It seems that pro-lifers just can’t wait for an ambulance to arrive at an abortion clinic.
I was glancing at some newsletter recently and there was yet another grainy picture of an ambulance in front of a facility in Texas and the headline was something like “Another Women Injured at Women’s Health Services.” The accompanying article seemed to relish the fact that there was an emergency at the local abortion facility.
Let’s get something straight here. Abortion is surgery. Actually, it is one of the safest surgical procedures that one can perform, particularly when done in the early stages of the pregnancy. In fact, there is a plethora of evidence that shows that giving birth is much more dangerous than having an abortion. But, over the years, the pro-choice folks have been reluctant to raise this issue because it could be interpreted to mean that we favor abortion over childbirth. And don’t me started on that one.
So, abortion is very safe but, let’s face it, accidents do happen. Doctors – including abortion doctors – are human, nurses are human, anesthesiologists are human And, yes, patients are human in that they sometimes do not reveal important information to their doctor about their physical health. Mistakes are made in the operating room and, when it happens, the clinic staff needs to take the appropriate steps to insure that the patient is properly cared for at a local hospital. And that means they might have to call for an ambulance.
But when they do what’s best for the patient, those blasted pro –lifers are out there ready to take their pictures. The real coup, of course, is if they can get a picture of the actual abortion patient so they can plaster her face all over the internet. Indeed, I can’t prove it but I gotta believe that when the protestors hears the sirens they probably get all lathered up with excitement that they’re gonna see a patient being sent to the ER.
So, that’s why there are some clinics that at times have hesitated to call the local ambulance. They should be able to do it without hesitation but they’ve got to be thinking that, first, pictures will be taken of the patient and, second, the clinic’s name will be circulated throughout the community. I’m not excusing those clinics that might react that way but over the years I’ve come to understand how some might hesitate before exposing a patient to the voyeurs out front of their facility.
Hey, why don’t you pro-lifers station yourself outside the birthing center in your local community and take their pictures? You’ve got a lot more material to work with.

May 1, 2015 at 11:26 am
Recently at our clinic in PA, ambulances were called twice. Once was a precaution, the other transported a patient to hospital. One of our regular, obnoxious protesters known as “Mad Anthony” went ballistic, claiming that ambulances arrived there in droves, constantly. Facts never get in the way of these antis; they can put the worst face on anything.
LikeLike
May 1, 2015 at 12:23 pm
Hey eddie, Mad Anthony sounds like my kind of guy. Give me the name of the mill and I’ll drive over there.
LikeLike
May 1, 2015 at 5:10 pm
John, eddie is Ellen Bell.
LikeLike
May 2, 2015 at 3:54 am
Holy moly, I’ll be talking to her in about an hour!
LikeLike
May 4, 2015 at 2:38 pm
Okay, who is Ellen Bell?
LikeLike
May 4, 2015 at 3:59 pm
Ellen’s a deathscort at the Allentown Women’s Center. They used to have forty but now only four — Ellen, Dougie Marsh, and the husband/wife team of Jimmy and Kate Ranieri.
LikeLike
May 4, 2015 at 2:37 pm
Thanks for chiming in Eddie. I think they love it when the sirens start wailing.
LikeLike
May 1, 2015 at 12:21 pm
“I can’t prove it but I gotta believe that when the protestors hears the sirens they probably get all lathered up with excitement that they’re gonna see a patient being sent to the ER.”
Not quite “all lathered up” but otherwise you got me, Pat. Ambulances support the fact I push — feticide leads to matricide. Kind of goes along with the big signs I display outside the Allentown Women’s Center, ABORTION CAUSES BREAST CANCER.
LikeLike
May 4, 2015 at 2:40 pm
Geez, Johnny, don’t you have any newer signs? Breast Cancer? C’mon. How about a nice sign, if you must, that just says “Think about it” or “We’ll pay for the Baby’s food, college tuition, insurance, clothes, etc.”
