This year’s presidential election is going to very interesting, very dirty and very close. So it’s tempting to start to dissect the individual campaign strategies because every minute decision could win or lose the race.
On the abortion issue, the lines are very clear. Obama is pro-choice, pro-family planning, pro- Planned Parenthood, pro-stem cell research. As we all know, Mitt Romney was pro-choice when he was Governor of Massachusetts but then he suddenly had a “conversion” about the time he started thinking about getting the Republican nomination for President from those right wingers who control their nominating process. Now he is pro-life, anti-Planned Parenthood, blah, blah. And although each candidate is always fuzzy on the issue of Supreme Court nominations, we know darn well that they will nominate justices that comport with their views on reproductive health. This is a very important issue as the next President is bound to get a few nominations and that could determine the future of Roe v Wade.
It should come as no surprise that both of the candidates, as they criss-cross the country collecting the few votes that could make the difference, never talk about abortion. Now, sure, I cannot say for a fact that they have NEVER mentioned it in a speech, but I have over the summer taken a lot of time watching their speeches on YouTube and as far as I can see they are not mentioning the issue. This is very interesting to me in light of all of the talk a few months ago about the Republican Party’s so-called “War on Women.” I’m not sure what happened to those folks who are concerned about that war, but they have been rather conspicuous by their absence. On the other hand, if they were smart they would hold their fodder and wait until Labor Day when the race is engaged in earnest.
I was surprised, therefore, the other morning as I was flipping a pancake when I heard some foreboding music on the television and saw the grainy image of Mitt Romney with a voiceover telling us that he would “outlaw all abortions, including in cases of rape and incest.” There was more foreboding music, like a soundtrack from some low budget vampire movie, and then I saw several pictures of women who were looking straight into the camera as if to say “stay out of my uterus, Mitt!” The commercial then finishes off with a fuzzy recording of Mitt saying “and we’ll get rid of Planned Parenthood.” Fade to black.
Now this commercial ran in Virginia, a toss-up state. And I would not be surprised if the commercial ran just here in Northern Virginia which is much more progressive than the rest of the state. Remember that it was the Virginia legislature that considered requiring vaginal ultrasounds before a woman could have an abortion. So, Obama is probably being very strategic but just once I’d love to see a presidential candidate go all the way.
Putting all of those polls aside, polls that can be easily manipulated based on how you frame the question, I still believe that the vast majority of voters in this country are generally pro-choice and, more importantly, they just don’t think it’s an issue for politicians to be involved with. And I think that Obama could tap into that sentiment by being a strong, unequivocal voice for “choice.” I mean, just come out and talk about the darn issue and tell the American that “I trust women.” In my many years in national politics, the biggest rounds of applause I heard were often when the candidate did not pull any punches, went right to the heart of the matter and told people that, while they might not like what he says, he is gonna tell them how he feels. I firmly believe that’s what we Americans want in a candidate – a candidate with guts. This is a great issue to demonstrate those guts.
Related articles
- Obama ad slams Romney for opposing Planned Parenthood, abortion (redalertpolitics.com)
- Mitt Romney / Condi Rice: The Most Pro-Abortion Republican Ticket Ever? (bungalowbillscw.blogspot.com)
- Michelle Obama Lunches With Planned Parenthood Activist | LifeNews.com (twtface.com)
- Granderson: Mississippi’s abortion end run (cnn.com)
- Obama attacks Romney on abortion stance, campaign calls new ad false (foxnews.com)
- Why Romney’s Finances Are Fair Game (newser.com)
- Ad targets Romney on abortion, Planned Parenthood (virginiabusiness.com)
July 15, 2012 at 1:37 pm
I think you’re right about the campaigns getting dirty (or dirtier). I also agree this is time for all the nice talk to be set aside and bring out the bold, decisive leadership that is needed. We certainly don’t need Romney.
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 8:47 am
Personally, I’m getting disgusted with both camps. I will vote for Obama, of course, but I am very disappointed in the tone his campaign is taking. And I’m sorry, but no one gives a crap about what he did at Bain. And, yes, I know Romney is bringing the issue up but when you start suggesting that he may have committed a felony I think that’s a sign of desperation
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 10:16 am
Romney’s time at Bain, and the fiduciary irregularities need to be vetted and studied.
