I’ve been a pro-choice advocate for many years. Whether it was as a lobbyist for the National Abortion Rights Action League or the Director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, I have been a rather visible persona in the pro-choice world. And, of course, I’ve heard every conceivable argument from both sides of this controversial issue.
And now, after all of these years, I’m finally convinced that I am actually pro-life. Let me explain:
I oppose the death penalty. It is certainly not a deterrent as evidenced by the fact that the rate of murders in this country has not gone down since we’ve had the death penalty. It’s also an uncivilized practice for any government to sanction;
I oppose the proliferation of nuclear weapons. I am old enough to remember the Cuban Missile Crisis and how Russia and the United States came to the brink of annihilating the entire planet. I mean, how many missiles to we actually need?
I favor strict regulations on the possession of firearms. No, check that. If I could I’d outlaw them totally. And the Second Amendment be damned. Don’t get me started on this one. Guns are rarely ever used for defense, so I don’t buy the NRA’s crap about needing guns to defend ones home against the bad guys or, even sillier, the government. Just look at all the other governments that have banned guns and look at the murder rate. DUH.
I support programs that provide assistance to children in need, whether it is the SNAP program, Head Start, etc. I’d say Food Stamps and Welfare assistance, but I don’t think they use those terms anymore. I always found it interesting how Members of Congress who opposed abortion rights also voted to cut back funding for federal programs that helped young children lead a healthier and more successful life;
I support stem cell research because it will help lead to the discovery of new cures for many childhood diseases, not to mention adult diseases. And please don’t start whining about how those cells are “little people” for gosh’s sakes. Grow up, will ya?
I am an original investor in a medical device that will make it safer for obese women to deliver a baby. Right now obese women have a tougher time giving birth. This device will make that process much easier;
I run my own charity for needy children. To prove that I put my money where my mouth is, four years ago I formed a 501c3 organization here in the Alexandria area that provides financial assistance to children in need. That charity was featured last year in the Washington Post and we are expanding our services to other parts of the country. In essence, we fund “minor” items like prom tickets, glasses, field trip fees, Little League registration and other relatively inexpensive items that are nonetheless very important to that child’s self esteem.
And, oh yes, I support the right to legal abortion because I believe it actually saves the lives of women.

November 3, 2015 at 9:38 am
Excellent writing. I have felt the same way myself.
LikeLike
November 6, 2015 at 11:19 am
Thanks, Charles! I’ve been meaning to write something like this for a while. I do have to hand it to the anti-abortion movement, however, in that they have co-opted the term.
LikeLike
November 3, 2015 at 9:47 am
These days, though, Pat, that term means you do not support the right to legal abortion. If you say you’re pro-life, you’ll confuse people. Probably we should call ourselves anti-abortioners, but that’s kind of hard to say.
LikeLike
November 6, 2015 at 11:20 am
Youre right, John. See my comment above. Even most pro-choicers call you folks pro-lifers. Kudos to your movement and your PR people.
LikeLike
November 3, 2015 at 9:59 am
This is so silly and cheap. You know that the label relates to abortion. People of all stripes support the initiatives you mention. Clever linguistic attempts to co-opt a viewpoint that objects to abortion is just tiresome.
LikeLike
November 3, 2015 at 12:06 pm
Ms. Ketola, you should be aware that people who call themselves “pro-life” only do so for the PR value. They do not adopt, serve as Big Brothers and Big Sisters, they do not volunteer as unpaid workers in public school classrooms, they do not serve as guardians ad litem in family court, nor do they foster children, at a greater rate than the rest of the population.
They are so-called “pro-lifers,” working out their own issues about death by trying to be heroes at minimal cost to themselves. Read Ernest Becker’s “Denial of Death” to start understanding them.
LikeLike
November 3, 2015 at 12:19 pm
So that’s where you got this nonsense.
LikeLike
November 6, 2015 at 11:25 am
Sorry, Charles, but I do not see how you can make such a broad generalization about how pro-lifers don’t volunteer, etc. I know a number of pro-lifers and they do put their money where their mouths are (“mouth is?”). Indeed, I run a local charity and I’ve got two rather ardent pro-lifers on my board.
LikeLike
November 6, 2015 at 12:32 pm
Sorry, Pat, but anecdotal evidence is not data. My now-defunct aborticentrism website had the citations on the actual level of care for human life that was exercised by the so-called “pro-lifers.” It wasn’t abysmal, but it was not up to average.
Where the so-called “pro-lifers” departed from average was in education and income. They were significantly below average in both, an indication that part of their concern about (rather than for) human life was an attempt to establish themselves as equal in social status and human agency to their educationally and economically better-off peers.
LikeLike
November 6, 2015 at 5:38 pm
Geeze, Chuck, I didn’t know you were an elitist too. Read that letter other elitists sent to the New York Times complaining about their columnist, Ross Douthat, and read his reply.
