Dedicated to the opines CG.
Please opine.
Call (800) 804-8868
Call (800) 804-8868 for immediate information on Abortion Care.Abortion Blog Stats
- 570,827
Abortion.com FaceBook
-
Join 239.8K other subscribers
Archives
Top Posts
Time To New President
January 20, 2020Twitter Updates
Tweets by abortiondotcomPlease Opine
dameirvolin on This State Is Banning Intersta… Anonymous on The Donohue Show Anonymous on The Donohue Show Helen Johnson Brumba… on The Donohue Show Jonnielyn Velez on Republicans Want 12 Randos to… Emily on Abortion Commenting Category Cloud
Abortion
Abortion Law
Abortion Rights
Blogroll
Late Abortion
morning after pill
pill
Therapeutic Abortion
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information %d
July 11, 2010 at 2:08 pm
Here are your “rescued” babies, from your very own Crisis Pregnancy Centers, John:
“For all the good crisis-pregnancy centers do, 80 to 90 percent of their clients–about 200,000 a year–eventually set up single-parent households. Most of these mothers and their children soon find themselves on their own, with no reliable means of financial support. Many end up permanently dependent on government welfare. Some even slip into homelessness. And we all know the eventual outcomes for many of the children born into such households: poverty, low academic achievement, susceptibility to crime. If pregnancy-counseling centers are to serve the best long-term interests of children, many of them will need to think beyond pregnancy and birth–to finding each one a two-parent home.”
You going to do something about those welfare queens now?
LikeLike
July 12, 2010 at 4:42 am
Sure, that’s Step 2. Step 1 is stop killing them. You can’t kill them because they’re poor, can you, Charles?
LikeLike
July 12, 2010 at 10:58 am
What is a Dunkle?
You’all have me confused …
LikeLike
July 12, 2010 at 11:30 am
That’s easy.
LikeLike
July 13, 2010 at 2:36 am
A dunkle is a loser that scares children and threatens adults and stalks women by his own admission.
That’s a dunkle.
It’s also a new verb.
I dunkled them.
Means one acted from an essense of stupidity toward another.
No logic or fact, and harms their own cause to completely waste their life.
LikeLike
February 8, 2011 at 12:12 pm
I kinds liked this Bc, but rewrite that last sentence.
LikeLike
July 12, 2010 at 4:39 pm
Cassandra, a Dunkle is the very core of the so-called “pro-life” movement. He exhibits plainly all of the characteristics which define it, and unlike its leaders– Wanda Frantz, the old Ralph Reed, Randall Terry, Monica Migliore Miller, Michael McHugh– he doesn’t sugar-coat or gild his message. Watch him and listen to him, and you will learn everything about how it is structured to meet the needs of a particular subset of human life: its members.
LikeLike
July 13, 2010 at 9:22 am
I dont think ole Randy Terry ever “sugar-coated” his stuff!!
LikeLike
July 12, 2010 at 4:43 pm
Well, another fantasy scenario, John:
Two children. One whom you think is getting its arms and legs slowly ripped off, and the other who at the age of four is getting sexually serviced by her father. Both of them within five miles of you.
Which one do you choose to “rescue,” and why?
LikeLike
July 12, 2010 at 8:46 pm
What’s that thing about hypothetical questions. I know where and when that will be done to the first child. I have no idea where and where, and even if, that will be done to the second child. It must be frustrating, Charles, that in order to argue your position, you have to create a make-believe world.
LikeLike
July 13, 2010 at 9:23 am
Sorry CG, but I think that’s a stupid question….
LikeLike
July 12, 2010 at 9:19 pm
John, less than one hundred yards from where my town’s so-called “pro-lifers” staged their annual Chain of Life thingy, real life for two under-four toddlers consisted of waddling around for two or three days in unchanged diapers while the parents traded sex for drugs and drugs for sex. The father had gone to jail several years earlier in another state for ripping out his infant’s tongue. This is not a make-believe world.
If you don’t think that there is a sexually abused toddler living within five miles of you, then you probably do not live in Pennsylvania. More likely you live in Nevada.
