Before I embark on my next award winning column, I want to inform our readers that my co-blogger, DRK8blogginfem, is now on sabbatical. As most of you know – especially you pro-lifers out there – she is a professor at a local college in Pennsylvania and it’s just become a matter of time management. So, she will be on the sidelines for a bit. Meanwhile, however, I’m pleased to report that I will soon be joined by two other bloggers – and one of them is from Ireland where things are hot and heavy. Stay tuned.
So, Tuesday is the 40th anniversary of Roe v Wade. I live down here in Alexandria, Virginia so by the end of the week pro-life activists will be streaming into town for their annual “March for Life” (they are marching on the weekend). Of course, it’s more than one march. It’s a series of prayer vigils, concerts, visits to Capitol Hill (more on that later) and protests at local abortion clinics. A fun time will be had by all.
To this day, however, I do not understand how the pro-life movement has made this day theirs. I mean, if I recall correctly January 22, 1973 was a day of liberation for millions and millions of women, wasn’t it? It was the day that ended the era of illegal abortion. It was a day that guaranteed that women would no longer have to resort to back-alley abortionists or self-induced abortions. Roe v Wade saved the lives of thousands and thousands of women over the years. Now, I know pro-lifers will point out that women have died from legal abortions and that is unfortunately true, but the number of deaths after Roe is miniscule compared to the epidemic of deaths that occurred pre-Roe.
So, how is it that the pro-choice movement never organized an annual “March for Choice?” Well, the answer is simple. Most people get energized when they are losing, when they are fighting FOR something. In the case of the pro-lifers, it’s seeking an “end to abortion.” They envision saving all of those “little babies,” giving little or no thought to the millions of women who each year feel compelled to abort. Nope, they just love those babies and we’re the “baby killers” so let’s go to Washington, D.C. and march!
On the other hand, pro-choicers find themselves in the fortunate position of having to defend legal abortion and it’s harder to get people energized when you’re defending something that young people in particular have been living with all their lives. As we have recently seen, the murder of 20 children with a semi-automatic assault weapon is a much more immediate and compelling image than the grainy black and white photos of a women lying in her own blood, the victim of a self-induced abortion in 1964. It’s just not the same.
So, the anti-abortion crowd has basically kidnapped this day from us. They’ll go up to Capitol Hill on Friday and hand out red roses to all of the congressional offices (we used to take them, put them in water, then bring them home to our spouses). They’ll talk about how every woman who has ever had an abortion has regretted it and is on the verge of suicide. They’ll talk about dismembering fetuses, partial birth abortion (which, ironically, does not dismember a fetus), Obama wanting to mandate abortion and how ObamaCare is going to force all of us to pay for abortions up to 42 weeks. It will be the same ole, same ole.
But, damn, I wish we could take this day back!
Related articles
- Roe v. Wade at 40: Why the Pro-Choice Movement is Losing the Abortion Rights Fight (time.com)
- Abortion Proponents, Foes Mark 40th Anniversary of Roe v. Wade (boiseweekly.com)
- Roe v Huh? Most Under 30 Don’t Know Roe v. Wade was About Abortion (jezebel.com)
- More abortion legislation may be headed for General Assembly (newsobserver.com)
- Most Americans under 30 don’t know Roe was about abortion (washingtonpost.com)




January 20, 2013 at 4:53 pm
It may be fun to take the day back. But I’m not sure. I say let them do what they want. It’s not like anything they do on that day matters anyway.
Thinking of what I’d suggest for this 40th anniversary, I have the following to offer.
I do know that there is reason to rethink terminology (like pseudo terms such as prochoice and prolife),
to critically engage legislators about their drive toward making women second class citizens (think vawa, imprisoning pregnant women, trap laws that make abortion more expensive for poor women, defunding planned parenthood making family planning and cancer screening more difficult, defunding wic, refraining from imposing gun laws because they violate a person’s privacy but being gung ho for laws invading a woman’s privacy with transvaginal ultrasounds or state-mandated biased counseling) and
to rethink tax exemptions for all politically active religious organizations (think catholics, mormons).
So, I’d say to all the bible thumping, rosary toting marchers, have a great time.
LikeLike
January 21, 2013 at 6:27 am
I second that!! My only other wish would be that while they are thumping their bibles and working those rosary beads….”Mother Nature” would bring her icy…bone chilling stare to the marchers!! Just to get their attention!!!
