On a cold, sunny December day in 1994, a pro-life terrorist named John Salvi walked into two abortion clinics in Boston and killed two people and injured five. Then, for some unknown reason, he jumped into his car and drove all the way down to Norfolk, Virginia where he pulled up in front of the Hillcrest Clinic, a facility that also performed abortions. He jumped out of the car and fired randomly at the building with a semi-automatic rifle. Fortunately, no one was injured and about a week later I visited the clinic and the clinic director, Suzette Caton, showed me the bullet holes.
The Hillcrest Clinic had always been a target for anti-abortion zealots. But, despite John Salvi, years of picketing, a bombing and an arson, the Hillcrest Clinic served women in the Tidewater, Virginia area for four decades. And now they are shutting down their doors because the Commonwealth of Virginia thinks they don’t have adequate parking and their hallways are not wide enough.
The Hillcrest Clinic closed its doors on April 20, 2013. There were two main reasons for the closure. One was that their patient load had declined over the last few years from 2,116 in 2009 to 1,629 in 2012. As any business owner knows, you always have a bottom line to pay the bills and a decline that dramatic certainly affects the income. Of course, one could say that that is “good news” in that fewer women were having abortions. Let’s just hope there were fewer abortions because the women just elected to not have them, versus being pressured by the state or anti-abortion zealots.
The second – and main- reason was that regulations had recently been passed by the Commonwealth of Virginia under the guise of “enhancing patient safety” and, according to Caton, it would have cost the clinic about $500,000 to comply with the new rules. The rules generally require the clinic to meet hospital-like design guidelines, such as hallway size, the number of parking spaces and number of toilets. As if the patients in the clinic were being forced to pee outside. That was too much of a price tag for Hillcrest, so they elected to close – which is exactly what these regulations are designed to do.
If there is any good news, it is that according State officials, of Virginia’s 20 abortion clinics, Hillcrest is the only one not seeking to have their license renewed. No doubt, the Planned Parenthood clinics will embark on fundraisers to come up with the money and the independents, well, it’s hard to say what their strategy will be. One thing that at least one clinic is hoping for is to stretch out the process until Virginia can elect a pro-choicer Governor this November.
“It’s a little bit bittersweet,” said Caton. “But I also feel like for 40 years we’ve had the honor of providing compassionate care to the women in Tidewater who are faced with an unplanned pregnancy.”
In 1983, a man broke in to the clinic, poured kerosene throughout the office and set it ablaze. A year later, a cluster of pipe bombs exploded nearby, breaking a plate glass window of the bank branch on the first floor. In May, 1989, six activists pushed their way into the building. Then Salvi paid them a visit.
Despite the violence, the clinic staff never talked about closing.
The pen may indeed be mightier than the sword.
Related articles
- Norfolk abortion clinic plans to close doors (hamptonroads.com)
- Bullying clinics to satisfy ideology (hamptonroads.com)
- Abortion clinic in Norfolk closing Saturday after 40 years (wvec.com)
- Virginia’s New Anti-Choice Restrictions Will Force 40-Year-Old Abortion Clinic To Close This Weekend (thinkprogress.org.feedsportal.com)
- Abortion Clinic Closes (newsplex.com)
- Virginia Abortion Clinic Closes Thanks to Bullshit ‘Safety’ Law (jezebel.com)
- Government overreach on abortion (hamptonroads.com)



April 28, 2013 at 9:55 am
You gotta stop using the term “pro-life.” Those assholes have co-opted you into using it. Stop it.
LikeLike
April 28, 2013 at 4:52 pm
I agree with Mary,anti-choice or pro-birth would be more fitting, there is nothing pro-life about the anti-choice movement, so from now on I will stop using pro-life.
See what the anti-choice movement does by enacting asinine legislation like this is just create an environment for future Gosnell’s to flourish. But I guess since the anti-choice people don’t live in the logical world they would never see it that way,would they?
Also I would think that since the majority of anti-choicer’s are religious and we all know that religion is far from logical, they are immune to think logically about women and abortion.
LikeLike
April 29, 2013 at 1:04 pm
Agreed, Sarah Rose. As for this creating “future Gosnells,” actually it might be just the opposite because the regulations are now so strict. Clearly, you are not going to see any new abortion providers opening up in Virginia or, for that matter, anywhere else with just a few exceptions. But the future Gosnell’s of the world could not afford and would not spend the kind of money that is now necessary to keep open or open up a new clinic.
LikeLike
May 3, 2013 at 11:32 am
“Aborticentric” is a far more accurate and polite description of those people. They are so focused on abortion that it precludes them from caring properly for human life. The theory of aborticentrism shows just how thoroughly they delude themselves and why they work as hard as they do to convince the public that they are heroes.
