The other night I watched a documentary entitled “The Assassination of Doctor Tiller.” The film followed the events leading up to the brutal murder of Doctor Tiller, a physician in Wichita who performed late term abortions.
I hated the film.
No, let me clarify that. I think it was dangerous and irresponsible.
Let me remind everyone that I knew George Tiller very well. We were good friends, spent a lot of time together. We had informative conversations about his controversial work. He was an amazing, dedicated man. And while I appreciated how this documentary discussed to some extent his life and his work, I am very concerned that the film could incite more violence.
Of course, the mainstream pro-choice groups all think it was a wonderful film in that it documented how abortion providers have been stalked, bombed, threatened and, yes, killed. They say it’s important for the public to know about the “domestic terrorism” that took place or is still taking place around the country.
Now, I am not naïve. I understand there are anti-abortion protestors who continue to stand in front of clinics and harass women. I know that some of the more unstable ones call clinics and threaten the staff. Those with too much time on their hands will follow the doctors to and from the clinic. Basically, a lot of stuff is still going on and abortion providers cannot let their guard down.
But the fact is that, compared to the 1980’s and 1990’s, when anti-abortion groups like Operation Rescue could get hundreds of people to block the front door of an abortion clinic at a moment’s notice, these days things are relatively quiet. There are a few reasons for this trend. Years ago, the pro-choice movement (with my assistance) passed federal laws that protected clinics and women entering clinics. Meanwhile, the number of protestors on a general scale is smaller as the anti-abortion leadership has become older and has moved on to other issues (issues that might be able to raise them more money). Then there is a very cooperative Administration that is making sure the FBI and BATF do their jobs. Surely, things are not perfect by any means. For example, there are still people like Bill O’Reilly who continue to preach hatred (and who was particularly focused on “Tiller the Killer.”) But my point is that things are much quieter compared to a decade or two ago when the shit was hitting the fan everywhere.
The film, meanwhile, focused on the heyday of Operation Rescue, particularly that time when they surrounded George’s clinic for a whole month as part of their “Summer of Mercy.” And I guess it’s good to have a history lesson lest we forget. But what really bothered me – and concerns me – is that the film spent a lot of time focusing on Scott Roeder, the man who assassinated Doctor Tiller. In my opinion, that was totally irresponsible.
I am not a criminologist but I do know that history is replete with cases where someone killed
someone after being “inspired” by some other violent event. There’s always a copy-cat killing after a sensational murder. Just remember the rash of school shootings that occurred after Columbine. The fact is that there are idiots out there, total losers, who are looking to depart from this world with a large bang. They’re thinking how they’ve got nothing to lose so they decide they might as well take out 20 people at a local McDonalds and get their name on the front page of all the newspapers in the country. These people are violent extensions of all of those folks who feel a need to go on Doctor Phil or Oprah and talk about their sex change operation or their fight against obesity. We are a nation of narcissists and sometimes those narcissists take their need for attention a little too far.
So, imagine there is this guy sitting in his dark bedroom, which is located in the basement of his parent’s house. He is 30 years old, he just lost his job and his wife and two kids are living in another state. He spends all day playing video games or watching reruns of “Cops.” He’s got nothing to look forward to. And he’s got several guns in the closet.
Then, while channel surfing, he runs across “The Assassination of Doctor Tiller.” He is mesmerized at the films of Scott Roeder, the confessed killer of Doctor Tiller. He watches his wedding ceremony films and learns how Roeder lost his job soon thereafter and his wife threatened to leave him. He listens to the ominous background music while he watches grainy films of Roeder standing quietly in front of an abortion clinic. The film then jumps to Roeder testifying during his trial about how he started thinking of killing Doctor Tiller. He is impressed with Roeder’s cool demeanor on the witness stand, how he admitted right up front that he did it, that he put the gun to Tiller’s head and fired. He finds himself getting excited at all of the attention Roeder is getting and how Roeder is cool, even relieved, as he testifies. He does not sweat a lick, even though he is going to jail for the rest of his life. Fucking A – he is the man!
Then maybe this guy in this dark basement starts to get his own ideas…
It happens every day. It’s the same pattern. And that’s what concerns me about this documentary. The pro-choice movement has basically done all it can to protect themselves. They have passed every law imaginable. But they cannot stop a lone madman from taking the law into his own hands. If a person wants to kill and give up his own life, you’re not going to stop him.
And what bothered me about this film is that it may have given some wacko out there another idea.
October 29, 2010 at 7:09 pm
That is the worst-case scenario. The best case scenario is someone looks at Roeder and sees a man who has sacrificed himself to save people, as God did, and decides to imitate him. Worst case, best case, we all know the scene will again occur.
LikeLike
October 29, 2010 at 8:15 pm
you just proved pat’s point.
LikeLike
October 29, 2010 at 8:19 pm
Scott Roeder killed a wonderful man, husband, friend and doctor. He saved no one.
LikeLike
October 29, 2010 at 8:53 pm
seeing roeder on the stand was scary.
not a hint of remorse and his “ends justifying the means” mentality reeked of insanity.
