If you have been following my recent posts, you know I am supporting the Abortion Rights Freedom Ride set to kick off on 23 July 2013 in New York City and San Francisco. I discussed this summer’s action with a number of people I respect, and there is a divide in the abortion rights community on whether or not it is wise to embark on this action. I did not reach the decision to support and join with the Riders without giving the decision due diligence; nor, did I neglect to consider the multiple outcomes of the action.
When facing a dichotomous debate among two sides of the community, two camps who should be working together toward common goals, I ask myself now as I did in the past, What Would Dad Do? Would he shrink back into the shadows, rely solely on private action and influence, or would he advocate, and actually engage in, direct action and response to those who tormented, stalked, and eventually killed him? Obviously, we know the answer: he did not back down! As I wrote a couple of posts ago, I also cannot and will not back down.
Upon the 20th year after my dad’s murder by a Christian terrorist, as we face continued threat of violence, and as state after state passes draconian anti abortion legislation, I reflect not only on what my dad would do but also consider the words of Yeats:
Things said or done long years ago,
Or things I did not do or say
But thought that I might say or do,
Weigh me down, and not a day
But something is recalled,
My conscience or my vanity appalled.
Knowing I will be appalled by remaining silent, I resolved the vacillation by opting to support what I believe is the right course of action. To that end, I co-authored a piece on the merits and need of the Abortion Rights Freedom Ride with one of its primary organizers Sunsara Taylor. I want to share with you our recent missive so perhaps more of us will come together on the need for direct, vocal, and mass support our clinics, our doctors, and our rights
Abortion Rights Are At a Crossroads:
This is NOT a Time to Lay Low – It is Time for Massive Uncompromising Struggle!
By Sunsara Taylor and David Gunn, Jr.
July 12, 2013
Across the country, people are waking up to the state of emergency facing the right to abortion. As legislators in Texas push hard to close down 37 of 42 abortion clinics statewide, new laws in North Carolina would close four of their five remaining clinics. Meanwhile, Ohio’s recently passed budget could close as many as three abortion clinics. North Dakota, on August 1st, may become the first state to effectively ban abortion. Already Mississippi’s last abortion clinic is merely an appellate ruling away from closure. We could go on.
If we do not reverse this trajectory now, we will condemn future generations of women and girls to forced motherhood, to lives of open enslavement, terror, and life-crushing shame. Women will be forced to have children they do not want, trapping them in abusive relationships, driving them into poverty, forcing them out of school, and extinguishing their dreams. Women will go to desperate and dangerous measures to terminate unwanted pregnancies, once again flooding emergency rooms and turning up dead women in cheap motels with blood caked between their legs.
We face two divergent roads: Either we seize control of the debate and reset the terms and whole trajectory of this fight; or we continue down the road of “established conventional wisdom,” only to awaken before long to an unrecognizable and untenable situation for women. What each of us does matters,and matters tremendously.
It is in this context that we initiated an Abortion Rights Freedom Ride. Our echo of the Civil Rights Freedom Rides is intentional and fitting. Women who cannot decide for themselves if and when they have children are not free. On the contrary, they are mere child-bearing chattel whose purpose is to serve and not actively chose their destinies.
Volunteers on this Freedom Ride will caravan from both coasts to North Dakota, traverse through the middle of the country into Wichita, and head due south to Jackson, Mississippi. Our aim is threefold: one, we must move beyond localized fights andlauncha national counter-offensive; two, we must radically reset the political, moral, and ideological terms of this fight so that millions understand that this fight is about women’s liberation or women’s enslavement; lastly, and of paramount importance, we must call forth the mass independent political resistance that is necessary to defeat this war on women.
As the Abortion Rights Freedom Ride evolved from conception to genesis, many have responded by with enthusiastic and unequivocal support. Regular people from across the country as well as those who have been on the front lines of the abortion rights struggle are joining with us in demanding abortion rights without compromise and thanking us for daring to travel to where women’s rights face harshest threat.
However, some who share our passion for the cause have raised concerns and even opposition to this action. They fear the Abortion Rights Freedom Ride will be too confrontational, too vociferous for abortion, and may turn off avenues of support.
Some have argued that it is wrong for people to come into local areas from the outside. Others argue that mass political protest will endanger the chances of winning important court cases and that it is better to rely on official channels of politics.
Because the future of women is at stake, we feel it is critical to address these concerns head on. In fact, it is exactly the faulty logic at the root of these concerns that has contributed to all of us finding ourselves in such a dire situation.