LikeLike
April 28, 2013 at 5:55 pm
Agreed!
They are never Pro Life as we have seen.
They are simply Pro Birth, Anti Choice, and Anti Life.
LikeLike
April 29, 2013 at 1:05 pm
Pro-birth sounds a little weird to me cause I’m “pro-birth” as well. I think it’s either anti-abortion or anti-choice. I prefer anti abortion because I just think we need to keep saying the damn word as much as possible in the hopes of eliminating the stigma to the word….
LikeLike
April 29, 2013 at 1:01 pm
I know, Mary, I know. I get into a zone and then blank out on that one. Thanks for reminding me, though!!!
LikeLike
April 28, 2013 at 12:57 pm
I am sitting here this morning with tears rolling down my cheeks…to think of all the terrorism these staff memebers have been through all these years…they have never waivered in their determination to see that the women that seek their services are able to obtain SAFE & LEGAL ABORTIONS!!!
It makes me sick to see this happen to another clinic…the ANTI-CHOICE figured it out after all these years…they could bomb us…murder our friends…stalk us…generally terrorise us and we DO NOT BACK DOWN!! So all they could do was elect these idiots…to legislate us out of business!! Our hopes now rest with the Supreme Court!!
My hat is off to all the people that stood firm at the Hillcrest Clinic!! You did a great job!! Thank you!!
LikeLike
April 28, 2013 at 5:59 pm
Lorraine,
Thank you for your sincere, thoughtful, and heartfelt comment.
We understand your depth of knowledge into the reality of women’s issues and appreciate your commentary!
The Christian Terrorists must be addressed in an appropriate legal and law enforcement fashion.
The authorities failed Dr. Tiller & others.
Hopefully they will not fail more doctors that provide legal services.
LikeLike
April 29, 2013 at 1:11 pm
The terrorists, Elena, will not be “addressed” in an appropriate fashion. It’s not like the old days when there were organizations conspiring to wreck havoc on clinics and doctors. When that occurred then the Dept of Justice could go after them. But its the lone wolves that are the dangerous ones and are extremely hard to track. As for Doctor TIller, I”m sorry but no one, unless he had a full time bodyguard, could have stopped that murderer. If you are not safe in your church, where are you safe? If an anti-abortion terrorists wants to exchange their life for the life of an abortion doctor, there is not much we can do about it. It just comes with the territory.
LikeLike
April 29, 2013 at 1:08 pm
I know you speak from experience, Lorraine, and we applaud you and you staff that went through hell for so many years. As for the Supreme Court, I dont think they are ever going to judge the legality of these new laws that are regulating the clinics out of business. This is an incredibly clever tactic that the anti-abortion mob has come up with. That clinic was/is such a beautiful clinic. I remember the beautiful fresh flowers in the waiting room and the soft music. What a shame…
LikeLike
April 30, 2013 at 10:11 am
Pat, what are the measures taken in order to contain this “crazies” now in days? Does the police still look to the other side or they do something better now? Despite my opinion about abortion, i totally disagree with what this people do….
LikeLike
May 2, 2013 at 9:38 am
It’s always hard to say, Sonia, what the police are doing because, of course, most of their work is behind the scenes. I suspect its the same ole, same ole. If there is an active anti-abortion presence near a clinic, the local police are aware of it and how far they go to keep on top of things is anyone’s guess. On the federal level, I have not heard of any active investigations going on but, again, it could be happening and we dont know it. LIke anything else, it’s a matter of resources, time, money and interest. But I’m sure the dept of Justice is not active on the anti-abortion “terrorism” front the way it was when doctors were being attacked on a regular basis.
LikeLike
May 2, 2013 at 9:48 am
We can only wish that this “crazies” are to one day realize that killing doctors won’t stop abortion…
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 8:12 am
Good point, Sonia. I once talked to Paul Hill about that (before he killed Doctor Britton) and he didn’t seem to care that if a doctor is killed, then the women go to another doctor. He was more interesting in “sending a message” to the other doctors, hoping the terrorism would make them drop out on their own.
LikeLike
May 1, 2013 at 7:54 pm
It is very sad that the Hillcrest office had to close.
LikeLike
May 2, 2013 at 9:40 am
It is indeed, Terry. One thing is evident, however, and that is that more clinics are closing than opening. The fact is that the numbers of abortions are decreasing and a clinic needs a certain number of patients to pay the bills. When they get below that number – like any other business – they gotta decide….
LikeLike
May 3, 2013 at 11:33 am
And why don’t the “crisis pregnancy centers” have to meet minimal standards of professionalism and “patient safety”?
