What could be more oriented toward caring for people in families than to ensure universal access to health care that includes abortion? Yet, the Republicans have spent over two decades fighting against what is in the public interest, favoring their own political and corporate interests. In 2009, just weeks after Obama’s inauguration, members of the GOP determined to roadblock the administration’s efforts for universal health care. In fact, just as they did during the Clinton administration, the Republicans were far more concerned with their party than with the good of the nation. You may recall all the specious arguments made by the right wing over health care including death panels and government takeover of health care. Their worry was not
about the health care of Americans but the viability of their own party. So while the GOP worries about their own survival, pushes for states’ right and less government, here’s a few troubling points that make their self-interested agenda seem downright draconian and against family, children, and, especially, women.
Abortion and Unwanted Children
According to Russo and David, writing for Transnational Family Research Institute, “there is a substantial literature that documents the serious health, social, psychological, and economic consequences of unintended and unwanted childbearing. These consequences can include increased maternal and infant death and illness, unstable marriages, and the restriction of educational and occupational opportunities leading to poverty and limited roles for women. These adverse effects are not shared equally by all segments of society, and in the United States fall more heavily on those who are poor, young, or members of an ethnic minority group. Further, evidence suggests that even in advantageous social and economic circumstances, when a pregnancy is unwanted and the women requests an abortion, to deny it forces her to bear a child at risk for psychological problems that are long lasting.”
In a follow up to the 1995 report, The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families, the current study, a white paper titled The Consequences of Unintended Childbearing, suggest that experiencing a birth or pregnancy that was unintended by the mother, who is most often studied, is associated with an array of negative outcomes, including delayed pre- natal care, reduced likelihood of breastfeeding, poorer mental and physical health during childhood, poorer educational and behavioral outcomes of the child, poorer maternal mental health, lower mother-child relationship quality, and an increased risk of the mother experiencing physical violence during pregnancy.
Yet, the so-called prolife folks, mostly Republicans, want to deny abortion rights, claiming all life is sacred. What a bunch of BS.
Child Abuse
Here’s a look at what happens when states are responsible for protecting children. Some states have little to no money to protect them.
Of the 715,760 children confirmed abused and neglected in 2008:
• 71.1% did not receive proper food, clothing, shelter, hygiene, education, medical care or protection.
• 16.1% were physically abused.
• 9.1% were sexually abused.
• 7.3% suffered from emotional abuse.
• 2.2% suffered from medical neglect.
• 9% suffered from other mistreatment such as abandonment, threats, and congenital drug addiction
• 60% of people in drug rehabilitation centers report being abused or neglected as a child
Of the millions of children reported abused or neglected each year, several thousand are in life threatening situations. In response to the statistics, the federal government began work in 2010 to increase public awareness of child fatalities and to enlist the federal government in elevating the issue. In their report, they found among the rich democracies, the U.S. child abuse death rate is 3 times higher than Canada’s, and 11 times higher than Italy’s. What accounts for the differences? Among other things, teen pregnancy, violent crime, imprisonment, and poverty rates are much lower in these countries. Further, their social policies in support of families are much greater and typically include childcare, universal health insurance, paid parental leave, visiting nurses, and more—all things which together can prevent child abuse and neglect in the first place—-all social policies the Republican party wants to deny American families.
The media repeats the meme “The Party of No” to define the GOP. There’s a bit of truth here when Republicans care more for their party’s survival and less for the very families they claim to embrace. It’s more family values malarkey.

October 18, 2012 at 10:25 am
The GOP does not care . . .
LikeLike
October 19, 2012 at 8:32 am
They don’t care, that is why we have to vote smart.
LikeLike
October 19, 2012 at 8:47 pm
The GOP cares about abortion only insofar as it can split people off from voting for a good legislator. Mr. Dunkle illustrated this with his comment that his bumper sticker says, “I AM A SINGLE ISSUE VOTER.” His hatred and fear of abortion will deliver his vote for a Republican who will reduce his Social Security by chaining it to the Consumer Price Index (or some such) and delivering the savings to the wealthiest 1%. But he’ll be happy in the belief that his Congressman or -woman will inveigh against abortion in his behalf. Talk about shooting yourself in the wallet!
LikeLike
October 18, 2012 at 2:57 pm
But, but– you want them ripped apart in the womb??????
Valid as your argument is, bloggingfem, it’s not going to build a bridge to the so-called “pro-lifers.” They cannot get beyond death, sorry to say. What is it that keeps them from weighing the needs of a child against their own need to be a “rescuer” who does not rescue?