First, while local ground conditions are different and unique in some ways, the fact that every clinic and every state is facing heightened assault is not unique nor is it local. We all face a national assault on abortion rights which requires a national counter-offensive. Not only is it utterly immoral for us to abandon the women living in the states most under direct duress, it is delusional to think that what happens in states like Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota and Kansas will not come soon to a theater near you. Our futures are bound together and we all share the responsibility to take this on and turn the tide where the attacks are the most severe.
Second, while it is true that a great many people – including many who support abortion rights – are defensive about abortion, they should not be ashamed and this defensiveness and shame is precisely something we must eradicate.
Among the reasons many are defensive about abortion are decades of propaganda by those who oppose women’s equality but posture as defenders of “babies”; meanwhile, supporters of abortion rights have too often been conciliatory, muted, and compromising. This must stop. This fight has never been about babies. It has always been about controlling women. This is why there is not a single major anti-abortion organization that supports birth control.
If we want to turn the tide, we have to tell the truth: there is absolutely nothing wrong with abortion. Fetuses are NOT babies. Abortion is NOT murder. Women are NOT incubators.
A great many people are hungry for this message. They are furious and searching for a meaningful vehicle to make their outrage felt. It is only by asserting the positive morality of abortion rights that we can call forth and mobilize the tens of thousands who already share our resolve. Only through direct action and a polemical shift can all of us stand together and change how millions of others are thinking. Shouldn’t this emergency situation awaken us to the need to change public opinion, not accommodate it?
History has proven that directly confronting oppressive social norms can be disruptive and scary; yet, it is a necessary and uplifting part of making any significant positive change. Many argued that it was wiser for LGBT people to stay closeted until society was more accepting; others counseled against the Civil Rights Freedom Rides out of fear that it would only rile up the opposition, but it was only when people took that risk and got “in your face” that broader public opinion and actions began to change.
We must create a situation where being anti-abortion is seen to be as socially unacceptable as it is to advocate lynchings, anti-LGBT violence, or rape (although, if you listen to some on the Right, rape advocacy is not necessarily off their table).When we reach that summit, we will be on our way to turning the tide.
Third, while court cases are important – even essential – it is only through truly massive independent political struggle that we stand a chance at defeating the truly unyielding and powerful foe we face. Every setback the anti-abortion movement experiences only makes them more determined and every victory only makes them more aggressive. They will not be appeased if we lie low. No court case or election or new law will stop them. Not only has the existing power structure proven unwilling or unable to do so, people who believe they are on a “mission from God” are not bound by human laws and do not yield to public opinion.
But they can be defeated. Forced motherhood is deeply opposed to the interests of humanity. If we get out there and tell the truth, if we resist, if we clarify the stakes of this battle, and if we mobilize wave upon wave of the masses to get off the sidelines and into the streets with us, we can win. There is a tremendous reservoir of people who can and must be called forth to join in this struggle. We have seen this vividly in Texas. Let us not underestimate the potential that exists in every state across this country.
We stand at a crossroads. For the future of women everywhere, let us refuse the worn pathways that have allowed us to lose so much ground. We must not lay low, hope these attacks will blow over, and allow women in some parts of the country to be forced into mandatory motherhood while hoping to preserve the rights of a shrinking few. We cannot continue to foster the attitude that abortion is the 21st Century’s Scarlet Letter while allowing abortion providers to be further stigmatized and demonized. We cannot recoil from the massive fight that urgently needs fighting at this moment in this time.
Now is the time for courage, for truth telling, for stepping out and launching an uncompromising counter-offensive. We have right on our side. We call on everyone who cares about the future of women to join with us in strengthening the national impact and influence of this Abortion Rights Freedom Ride. Join with us at our kick-off rallies in New York City and San Francisco in July 23. Caravan to meet us in North Dakota, Wichita, Kansas, and Jackson, Mississippi. Send a donation or a message of support. Reach out to individuals and religious communities that can provide safe passage to the courageous individuals who are giving up their summers and putting everything they have into winning a different and far better future for women. Most importantly, let us together take the rough road to victory. It may be less traveled, but only through struggle can we reap the benefits of love’s labor won.
To learn more about and get involved with the Abortion Rights Freedom Ride, go to: http://www.stoppatriarchy.org/
Sunsara Taylor writes for Revolution Newspaper (revcom.us) and is an initiator of the movement to End Pornography and Patriarchy: The Enslavement and Degradation of Women (StopPatriarchy.org)
David Gunn, Jr. is the son of David Gunn, Sr., the first abortion doctor to be assassinated by an anti-abortion gunman, and blogs for Abortion.ws
July 15, 2013 at 1:22 pm
Thank you David and Sunsara for your energy and compassion. And I certainly wish you luck with your effort. As you pursue your quest, keep in mind that all politics is local. Those wacky legislators in Texas do not give a crapola about anyone outside of their state. And, unless they have state wide ambitions, they dont give a crapola about anyone outside of their district. You can deluge a legislator with millions of postcards but the only voices they hear are the ones down the street, the ones who go out and vote for them or against them. The irony is that in some way, this is a district by district battle, not a national one. Frankly, most folks who live in Brooklyn dont give a darn what is happening with abortion clinics in Virginia. Indeed, we just had one clinic close just yesterday because of new state regulations.
