Imagine what it is like to be 14 and pregnant. Not now, but in 1976. No adult to confide in or ask for advice because to confide in someone would mean admitting that you had had sex. Whatever culture of sex, drugs, and rock ‘n roll was underway, as the daughter of a military officer, you were supposed to be chaste. The concern about what people would think was greater than the concern about being pregnant. The fear of informing your parents was even greater. Your mother was a depressed alcoholic who you did not want to give another reason to drink. Your father once left welts up and down your legs and back because you cut a class. Your 19-year-old boyfriend offered to marry you and, what seemed to be spoken at the same time, asked if you thought about abortion. You knew that your family would be moving more than an ocean away within three weeks. There was little time to sort things out.
Few of us can know what we would do in many situations until we have been there. And, once there, we are challenged to be strong and thoughtful as we also challenge our moral views of whatever the situation. Almost 40 years later, I can vividly recall each emotional moment of what I just asked you to imagine. It was challenging and heartbreaking to be so young and alone.
Abortion had been legal for three years but legal did not mean accessible, especially for minors. None of the family planning places I called could provide an abortion nor could they even see me because of my age. A friend I finally confided in told me about a woman who could perform an abortion on me for $500. Her house – where she performed the abortions – was filthy. I was smart enough to know that the abortion option was not safe and marriage was not the right response to the pregnancy. The only thing I knew for sure was that I was going to have a baby.
As the “new girl” at a middle school, I stood out in no small part because I looked at least potentially pregnant. I denied my pregnancy to a guidance counselor who questioned me. I successfully feigned fatness to my parents and siblings, thanks to the full and flowing smock tops girls wore then. Halfway into my third trimester, my parents confronted me. I still denied I was pregnant. After insisting that I visit an obstetrician, we were all informed that I would deliver a baby within a couple of months. In less than a week, an adoption agency caseworker met with me at school. She treated me to lunch or dinner on a weekly basis, always trying to convince me to “stop being selfish” and give my baby up. I refused. By then I had in fact bonded with the child I was carrying. I was following recommendations for in-utero nurturing that I read about in the Boston Women’s Health Collective Our Bodies Ourselves. I was religiously taking the prenatal vitamins the OB gave me and I even attended two childbirth classes before I gave birth.
Those who would have encouraged me to give birth, because abortion was wrong, would never have considered that my son was placed in a foster home because my parents refused to let me bring him home. They would not have prepared me for my parents deceptively adopting the son I fought so hard to keep and had lovingly mothered – the son they so vehemently objected to my keeping. Once the social workers convinced my parents that foster home was not a good long term alternative, my son came home and they fell in love with him. So much so that when my father knew he was going to be relieved from military service, and they would move to another state, they told me that they had to adopt my son in order for him to have medical care. I signed the papers without separate counsel or knowledge of the pending move. Not long after that, my father informed me that they were moving, my son was now their responsibility, and that they knew I wanted to stay put (even though, at 16, I only had a car). To a powerless 16-year-old who lived in fear of her father, the message was clear: you are on your own and without your child.
No anti-abortion person could have prepared me for living in a car in Ft. Lauderdale, or in Central Park in New York City, or what it was like to survive without a family or support system and, most of all, without the child I deeply loved and cared for. I could not have been prepared for what it felt like to show up at my parents’ place several years later to see my beloved child living in a house without indoor plumbing and the same parents with the same problems that marred my childhood. I only mention those things here because all too often when people learn I had a child so young, I am complimented for how well I turned out…or some comment like, “See? It can be done…the pro-choice people always make the choice of life seem so doomed…”
What I really what to share here is that it is 2013 and yet, in terms of abortion rights for young women, it feels like it is 1976 all over again. Don’t read into this that I absolutely would have chosen abortion had it been accessible. Consider instead that I had the option to illegal abortion – and so will young women throughout the country as states further erode abortion rights. Consider that no matter how much more acceptable sexual activity or teen pregnancies are in our culture, we provide minimal education and support for either. Most striking in that regard is that the very people striving to criminalize abortion are at the same time thwarting educational and support services for young people and their tiny offspring.
No choice is an easy choice when a pregnancy is unplanned. Abortion is not a viable or appropriate choice for all women. Adoption has a seedy side that some of us know all too well. Motherhood is best when both the mom and the child are adequately supported by society. If you oppose abortion, think hard before you judge one more woman for thinking abortion is the more moral choice. We really don’t know what we’d do in a given situation until we are there.
