Well, there’s nothing like having triple bypass surgery to help put things in perspective.
Yep, in late July some doctor opened up my chest, ripped three veins out of my left leg and re-inserted them somewhere near my heart. I had been feeling a little short winded at times and, being a hypochondriac, I decided to see my doc. He suggested a stress test and bingo-bango, a surgeon is suddenly looking at me saying “you need open heart surgery.” Anyway, surgery went fine, recovery going well, feeling great.
Aside from the surgery itself, for me the real tough part was the time leading up to the surgery. I mean, you just can’t help but think about death. So, the first thing I did was write letters to my two (wonderful) boys, telling them how proud I was of them. Then I had to “put my affairs in order” by telling my wife where all the important papers were, the receipts, the invoices, etc.
After that exercise, you just have time to think as you sit there in your hospital bed, listening to all of the monitoring machines tracking everyone’s vitals.
So, the day before my surgery I found myself thinking about all of the years I’d devoted to the abortion rights movement. I envisioned that underneath my name in my obituary the subheading would be something like “abortion rights lobbyist.” And I have to say that I was totally comfortable with that notion (although I had always dreamed that it would say “Yankee Second Baseman.” )
The fact is that I’ve always been comfortable, if not proud, of the work I’ve done but when you’re faced with the prospect of maybe not waking up from surgery, you really start to dig deep and you question what your whole life was all about and if you made the right decisions. Ultimately, I concluded that I had made the right decision to go into that line of work and I found myself even hoping that some of the eulogies would mention my work in this field.
To be honest, I did have a few uncomfortable moments during my reflections. I recalled how, as the ED of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, I pushed the envelope a lot and, as a result, lost the support of some fellow pro-choice colleagues. I also lost some good friends. I especially cringed when I recalled “outing” my colleagues during the Partial Birth Abortion debate, in effect publicly calling them liars for distorting the truth about that procedure. I did the right thing, I concluded, but it was absolute hell for me, my friends and my family.
Then, it was sad to think about some of my good friends who were killed. Doctor Bart Slepian, who two weeks before he was murdered in his home, admitted to me he hated to fly. And, of course, Doctor George Tiller, a dear friend who always knew he was a target. Then there were the other activists: Susan Hill, Bill Knorr, James MacMahon and others who have passed on. Great friends, great allies, great party animals. Good times.
So, this pre-death “trial run” actually turned out to be a good exercise. It forced me to reflect on a life’s work and, while I made a bunch of whopping mistakes, I can now say in good conscience that when ultimately I do check out, I will celebrate the work I’ve done over the years.

September 10, 2015 at 3:34 am
Best pre-obit I’ve read since Fr. Richard Neuhaus’s.
LikeLike
September 10, 2015 at 9:14 am
Thanks, John!! I’ll tell ya, it was scary stuff for a while there. Cherish each day (as you know).
LikeLike
September 10, 2015 at 11:37 am
Pity that the millions of babies that have been aborted to date have not been afforded the opportunity to have the “reflection” that you were granted. I saw that as an opportunity for grace and change of heart for your “pre-death trial run” but, alas, it was not to be. I do think you will encounter those dear friends of yours in the great beyond however and that all of you will spend eternity “celebrating” your legacies.
LikeLike
September 11, 2015 at 4:07 am
This powerful statement scares me. But one reflection: the aborted millions avoided falling into Satan’s grasp.
LikeLike
September 15, 2015 at 8:01 pm
Yep, doc, I guess i was lucky that I was not aborted. But, then again, if I were I would have had no idea what was going on. I would just not exist. So, you can focus on the little fetus who has absolutely no idea what is going on and I’ll focus on the woman, who is here right now and who is dealing with a lot of issues.
LikeLike
September 21, 2015 at 12:58 pm
Be advised your celebration might be a rather hot environment. Hope you can take the heat. What a shame you are still deceiving yourself even when confronted with your own death.
