“We must stand up to the special interests in this country!”
How many times have you heard a politician utter this phrase? Invariably, it is always followed with a rousing round of applause, perhaps even a standing ovation. Yes! Let’s get those blood sucking, sleazy lobbyists who represent those blood sucking, sleazy special interests! Lynch ‘em!
I don’t know who is more stupid – the politicians or the voters. Or maybe they both deserve each other.
So, who are these “special interests” that we all hate so much? Well, in the context of this world famous blog we need to recognize groups like the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League and the National Right to Life Committee. These groups spend hundreds and thousands of dollars (if not millions) each year promoting their agenda and/or fighting the other side’s scurrilous attempts to bring down our Republic. So, when President Obama or Speaker Boehner assure us that they will no longer cow-tow to the special interests, what exactly does that mean? I mean, it sounds really good, doesn’t it? But let’s get past the rhetoric and play this out for a second.
First of all, EVERYONE has some kind of special interest in something, don’t they? Of course they do. And, if I recall the First Amendment, EVERYONE has the right to express those interests to their Member of Congress or any other elected official. So, if Mark Jones of Brooklyn, New York writes a letter to his Congressman opposing higher taxes, he is expressing his views on an item of “special interest” to him. When Billy Bob Horsehide of Butte, Montana sends an email to his Senator about gays in the military, he is conveying his “special interest” in that issue. EVERYONE has a special interest in something so I don’t understand why everyone says we need to eliminate the “special interests.”
Then, let’s say that Mark Jones is also anti-abortion but he doesn’t have the time or perhaps inclination to write a letter expressing his opposition to the “legal killing” that is going on in this country. Instead, he sends $100 to the National Right to Life Committee. Then, the NRLC sends its cadre of lobbyists to Capitol Hill to meet with Members of Congress to express their concern for the “unborn.” Mark is only using a larger organization of like-minded individuals to convey his position on an issue of importance to him. What the hell is wrong with that? Is the NRLC one of those “special interests” that pro-life Speaker John Boehner would seek to eliminate? I think not.
Then let’s take Obama. He also has made a big deal out of promising the American public that he also will eliminate those nasty “special interests.” Let me show you how absurd that notion is. Say pro-life Congressman Chris Smith introduces a bill that eliminates abortions after 24 weeks and the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee indicates that he would like to move the bill for a vote. The committee is primarily pro-life so there’s a good chance that the bill will pass. Are you telling me that when a staff person at the White House hears about this bill, he is just gonna sit back and not give it another thought? No way, Jose. In the real world, he will pick up the phone and call – dare I say it – the LOBBYIST for NARAL to get their thoughts on the prospects for this legislation which ultimately could wind up on the President’s desk. The staff person will ask the “experts” about the impact of the bill, he will ask if the pro-choice Members of Congress on the committee should offer some amendments to mitigate the impact of the proposal. In other words, the White House staff will actually strategize with their allies in the pro-choice movement. They may even have a meeting in the Old Executive Office building with all of the pro-choice lobbyists!
Indeed, that’s how it worked years ago when I was a LOBBYIST for the abortion provider movement. I was constantly in touch with President Clinton’s liaison with the “women’s groups.” The point is the White House or those on Capitol Hill do not work in a vacuum. Nor should they. So, all of this stuff about getting rid of the “special interests” is horse hockey, pure and simple. In fact, I would take it a step further – “special interest “ groups are part of our democratic system, they are a way for the little guy to join other like minded little guys and convey their message to their elected officials.
What the heck is wrong with that?
January 17, 2011 at 2:21 pm
I laud your honesty, Pat. My academic issue with special interests center around the near-invisibility of lobbyists, front groups and the like, often parading around as if for the common good. Front groups for the forest, tobacco, petroleum and pharmaceutical industries are a but a few examples of organizations who collect contributions and spend millions on slick PR campaigns to tell the public how good genetically modified food is or how we have better living through chemistry. In other words, ordinary folks are often unaware of the back room machinations, of PR’s presence in what is passed of as news (up to 50% of news is actually PR work). Further, special interest groups have managed to silence the public with food disparagement laws, with corporate silencing, with the Patriot Act and more.
Obama promised more transparency in government. I’d like to see that.
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 12:02 pm
Have a little more faith in the system, Kate. Yes, there are some sleazy lobbyists up there but the fact is (and I worked for several Congressman) that the Members of Congress don’t just cow-tow to that one lobbyist. Because they are politicians, they have to think of ALL of the interest groups involved in an issue, including “the people.” Many years ago, lobbyists often told Congress what to do. It just aint’ that way much any more. As for their PR presence, it cuts many ways. The pro-choice organizations have some pretty slick PR campaigns themselves. And for every sleazy lobbyist, there is a good lobbyist making the opposite argument…..
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 2:34 pm
jajajajaja
i LOVED your first point, patty!
i believe that if we are honest, we will admit that we all have some sort of agenda.
i certainly do.
but when i say that to some people, regardless of the topic we are discussing, some people become outraged that anyone would even think about considering the notion, that their fine noble cause could be part of an agenda.
if i could be charged with thought crimes by those people, i would have a life sentence.
but the fact is that we all have one, and denial of it won’t negate that fact.
having an agenda is not what matters. what does matter is how we promote and implement it, and how it will affect others.