LikeLike
January 22, 2013 at 8:11 am
You might get your wish, Lorraine…
LikeLike
February 10, 2014 at 6:40 am
//dondu should asnwer for this//.Why?//the MK called IPKLF as worst force and today also he is publishing poems praising terrors tits//.I love tits. They are never terrors for me. They are rather friendly and pleasant to behold and hold. :))))))))))Regards,Dondu N.Raghavan
LikeLike
January 22, 2013 at 8:10 am
Yeah, it would be nice to “take back” the day but you’re right – it ain’t gonna happen. The good news is that it’s gonna be absolutely freezing down here (although I do feel bad for the kids).
LikeLike
January 24, 2013 at 3:08 am
The best way to take the day back is to show how they are so focused on death they cannot and do not care for life. Point out that the emperor has no clothes…
LikeLike
January 20, 2013 at 5:41 pm
I have to agree with Drk8, they are really doing nothing on that day other than proving how pro-life they are not. If these pro-lifers were really PRO-LIFE they would be doing something on that day that would truly prove they’re pro-life, like fighting for the already born lives that are in need of help. They would also be trying to prevent pregnancies, thereby prevent the need for abortion but they are against birth-control as well. I just wish we could take that label “Pro-Life” and use for those of us that are really pro-life.
LikeLike
January 20, 2013 at 6:28 pm
Anti Choicers show every day how anti life they are . . .
LikeLike
January 22, 2013 at 8:12 am
Good idea, Sarah Rose. They should put their money where their mouths are. But working at a homeless shelter for that day would not get them on the news. This is all about PR, screaming at people, holding ugly signs and insulting women.
LikeLike
January 21, 2013 at 5:46 am
I really had a hard time digesting this since day 1. It’s so not easy to figure it out how anti-life people fight for this right.
LikeLike
January 23, 2013 at 12:47 pm
cynthia, can you expand on your comment? I am not sure what you mean . . .
LikeLike
January 25, 2013 at 9:19 am
The rest is silence. . . . Cynthia is without a philosophy to speak from.
LikeLike
January 21, 2013 at 6:30 am
It comes down to one pure and simple fact, prolife means anti woman. Even the women deny themselves as women. They’ve lost their souls to the patriarchs.
LikeLike
January 22, 2013 at 8:14 am
Of course, Parker, they would not say they are anti-women because they would say they are “saving” them from the “horrors” of abortion. I certainly know that they do not trust women to make the decision!
LikeLike
January 21, 2013 at 7:33 am
Happy Anniversary R v W!
LikeLike
January 21, 2013 at 10:24 am
March for Life,
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Obama inaugural event
40th anniversary of R v W
What are the common threads? Money, power, and influence?
MLK was a powerful advocate for social justice, for raising the economic prowess of the poor. He led a life of relative poverty, funneling any earned income into the civil rights movement. Even his funeral procession featured a humble casket drawn by a mule carriage.
Obama, despite the obstacles from his detractors, used his influence and position to pass healthcare for everyone, leveling the health care field, and definitely an MLK nod toward justice. Obama adopted a transformative initiative to redistribute wealth through tax reform, to, again, attempt a more level playing field.
Roe v Wade, celebrating 40 years of reproductive choice, definitely leveled the playing field for women. But as the conservatives’ war on women raged on over the past two years, the façade of prolife was peeled away. Instead of compassion for women, there was/is disdain. Instead of proclaiming concern for all life, there was/is rampant war-mongering against women and children here and abroad.
And when the March for Life folks show up, instead of humility and concern for all humankind, there is egotism. Instead of the humbleness of MLK, there is the arrogance of the likes of Frank Pavone, begging for money to keep his celebrity priesthood functioning. Instead of honoring her Uncle Martin Luther King’s reputation, niece Alveda King disgraces herself by rewriting his history.
What are the common threads? Money, power and influence…but the key difference is that they can work for the greater good of humanity or work for personal aggrandizement.
LikeLike
January 21, 2013 at 9:05 pm
True compassion is more than flinging a coin to a beggar.
It comes to see that an edifice which produces beggars
needs restructuring.
– MLK
But don’t expect the prolife movement to understand.
LikeLike
January 22, 2013 at 8:20 am
That’s a great quote – a keeper!
