasy in a union that affects us physically, emotionally, and psychologically. The fact that for some readers such an analogy will smack of sacrilege or even heresy only indicates the depth of the split between these two natural human activities.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 4:12 pm
What a load a crap.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 9:10 pm
For someone who is so intent on correcting the writing of others, your comment illustrates the reality of your unfortunate intellectual deterioration.
In fact, the grotesque nature of your character seems to expend a perpetual energy which points not to a rounded personality but to an impersonal, mechanical driving force. You are a victim of obsession that displays the grotesque power of the human spirit in regression, that lives and speaks as if you were the only self in the world.
LikeLike
June 21, 2012 at 4:19 am
Hey Rog, translate this too!
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 4:00 pm
Who can support a so-called church that perpetuates ugly sins, who protect arrogant, cruel leaders and who has the moral authority of a pithed frog? Valerie Tarico shared these ‘ugly sins’ listed in abbreviated form here:
1. Excommunicating doctors and nuns for saving lives.
2. Protecting even non-Catholic sex-offenders against child victims.
3. Using churches to organize gay haters.
4. Lying about contraceptives to poor Africans.
5. Obstructing patient access to accurate information and services in secular hospitals.
6. Slapping down nuns.
7. Bullying girl scouts.
8. Purging popular and scholarly interfaith bridge builders.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 4:09 pm
If only you anti-Catholics were right.
LikeLike
June 20, 2012 at 9:15 pm
There is no ‘IF’ here. You, who turn to the grotesque like a two-headed toad, subvert human virtue and dignity in your support of this so-called ‘one true faith’ church.
LikeLike
June 21, 2012 at 4:23 am
How does a two-headed toad turn to the grotesque? Sure, one true Church, didn’t Jimmy learn anything out there in Gonzaga?
LikeLike