LikeLike
October 29, 2010 at 8:44 pm
patty, do you feel that it is safe when planned parenthood goes to universities to recruit students to work or volunteer in clinics?
i have a couple of friends that went and then told us of the state of the facilities. granted, they were not there to harm anyone, but isn’t it possible that someone that PP tried to recruit might be dangerous?
infiltration works both ways, btw. i once went into a cpc to drop off some diapers and wipes that we had collected and wanted to point percy to the porcelain. i made a joke that i was there for my free pregnancy test.
i heard a peal of laughter that i recognized and turned around and to see a friend who is pro-choice sitting there.
she just gave me a look that told me to remain silent.
my first thought was concern that she was facing an unplanned pregnancy.
as it turned out, she was just infiltrating the cpc to see if they were upfront about the services that are offered, and what info they give to her.
jajajaja
we sat at starbuck’s and shared stories of how we find out info from the cpc’s and the abortion clinics.
LikeLike
November 2, 2010 at 11:14 am
Rogie: I guess it is always possible that you’re gonna “recruit” someone who is an anti. That comes with the territory. And, believe me, antis have been known to infiltrate abortion clinics. but, as you said, it also goes the other way as in the case of the CPC. It’s all very silly to me. I think people on both sides often have nothing to do. I think some get their rocks off by engaging in this “war” and by spying on the other side. Get a life, folks….
PS – I’m impressed that you were bringing diapers to the cpc….
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 12:11 pm
well, we run diaper drives regularly and they don’t want them at the abortion clinic, so we just take them to the cpc next door. 😛
LikeLike
November 1, 2010 at 10:41 am
You are right Rogie…I was always very careful about who I let in…You can not be to careful..when you have patients and staff it is your responsibility to make sure everyone is safe!! I don’t know that I would go out and recruit…but perhaps they vetted these people that were interested in coming to the clinic…but you can only do so much!! If someone is going to hurt/kill you if they are determined they will find a way…I guess Pat has a point..but I did not have such a strong negative reaction to the show…
LikeLike
November 1, 2010 at 8:46 pm
lorriepoo, the recruiting was a planned parenthood thing.
it might have even been just this particular one that was doing it.
they have suspended surgical abortions for the time being, as the place was falling apart and they had some serious reconstruction to do.
i have heard speculation though, that they are looking to get a larger building within an area that has a large number of medical facilities, and making a bid for their space using a name other than planned parenthood.
but there is quite a bit of infiltration by lifers into abortion clinics and by choicers into cpc’s.
there is a pro-life journalist named lila rose who often poses as a patient and goes into abortion clinics and reports what she sees there.
and james o’keefe is the guy who posed as a racist and made the audio of the planned parenthood employee who promised to earmark his donation to abort a black baby, and made several racist comments and got her on tape agreeing with him.
i have a couple of friends who pose as women facing unplanned pregnancies who go into the cpc’s to see if they are upfront about services they provide and of they use scare tactics, etc.
i have always found that the cpc’s that don’t lie to the clients offer far better services and these women conform that.
still, the fact is that statistically speaking, the people in the cpc’s aren’t in the danger from outsiders that the staff in the abortion clinics are.
sure, there is violence directed at lifers, but it never comes from the staff in the clinics. the closest i have come to a staffer directing violence towards me was one day when pinky walked down to the sidewalk to tell a man who was leaving the clinic and was blocking the driveway, and shoved me as she approached him.
the violence towards lifers comes from passersby, not from clinic staff.
and of course there is the violence towards pregnant women who want to have their babies, by their partners who want them to abort. but that is hardly a situation of those guys being violent because they are choicers. they are just violent period.
i’m sure john will want to point out the violence towards the unborn, but i am referring strictly to the people who are already born.
the cpc’s don’t get death threats and bomb threats and stalkers like the abortion clinics do.
so the people there are safer from outsiders than the staff in the clinics.
i guess that’s why i was so shocked when i heard about the manager of the abortion clinic in tulsa who faked a bomb threat in her clinic.
that was a slap in the face to the staffers who deal with real threats everyday.
LikeLike
November 2, 2010 at 11:16 am
A clinic manager at the clinic in Tulsa faked a bomb threat??? Give me the details. I know that clinic well….
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 12:23 pm
you didn’t know????
i originally read about it in one of the anti sites that i go to.
you know… they teach us how to pray for spells to hide our horns and forked tongues from the choicers.
anyway, i googled it to see if it was true or just propaganda.
apparently it is true because she pled guilty.
http://tinyurl.com/2efkx4u
do you know the lady as well as the clinic?
it is especially troubling because something like that leads people not to take threats as seriously as they should be taken.
it puts other clinic staffers in greater danger.
LikeLike
November 1, 2010 at 1:53 pm
I agree but then again it is how you look at it.
LikeLike
November 1, 2010 at 8:46 pm
what do you mean, melissa?
LikeLike
November 2, 2010 at 12:55 pm
I meant that it is dangerous in a way to have certain people watch this documentary but what are you gonna do?
You can’t filter who the audience will be, anything can set crazies off.
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 7:50 am
You can’t filter the audience but you can decide to not do the film. Everyone is playing upon our fears, including the “good guys.”