LikeLike
January 22, 2013 at 6:58 pm
It’s a keeper for certain, especially for folks who want and who do
ACTUALLY HELP
R.E.A.L. CHILDREN
LikeLike
January 21, 2013 at 9:20 pm
The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy. The true neighbor will risk his position, his prestige and even his life for the welfare of others. In dangerous valleys and hazardous pathways, he will lift some bruised and beaten brother to a higher and more noble life.
– Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr
So as I listened to MLk events and the Obama inaugural celebrations, I came to understand what Dr King was saying and what it means today.
The ultimate measure of a prolifer is not where s/he stands in moments of comfort and convenience but where s/he stands at times of challenge and controversy.
The true neighbor will risk his/her position, his/er prestige and even his/her life for the welfare of others. But NOT THE PROLIFE CROWD. They refuse to risk their position/prestige….refuse to help others.
In dangerous valleys and hazardous pathways, s/he will lift some bruised and beaten brother/sister to a higher and more noble life ONLY IF the prolifer can gain some notice, some sense of worth.
Pity the poor prolifers. They are lost in the desert.
LikeLike
January 22, 2013 at 8:36 pm
THINGS THAT LOWER ABORTION RATES
CONTRACEPTION? YES
FREE CHILDCARE? YES
FAIR WAGES? YES
HOUSING? YES
FOOD ON THE TABLE? YES
JOBS THAT PAY A LIVING WAGE? YES
CROSS GENERATIONAL COMMUNITY SUPPORT? YES
HEALTH CARE FOR WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN? YES
STANDING OUTSIDE ABORTION CLINICS BEING A DICK? NO!
STANDING OUTSIDE ABORTION CLINICS BEING A BITCH? NO!
LikeLike
January 23, 2013 at 12:50 pm
Love it!!
LikeLike
January 23, 2013 at 1:10 pm
Don’t forget general education, not to mention more eunichs
LikeLike
January 23, 2013 at 6:16 am
“We should not be ashamed to talk about abortion or apologetic for defending our rights. We should be outraged that we still need to do so.”
LikeLike
January 23, 2013 at 1:12 pm
Unfortunately, DB, there are so many folks who support legal abortion that are still afraid to say the word, much less talk about their own abortion. It’s still a “dirty” word that is uttered only by those who oppose it. Hell, I know some doctors who perform abortions who can barely say the word!
LikeLike
January 24, 2013 at 2:57 am
Breaking news! Catholic hospital argues in lawsuit that fetuses are not people:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/23/catholic-hospital-argues-_n_2534383.html
LikeLike
January 24, 2013 at 9:07 am
Great article!
LikeLike
January 24, 2013 at 11:07 am
haha so when it is convenient fetuses are not people… GREAT!!! That is the pro-life movement…
LikeLike
January 25, 2013 at 9:20 am
A further confirmation that the so-called “pro-life” movement is not based on care for human life but on something else….
LikeLike
January 25, 2013 at 2:16 pm
Catholic Hospitals need to provide good community standard care for women, or simply not be allowed to take women as patients.
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 6:37 am
I saw this on FB today:
Our call to Faith does not ask (or command) us to ignore reality.
It seems to me that the Catholic hospital debacle and the prolife, antibabortion, antisex movement ignores the realities of women’s lives and the lives of those the love and do so in the name of some cockamammy reification called Faith.
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 2:03 pm
Catholics are only about control, power and money….
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 2:09 pm
Just reading the word Catholic gives me indigestion.
When I think of all the crimes against humanity the RCC has perpetrated over the last 1,000 years it is sickening.
LikeLike
January 24, 2013 at 10:39 am
Did anybody here saw the person who was in a tree protesting against abortion on inauguration day?
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 2:10 pm
I saw that.
Another anti choice lunatic …
LikeLike
January 25, 2013 at 9:28 am
There are two campaigns possible by which the “pro-choice” crowd could stage a counter-protest.
The first is to take over the pro-life label: “WE are Pro-Life!” emphasizing the children they have and the intelligence they exercise in determining how best to provide them with the proper nurture– food, clothing, shelter, education, protection, attention and role modeling. Ancillary messaging would include the intellectual efforts involved to make the decisions they have made and will make, including whether or not to have another child.