LikeLike
September 21, 2015 at 1:59 pm
Before everyone blows up and rears their ugly comments, I do want you ALL to know that the above comment was said out of deep concern for Pat’s souls eternal rest. I’ve been on and off this site and from what I gather you seem to be a nice man albeit extremely misguided on the abortion issue. Please take more time to reflect as I’d hate for you to choose to be damned forever by your pro-abortion prowess. Instead of your accolades proudly proclaiming your pro-death stance, why not go out like your former mentor Dr. Bernard Nathanson and have a total conversion of heart on this issue! God Bless you Pat.
LikeLike
September 21, 2015 at 3:21 pm
It ain’t that bad, A. What about invincible ignorance?
LikeLike
September 21, 2015 at 8:21 pm
One thing Pat isn’t – and that’s ignorant. I hope for his sake that he has such a compassion for the expectant moms that he has misguidedly and sadly forgotten about the ‘little ones’ who can not speak for themselves. God will be his judge.
LikeLike
September 22, 2015 at 5:00 am
I believe that’s a neat example of what the Catholic Church calls “invincible ignorance.”
LikeLike
September 22, 2015 at 6:16 am
John, do you mean Pat would fall into the “vincible ignorance” example whereby he has not heard the truth regarding abortion? I looked it up and unfortunately Pat may fall into the ‘invincible ignorance fallacy” category as he has been told repeatedly the error of his ways yet he refuses to believe the pro-life argument ignoring all the scientific evidence presented.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Invincible ignorance fallacy: Not to be confused with Vincible ignorance.
The invincible ignorance fallacy[1] is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given. It is not so much a fallacious tactic in argument as it is a refusal to argue in the proper sense of the word, the method instead being to make assertions with no consideration of objections.
History[edit]
The term “invincible ignorance” has its roots in Catholic theology, where — as the opposite of the term vincible ignorance — it is used to refer to the state of persons (such as pagans and infants) who are ignorant of the Christian message because they have not yet had an opportunity to hear it. The first Pope to use the term officially seems to have been Pope Pius IX in the allocution Singulari Quadam (9 December 1854) and the encyclicals Singulari Quidem (17 March 1856) and Quanto Conficiamur Moerore (10 August 1863). The term, however, is far older than that. Aquinas, for instance, uses it in his Summa Theologica (written 1265–1274),[2] and discussion of the concept can be found as far back as Origen (3rd century). When and how the term was taken by logicians to refer to the very different state of persons who deliberately refuse to attend to evidence remains unclear, but one of its first uses was in the book Fallacy: The Counterfeit of Argument by W. Ward Fearnside and William B. Holther.[3]
LikeLike
September 22, 2015 at 11:22 am
Kinda heavy for me, A. Somebody who’s never heard of Jesus is invincibly ignorant, that’s for sure. But even someone who’s heard of him, many times, might be. He will decide.
LikeLike
September 23, 2015 at 4:43 pm
Kinda heavy for me too! Not sure how to respond to anonymous (I always get a kick out of people who are too afraid to tell us their name). I have compassion, my friends. First and foremost, because they are people I can see and talk to, i have compassion for the women undergoing the abortion. It’s not easy and it’s sad. No one wants to do it but they feel compelled to for so many different reasons. But I do feel some “compassion” for that 23-24 week fetus to some extent. It’s sad that they’re going to be aborted but, again, that is up to the woman.
Tell me, anonymous…are you a man or a woman?
LikeLike
September 25, 2015 at 3:54 pm
“The invincible ignorance fallacy[1] is a deductive fallacy of circularity where the person in question simply refuses to believe the argument, ignoring any evidence given.”
There is exactly zero evidence of (1) god, (2) heaven or (3) hell. They are all just beliefs. There is some evidence of a historical Jesus, but none of his divinity. Ergo, invincible ignorance appears to apply to Christians and others of religious faith. It does not apply to being pro-choice.
LikeLike
September 25, 2015 at 3:58 pm
If you’re Catholic it does.
LikeLike
October 25, 2015 at 1:44 am
Honestly speaking It’s never easy and it’s sad on the other end. No one really wants to do it but they feel compelled to do so for many different reasons.
LikeLike