LikeLike
October 19, 2012 at 5:10 pm
Why is it pro-lifer’s almost always resort to sensationalizing the death of the fetus?? “Ripped apart in the womb”- Dramatic much? You really either get off on that idea so much that you want to systematically cram it down everyone’s throat or you really need to do some research on what is really going on! I find so many people have no clue on how the female body works, even today it feels hushed and that inevitable leads to ignorance…
This is NOT a baby we are talking about- first get that through your heads- This is medically called a zygote or a fetus, whatever it may be it isn’t a living child until it breaths air! You can’t tell the sex of the fetus until around the upper end of 14 weeks before that it is a sexless, nameless, parasite living off a woman’s body. *And that’s really the key because everyone would think it was so crazy if a woman was told not to go get antibiotics to rid her body of bacteria but yet a baby is a whole nother kind of commitment with deep mental and physical rammifications for the mother if taken to term! That’s inhumane for the mohter and the unwanted child.
You know if any of you bible thumpers went out and made thos unwanted children feel loved, adopted them so they could feel loved and not turned around and molested them behind closed doors or created the next bible army with them then maybe I’d say, you know, they really care! But you don’t!! You don’t spread love or peace or acceptance, you go out bomb the people who oppose you and the books that YOU read, you hold signs up and scream at mothers facing a huge turning point in their lives. And it’s more than uncivil, it’s inhumane.
JUST BECAUSE IT’S NOT IN YOUR BOOK DOESN’T MEAN IT CAN’T BE APART OF MY LIFE
LikeLike
October 20, 2012 at 2:56 pm
But Cassie, while I agree with you about early abortions, the fact is that as it advances it does appear to be more like a “baby” and the pro-choice movement is very skittish about addressing that part.
LikeLike
October 22, 2012 at 6:27 am
That’s simple, it’s because many ppl are split on how they feel about it. Nobody WANTS to terminate a life but if its what makes sense for the mother and ultimately the baby then sometimes there’s just no way around it. I don’t believe that every mother loves her unborn child, we wouldn’t see the horrific crimes we do if they did, there wouldn’t be babies n dumpsters if they did. But I do feel that abortions are a big decision to everyone and they should be. Personally I would not want to terminate a pregnancy n the later development stages but that doesn’t mean we should get all caught up in the specifics before we even have it available to women period. I want everyone to start looking beyond their own nose, practing what they preach, step into somebody else’s shoes, I mean this is third grade sh*t right here.
LikeLike
October 23, 2012 at 10:02 am
An excellent response, Anonymous. And you are right about trying to step into another person’s shoes. When I was in the abortion rights movement, I remember abortion doctors telling me how PROTESTORS in front of their clinic would occasionally bring in their daughter or another relative for an abortion But, of course, that was “different”….
LikeLike
October 20, 2012 at 3:16 pm
I am not skittish about whatever stage of development the fetus is in. The fetal Ted Bundy looked more and more like a “baby,” but there was no one there to nurture him properly.
A fetus to whom someone does not pledge their time, their priorities, their fortune and their reputation is already halfway to being another Ted Bundy. I am not going to risk inflicting on other people the potential for violence immanent in a child I refused to care for. If I won’t pledge to raise the child, I have no right to tell a woman I’m in charge of her pregnancy.
The big problem of the so-called “pro-life” movement is that they refuse to care for the child that results from an unwanted or unintended pregnancy. And they can’t address why they are unable to do so,
LikeLike
October 20, 2012 at 5:05 pm
Oh, but some of them do claim they help. They throw baby showers, boxes of diapers, old cans of formula, or take them shopping for a winter coat or maternity clothes….you know, all the stuff that really matters in life.
LikeLike
February 9, 2014 at 6:48 am
Congrats! I can’t wait to watch your pregnancy vlogs! When I was pgnrnaet with my daughter I was the same way with the eating. I never had morning sickness, and I was hungry all the time. I ate a ton, and didn’t gain any weight in the first several months and then all of the sudden it caught up to me! Food tasted AMAZING so I don’t regret gaining more weight than I was supposed to. It was worth it HaHa!
LikeLike
October 19, 2012 at 1:41 am
Too bad no one knows that Jessica had a secret abortion after her last affair so Jason wouldn’t find out…That’s why he got drunk & took a little ride with Brittany Kerr..An inside source told CMT
LikeLike
October 20, 2012 at 2:56 pm
What the heck are you talking about, one country?
