Anti-abortion advocates often suggest that many women die each year at abortion clinics, giving them yet another bullet point for their “fact sheet” outlining their reasons for opposing abortion. I don’t know where they get their “facts,” but let’s discuss this issue for a minute.
It is well documented that hundreds and maybe thousands of women died of illegal or self-induced abortions in the years before abortion became legal in this country. Whether abortion is legal or not, it is axiomatic that women at times feel it is absolutely necessary to abort and, in the days before Roe v. Wade, they would resort to some outrageous methods of terminating their pregnancy. The woman would first do some very quiet research, looking for a doctor who was willing to perform the illegal abortion. Oftentimes, if they found one, that doctor would not be reputable yet many women still had the so-called “back alley abortion.” The emergency rooms were filled with women who were seriously harmed by these fly by nighters. Many of those women never made it to the emergency room.
To digress for a moment, I always wondered why the pro-choice movement did not resort to more graphic arguments by showing pictures of women lying in pools of blood after an illegal abortion? Pictures are indeed worth a thousand words and I fear that the younger generations are losing the perspective of the days of illegal abortions.
If the woman could not find a doctor, there were some women out there who would perform abortions. While they were better intentioned and certainly more sensitive to the woman’s needs, they were not trained medical personnel so they had their share of botched abortions.
If the women could find no one to do it, they may have actually performed an abortion on themselves. One of the everlasting political symbols of the pro-choice movement is the coat hanger, a device that many women used to abort their pregnancy. Or, they would concoct some solution and drink it, thinking it would kill the fetus. The horror stories are well documented, although many pro-lifers suggest that they’re made up.
Today, when a woman dies of an abortion it makes headlines in the local papers. I guess that really is the good news, i.e., that it is so rare that it becomes a story for the press. I haven’t looked at the statistics lately, but when I was involved in the movement there were maybe 2 deaths a year. And, for the most part, the deaths were not related to the actual abortion procedure but to something ancillary, like the anesthesia. But when there is a death, it casts a pall on the entire field of abortion providers.
One morning in June, 1996, I got a call from a clinic director who was in tears. When she finally gained her composure, she told me that a patient at her clinic had died on the surgery table early that morning. She had died of an embolism, something that no one could have predicted. Later investigations determined that the clinic and doctor were not responsible. But to this day, I’ll never forget the mass depression that spread throughout the universe of abortion providers. Her staff was barraged with emails, telephone calls and letters, urging them to keep moving forward. The point is the death was so unusual that it evoked an incredible nationwide reaction amongst her peers.
When a woman enters a clinic – any medical clinic – and has surgery, there is a chance she can die.
Prior to the legalization of abortion, however, the chances of dying were much, much higher….

May 24, 2010 at 9:55 am
I’m willing to bet that one unaborted fetus, Ted Bundy, killed more women than died while undergoing a legal abortion last year.
LikeLike
May 24, 2010 at 10:57 am
Now, if there was only some way that we could identify the Bundy’s of the world in utero……
LikeLike
May 25, 2010 at 9:04 am
That would be great, Abortion, however the ethical quandaries of Abortion choice are nothing compared to the potential issues of genetics.
Abortion is clearly the right of women.
Watch the minority report movie by Philip K Dick,
Predetermination is very complex, because of false positives.
Women should always have right to Abortion and Abortion Pill.
LikeLike
May 25, 2010 at 5:58 pm
Let me tell you what can be pre-determined 100% of the time in absolutely EVERY pregnancy– if somebody does not take on the responsibility for the proper development of the fetus and the child for 5.7 million seconds of its life, that particular fetus stands a very good chance of having something REALLY bad happen to its life.
If you who read this haven’t checked out the aborticentrism site and read the story of The Baby Store, I advise doing so now. Click on my name to link to the general site.
Pat, your comment about needing to determine which ones will be the next Bundy is an indication of how well you (like virtually every other “pro-choice” person) engages in the debate on the terms established by the so-called “pro-choicers.” The issue is not whether or not a baby deserves to be born; the issue is whether or not those who want a baby to be born will care for it.
By the way, I’ve finished the rough draft of your next Mother’s Day essay. Would you like it here, or would you rather pick it up off the RESPONSIBLE Right to Life (aka aborticentrism) site?