LikeLike
May 4, 2015 at 4:01 pm
I do have a new one. I’ll send you a picture.
LikeLike
May 4, 2015 at 6:42 am
And btw, “obnoxious” is not bad. You should have seen what Ellen used to say. Took me a while but I cured her of that.
LikeLike
May 5, 2015 at 11:45 am
It’s interesting that Allentown only has a few escorts these days. I guess that’s a good sign! Says John and his folks are not winning.
LikeLike
May 5, 2015 at 3:43 pm
you’re right you’re right you’re right Geography has something to do with it.
LikeLike
May 4, 2015 at 10:55 am
This is part of something I read today in a newspaper commentary:
“Anyone who assumes certain things are incontrovertibly, eternally true as a mater of faith … is a threat to the democratic way of life. Democracy depends on recognition of the legitimacy of opposing views… There is no room for that in hard-line religious dogma… I marvel at the Vatican’s failure to acknowledge (a) the bleak real world consequences of its bans on contraception and abortion or (b) the brackish hypocrisy of such dictates vis-a-vis the Church’s own ‘mission to the poor.’… If you don’t believe in abortion, don’t have one…. There is [no] denying religion’s corrupting effect on … critical thinking.”
Wow, the writer got it so right! Sorry, John, there were so many good sentences (I left out a ton) I couldn’t excerpt just one.
LikeLike
May 4, 2015 at 11:42 am
Then I’ll pick: ” Democracy depends on recognition of the legitimacy of opposing views… There is no room for that in hard-line religious dogma.”
Hard line religious dogma could be Mormonism, or Catholicism, or Secularism, or . . . It just depends on what you believe intensely.
Today I think Secularism, for example, takes a much harder line than Catholicism. They’re on the verge of getting us to accept sodomy of the homosexual kind and they’ve already gotten us to pay for legal murder. How far do you think we’d get if we tried to get them to make condoms illegal?
LikeLike
May 5, 2015 at 11:53 am
John, you are wrong again. You are not expected to engage in behaviour you don’t agree with. But you are not practicing freedom when you try to deny those behaviours of others (i.e., you must not make condoms illegal but your use is a matter between only you and your partner). The only restriction on behaviour is that yours does not infringe on someone else’s and theirs does not infringe on yours. Laws are intended to draw the lines between where your rights stop and others’ rights start. (I know this is probably too many sentences for you, and I apologize for that.)
LikeLike
May 5, 2015 at 2:05 pm
Yeah it is. Can you shorten it?
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 10:05 am
Calling protesters like Anthony an ambulance chaser seems appropriate. Like a few opportunistic lawyers who are ambulance chasers, Anthony and all his mean-spirited counterparts across the nation, deserve to be viewed as greedy, desperate and exploitative. Unlike legal ambulance chasers who seek to represent clients with personal injury claims, anti choice chasers seek only to promote themselves for spotting an ambulance. Further, unlike anti-choice chasers, lawyers are called to abide by ethical guidelines that include acting with integrity and competence, treating all people with dignity and abiding by the rules of the law. Anti-choice chasers seldom follow any ethical or legal guidelines. For lawyers, their goal is to representing a client to resolve an injury while also making money. However, for anti-abortion chasers, their goal is not directed at helping the person in the ambulance nor at gaining any monetary compensation. Nor do they adhere to any ethical framework such as treating women with dignity, valuing communal values over individual values, putting others ahead of self and showing compassion. Their desperate goal is to exploit a situation about which they know nothing for their unscrupulously greedy self-glorification and for shameful rumormongering. Rather than abide by any ethical framework, they exhibit a gross infraction of Christian ethics, ethics for which they vociferously claim to cherish.
LikeLike
May 11, 2015 at 12:50 pm
Here’s what I got out of this, Alice: the love of money is the root of all good.
LikeLike
May 25, 2015 at 11:17 pm
The tech and gadget news article is definately the very best i’ve seen today.
LikeLike