A few years ago, I wrote about Adam Hamilton’s When Christians Get It Wrong. It seems especially important to talk about his book again in light of current political events and the election.
In a particularly lyrical passage, Hamilton writes “scientists act as God’s docents, whether they believe in God or not. By helping us understand God’s handiwork, they add to the majesty and glory of creation that, as a believer, leaves me with a greater sense of awe about the One who created all things.” Witnessing the behavior of self-proclaimed Christian legislators and candidates for public office, I have to say that they are not doing a very good job of telling the glory of God, not doing a good job at all sharing the majesty of human beings. In fact, I believe that the assaults on women’s reproductive health care demonstrate the ugly, depraved side of these so-called Christians.
Men like Richard Mourdock, John Koster, Todd Akin, Paul Ryan, and by extension Mitt Romney, lacking any human empathy (Christian compassion?), believe that women who suffer unimaginable violence from rape and incest should be further victimized by taking away their freedom of choice. But one’s faith shouldn’t be an issue that voters need to be wary of when it comes to choosing a candidate to support.
What a person believes personally and what is legal, what is constitutional, and frankly, what is fair and just, is how a politician needs to promise to govern. But such a concept doesn’t exist within the Republican party of NO. Their attempts to cut off funds needed to implement Title X family planning funds, allows employers to opt-out of covering contraception or pretty much any other medical care are written on the basis of their religious beliefs or moral convictions.
Another point that Hamilton makes is about the new testament of the Bible, which was an attempt to correct “self-righteousness, hypocrisy, judgmentalism, spiritual pride, moral compromise and a host of other issues” through one simple concept called LOVE. Yet, every time I hear an antiabortion protester invoke the name of Jesus, I cringe. There’s nothing Christ-like in that invocation, particularly because it lacks love and is full of rage and contempt for any woman who enters an abortion clinic. Every time I hear the arrogant Paul Ryan’s conservative Catholic, staunch antiabortion mouth open about ending abortion, I gasp at his hubris and worry that he could one day be sitting in the oval office. His views are not about love or compassion. They’re about his right to impose policies based on his religion to mandate policies that impact women.
This country was founded on a separation of church and state. But we’re slipping into a theocracy that does not bode well for women. Think carefully when you vote next week.

November 1, 2012 at 11:08 am
Despite the ability of science to prove the existence of a Deity, religion does serve the purpose of comforting people about the finality of their death. The nature of the dysfunctional self-help movement that calls itself “pro-life” is meant to help religiously inclined people to feel good, when in fact they do not have enough religious faith to accept their eventual oblivion. For these people, it is totally in congruity with their religious impulses to be un-Christian or -Islamic or -Buddhist. . .
LikeLike
November 1, 2012 at 4:30 pm
I am not a religious person, but from what I know religion also comforts people about the death of others. Look at Rose Kennedy.
LikeLike
November 1, 2012 at 4:33 pm
I have always been fascinated about these pro-life folks who love to talk about Jesus. Meanwhile, as you said, they are out there screaming at women and their partners. They are dragging out their little kids, making them hold up ugly signs with ugly messages. And of course, there are those who kill in the name of Jesus. That’s why I do appreciate, if that is the right word, those pro-lifers who “merely” go out to a clinic and pray. That, to me, is a more christian thing to do.
LikeLike
November 2, 2012 at 5:26 am
But saying that religion comforts people seems a contradiction with the numnuts who stalk women outside clinics. If they were so religious, it seems to me that their faith in God would be enough. But it’s not. They act on their own willful selves to play God, to judge women, to shove their messed up beliefs on others. We’ve witnessed plenty of that crap even on this site.
LikeLike
November 2, 2012 at 8:40 am
They’re acting out an allegorical battle when they demonstrate, the battle for transcendence of their own death….
LikeLike
November 2, 2012 at 5:21 am
The philosopher Thomas Merton, wrote “Those of us who attempt to act and do things for others or for the world without deepening our own self-understanding, freedom, integrity and capacity to love, will not have anything to give others. We will communicate to them nothing but the contagion of our own obsessions, our aggressivity, our ego-centered ambitions, our delusions and ends and means.”
***Translated for the antiabortion activists***
You who yell at women entering or leaving abortion clinics communicate nothing but the contagion of your own obsessions with fetuses, your aggressivity toward women, your ego-centered ambitions to prevent women from acting on their own reproductive rights, your delusions about fetal agency, the subservient role of women, and the supremacy of your own twisted religious faith.
LikeLike
November 2, 2012 at 7:39 am
Here’s a great article that debunks the prolife propaganda
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2012/10/how-i-lost-faith-in-the-pro-life-movement.html
LikeLike
November 2, 2012 at 8:37 am
her follow-up comments do a bit to address the discrepancy between what so-called “pro-lifers” say and what they do:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2012/11/a-response-to-objections-on-my-pro-life-movement-post.html
LikeLike
November 4, 2012 at 8:56 am
Sorry BF, but we’re already there….
LikeLike
November 5, 2012 at 3:33 am
It’s really hard to comment if the battle is between rights. Right to life, and right to have a good life.
LikeLike
November 6, 2012 at 7:00 am
But is the post about a battle between rights?
LikeLike