LikeLike
May 3, 2013 at 1:22 pm
“pregnancy crisis centers” don’t need to meet standards because…they play both sides of the fence!! the pregnancy test they use are “like” the ones you can buy O.C.!! Then the rest of what they do is tell “horror stories” see how innocent all that is?? However in SC they were called by the state to hellp regulate “abortion cllinics”???!!! So even though they are usually staffed by some “looney tunes” (usually but NOT always!!) I have yet to figure out why they helped form the regs (secretly…) then we were asked to come in and fight against anything we thought was “unfair or unnecessary)!!
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 8:14 am
They also dont need to meet standards because the pro-choice movement is not organized around that issue. The antis have focused their attention on passing these laws with much success. We, on the other hand, have to either spend our time defending ourselves against these laws (and other proposals) or we just dont have the energy to go after cpcs….We just dont wake up in the morning thinking about abortion.
LikeLike
May 3, 2013 at 12:15 pm
I can see a big problem ahead on Equal access under the law. A woman in North Dakota is not equal with a woman in California. Neither is equal with a woman of means who has the capability of removing herself from a state with a restrictive law and going to a state with more latitude.
If a woman from North Dakota goes to California for an abortion, is she subject to arrest when she returns to North Dakota? Can the California Doctor be Extradited for aborting the child of a North Dakota citizen?
If a state passes legislation saying that life begins at conception and that that life acquires all the rights of a living person, is an abortion out of state by a state’s resident considered Murder and is the Doctor subject to Extradition? Is the woman subject to arrest when she returns to her home? If the state has the Death Penalty, can both be sentenced to death?
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 8:15 am
And that’s why, Jatotti, the pro-choice movement is challenging these laws wherever they can! Good explanation! Chime in some more.
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 11:44 am
Abortion is wrong!!!!!
LikeLike
May 5, 2013 at 8:15 am
Interestingly, CFL, more Catholics get abortions than any other religion. So, are all of your fellow parishioners so “wrong?”
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 11:46 am
Anti Choicers are screwballs,
It is rare for them to be able to address the issue of penalties for women that break Anti Choice laws.
Anti Choicers cannot rise above their internal cognitive dissonance on this obvious paradox that is a gigantic hole in their manner of belief.
LikeLike
May 3, 2013 at 12:17 pm
It amazes me that animals get more protection than an unborn baby. A cluster of cells or developing child, its the same thing. Aborions are barbaric no matter how much you try and pretty it up. It is WAY TOO EASY not to get prego. Its a moral issue, women have a choice. For every choice come a consequece. Unprotected = Baby.
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 8:17 am
Frubol, I frankly dont know where you get this we’re trying to “pretty it up.” Pro-choice people – and the women who get abortions – know it’s not pretty. They know the results of an abortion and, indeed, I’ve been with women when they’ve SEEN the results of their abortion. You just have no idea what it’s like to be in that situation. Try to put yourself in their shoes, which I doubt you can do. And I love how you use the term “prego,” that just shows me you dont know what you;re talking about.
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 11:47 am
Frubol,
Your point is moronic.
A fertilized cell is the same as a baby in your mind?
LikeLike
May 3, 2013 at 1:39 pm
Frubol…so you would be willing to “throw away the life of a young woman…woman just trying to finish her higher education…a young mother with children she cannot feed…or a postmenapousal woman that just doesn’t want to raise a child at 50 yrs old…you would give a “cluster of cells” more rights than these women??? Just doesn’t make good sense to me!!!
LikeLike
May 3, 2013 at 9:25 pm
Yes.
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 8:18 am
Well, Lorraine, you asked the question and he answered it! What the hell do you do with putz’s like this one, huh?
LikeLike
May 4, 2013 at 11:48 am
Anti Choice = Anti Life
There it is . . .
LikeLike
May 5, 2013 at 4:48 am
Pennsylvania is pouring money into Catholic coffers for false pregnancy counseling, all the while lining the pockets of their Catholic lawyer president ($199,000 salary). Where’s the separation of church and state?
http://www.citypaper.net/cover_story/2011-08-18-real-alternatives-pennsylvania-abortion-taxpayer-money.html
LikeLike
May 5, 2013 at 9:35 am
It really is time for the so-called “pro-choicers” to focus on re-defining the terms of engagement:
1. Show the public that the term “pro-life” is actually a label used by people who want to feel good about themselves.
2. Buttress this argument with constant repetition of the facts regarding their non-involvement with the care for real human life.
3. Commission studies which explore (as does literature about the “conservative brain”) the gap between what they profess and what they do.
4. Lay it out fully to the public that the so-called “pro-life” movement is quite simply a dysfunctional self-improvement program.
It is simply amazing to me that there are no “pro-choicers” who are aware of this and its potential to banish the so-called “pro-life” movement to the dustbin of history.
LikeLike