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 12:04 pm
You’re right, Rogie. Indeed, it’s interesting when people complain about the special interests and then tell me how they oppose the war in Iraq or are for gun control. I think what it comes down to is that people dont like the “special interest” folks unless it is their own special interest…..
LikeLike
January 17, 2011 at 3:11 pm
I think they are talking about eliminating groups that only take interest on the big companies.
I don’t think is possible for them to eliminate special interest groups at all. It is part of politics.
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 12:05 pm
You may be right, Melissa, but no one has really said that. And if they want to take on the “big companies,” they need to be careful because there are actually a bunch of very good “big companies” that do a lot for women’s rights, the environment, etc. What bothers me is that the phrase is just a throw-away line and, worse, the people eat it up without even thinking about it…
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 7:40 am
Pat…great article!!! My problem with lobbyist is all the $$$ they spend {and give} to make their point heard!!! There was some type of {I can’t remember right now} law passed a number of yrs ago abt how much they could do or spend…to get their “point across”!! But we all know {with some scrambling around} they figured that out!!!
There is one particular “drug company” in regards to “birth control pills” that in the past has spent “millions upon millions” to get ALL the business from abortion clinics!!! I hate to say I have seen them succeed in some cases!!! So you know that on a higher level they spend 100 x more to “get their point” across…that is what bothers me!! That the little guy{lobbiest}..can’t “BUY” as much of the your Senator/US Represenatives time!!! That is what makes them so “DIRTY”…when people think abt them!!! On the surface everything you said is true!!! But there is a very “dirty” side to the lobbiest business!! Also very lucritive…that is why so many of our guys become one …when they loose their seats!!!
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 12:08 pm
But, Lorraine, keep in mind that groups like Planned Parenthood, the Feminist Majority, etc. also spend millions each year trying to make their point. Indeed, if I had been able to raise millions when I was at NCAP, the members would have applauded and said go for it! The other thing is that money can buy access to some extent but I worked for some Congressman who would purposely NOT meet with their big contributors for fear of what it would look like!
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 5:15 pm
pat makes a good point about big entities.
right now, i am helping with a fundraiser for a free clinic that serves mainly the immigrant community and the homeless.
one of the biggest contributors is the susan g komen organization.
their name is on our flyers and we are upfront about them helping us.
selling tickets for this fundraiser in my parish, a couple of people have refused to help because of this, because they also give funds to planned parenthood.
i point out that we are not giving money to them, they are giving much needed funds to us.
i can’t look at one aspect that i disagree with without also accepting the other aspects that i do agree with before coming to a final conclusion.
LikeLike
January 21, 2011 at 9:34 am
Geez….I”m sorry but I think people just think too much and it drives me nuts how some people are so picky.
LikeLike
January 21, 2011 at 10:30 am
i am just grateful that they give us those funds.
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 5:30 pm
Hi Mike, sorry to join you as another vicadtim to the scam… Can you kildny tell me how to get Click.Bank to refund me the money, please? (I am from UK). I have canadcelled my credit card immeaddiadately and now wonadder if I have taken the step too quickly because how is Click.Bank going to credit back the money now? Would greatly appreadciadate your or anyone’s advice please. (Big regret and kickading myself as I am usuadally very cauadtious! Doh!). Well, a lesadson learnt! You r right, it goes to show that more have to be done to proadtect the wider pubadlic from these crooks. Hope to hear from you soon. CS———————————–Hi,Im in Ireadland, and I fell for this scam yesadteradday. I guess, job issues, recesadsion, and a bit of hope a wing and a prayer. I paid for VIp (hahaha) seradvice. Anyadway. I went and found out more after I paid, and I already gort my money back from click.bank, and have notiadfied my credit card comadpany and I expect a full refund there also. Its not the first rtime I was take in my scamadmers online, but what intrigues me is how they can remain at large, not behind bars, and conadtinue to ply their illeadgal trade. I read a blog someadwhere today and it would aopopear hunaddreds of thouadsands of peoadple have fallen into this trap a gain and again. Can nothadingbe done through the Seradvice Providers/Host to insure everyadthing is legal and above board. Othaderadwise the interadnet will evenadtuadally be the home of crooks, thieves and scoundrels.
LikeLike
April 22, 2014 at 7:02 am
A good many valuables you’ve given me.
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 3:26 pm
Well, i think that everything inside the politics have their “special interest”
No matter what or how they always go around what is really important to get what they want.
I use to work in a construction company that was all about who knows who or who gets what or how much. So when a bid was to be presented, i don’t know how, they would find how much was the asking price for the other company and they would ask a penny less and offer something in exchange.
It is like that every where.
LikeLike
January 21, 2011 at 9:36 am
Sonia, try not to be too cynical. I know there are folks out there who cheat the system (like your construction folks), but for every one of them there are hundreds of honest, hard working people/companies that play by the rules. But they are the ones who do not make the headlines. In the abortion rights world, we say “Trust Women.” In my bigger world, I still say “Trust People.”