The second is to paint the so-called “pro-lifers” as they actually are: sex-obsessed, fearful, easily duped, feeling powerless, vindictive, and so focused on abortion that they cannot care for the very life they claim is human when it actually becomes so.
A third possibility– not very effective, but I like the idea– is to make fun of them with a burlesque.
LikeLike
January 25, 2013 at 2:21 pm
40 years ago, women secured a great victory for reproductive justice and security of their person. We will NOT go back, because we simply can’t afford to go back to the days when thousands of women died in illegal abortions.
LikeLike
January 25, 2013 at 4:44 pm
Amen
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 11:22 am
Yo, anti abortion crusaders!
For those of you who chase after other people’s fetuses, who wring your hands about the millions of aborted and unwanted, why not, instead, worry about the born people, the 27 million enslaved people in the world with human trafficking? Or would that be too much reality for you to consider?
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 1:10 pm
Parker, it would be more to their inclination to focus on adoption rather than the effort you propose.
For almost 30 years, RESPONSIBLE Right to Life has been pressuring self-proclaimed “pro-lifers” to end the need for abortion by adopting four children per year. With four million of them, this would mean 16 million of their “unborn humans” rescued, praise Jesus!
Sadly, for some reason they still let their passion for human life detumesce at the delivery room door: RRTL membership still stands at a dismally low figure; to be precise, one…
I have sweetened the pot by offering an incentive to any one who joins and stays with the program for 15 years (four children per individual, eight per couple adopted annually): firebomb an abortion mill in their name. And while they’ve expressed some interest in that, they still haven’t joined, nor have I found any abortion mills since Carol Everett’s got raided decades ago…
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 2:02 pm
Firebomb an abortion mill? Do you mean if someone takes you up on this offer, you’ll firebomb an abortion mill? Do you really want to put that in writing in such a public forum? Or are you so certain that absolutely NO prolifer would ever do something so pro life as adopt all those children for 15 years?
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 2:07 pm
Some Anti Choicers act out like terrorists.
We have to be very careful among the violent anti choice anti life crowd.
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 8:44 pm
I don’t think you’ll find many of them willing to adopt 60 kids just to see an “abortion mill” bombed. One of the traits of the so-called “pro-lifer” is that he/she takes the easy way out in trying to be a hero. That’s why their adoption rate is actually lower than the general population’s!
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 5:06 pm
Parker, wouldn’t you be willing to do that for somebody who was raising 60 children?
I think it would only be a nice way to say “thank you.”
As I said, I’d do it in their name, but it seems Carol Everett owned the last abortion mill in America. Another one might be hard to find.
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 5:07 pm
Or for a couple who were raising 120 children…..
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 8:02 pm
What a plsuraee to meet someone who thinks so clearly
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 12:30 pm
Charles, interesting offer! But how would you define an “abortion mill”?
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 12:37 pm
Anything that’s run the way Carol Everett ran her operation is fair game, nothing else.
However, it’s been 30 years I’ve been making that offer, and NOT ONE so-called “pro-lifer” has accepted the RESPONSIBLE Right to Life challenge! You won’t see me going to jail any time soon for pulling an Eric Rudolph….
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 9:07 pm
Carol Everett is now a staunch pro-lifer! Her testimony follows:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jf6aBvEm9wA
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 7:15 am
So what?
Stupid video.
Can’t understand what this moron is saying most the time.
It’s clear she is spewing the typical Anti Life vitriol.
You still do not have the right to legislate what I do with my body.
Live with that fact, as you never will decide what I do with my body.
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 12:32 pm
Interesting that she stayed there for a while then when it was convenient for her to raise money on it, she went to the other side. Bottom line is her clinic was a mess, there are bad apples in every field, including abortion. And because she chose to help run this “mill” it doesn’t mean the hundreds of other clinics are “mills”.
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 12:45 pm
Everett’s BIG failing was telling non-pregnant women that they were pregnant and needed to have an abortion. But it was Texas, controlled by the Republican Party, and she didn’t go to jail….
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 7:57 am
Pffffft. Stupid is as stupid does and this person makes little or no sense, simply appealing to her audience’s sex-obsessed, fearful, and vindictive natures, Your bad video simply makes Pro-Choice speakers look even more intelligent, thoughtful and articulate than they are already.
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 8:00 am
I am sickened by anti choicers who post stupid videos.
Just Saying is a SPAMing anti choicer who never has anything substantial to add to the conversation.