They are completely relevant to the campaign, as Romney uses this as a cornerstone of his “Business Acumen.”
The economy being highly important to many people makes this specific item very relevant and important to many.
The pollsters just do not know how to ask the questions correctly . . .
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 12:38 pm
The electorate needs to understand that the basic standard of Wall Street is the screw.
Traders take pride in screwing their clients and making a fat commission from doing so. One of the analysts who saw the subprime bubble for what it was previously worked for one of the firms. Assigned to close a deal, he said to the dealer, “Okay, I want to know how you’re going to screw me on this.”
“Oh, no,” protested the trader. “This is good for both of us!”
“I’m going to do this deal anyway, but I want to know how you’re screwing me.”
So, the trader told him, and they did the deal.
Mitt Romney and the other junior partners bought out the senior partners in Bain Capital– AFTER the seniors secretly loaded it up with debt and screwed them. Bain Capital did the same with about 25% of the companies it “rescued,” all part of the standard practice. As president, Romney will be very aware of who he’s going to screw, how and why.
The American people should be very interested in this. It is not something they’d blow off.
LikeLike
July 18, 2012 at 10:31 am
Thanks Chuck. I agree. wE’re back to the Greed is Good era.
LikeLike
September 23, 2013 at 7:52 pm
While I do not agree with your political potiison I too will be sitting the 2012 presidential election out. I will go to the polls but not vote for either the Democratic or Republican candidate deserves my vote. This country need a viable multiple party system and by that I mean more than two parties.In my opinion President Obama is incompetent. In 2008-2010 he squandered the chance he had to show leadership on a more liberal and moral addenda. Instead he rushed to get in bed with corporate interests. Romney is a con man. Essentially his addenda is a minor rehash of policies that go us into this bad economic situation. I am reminded that one of the definitions of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. So someone who is trying to sell such an insane addenda deserves the title con man.
LikeLike
April 28, 2015 at 3:34 pm
The ability to think like that shows you’re an expert
LikeLike
July 20, 2012 at 4:11 am
THE DARK KNIGHT RISES…”BATMAN”…coming to a theater near you!!! Does Rush Limbaugh…really…honestly think that the Democrats are playing up the “Bain Capital” crap… right now …because they can connect…Romney with the…BAD…BAD…charecter “Bain” in the movie?!?!
Because the charecter is “dark…&…bad” that is really a stretch!!! I think Limbaugh might have lost it this time for sure!!! To much “Percocet” Rush!?!
Have ya’ll seen this stuff on the news? I don’t know anything about Batman but is sounds “stupid” to me…
LikeLike
July 20, 2012 at 4:06 pm
“stupid”?
LikeLike
February 9, 2014 at 8:52 am
Obama’s social views are a huge baeirrr to [voting for him].I’m not suggesting you should, Rod I’m not going to vote for either but given that the concrete difference it will actually make is going to be pretty close to nil, what difference practically speaking do his (or Romney’s) social views make? We’ve discussed on several threads here how political solutions aren’t changing anything, so why does it matter?I’m basically looking for a reason to vote Romney, but I’ve not found it.See, this is what I don’t get. Why on Earth would you look for a reason to vote for anyone? I’ve been registered Democratic from 1981 until this year, when I changed to Independent; I’ve voted for people from both parties at different times; at the current time, I can’t see voting for any Republican for national office because there are too many deal-breakers; but I’ve never felt the need to talk myself into voting for my side . In 1996 I voted third party; I’ll probably write in this time. The point is that I feel no loyalty to anyone based on party, even if it’s the party that aligns more with my beliefs. The only way I’d vote for Obama is if there were a snowball’s chance he might win my state and its electoral votes (but there isn’t) and it was a matter of preventing Romney from getting in, since I think Obama would be very, very marginally better. Since that’s not going to happen, though, he’s not getting my vote, for reasons I’ve discussed before. I mean, it’s like on some level you sort of feel bad for not being able to vote for a Republican. I simply do not get that. For me it’s a cold, cruel calculus of which I think will do the better (or least bad) job. I’m way too cynical to invest more emotion in it than that. If my party can’t manage to field someone I can support, well, too bad for it.