LikeLike
October 19, 2012 at 5:08 am
The New England Journal of Medicine published an article written by the executive staff leadership of five professional societies that represent the majority of U.S. physicians providing clinical care — the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American College of Physicians, and the American College of Surgeons. Their focus, and complaint, is the alarming trend of inappropriate legislative interference. The leadership of physicians and surgeons believe patients’ best interests should be first. Critical to achieving this goal is respect for the importance of scientific evidence, patient autonomy, and the patient–physician relationship.
Examples of inappropriate legislative interference with this relationship are proliferating, as lawmakers increasingly intrude into the realm of medical practice, often to satisfy political agendas without regard to established, evidence-based guidelines for care.
LikeLike
October 19, 2012 at 8:35 am
No doubt, legislators are micromanaging doctors and patients for their own personal agendas!
LikeLike
October 19, 2012 at 12:20 pm
Please note:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsb1209858
Really well done, in one of the most distinguished wel established peer reviewed periodicals in the world.
LikeLike
October 19, 2012 at 12:22 pm
Good catch BF, this article representing almost all physicians in the US, points out the corrosive and meddlesome conduct of legislator between the bond of the doctor patient relationship, and the basic ethical rights that doctors follow, one of them being Patient Autonomy.
LikeLike
October 20, 2012 at 7:38 am
Thanks for the url….forgot to attach
LikeLike
October 20, 2012 at 2:58 pm
Well, this “inappropriate legislative interference” may be just that – inappropriate – but it ain’t gonna stop. It comes down to the votes. If the antis have the votes, they will push their agenda and no amount of us trying to be rationale is gonna stop them….
LikeLike
October 20, 2012 at 5:06 pm
I’d say you are a bit cynical but then I’d have to look in the mirror and realize that I’m just as cynical if not more so. It’s beginning to look a lot like fascism….wrapped in flag.
LikeLike
October 21, 2012 at 2:22 pm
Well I just got my ballot in the mail, so on election day I can get as many friends out to vote for Obama rather than spend the day in line voting.
I think the race is so tight and one state (like my stupid state) screwed it up in Gore vs Bush43 will make the entire difference, by probably Not That Many Votes . . .
Good fortune everyone!!!
LikeLike
October 29, 2012 at 4:19 am
Values formation within the family still counts when it comes to educating ourselves regarding reproductive health and sex education. Parents have great role in molding their children’s minds. This is one factor that can possibly avoid early pregnancies among the youth.
LikeLike
November 9, 2012 at 5:55 pm
Ok, this sounds like pure religious rhetoric but u r right to a point. I have a daughter and I’m not going to promote pregnancy to her as an alternative to college (j/k) or n e thing but realistically teen pregnancies still happen and did even in the prime n propper 50’s. but u speak of such a small scope of unwanted pregnancies that its almost entirely dismissable. We will all keep teaching our “family values” but unwanted pregnancies will still happen and we need to look at the best way of dealing with that as a whole and not spend all our time defining things into ingest-able pieces for those who want to jump into the conversation without a realistic scope of the situation they are addressing
LikeLike
November 12, 2012 at 10:25 am
That’s a very level headed approach, Cassie. If only more people looked at things the way you do.
LikeLike
November 10, 2012 at 9:26 am
friendlyme, parents can “have [a] great role in molding their children’s minds,” but the fact of the matter is that the most teen pregnancies occur in the most “religious” families– the evangelicals, fundamentalists, snake-handling, come-to-Jesus types who are generally at or near the bottom of the socio-economic ladder, so powerless that they can only work off their vindictiveness on their children, manipulating and confusing them to the point where the children are absolutely powerless to say no to their uncle, cousin or boy friend. And when the child does become pregnant, the parents use the pregnancy as another way to prove who’s the boss in the family. It’s how Ted Bundy got his start…
Right now, an acquaintance of mine who is a tea bagger has a daughter who got pregnant, has no spouse or full-time job and has had to move back home. If every child who runs into such difficulties has only the option of moving back home to live by “family values,” then the logical extension of “family values” to all of society is to return to tribalism. If I were you, I’d never use the phrase again in a meliorative sense…. It is nothing less than cruel.
LikeLike
November 12, 2012 at 10:27 am
That’s a very interesting point, Charles, about teen pregnancies occuring in those families. I’d love to personally confront some of those hypocrites….
LikeLike
November 12, 2012 at 10:24 am
You are right, Friendly, parents do have a lot to say about molding minds. Unfortunately, there are a lot of nutty parents who mold their kids minds in the wrong direction.
LikeLike