Related articles
- Much Ado About Abortion: Open Minds and Humanlife Part 8 (thefeministskeptic.wordpress.com)
- Last week – what we missed (politicspowersex.org)
- You won’t believe this new abortion decision, or who decided it. (dailykos.com)
- Nebraska Decides 16-Year-Old Must Give Birth Because She Isn’t ‘Mature’ Enough For An Abortion (thinkprogress.org)
October 15, 2013 at 7:41 am
Look what happened in one of the red states, a teenager wanted an abortion and the state’s court denied her access
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 2:27 pm
And that is only one we have awareness. In 1990, after Arkansas passed a parental notification law, a guide was developed that, amazingly, the judges seemed to read. It informed them about the debate in unbiased terms as well as presented factual information about the abortion procedure as compared to pregnancy. Every state with such laws boldly states that the laws are to “protect” young, pregnant women. Well, they could buttress that so-called protection by working with medical providers to develop similar guides in order to get these young women on the docket and onto their lives.
LikeLike
October 22, 2013 at 5:32 am
I think it was Nebraska
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 9:22 am
I worked for an adoption agency for about three months.
I couldn’t believe how disgusting they were.
All they were concerned about was making money. They did not care about the pregnant lady at all!
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 11:24 am
Adoption is indeed “big business” and while there are certainly some reputable, high quality agencies and lawyers, the public generally does not realize the extent to which laws are violated and standards falsified in reporting. Those giving birth – and often their offspring – suffer as a result.
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 9:36 am
This is a very powerful piece, Kim, and I thank you for sharing your story with us. I could not have been easy but I hope that just writing about it was a little cathartic. Unfortunately, this kind of history is being lost. The current generation really cannot comprehend what it was like years ago so they cannot project what it could be like again if the right wing gets its way. And the really scary thing is that many of those women who experienced illegal abortions are growing old fast and will soon disappear (not you!). Then we’ll just be left with history books but no living testimonies.
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 11:27 am
It will be a very long time before I disappear from this cause – that is for sure! You are correct – people can’t comprehend what was once the norm and, sadly, appears to be resurfacing as a new norm…at least, it will if we don’t put common sense back into the state legislative bodies and soon.
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 10:21 am
Excellent Post!!
Tx for sharing!
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 10:50 am
Most people has shown that have this very wrong and dangerous concept that an abortion is an easy way out for their “mistakes”. Well.. ¿Does that mean also that we should not look for a way out if you get in trouble of any sort? If you fall in a ditch you should not look a way out if that way out is not ethical in the eyes of others? Great post
LikeLike
October 20, 2013 at 4:28 pm
Thank you Alma. For sure, we each have our own ethical compass; it is not anyone’s obligation, or right, to monitor mine for choices I might make or consider.
LikeLike
October 22, 2013 at 5:31 am
Anti Choicers are nuts
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 11:48 am
Kim,
Brava! Such a poignant essay on your personal life that is, at once, also very political. The tawdry business of adoption is not for the faint of heart. It’s also a worldwide problem in both secular and religious institutions.
I would add to your comments that we need to make public the scholarly research that points to the lifelong emotional pain for both the birth mother (and sometimes birth father) and for the child. The antichoicers talk about adoption as the better option when, in truth, it’s often the worst option.
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 2:34 pm
Thank you DrK8. Really, I am fortunate because I have had, and will continue to have, many happy beginnings thanks to some key people and situations I encountered by chance at the right time. Bad adoption practitioners routinely exploit and lie to women about the extent to which they will support them post adoption. Yes, there is pain for those women and it is real and it can be proven…
LikeLike
October 15, 2013 at 3:50 pm
Hmmmm. No so-called “pro-lifers have weighed in yet on this. Must be that it’s too complex for them to deal with. I suppose they consider it a happy ending, since the fetus was “rescued.” Never mind the mother….
LikeLike
October 17, 2013 at 7:38 pm
Since Reagan was elected by the Religious Right, there has been a steady, constant attempt to push women down and take complete control over their bodies. Until we pass the ERA and strengthen our rights as equal human beings to men, we will continue to be attacked and treated like shit at every opportunity by the right-wing, conservative, male-dominated establishment.
LikeLike
October 18, 2013 at 12:03 pm
This is a sad story with at least some reasonable current situation for the writer. One missing piece – after the squalid conditions that your son lived in, what has become of him and does he know you are his birth mother?
LikeLike
October 18, 2013 at 3:58 pm
My son ended up living with me in his later teen years after years of my father discouraging a relationship between us; we had many moments of reflection during that time and into his adulthood. He is successful in terms of his career. I can’t speak for him personally but can say that he certainly had a few things to figure out – it was/is important to me that he arrive at his own conclusions without my influencing him towards one direction or another and that I be available to help him with any that were negative. It is too complicated to provide significant details here as I am sure you can understand. Neither of us has much contact with my father and at a certain point, having healthy, meaningful lives became more important than anything in the past.
