The candidate walks into the jam-packed auditorium at Calvin Coolidge High School. The district he seeks to represent has elected both Republicans and Democrats. The residents are independent thinkers who are very serious about the social issues of the day. As the candidate strides up to the podium, he looks over the crowd and sees a number of pro-life and pro-choice signs. It seems evenly divided. Personally, the candidate believes abortion should be legal but has some concerns about its usage. He is truly in the middle somewhere. But the conventional wisdom says that the candidate should just put their lot into one of the camps and stick with that position. This candidate is different and tonight his goal is to defy that conventional wisdom by appealing to the activists on both sides:
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. I’ve been asked to give you my views on the abortion issue tonight. Generally it is not an assignment that the average candidate looks forward to but I guess I’m a little different. I’ve actually been excited about this prospect.
Let me start by saying that I respect those of you who are pro-life and those of you who are pro-choice. This is probably the most controversial issue of our time and I honestly believe that all of you are well- intentioned. Unfortunately, the media loves to focus on the negative, so they will cover the extremists on both sides. That is not fair because I firmly believe that the average activist comes from a good place, has deep- seeded convictions and is not shy about expressing them. Indeed, I applaud you all for standing up for what you believe.
Now, I’m gonna be straight with you. I’m not the typical politician who tries to have it both ways. You deserve to know where I stand.
I believe abortion must remain legal in this country. To me, it is a matter of a woman’s health. I am a great student of history and, as everyone knows, before abortion was legalized in this country, many women were dying from botched, unsafe back alley abortions or were being severely harmed. We can all quibble about how many women we’re talking about but, for me, the numbers don’t matter. Women will always seek out abortions and, if that is the case, then I prefer they be safe.
At the same time, however, I think the pro-choice folks need to fess up. Abortion is a form of killing. A woman sitting in the abortion clinic waiting room has something – and you can decide what you want to call that something – in her body. It is something that, if not aborted, will ultimately become a child. It is a living organism. Indeed, if it was a wanted pregnancy, we would be calling it a “baby” from day one. Then, when the woman leaves the clinic, that organism is no longer alive. To me, that is “killing.” It’s a sad process, one that no one wants to experience. It’s a very sad fact of life.
But here’s the good news. The number of abortions in this country is decreasing. It’s hard to say what is causing that trend, but I would like to give credit to both sides of the issue. For example, the pro-choice folks like to emphasize birth control education. The pro-lifers hope to “protect” women by pointing out how some women ultimately regret their abortions. Whatever the reason, the number is going down and that is a good thing.
Now, although I support abortion, I am very concerned that some women might be getting later terms abortions for less than compelling reasons. That’s why I would support banning third trimester abortions unless the woman’s life was endangered or if there was a possibility of her experiencing severe health consequences. I don’t think a woman should have an abortion at that stage for some less-than-serious reason.
I will add that I can support the work of so-called crisis pregnancy centers as long as they are totally candid up front about their opposition to abortion. If a woman clearly understands that she is basically going into a pro-life center andshe still wants to talk to them, then go for it. I have no problem with that. In addition, I will vigorously support the right of pro-life activists to protest in front of a clinic. That is the essence of the First Amendment.
Although I support legal abortion, I am torn about the use of taxpayer’s dollars for abortions. I understand how the pro-lifers don’t want their tax dollars used to fund something that they find morally objectionable and they have all the right in the world to try to pass laws restricting the use of those dollars. Indeed, in my earlier days I supported efforts to de-fund the Vietnam War. On the other hand, I am troubled by the thought of a woman on welfare with four children not being able to use her Medicaid card for an abortion because it means we all will be paying more money to help her raise yet another (unwanted) child. It’s a tough one for me and I would like to sit down with representatives on both sides of that issue.
Abortion is not a black and white issue to me. It is very, very complicated. In the meantime, however, if I am elected to Congress I will work hard to make it easier for couples to adopt, I will support using federal dollars for contraceptives. I will support any educational effort that has the same goal as we all do – to eliminate the need for abortion in this country. I ask you all to consider supporting me. I support legal abortion but I will work as hard as anybody to eliminate the need for it.