LikeLike
January 18, 2011 at 9:09 pm
No Dunkle,
What a pleasure!
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 5:31 am
I don’t understand this stuff, Karen. Very frustrating. When I do understand the topic and someone says something stupid, then I relieve my frustration and jump in. You have been the source of that relief more than once.
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 11:00 am
Oops, Karen, you spoke too quickly!!!
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 12:21 am
Why does Ron Fitzsimmons use the fake name “Pat Richards” on this site?
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 11:17 am
???
What do you mean?
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 10:42 pm
Ron Fitzsimmons wrote on his Facebook page about writing this blog under an “assumed name.” Of course anyone who knows anything about the pro-abortion movement would know that it is Fitzsimmons from the content of his posts. So I’m just wondering why he is using the name “Pat Richards” here?
LikeLike
January 21, 2011 at 10:32 am
i am wondering why you use a fake name to make claims of someone using a fake name.
LikeLike
April 8, 2011 at 5:43 pm
Well Well Well!
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 5:05 pm
i would say the question is why do YOU use a fake name in this site?
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 10:43 pm
I’m just a curious observer, not anyone you all would know.
LikeLike
January 21, 2011 at 9:01 am
Really I don’t care “who” Pat Richards is…because HE/SHE writes important..thought provoking articles!! I don’t know what your point is…with your post!! Do you think “if” Pat is someone other than Pat…that it would change the importance of the words that are written??
LikeLike
January 21, 2011 at 9:39 am
Good point, LDM.
LikeLike
January 22, 2011 at 1:05 am
Just thought it was ironic that Ron was being praised for his “honesty.” He has deleted the Facebook posting but he had written that the “feds” are watching Dunkle on this site, and that he was befriending Dunkle under the assumed name. I haven’t read enough to know whether Mr. Dunkle warrants watching by the feds or not. I find Ron’s observations and stories of his experiences interesting and wonder why he doesn’t want it known that they are from him, since he is certainly known from his abortion advocacy career.
LikeLike
January 22, 2011 at 5:02 am
Thanks,a, but look, I’m just so happy to find a killers’ helper like Pat that I don’t care if the objectivity is fake or not. My enemies are not the killers’ helpers anyway, even the illiterate ones or the ones I love to tweak, like Chuckles and Kate. Those folks are blooded and alive. They’re wrong, sure, but give me one of them to talk to any day rather than the zombie who hides from the issue altogether. And the feds? Tough guys, but they know me like a book anyway (they’e the only ones who read, and I mean read, my newsletter).
LikeLike
February 7, 2014 at 11:56 pm
dude she clearly did and she’s just hanivg the after math fixed up. and excersise doesn’t work for everyone, some people work out every day and try so hard to eat right and keep a perfect diet and still almost always gain weight, it’s not always a disease, sometimes it’s just not always as simple as going out and excersising. it’s people like you that bully people, bet you’re not perfect.
LikeLike
April 1, 2014 at 11:01 am
How neat! Is it really this simple? You make it look easy.
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 7:33 am
Let me share this link to understand my pessimism, Pat.
http://www.rootsaction.org/news-a-views/46-from-military-industrial-complex-to-permanent-war-state
Kate
LikeLike
January 19, 2011 at 11:04 am
I understand your pessimism, Kate and, yes, the system is not perfect. But, as this author suggests, today we could start a new organization called “Stop the Permanent War State” We have that right. We could do a Facebook page, etc. But then it would be up to us to promote it, to recruit, etc. Democracy takes a lot of energy, as you know but the bottom line is we could do it if we wanted to. We actually do have some “power”. For example, I work for a county supervisor in Virginia, kind of like a mayor and every day I see the “power” of one individual who might want a stop sign on their corner or a new sidewalk. Congress is a bigger target, of course, but as one who was very active in the anti-war movement in the 60’s-70’s, I do believe that people can have influence. It just takes a hell of a lot of work!
LikeLike
February 9, 2014 at 12:01 am
Hi Mike,It is a shame that they conadtinue to fraud peoadple around the globe. the FBI in the US has an ongoading invesadtiadgaadtion and have been tryading to catch these peoadple for nelary three years, but as you can see they have not been sucadcessadful.The probadlem is that they are interadnaadtional and are very sophisadtiadcated in in their scam techadniques. They cloak their idenadtiadties and their sources to avoid trackading and tracading, thus preadventading any prosadeadcuadtion.What we can do as conadsumers and as indiadvidaduadals is to report the scams as they occur and in this way try to help make peoadple aware of the scams as they arise.I am very glad that you received your money back from the ClickadBank site. PayadPal has also been very good at reimadbursading funds.We all hope that someadday the peoadple behind these scams will be caught and brought to justice.
LikeLike
February 7, 2014 at 9:12 pm
اوه من خوبی! a tremendous arltcie dude. Thank you Nonetheless I’m experiencing difficulty with ur rss . Don know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting equivalent rss problem? Anybody who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx
LikeLike