LikeLike
October 19, 2013 at 8:39 am
The so-called “pro-life” movement is incapable of considering anything underlying the surface appearance– if they were to look at the future of a newborn child, they would be confronted with the dangers it needs to be protected from in order to grow up safely and well.
To look at those dangers would be to risk facing the need to commit more than they either want to or possess to care for it– and such commitment is beyond them.
This is not due to ingrained cruelty, but to their lack of their ability to care and to share. For them, the goal of their movement is not to care for human life, but to care for their own fragility.
LikeLike
October 18, 2013 at 1:31 pm
I just read this and want to share the level of depravity of the antichoice crowd, as illustrated in this WaPo article.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/a-sad-death-turns-into-misplaced-activism/2013/10/17/6f3d7bec-3747-11e3-8a0e-4e2cf80831fc_story.html?hpid=z4
LikeLike
October 18, 2013 at 4:03 pm
Thank you for passing this link to readers. Dr. Carhart nor any other compassionate, competent abortion provider or any patient deserves the intrusion of anti-abortion people in their relationships. It is despicable that people would feel so inclined to invade the privacy of others in this way.
LikeLike
October 22, 2013 at 5:31 am
Good read!
LikeLike
October 22, 2013 at 7:25 pm
she traveled a long way to get the abortion.
i wonder if the laws in her own state hadn’t forced her to travel so far if she would still be alive today?
LikeLike
October 22, 2013 at 8:55 pm
Laws and, in her case, since it was later term, there are so few skilled doctors. Women in such situations may have to travel regardless of the laws in their state of residence. Med schools really need to step up the training in reproductive health, especially for these types of cases.
LikeLike
October 18, 2013 at 4:51 pm
Remember the Kansas AG, Kline, who dogged Dr. George Tiller like some rabid mongrel? Check out how justice can prevail:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/kansas-supreme-court-suspends-ex-attorney-general-over-abortion-investigation
LikeLike
October 18, 2013 at 5:17 pm
Once again, thanks for sharing the link with readers. I saw this earlier in another publication and was very happy to see that some form of justice was meted out for Kline. Over the years I have worked with numerous anti-abortion politicians in a range of offices. I know there are some rabid ones out there but fortunately, for the most, none as flagrantly so… to think that an Attorney General would assign employees to collect license plate numbers of women believed to be seeking abortions is beyond the pale of anything I could ever imagine. May he never be able to practice law again – clearly, he wasn’t in the first place!
LikeLike
October 21, 2013 at 7:50 pm
yea, collecting license plates numbers of the women is the height of sleaze
LikeLike
October 19, 2013 at 8:41 am
Liberty University! Figures…
LikeLike
October 20, 2013 at 7:41 am
OOOORALE!
i’m SO sorry that you and your son went through that!
LikeLike
October 22, 2013 at 7:23 am
correct me if im wrong, i understand in the blog that the girl want to abort the fetus. so that it will not experience suffering?
LikeLike
October 22, 2013 at 8:41 am
Slip, please understand that to insist that a fetus be carried to term– whether someone else’s or your own– carries with it the responsibility to nurture it after birth to the point where it will evolve into a functioning adult. This means protecting it from suffering (while at the same time allowing it to suffer just enough from the consequences of bad choices to learn how to make better choices).
If you are not willing to protect the resulting child from suffering as well as to provide him or her with the rest of necessary nurture, then you would be doing both the fetus and yourself a favor to either consider adoption or abortion.
This is the central tenet of RESPONSIBLE Right to Life, an organization of “pro-lifers” who pledge to raise to adulthood every “unborn human” they want “rescued.” It sounds as though you should join. Sadly, no self-proclaimed “pro-lifers” have in the past two decades.
LikeLike
October 22, 2013 at 8:57 pm
Slip, if you reread, you will note that abortion was considered a possible option.
LikeLike
October 22, 2013 at 9:58 pm
Abortion is MURDER!!!
LikeLike
October 23, 2013 at 4:18 pm
Slip, my man! Just the person I’m looking for!
You can PREVENT a murder.
All you have to do is pledge to help the next “unborn human” to make it safely to adulthood by talking with your money.
Just give $16,000, and you’ll protect some born baby by providing him or her with all the well-child checkups and shots needed by age 6.