Thank you very much.
February 17, 2011 at 6:20 am
Ooops! Jacobtoo is me.
LikeLike
February 17, 2011 at 4:56 pm
I would be ashamed of that as well.
LikeLike
April 8, 2011 at 9:45 am
Before it disappears, I’m saving this great post (along with two others it inspired, or spawned)in my May issue of skyp1.blogspot.com (
Before it disappears, I’m saving this great post (along with two others it inspired, or spawned) in the May issue of skyp1.blogspot.com (Abortion is Murder). The May issue isn’t out yet but I’ll let you know when it is.
LikeLike
February 10, 2014 at 8:00 am
it is then we can get some strange molars, genocide is justified and so is homophobia; and so is much more that most reasonable people would agree is certainly not good molars (confess to a little question begging when I said most reasonable people )You certainly do digress and do not return from your digression, the question was How do you get to equate homosexuality with your made up deathstyle .Back to your digression I would think that my example of a moral truth that sexual abuse of children is wrong is an argument against this moral truth giver, your God. Not all but a sufficiently large percentage to be a worry are officials in one form or another of one of God’s churches, how could this be permitted, why would an ultimate moralist permit such immorality to exist, why would he permit his servants to cover up so much abuse and at the same time direct his servants to spread hate against fellow humans that are all part of his creation. That such is the case, along with lack of demonstrable proof of existence, makes for a strong case that there is no God, and certainly not yours.No matter what philosophical and religious arguments that are presented for the existence of a creator none can say that the creator is your God, there are many other contenders. Further there is nothing to support a Trinitarian version of Christianity over a Unitarian version.
LikeLike
April 9, 2011 at 5:51 am
OK, Pat’s post and the two others are now up — skyp1.blogspot.com
Oh I know, I know, this is what I’ve been blasting Chuckles for, self-promotion, but I promise I won’t do it again.
LikeLike
February 10, 2014 at 9:36 pm
Henry 6:31 Maybe you can furnish some. As a maettr of fact, I can. Please visit whatever websites are managed by protesters. I’m sure the local Catholic Church has one and there must be others. Look to find a picture of an ambulance at the Clinic taking away a patient. If this did happen, a dozen protesters with their phones would have photographed it probably the Forum would have published the photo. Maybe there are such photos on these sites, I have not looked.
LikeLike
May 24, 2012 at 1:53 am
UTS~I’m not cneecrnod as a “conservative”, I am cneecrnod as a christian woman who happens to be black. I am cneecrnod that other christians and especially so-called black christian who aren’t outraged that our population is on the decline. Those who want to destroy us are enjoying great success. The little spiel about “only caring about black children is when they are fetuses’ is a lie from the pit of hell, stop spewing Roland Martin, Tom Joyner, Michael Baisden talking points as they really sounds dumb because think about what it is you are really saying when you make such an asinine comment….what you are really saying is black life is so worthless that you support extinguishing it before it is born because “conservatives” aren’t going to care about it after it’s born. How utterly insane is that? That’s the problem with the prevailing warped mentality of black folks — looking outside of our homes for someone to give a damn about our families instead of taking responsibility ourselves. If that weren’t so, then why would you even fathom that “someone” other than the Mama & Daddy or hell just the Mama (truth be told) should be cneecrnod about the “fetus” outside of the womb. How many white children do you give a tinker’s damn about, UTS? So, please spare us the insipid platitudes that you black quasi-socialist fundamentalist progressive racism chasers love to repeat — over, and over and over and over again.
LikeLike
May 24, 2012 at 7:56 am
Maqui, I appreciate your comments but can you tell me who is actually trying to “destroy” you/your race? You do make some interesting points!
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 5:51 pm
Why does this have to be the ONLY rebllaie source? Oh well, gj!
LikeLike