If I had millions and millions of dollars, I would be targetting anti-abortion leaders in certain states, maybe the ones who introduced these terrible bills and I would try to defeat them. Simple as that. Scare the crap out of the next person who dares to think about infringing on a woman’s right to abortion. Otherwise, we are going to wind up – ironically – exactly where we were before Roe. Only certain states like New York, Oregon, etc. will have clinics and women will find them. And, unforutnately, many women who cannot afford to get to those states will self abort and possibly die.
LikeLike
July 15, 2013 at 2:41 pm
Pat, i absolutely agree that applying pressure at the local level is of vast importance, and I think one of the purposes of this action is to bolster, encourage, and, hopefully, plant the seed for continued, persistent, and unrelenting local action.
LikeLike
July 16, 2013 at 11:17 pm
Thank you for posting this…the ideas expressed in this missive are extremely important for people to be thinking about right now. As those of us on the Abortion Rights Freedom Ride are about to embark, abortion rights are in more of a state of emergency than ever before. Almost daily there is new anti-abortion legislation coming out in different states all across the US. This is a battle, all of these local or state anti-abortion laws are attacks on the rights of women, & this is not a time to back down, to lay low…this state of emergency is real, and it is not going away.
And there is a need for people to see the link between the local & state battles and the question of women all over the US having the right and access to abortion! We all need to stand up for ND, for KS, for MS, for TX, for WY, for NC, for OH…need I continue the list?!?! People in Brooklyn and other more progressive areas where abortion access is not as under attack (and it IS under attack, even in NYC) should care about this, and many will once they hear about it….and they should support it, fund it, join it in whatever way they can. Nothing less than women’s lives and futures are at stake.
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/abortion-rights-freedom-ride
LikeLike
July 18, 2013 at 8:40 am
Andrea: I really appreciate your energy and commitment to the cause. And I certainly wish you the best of luck in your endeavor. Do not lose that energy. I just hope that this does not sound to others like “white noise.” Unfortunately, for many many years the pro-choice movement has been talking about abortion rights going down the tube and I hope the general public has not tuned out at this point. I just wish you were coming to Washington, D.C. so I could join you!
LikeLike
July 18, 2013 at 7:53 pm
How do we respond to Rick Perry for signing his anti abortion legislation?
LikeLike
July 19, 2013 at 8:17 am
Honestly, I”m not sure what we can do about Perry. Sure, he might run for President again and we should raise these issues during his possible campaign. But the damage is done, it’s up to the courts. Ideally, if I had a million dollars, I’d set up a pro-choice PAC and try to defeat every legislator who voted for that bill. If we could defeat a bunch of them, legislators in other states MIGHT think twice about doing the same. But that might be pie in the sky thinking….