LikeLike
November 7, 2015 at 3:02 pm
Yup, the middle class starts at $30,000 a year, Mr. Dunkle, so I guess I’m an elitist.
LikeLike
November 6, 2015 at 11:23 am
Oh, I agree Kim that the label relates to abortion. And, as I’ve said above, the “pro-life” people have done a great job of co-opting the terms. I just wanted to make a statement. I was totally bored, recovering from surgery, not sure what to write about and this came out. I didn’t mean to write something “silly” but I guess it just happens sometimes. I think John Dunkle will attest to my better attempts at writing. Thanks for chiming in, Kim!
LikeLike
November 8, 2015 at 6:52 am
I won’t attest to that because I think this is one of your better attempts. Matter of fact they’re all better. And as I’ve said before, you’re the best you guys have at making a case for continuing the legalization of our holocaust.
For this one I agree with paragraphs 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9; disagree with 5, 7, and 10.
LikeLike
November 8, 2015 at 11:13 am
Hmmm, sounds like you’re actually a flaming liberal John 🙂
LikeLike
November 9, 2015 at 4:59 am
Shh, my buddies don’t know.
LikeLike
November 9, 2015 at 4:09 pm
When my father realized he was going to die, he started being nice for no reason to his offspring. One of my sisters commented, “He’s buying his way into heaven.”
LikeLike
November 9, 2015 at 5:11 pm
That’s what you’ve gotta do.
LikeLike
November 10, 2015 at 10:42 am
Yup. Spend your life being a pissant and then get right with Jesus. Good luck with that.
St. Dunkle has a nice sound. Patron saint of serial killers.
LikeLike
November 11, 2015 at 5:41 am
Abortionists kill a dozen or so people a day two or three days a week. Now that’s what I call serial killing. Bundy and his like don’t come close to matching it.
Serial killers have always been your obsession, Chuck; you just don’t know where to find them.
LikeLike
November 3, 2015 at 12:01 pm
Abortion also saves the lives and futures of real children.
LikeLike
November 3, 2015 at 12:17 pm
Right. And the German Holocaust saved the lives and futures of real Jews.
LikeLike
November 4, 2015 at 5:41 pm
I met a woman who was one of 17 foster children in a family. Her feet were ruined for life because for three years she wore the same shoes. Distracted by the tasks of caring for 16 others, the foster parents never noticed. Nobody in Ted Bundy’s family had time to think it odd that he put sharp knives in his “sister’s” (actually his aunt) shoes and lurked to see what would happen when she tried put them on. Of course, you’ll never read his lawyer’s book, “Defending the Devil.” Even though he killed up to 60 women, she wound up feeling sorry for him.
LikeLike
November 11, 2015 at 9:37 am
Mr. Dunkle, challenged by the prospect of his posthumous reputation as the patron saint of serial killers (he could have raised Ted Bundy to be a very different person), responds: “Serial killers have always been your obsession, Chuck; you just don’t know where to find them.”
What he is trying to do is continue to dodge his share of responsibility for the evil done by the real children whose lives he coerced into existence. Bundy alone killed as many as 60 young women. One would think this would give Mr. Dunkle pause for reflection, as he always fantasizes that the fetuses he imagines “rescuing” are female. So, Mr. Dunkle “saves” one fetus and cares not that he is instrumental in the death of sixty others.
Which leads us back to his problem– not only does he not take steps to ensure the proper nurture of one real child, allowing that one to develop into a serial killer, neither does he care to prepare sixty other children against the eventuality that his one child might murder them.
His attitude is the cancer at the core of the so-called “pro-life” movement– what he really seeks to address is his feelings, not the needs of human life.
LikeLike
November 11, 2015 at 9:54 am
I blame you guys for this stuff. A while ago I asked you for a translation. Not a peep. That means you’re as confused as I am and your silence only encourages more nonsense.
LikeLike
November 15, 2015 at 4:54 pm
No, you’re being deliberately obtuse. There’s no way you actually could be this dense and have been employed as a teacher, even in a parochial system.
LikeLike
November 16, 2015 at 4:35 am
See what I mean?? With Chuck all I get are insults. With you, silence. What’s a guy supposed to do?.
LikeLike
November 16, 2015 at 11:38 am
How is that an insult? I think it shows you are a clever person, to a degree.
LikeLike
November 29, 2015 at 10:04 am
blink
LikeLike
November 30, 2015 at 8:27 am
“Blink.”
Very judo, Mr. Dunkle! Use a minimum of effort to incite the enemy to wear himself out venting to no avail.
Don’t forget to send a thank-you note to your friend in Colorado who killed three. He’s taking the rap for you.
LikeLike
December 1, 2015 at 4:52 am
See, Chuck,you can make sense when you’re pushed. Now here: paragraph 1 — right; paragraph 2 — maybe..
LikeLike
December 1, 2015 at 10:48 am
You’re allowed your wet dream…
LikeLike
December 2, 2015 at 5:38 am
blink
LikeLike