LikeLike
November 4, 2010 at 12:49 pm
We wouldn’t be America if we did that, would it?
The crazies have to be controlled, Why should we live in fear that they might do something crazy because of a film?
LikeLike
November 5, 2010 at 12:28 pm
The media is always deciding whether ot not to run a story based on a number of reasons. A film like this in no way “controls” the crazies. It might inflame them. There was absolutely no redeeming value behind the film. Indeed, I challenge anyone to tell me what this film accomplished…aaengaijo re
LikeLike
November 2, 2010 at 6:10 am
Pat, a lone TV special does not make someone psychotic. PEople whom are that radical are mentally ill to the point where they should not be integrated into society…they are a threat to any and everyone…not just pro-lifers.
To not allow this documentary to be played out of fear of the ill is allowing them to win. This type of psychological war fare should make us stronger, not make us cower in a closet.
LikeLike
November 2, 2010 at 11:19 am
Erun, I am not saying that the film alone would incite someone but things add up. Paul Hill told me straight to my face that he was “inspired” by Michael Griffin, who killed the first doctor.
As for the “war,” tell me exactly what did this film accomplish for the pro-choice movement? Let’s talk this through a little…
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 7:37 pm
one of the staffers pointed out that the way that SOB bill o’reilly kept calling dr tiller “tiller the babykiller” dehumanized him to some people.
i thought that was an excellent point.
even though i think what he was doing was wrong, by listening to his side, i saw that he thought he was doing a good thing, and that was his motivation.
i am glad that she pointed out that it was wrong to dehumanize him.
LikeLike
November 2, 2010 at 1:57 pm
Such a beautiful picture of Dr. Tiller. He was an outstanding person.
LikeLike
November 2, 2010 at 4:09 pm
It was wrong to murder Dr. Tiller and it was wrong for Dr. Tiller to murder babies. Nobody here seems concerned about the second part of the sentence. Murder is murder.
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 7:45 am
Jenelle: Abortion is not “murder.” If it were, it would be against the law. However, I will grant you that abortion is a form of “killing”. Are you saying, then, that as long as doctors perform abortions, you should be allowed to kill them?
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 8:44 pm
murder would require malice on the part of the one who is killing.
i don’t think that either the mother or the abortionist has malice towards the baby.
murder is not the correct term no matter what side of the fence you are on.
LikeLike
November 8, 2010 at 1:35 pm
OK, Pat, Rog, about this murder stuff. The perps are killers or killers’ helpers, not murderers — certainly not legally and morally that’s for God to decide.
However, the child is murdered. She is hunted down and destroyed; murdered, not killed. If the woman carrying her drowned, you could say she was killed. But that’s not what happens when the pregnant lady walks into the little auschwitz, is it.
LikeLike
November 2, 2010 at 5:36 pm
Jenelle, it’s not murder when you are forced to kill someone to save lives. Look at Columbine. The “Nobody”s don’t count; you count.
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 7:46 am
So, John, if one of your buddies told you they were going to kill an abortion doctor, would you feel obliged to kill that buddy of yours? After all, you’d be “saving” a life, wouldn’t you?
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 7:53 am
Pat! In war no one kills an ally!
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 10:25 pm
There you have it. One sick MF who believes killing a physician is a perfectly acceptable tactic, who believes he (the MF) is a warrior, a soldier in a war that was built on the two-fold imaginary of the sky god and the fully-formed sentient fetus who is holding court in some distant uterus proclaiming personhood. Sounds like anime to me. I’d say that is pretty shaky ground.
LikeLike
November 5, 2010 at 12:43 pm
If a neighbor of those Columbine kids heard that they were plotting to go kill kids at the school and this neighbor, in order to “save live” went to their house and killed them, that would be murder my friend.
LikeLike
November 6, 2010 at 9:35 am
Yes, that would be murder. The neighbor’s obligation there would be to go to the police.
LikeLike
November 3, 2010 at 10:27 pm
On second thought, I apologize for using the MF to reference the toad. I should really be the better person. So sorry, toad.
LikeLike
November 4, 2010 at 4:15 am
I do have that ability, don’t I, to bring out the worst in you folks. The “worst” has to be there, doesn’t it. Otherwise you would not be in favor of continuing to kill unwanted, innocent people; you would not be supporting this extended “Auschwitz.”
LikeLike
November 11, 2010 at 12:54 pm
Pat, about your response in #5: “I challenge anyone to tell me what this film accomplished.” It accomplished something quite remarkable. It, along with NBC’s “Law & Order,” proves that the media can present the pro-life argument fairly. Do you know what an accomplishment that is? Just look at this site! Who, other than you, does anything more than name-call, excoriate, and lecture? (I should add, or talk in riddles, like Chuckles.)
LikeLike
November 11, 2010 at 1:40 pm
That’s funny, John, because most pro-choice folks would say that the media often takes the pro-life side.
And, by the way, not that you’re my buddy or anything and I certainly do not like what you do but there are talks going on in your area with the authorities about the Flip Benham prosecution and how to use it up there….
LikeLike
November 11, 2010 at 5:15 pm
Oh my gosh!
LikeLike