LikeLike
July 19, 2013 at 2:11 pm
Perhaps if we left a trail of percocet away from his desk and his signing pen, he’d forget all about signing it into law…
LikeLike
July 22, 2013 at 4:39 pm
jajajajajaja
LikeLike
September 23, 2013 at 10:20 am
So if it isn’t a human then what do you say it is? It is a fertilized egg that will (likely) bemcoe a human being.. If a biologist were asked to determine the species would he not conclude it to be human? This very much depends on your definition of the word human . Science is a morally neutral tool to discover/explain/describe the natural world using naturalistic explanations. A species is generally defined as a group of organisms capable of interbreeding and producing fertile offspring and has similar DNA. I think a biologist would conclude that egg cells, sperm cells, and fertilized egg cells all have human DNA and are of the human species. I think a biologist would look to her moral judgement based on her religion or philosophy as to whether any of these things are a person i.e. human with rights. It is not science that confers human rights, it is moral judgement based on religious belief or moral philosophy applied to the morally neutral science/naturalistic explanations that confers human rights. So again I ask at what point do you say we earn our human rights? First some distinctions. I don’t think there is a single point of human development at which all human rights are conferred onto a person. I think different rights are earned at different stages. For example, the right to vote: our society has deemed a person must reach the age of 18 which is also the age at which many rights are earned. Even the inalienable right of liberty is restricted to parental control before then. But the most basic of rights I think we all agree is the right to life. I think we would all agree that the right to life is conferred onto all persons from the beginning to end of their person-hood. So when does that which is human (has human DNA) bemcoe a person with at the very minimum, the right to life? This depends on the definition of a person (we have also been using the word human here in this context). Dave has offered some candidate definitions:“Most people agree that what makes us human is our ability to reason and to have complex emotions. This sets us above other life forms as we can learn and grow on our journey.”“Self-awareness, free moral agency, speech and symbolic cognition, conscience and the imagination”Now these of course would not suit a newborn babe, much less the fertilized egg, but I don’t think he was going for that kind of definition. But I think the point is, that human thought is what sets us apart from all other beings. I’ll come back to this.I’ll start from the birth side. Surely there is such little difference the day before birth to the day after birth that we must call it murder to end the life of that fetus the day before birth. And once I concede that birth is not where the line can be drawn, then I’m on the slippery slope of what constitutes a person. Unless I jump to the far other side of conception. But does a destroying a fertilized egg truly make it murder because of its potential to bemcoe a baby? I submit that it does not. It does not because it does not have enough person/human characteristics. DNA is not enough and a potential baby is not enough. I reject always and never. This puts me back on the slippery slope (can of worms) of defining a human based on some kind of criteria.I did a little research on what some religious texts teach. The Jewish Talmud teaches that a fetus is not a person and has no rights. There are still Jews against abortion but it does not fall under the murder rule. The Old and New Testaments contain almost nothing specific to prohibiting abortion. The closest I could find is Exodus 21:22 where if there is a fight and a woman bystander should accidentally be injured and as a result miscarry, the assailant must pay a fine. There is a lot of history on this topic, I was surprised at how much and I am only scratching the surface.If a line is to be drawn, it ought to be drawn conservatively, that is on the early side. And there must need be a line drawn for there to be law in the matter. So where is the line drawn in Roe vs. Wade? The woman’s right to reproductive freedom is protected by constitutional guarantees of privacy. But that right is not unqualified. The woman’s right to privacy and the fetus’s right life must be weighed. And the court weighed those rights and priority was given to privacy in the first trimester and life in the third. Their criteria was viability, whether the baby could live outside the womb. The crux was lung function which is not sufficiently developed until about the 24th week (beginning of the sixth month). I reject viability as a coherent criteria for determining person-hood. It is not the ability to breath which makes us human. Also a morality based on technology seems fragile. What if new incubators come out that make it viable for a 4 month old fetus to live outside the womb? It is the ability for human thought which makes us uniquely human. I submit that the earliest onset of human thought in the fetus should be the criteria. This actually happens after the 24th week so the time framing of Roe vs. Wade should hold in order to draw the line conservatively.Now I have offered plenty of arguable points here. I only ask that amongst your arguments you at least address the question of what the definition of a person/human is. And also why is a fertilized egg a person/human?
LikeLike
July 22, 2013 at 7:27 am
be safe in your endeavors.
LikeLike
July 22, 2013 at 1:45 pm
Abortion is Murder!!
LikeLike
July 22, 2013 at 4:37 pm
no it’s not.
murder is a legal term indicating the illegal taking of a human life.
abortion takes human life, but it isn’t murder, just as the death penalty isn’t murder.
murder also requires malice. women and couples seek abortions for any number of reasons, but malice towards the zefb is never one of them.
if you choose to participate solely with emotional outbursts, that is certainly your prerogative, but please at least have your facts straight.
i am an anti, and you and people like you make us all look bad.
LikeLike
July 27, 2013 at 9:19 am
I think you’re right, Rogelio. It’s folks like that guy above who give pro-lifers a bad name
LikeLike
July 23, 2013 at 8:48 am
Just as we figured: CPCs are unethical (like the majority anti abortion zealots outside abortion clinics)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-erdreich/why-a-prochoice-activist-_b_3601194.html?utm_source=nar.al&utm_medium=urlshortener&utm_campaign=FB
LikeLike
September 24, 2013 at 2:53 pm
HiI’ve done the Operation Christmas Child boxes before but have been warend off them. I live in Fareham, Southern Hampshire could I please order some shoeboxes please and where would I drop them off at?Many thanks
LikeLike
April 27, 2015 at 9:44 am
We’ve arrived at the end of the line and I have what I need!
LikeLike
July 27, 2013 at 4:34 am
stoppatriarchy is anti-porn!
LikeLike
August 20, 2013 at 1:59 pm
Good Public Radio piece . . .
http://kalw.org/post/today-your-call-what-most-effective-message-abortion-rights-supporters
LikeLike