LikeLike
February 11, 2014 at 11:32 pm
For some time now, Rod, it seems obvious that Mitt is not your man. Methinks thou doth psrteot too much. Are you secretly looking for a way to vote for Obama. If so, as Nike recommends, JUST DO IT. If you want to vote for Romney quit the whining and do that. I may be one of the few undecided voters left. I have never taken seriously the possibility of voting Obama. Now I consider it a possibility not a vote for Obama, necessarily, but a vote against Romney, for what I fear would be a return to Bush policies. Obama’s social views are a huge barrier to that. I’m basically looking for a reason to vote Romney, but I’ve not found it. I may well go third party, but that feels like a wasted vote. I wasted my vote last time. Anyway, it doesn’t matter Louisiana is going to go for Romney. The choice is not as stark, but the prospect of voting Obama reminds me of the time I had to vote for the odious Edwin Edwards for governor of Louisiana, because the only choice was David Duke. Again, Obama isn’t Edwards, and Romney damn sure isn’t David Duke. But for me, both candidates are deeply unpalatable. It’s a matter of picking one’s poison.
LikeLike
July 16, 2012 at 9:32 am
Well stated article!
LikeLike
July 16, 2012 at 5:43 pm
When reason and facts fail the right-wing media’s agenda, they resort to inspiring their unquestioning audience with baseless fear. Just watch their ads, blog comments, and baseless opinions.
LikeLike
July 16, 2012 at 9:53 pm
Why are conservatives so crazy wacky people?
Who is this Dunke character? Is he a real person?
The character seems to stupid. Is it a fake person?
It is hard for me to believe as an educated individual that people like the Dunke character is real. He is just too dumb and not informed. Like a puppet he doesn’t answer relevant questions and so on. I feel like it is impossible for someone so idiotic to really exist. Help me understand.
Is there any proof that he exists?
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 3:48 am
such
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 6:34 am
Rita,
Dunkle exists. In his retirement years, he has taken up the cross as a prolife martyr. His religious rage is likened to the frightened human psyche that needs the certainty of religion, no matter how narrowly defined, in order to feel secure. He acts as if he is an avatar for God’s anger in the war on abortion, contraception and women.
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 8:50 am
Is that a good description of you, John? Sounds too complicated for me…
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 9:07 am
Yeah, too complicated. That’s the way people talk when they’re told they’ve learned something. Actually, they’ve been fed courses in “women’s studies,” “sociology,” “anthropology,” “political science,” “GLTB science,” etc., and learned nothing. Worse — they’ve been led away from their innate common sense.
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 10:20 am
No offense, but, I am having trouble buying into this Dunkle character.
No real person I have ever met writes the crazy nonsense this character writes.
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 11:08 am
Spend your money anyway, R. It just might not be wasted.
LikeLike
July 18, 2012 at 1:18 pm
I am even more skeptical now . . .
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 8:48 am
But, as stated above, Obama is now doing the same thing. I still dont know what Obama’s message is…
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 6:54 am
Speaking of politics, just saw a funny
Imagine the image of the Nazi pope smiling with the text
“Prolife—sounds better than ‘All women should be Christian baby factories, even if it kills them'”
found it on facebook [dot] com [forward slash] pages [forward slash] Abortioncom/114710445267687
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 9:08 am
a funny?
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 10:23 am
No real person writes comments like this fake Dunkle.
LikeLike
July 17, 2012 at 11:09 am
Vary your message, R.
LikeLike
July 18, 2012 at 10:33 am
Yeah, really, Rita, is that all you can say? Indeed it makes me wonder if you are real….
LikeLike
July 18, 2012 at 3:01 pm
Ooof! Right in the gut!
LikeLike
July 18, 2012 at 6:59 pm
Another stupid fake Dunklish comment . . .
LikeLike
July 19, 2012 at 4:01 am
shain’t real.
LikeLike