LikeLike
May 26, 2010 at 10:34 am
thanks, CG! You can send it here…
LikeLike
May 26, 2010 at 4:10 pm
Here your next Mother’s Day piece, Pat. Change it as you see fit~~
To those mothers who have had an abortion or would contemplate having an abortion, “Happy Mother’s Day!” This day is a tribute to your success in caring for human life.
Little known is the fact that you are a better mother at several levels. Craig Seaton in his book about the trial of 18 Canadian anti-abortion protestors, Altruism and Activism (1996, University Press of America), compared the demographic profiles of the typical “pro-choice” woman and the so-called “pro-life” woman:
• You and she both grew up in a large urban setting and are 44 years old and married, but those are the only common characteristics.
• Your husband has a college diploma and is a professional man; hers graduated from high school and is either a small business owner or a low-level white-collar worker.
• You have one or two children; she has three or more.
• Your household income was $50,000 in 1996 ($67,000 in 2009 dollars); hers was only 60 percent of that, $30,000 ($37,000).
• The income disparity is huge than when divided among the family members: Your family’s per capita income is between $12,500 and $16,667 ($17,000 and $22,560); hers tops out at $6,000 ($8,100), not even half of your family’s floor. With additional children, it gets lower, fast.
• You most likely have a BA degree and some additional postgraduate or professional training. (This puts you at a distinct advantage for having a broader scope of envisioning possibilities, knowing and finding resources and serving as a role model for your children’s attitude toward higher education.)
• Meanwhile, she might have a BA, but more likely either did not start or never finished college. (While her maternal instincts are just as strong as yours, she does not have as broad an experience in thinking things through for herself and relying on impartial information in making choices. She is guided more by personal inputs from family, friends and authority figures, rather than by exposure to the information available in the broader culture.)
• According to a study of parents who had only the children they wanted, versus those who had to have children they didn’t want “Born Unwanted, 35 Years Later: The Prague Study,” Dr. Henry P. David, 2006), your children are more likely to complete high school
• Your children are also significantly more likely to have satisfactory relationships.
The educational difference shows in how you use your talents: You are employed outside the home; she is not. You have the opportunity to test your broader abilities at will outside the home—if you choose, you can forsake the job and mind the children. But she, either for reasons of servitude, self-doubt or inculcated role-playing, foregoes that use of talents and expansion of her world.
Religion is not very important in your life; you and your family attend church infrequently if at all; the so-called “pro-life” woman is most likely Catholic and attends church at least weekly if not more often. (As reflected in her income, employment and fecundity states, the “pro-life” woman is very likely to be “pro-life” based not on having attained an integrated state of cognition (cf Belenky et al., Women’s Ways of Knowing), but as a result of being directed by her religious or social culture.)
By choosing abortion, you and millions like you have reduced the cost to society of juvenile crime: A report by Levitt and Dubner in Freakonomics (HarperCollins, 2005) showed that the introduction of freely available abortion in the US resulted in a drop in crime among young US males 20 years later. Although the data was disputed (Good and Foote in the Wall Street Journal), the authors refuted the challenges.
By choosing abortion, you have kept your family from being a burden on society: The state of Michigan in 1987, following the lead of the “pro-life” lobby, outlawed the use of Medicaid funds for abortion; eighteen months later there was an increase of 40,000 people on the welfare rolls. The increase, according to the state commissioner of social welfare, was directly attributable to that law.
You also understand that an additional child might force you to deprive another child of critical resources, thereby stunting the possibilities for both of them. You know that while God might be all-caring, He does not guarantee you 26 hours in a day or fully-paid tuition.
You also know the first rule of child protective workers: “You can’t take care of the child in the family until you take care of the mother.” You know that if you are over-stressed for time, finances and parenting skills, the whole family will suffer. You treasure each child you have because you chose to love each one. You never weep from frustration or rage against the implacable injustice of a world against whom you are powerless; you have the extra strength to do the mothering you intend to. And Happy Mother’s Day to you!
LikeLike
May 27, 2010 at 8:14 am
Yikes!
Well, CG, looks like you already wrote the piece. Thanks!
LikeLike
August 3, 2010 at 2:18 am
When looking at complications that might arise in abortions, something that can’t be overlooked is how truthful the patient is when giving information that might be pertinent to the situation.
Things such as diabetes, drug or alcohol abuse, various medications, etc, all the the possibility of having adverse effects if the staff id unaware of them.
It is imperative that a patient be totally honest when considering medical procedures.
LikeLike