I am so sick and tired of feigned outrage.
We see it every day. Some movie producer does a movie depicting some Italians in a bad light and the Italian Defamation League gets “outraged” at the (probably accurate) portrayal of the Italians in the Mafia or Cosa Nostra. They issue a press release condemning the movie, which only increases ticket sales, and they might even hold a protest or two which, again, brings attention to the film that they don’t want people to see.
And now even the pro-life movement has joined the crowd.
As we all know, since 1993 a number of doctors, clinic staff and security guards associated with abortion clinics have been killed by acknowledged pro-life activists. And, for very good reasons, the pro-choice movement expressed its outrage at these horrific crimes because these were bona fide acts of violence conducted by protectors of the fetus against those who stood ready to abort that same fetus. And, yes, the cynics (myself included) will note that the pro-choice groups raised money on the murders.
Now, just a few days ago, it seems that a security guard at the Washington, D.C. headquarters of the pro-life Family Research Council was shot and the assailant was apprehended immediately. According to some reports, the assailant posed as an intern and shot the guard in the arm. The first response by FRC President Tony Perkins was that “The police are investigating this incident. Our first concern is with our colleague who was shot today. Our concern is for him and his family.”
So far, so good. A terrible, uncalled for incident and a well-intended statement of concern.
But, then, of course, it was time to make some political hay. I mean, after all, those “pro aborts” got so much attention years ago, didn’t they? Why shouldn’t we? So, shortly after the incident my buddies at LifeNews.com announced that “the White House is coming under criticism from pro-life advocates for not issuing a condemnation of the shooting of a security guard at the offices of the Family Research Council, a pro-life group.” They went on to say, however, that “it took them (the White House) almost five hours to issue a statement,” which of course contradicts the previous statement. Indeed, the headline of the release saying pro-life groups were condemning the White House for their silence was entitled “White House Takes Five Hours to Comment on FRC Shooting.” Get your act together folks.
Then, later, Mr. Perkins tried to link the shooter to the pro-choice movement (of course). He stated that the assailant “…was given a license to do that by a group such as the Southern Poverty Law Center who labeled us a hate group because we defend the family and stand for traditional orthodox Christianity.” How’s that for some hard evidence of a conspiracy?
Then, a pro-life blogger suggested that the media outlets were either ignoring or downplaying the shooting because, of course, the entire media (I guess including Fox News) is pro-choice. I guess they felt the media was over blowing things when an actual abortion doctor was murdered in front of an abortion clinic.
The funniest thing I read was how the pro-life groups were pooh poohing Obama’s statement condemning this act of violence. On the other side of the coin, pro-life Presidential candidate Mitt Romney had this to say: “I am appalled by the shooting today at the offices of the Family Research Council in our nation’s capital. There is no place for such violence in our society. My prayers go out to the wounded security guard and his family, as well as all the people at the Family Research Council whose sense of security has been shattered by today’s horrific events.”
So Romney used three sentences to say what Obama said in one. Big deal. And yes, he did issue it a little before Obama. What a guy. He must really care more.
This shooting is terrible. The hope the security officer has a speedy recovery. But gimme a break, folks. This is absolutely nothing like the actions of Paul Hill, Michael Griffin and John Salvi.
But nice try.
Related articles
- “Winking With A Blind Eye”: Where Are The Pro-Life Reactions To The Romney-Stericycle Story? (mykeystrokes.com)
- That’s Not ‘Misspoke’ (talkingpointsmemo.com)
- Akin’s Abortion View: More Widespread in GOP Than You Think (thedailybeast.com)
August 19, 2012 at 1:45 pm
“This is absolutely nothing like the actions of Paul Hill, Michael Griffin and John Salvi.” But is similar to the action of Shelley Shannon (that is, if what’s- his-name was actually aiming for the arm). And you cannot even compare what those guys did to what Tiller the Killer did every day.
When child killing again becomes illegal, you’ll see a few more desperate people, like Kate, acting out same way — shooting someone they blame for depriving women of their rights.
LikeLike
August 21, 2012 at 10:54 am
If abortion ever becomes illegal, John, Kate and I and others will not go around shooting people. We will take to the streets and try to get those rights re-instated. We are not pathetic little white boys looking to make a name for themselves.
LikeLike
August 25, 2012 at 6:28 am
Exactly Pat…we will also fight for the law that makes abortion “illegal” to also have a rider put on it:
Any woman that leaves this country will need to have a pregnancy test leaving the U.S. and returning to the U.S. at the airport with strict protocol!!
I bet when the “rich and the lawmakers” know they can’t sneak out to another country to have an abortion…they may re-think their stand on the issue!?! LOL
LikeLike
August 20, 2012 at 9:12 am
Everyone is afraid to comment on all the murders the Catholic Church advocated for hundreds of years.
Why does the media not report on the horrors of the Church against the innocents?
LikeLike
August 20, 2012 at 2:55 pm
Evi the Anti (Catholic, that is) is back, and stupid as ever. Why does the media not report on the horrors of people like Evi against the innocents? I’ll tell you why. They occur so often it’s not even news.
LikeLike
August 20, 2012 at 3:06 pm
Seriously that is dumb.
Do you not recognize the atrocities of your Catholic Church over the last millennium? By avoiding the discussion and denying it often, you just appear illiterate, as everyone knows the history of the Catholic Church, including PJP II who tried to apologize for a small subset of the atrocities.
Johnny boy, why not admit the truth?
You shouldn’t get such a horrible emotional response from the truth. In my review of the documentation, the Catholic Church is obviously the monster that it has been for a very long time . . . you avoiding the issue just makes you appear uninformed – At Best.
LikeLike
August 20, 2012 at 4:48 pm
One of your problems, Evi, is you think name-calling is discussing.
“The Church is evil” is simply not a disusing, Ev, even if you add “everyone knows” and “the Church is obviously a monster.” It’s what high school freshmen think of as discusing. Some of them stop thinking that by the time they’re sophomores. Any hope for you?
LikeLike
August 21, 2012 at 8:17 am
Please discuss the murderous history of the Catholic Church.
LikeLike
August 21, 2012 at 10:56 am
Evan, why do you focus so much on the Catholic Church? Haven’t all churches been involved in some kind of war or aggressive activities against the innocent?
LikeLike
August 21, 2012 at 11:01 am
That’s not the way one begins a discussion, Ev. One backs up an opinion with reasons. And to repeat, “everyone knows that” is not a reason.
LikeLike
August 21, 2012 at 11:07 am
And Pat, you’re right — churches are composed of people and people have a tendency to do bad things in spite of what the church they belong to says. However, anti-church people, like Hitler and Stalin, do much worse things.
LikeLike
August 22, 2012 at 1:43 pm
Apparently you will not even acknowledge the atrocities of the Church, while you do acknowledge the atrocities of Hitler and Stalin.
A pathetically simple disingenuous evasive tactic.
Obvious to all readers.
LikeLike
August 23, 2012 at 4:23 am
Of course I won’t acknowledge things that don’t exist.
Your “pathetically simple disingenuous evasive tactic” is similar to “Have you stopped beating your mother? Answer yes or no.”
LikeLike