$5,000 will keep the little one supplied with disposable diapers until potty-training takes hold.
$60,000 will make full-time day care available so his mom can get back to work and support all the other kids in the family as well until he or she starts kindergarten.
You can agitate to have your school taxes increased so the tyke will have an after-school program to take care of him until mom and dad get home from work.
$20,000 will ensure that a half-time social worker will be available to make sure the child you rescued doesn’t suffer abuse. But of course that’ll only be for one year.
$11,000 will pay for the cost of prenatal care and delivery of your “rescued” child’s baby if she winds up getting pregnant when she’s still a child herself.
And here’s a real bargain: Food! Only $27,000 for eighteen years’ worth of meals!
So, step up like a man and let every pregnant woman know how much YOU will pay to save her baby from abortion!
How much will you stake?
Slip?
Slip?
The rest is silence. . .
LikeLike
October 23, 2013 at 8:37 pm
Excellent data in your response to Slip. I have no reason to believe he is insincere and will therefore give him the benefit by assuming he is delayed retrieving responses to his comment. Slip may be THE ONE to walk his talk…let’s see if he pulls the checkbook out.
LikeLike
October 23, 2013 at 8:35 pm
Slip – Please support your claim so that readers can understand you better. If you use “murder” as a euphemism to somehow express your view of abortion, then many could use the same euphemism of “murder” to express their view of what happens to children of all ages in a world of people unwilling to provide for them financially, spiritually, morally, parentally, educationally, and much more. Would it be acceptable to you, for example, if one were to say that one who suffered physical beatings throughout life, was chained to a basement floor throughout life, and kept from sunshine throughout life because his parent(s) were incapable of providing for him was the victim of murder? At least, try to operate from the definition of murder as a starting point. Who would be charged and with what?
The definition of murder:
Law. the killing of another human being under conditions specifically covered in law. In the U.S., special statutory definitions include murder committed with malice aforethought, characterized by deliberation or premeditation or occurring during the commission of another serious crime, as robbery or arson (first-degree murder) and murder by intent but without deliberation or premeditation (second-degree murder)
LikeLike
October 24, 2013 at 4:58 pm
Hey, farrelljk, Slip isn’t going to pull out his checkbook.
It’s not that so-called “pro-lifers” hate children more than they hate abortion; it’s that they are simply UNABLE to relate to the dangers all children face, from parents who love “measles parties” to death from falling off a stationary bicycle while not wearing a helmet (it’s happened.)
I would like to think that they simply deny the needs of children because they would otherwise have to face their responsibility to care for human life, but given the general demographics, it’s more likely that because they generally are poor and less educated, they make up for these deficits by seeking empowerment through anger.
Anger at abortion is risk-free. They don’t have to spend money, commit time, or follow any particular discipline. It’s a cop-out response to facing what’s really holding them down. But the fantasy of being powerful is a sufficient narcotic.
LikeLike
October 24, 2013 at 6:04 pm
Okay okay RESPONSIBLE Right to Life!! I hear you loud and clear… I suspect your assessment is spot on; I always like to just give it a shot. The mere fact that ‘ol Flip, er I mean, Slip, is shouting deafening silence in response to both of our posts says quite a bit…sadly.
LikeLike
October 24, 2013 at 8:29 pm
You’ll just have to put up with me, farrellkj!
I’ve been saying this message for almost 30 years now, and nobody’s picked up on it. I feel like Diogenes looking for an honest man. When I started, I expected to see people slapping themselves on the forehead and exclaiming, “So, THAT’S what the [so-called] “pro-lifers” are really doing!” And it hasn’t happened yet, but I keep trying…
LikeLike
October 24, 2013 at 8:44 pm
Keep up the fight! I can say with confidence that in my own 30+ years supporting abortion rights at the same time accepting the disagreements others have, the one facet of the “other side” that has consistently troubled me is their unwillingness to go beyond figurative support. While I have seen generosity towards pregnant women and infants to young children, I have yet to see full support (direct financial, material, and emotional/psychological, etc.) Therefore I have no problem “putting up with” anyone who advocates as you do.
LikeLike
December 29, 2013 at 9:18 am
Digby at Hullabaloo says of so-called “pro-lifers” in Indiana:
“They would make 13 year old molestation victims bear their rapists children. They are so blinded by their zeal to outlaw abortion that they actually believe it’s worse for a little girl to have one than to require her to give birth to her own sibling.
“I don’t traffic in the words good and evil — they have a little too much religious absolutist baggage for my taste. But if it did, I know into which category I would put this.”
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/chipping-away-at-our-rights-one-county.html
LikeLike