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 6:11 pm
Everett is a lunatic
LikeLike
February 10, 2014 at 9:30 am
Briaillnce for free; your parents must be a sweetheart and a certified genius.
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 1:59 pm
Finally, the Catholic Church admits that a pregnancy is not a Person.
It is sad that the Catholic Institution, in all it’s endless duplicity, in the end argues whatever point is to their financial advantage.
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 2:05 pm
I saw that story in the news online!
It is remarkable what those nutty Catholics are willing to do.
It is as if all they have in their skulls is soggy jello.
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 12:33 pm
Parker and Jennifer – you should now look at my most recent post!! Would be very interested in your reactions!
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 2:34 pm
John Fugelsang said, “Only in America can you be pro death penalty, pro war, pro unmanned drone bombs, pro nuclear weapons, pro guns, pro torture, proland mines, and still call yourself ‘prolife”
But the really sad point to all this is these prolifers wouldn’t get the irony.
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 5:00 pm
Thanks Parker!
I Love that quote . . .
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 12:34 pm
That IS a great quote, isn’t it??? Thanks Parker!
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 4:21 pm
Sometimes the Catholic Church is not totally wacko:
LikeLike
January 26, 2013 at 4:56 pm
I agree.
Every once in a blue moon the Catholic Church is not completely 100% demented and wacked out of their brains.
Lets see if Catholics, known for their long history of Horror, will finally raise to the occasion to actually do something Pro Life regarding Gun Laws . . .
I remain skeptical until I see it happen . . .
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 12:37 pm
Thanks for posting, David. I agree that – putting abortion aside – the Church can be “reasonable” at times. Indeed, in my community I work with the CC on a number of issues, like helping the homeless, etc. I do not like it when others take a broad brush and paint the church in a negative way because of their position on abortion. And, remember, while the church has the official position, there are millions upon millions of Catholics who do not protest at clinics, who quietly support abortion rights and, of course, who have had abortions themselves.
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 3:50 am
Just Saying: Carol Everett was NEVER a “pro-choicer.” As she will happily tell you herself, she never gave a woman a chance to refuse to have an abortion– even if the woman wasn’t pregnant! Her goal in her final year of operation was to clear $250,000. Her staff were instructed to get as many women “aborted” on as possible.
She was finally raided, after her bookkeeper tipped off the authortities.
In a desperate attempt to continue denying to herself just how scrofulous her morality was, she blamed her deceit, greed and ambition on “post-abortion syndrome,” and became a “Christian counselor” at a so-called “crisis pregnancy clinic.”
The problem with her “conversion” is that like a recovering alcoholic who sees everything through the bottom of a bottle, she ascribes every unwanted pregnancy to “post-abortion syndrome.” At the speech I attended, she talked about a woman who had had her first abortion at age eleven and her second at age 14, at the latter of which she was accompanied by her 34-year-old boy friend (if memory serves me; it might have been 30).
She ascribed the girl’s sexual behavior and her family’s “drinking and drugging” to “post abortion syndrome.” She didn’t report it as statutory rape or inform child protective services of the kid’s victimization. A legitimate counselor who judged such a situation the way she did would have lost her license.
But the CPC’s operate the way Carol Everett operated her abortion mill– nobody leaves without having gotten the full monty. She’s a piece of work.
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 7:16 am
I love it when the facts are revealed!
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 12:34 pm
Everett herself had had an abortion after cheating on her husband. It became her excuse for her behavior; she never has had to say she chose to be greedy, unethical and criminal.
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 12:40 pm
That has always driven me crazy – anti abortion types who conveniently had one, two or three abortions when they needed them. But, oh now they “see the light” and they “regret” what they did. some people merely like to be celebrities, they like to be on camera, they like the attention. That’s what happened to Carol, to Bernie Nathenson and Norma McCorvey.
LikeLike
January 27, 2013 at 6:31 pm
I think it is insane that these people continue to ask the rhetorical questions to simply induce a commonality amongst the other self-aggrandizers.
It is because of people like this, Pat, that we have to sit and dissect these arguments. It makes no sense that we should have to under-go such painstaking advancements from the sign-holders, to the screaming wing-nuts. It asks the question that if we have a common thought and a common voice, when does one sides argument become fully negated for the malice it brings upon society.
LikeLike