So much has been written about the plethora of candidates running for President in 2016, particularly the mass of bodies on the Republican side. They are falling all over themselves looking for every possible vote, particularly in the key states of Iowa and New Hampshire (and don’t get me started on the inordinate amount of influence those two pukey little states exert).
The candidates are attending every convention imaginable to convince that small block of special interests that they love that group dearly and will fight every day to promote their interests if they get into the White House. And, to be fair, the Democratic candidates are doing the same thing (p.s., I still don’t think Hillary is a lock).
So, it was no surprise when most of the GOP candidates recently flew down to New Orleans to kiss butt at the National Right to Life Committee’s national convention. The goal, of course, was to convince the attendees that they would be the “most pro-life President” they ever saw. Showing shrewd political acumen, the president of the NRLC, Carol Tobias, warned the convention goers that “the quickest way to defeat a pro-lifer is to fall in love with your candidate and then get your feelings hurt when they don’t win the nomination.”
Anyway, here are some highlights from the candidate’s speeches:
Former Senator Rick Santorum (PA) reminded the audience that he sponsored the federal law that banned the so-called “partial birth abortion.” Actually, I do have to give him some credit here because he really was the lead guy on that issue. Indeed, he hounded me and the pro-choice movement in general for years. “You know me; there’s no quit in this dog,” he said. “Go ahead and nominate somebody who’s just going to go along. Then try to convince yourself you’ll make a difference” (I’ve read that line several times and still don’t know what it means).
Former Texas Governor Rick Perry reminded folks that the next president might get to nominate as many as four Supreme Court justices — who could presumably overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion nationally. “If I have the opportunity to put justices on the Supreme Court, they will not be squishy,” said Perry. Okay, that’s pretty clear, huh?
Florida Senator Marco Rubio explained his opposition to abortion as “inseparable from the effort to reclaim the American dream … for every child,” and recalled abortion restrictions he helped pass as speaker of the Florida House of Representatives. By the way, my money is on Rubio getting the nomination.
Jeb Bush, whose tenure as Florida governor overlapped Rubio’s speakership, mentioned some of the same laws in a video presentation, as he did not physically attend the convention. Ben Carson, a retired neurosurgeon who has never held elected office, blasted abortion providers as “evil.”
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie supported abortion rights earlier in his career, but he is now getting close to toeing the party line. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker celebrated passage of a new state ban on most abortions beyond the 20th week of pregnancy. Yet late in his 2014 re-election campaign, he aired an ad in which he affirmed his abortion opposition while emphasizing that Wisconsin law “leaves the final decision to a woman and her doctor.” South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham has sponsored a ban on abortions after 20 weeks but some conservatives blast him for voting to confirm Obama’s two Supreme Court nominees.
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal talked Thursday night about having to defend his anti-abortion stance in his interviews for medical school and Donald Trump, the flavor of the moment, did not attend but he also seems to have switched from his previous pro-choice position. He probably does support abortion for illegal immigrants, however.
The bottom line is that, should any of these candidates win the presidency, they will be under intense political pressure to nominate a pro-life justice or two or three when the time comes. And therein lies the future of abortion rights in this country.
Every four years we hear how the next election is the most important election in our lifetimes. Well, look at the age of the justices. There ain’t no way that all of them will survive another four years. All hyperbole aside, this election may actually be the most important in our lifetimes.

July 13, 2015 at 3:39 pm
Another informative post, Pat.
Incidentally, I did order David Cohen’s “In the Crosshairs.” Couldn’t help myself. But I’m not even mentioned! Worse, all the prominent opposition I’m involved with — you, Anasti, Roizin, Boulanger, Danzic, Benjamin, Lebed, Lee Tripp — none of you named.
So far I’ve read the first chapter. Cohen creates seven killers and their helpers. He says he doesn’t want to name names. This lets him of course say anything. Each subject is a composite of things pro-deathers say about themselves and all their clients are these wonderful suffering women who wouldn’t dare hurt a flew but just have to go through with “the procedure.” We, the opposition, are depicted as cartoonish. Fiction written for five-year-olds. (He also needs a proof-reader — the syntax is OK but the grammar falls flat.)
LikeLike
July 14, 2015 at 3:05 pm
I haven’t even heard of this book. Is he on your side or mine? And I”m not surprised that he didn’t mention me. Let’s face it – I was not a very high profile pro choicer while at NCAP. It was only when I came out on the partial birth stuff that I made headlines. Yikes, to this day it gives me a stomach ache thinking about how my one line got taken out of context. UGH.
LikeLike
July 14, 2015 at 3:21 pm
Actually, John, you inspired me so I went to Amazon where I could read several chapters of the book. BORING. Absolutely nothing new. I assume “Rodney” is Lee Carhart, not sure about the others. Same ole, same ole.
LikeLike
July 14, 2015 at 1:10 pm
It would be nice if candidates would lean to the majority of the nation and not lean to or grovel for the majority of the far right wing of GOP.
So much for democracy.
LikeLike
July 14, 2015 at 3:06 pm
Actually, Alice, the latest credible poll that I saw said 51% of the public believes abortion should be legal in most cases and 47% believe it should be illegal. So, if you were a good, true politician, you’d be somewhere in the middle – if that is even possible. Democracy is alive and well.
LikeLike
July 15, 2015 at 8:05 am
Polling is one thing. Actually passing laws that thwart access to safe and legal access to abortion is another. So when you write, Pat, “if you were a good, true politician, you’d be somewhere in the middle” and link it to democracy being alive and well, I can’t fully agree.
LikeLike
July 15, 2015 at 12:44 pm
In a democracy, Alice, sometimes your side does not always win. If the pro-lifers managed to make abortion illegal again, they’ve done it through the democratic process.
LikeLike
July 17, 2015 at 7:14 am
In a democracy, the majority rules. But let’s not fool ourselves. We are not in a democracy when money rules, when dark money from special interests and the self-centered interests of politicians overrule the public interest.
LikeLike
July 18, 2015 at 2:46 pm
So, the pro-choice movement gives money to politicians. Are they not a “special interest?” Or are the “special interests” just those groups that you do not agree with?
LikeLike
July 19, 2015 at 10:51 pm
Ooof.
LikeLike
July 16, 2015 at 4:36 am
Hey! “In the Crosshairs” ain’t that bad! If you’re me, that is. Once you get past the fake names to learn who the principals are you’ll see that I’m the chief antagonist. Eighty years old and my first biography.
Course David gets most things wrong but as they say, the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.
I’m on the last couple of chapters. They’re about the law and kind of boring again, but from three to eight, not bad, not bad.
LikeLike
July 21, 2015 at 2:24 pm
We do not live in a democracy. As far as I know, democracy has not been the form of government in any country since ancient Greece, We live in a republic. Our representatives are supposed to govern according to what the people want, But voters get to tell them, not non-voters and not pollsters. Furthermore, there is an overriding Constitution that is intended to limit the ability of the majority and the rich and powerful from stomping on others. Unfortunately, gerrymandering does screw this up.
LikeLike
July 30, 2015 at 6:29 pm
Hey Pat, I tried to send you an email but I must have erased your address. Anyway, I have a post. I should send it to you first to see if it’s acceptable.
LikeLike
August 18, 2015 at 9:31 am
john, you can send it to ronjfitz@cox.net. I want to apologize to you and other readers for being incommunicado recently. Two weeks ago I had emergency triple bypass surgery. I’m now recovering. It’s been tough but I’ll get there.
LikeLike
August 20, 2015 at 8:23 am
O my gosh.
LikeLike