I’m not going to bother commenting on your fantasies, except to say that they are in accord with the insights offered by aborticentrism: the need to fight an invented evil, done at one’s leisure and from a position of strength…
LikeLike
July 13, 2010 at 5:48 am
The make-believe, Charles, is not that horrible things happen, no, it’s that they even approach the horror of torturing to death a million and a half young people every year. And the make-believe is that in those cases we know what will happen before as well as after the fact. And the make-believe is that people who buy into your make-believe world are normal while those who don’t are not.
OK, this time, if you want to run, run. Six times now I have had to cajole you and placate you and treat you with kid gloves — simply to keep you talking (in both our public and private correspondence). No more, and if you do run this time, good riddance.
LikeLike
July 18, 2010 at 5:29 pm
I saw Aborticentrism on Abortion.com FB page.
It’s pretty cool.
They said to check it out here.
Never heard of it, but it makes sense, once one spends a little time reading about it.
The FB helped find this amazing blog!
Who is the Dunkle here. is that real? It doesn’t look real to me?
LikeLike
July 18, 2010 at 5:42 pm
Thank you, Craig McG. Anytime you find a person proclaiming one thing and doing something quite different, you’re looking at somebody with a problem. The more discrepancy between what they say and what they do, the bigger the problem is.
John Dunkle has never divulged his history of sacrificing his time and money for someone else’s unwanted child. Yet he has gone to great lengths to crusade against death, violence, killing, murder, and so on– but mysteriously ends his crusade at the delivery room door! He’s never explained why– not because he won’t, but because he can’t. This is a trait displayed by people in denial. And it’s typical of the movement! So, what are they in denial about? Aborticentrism offers an explanation.
LikeLike
July 13, 2010 at 7:08 pm
I’ve been dealing with kids like those in my “fantasy,” John, and the work has left me a lot more tired than your work has left you! My guess is, you’re the smarter guy. . .
LikeLike
July 14, 2010 at 4:50 am
Over at Norman Rockwell, I just stated that encouraging someone else to have a baby is never in the interests of the child. Now, apart from the so-called “pro-life” shtick about saving an unborn innocent from a Fate Worse Than Death (well, okay, Death), what reasons do people have (like my sister’s roommate did) for wanting someone else to carry through with a pregnancy? Hers was to be a really cool couple of females.
This is the secular equivalent of the Catholic Examination of Conscience. Look deep within yourself, but– as the nuns always warned us– don’t touch.
LikeLike
July 14, 2010 at 5:11 am
Charles, why are you so obsessed with the motive of someone who wants to save another’s life? Put yourself in the position of someone who’s about to be killed. Wouldn’t you be thankful if someone stepped in and saved you? Wouldn’t you be thankful for someone who gave you a chance to face life on your own, same as everybody else? Would you really care if he were a tax cheat or a dunkle?
LikeLike
July 14, 2010 at 8:24 pm
Before I point out that you’re not answering my question, John, I will mention this:
1. Because of their need to be heroes, so-called “pro-lifers” need to meet society’s price in order to be recognized as heroes.
2. Because they don’t want to have to die in order to be heroes (after all, it’s their unresolved issues with their own death that is at the bottom of it all), they cannot accept society’s normal price (witness Todd Beamer of the famous Flight 94).
3. Therefore, they have to make a public relations pitch to society which will cast them as a hero, and they use the fetus as an “unborn human.”
4. Which makes their job easier, because if they can market it as a real human being, it is much easier to have their target audience identify it with themselves.
5. So then they can ask, “Wouldn’t you be thankful if someone stepped in and saved you?”
6. And of course they’d be finessing the question of, “Why can’t so-called ‘pro-lifers’ pledge themselves to raise to adulthood every ‘unborn human’ they want ‘rescued’?
You ought to know, John, that as Lily Tomlin put it, “We’re all in this alone.” Or to paraphrase Kipling, “The life that we do two by two, we live it one by one.”
Now, are you going to answer the question? Nah. . . .
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 4:07 am
Question: What reasons do people have to save the lives of others? Who cares (besides you , that is)?
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 2:24 pm
As I’ve said before, it’s obvious that you care about human life rather than for it.
Your focus has always been on violence, death, dismemberment, murder, killing and death, rather than hope, love, nurture, sacrifice, empathy, agape, and happiness.
You have been so consistent that I have a feeling your grandchildren at best tolerate you and more likely avoid if not fear you, and that your sons hug your perfunctorily, as a filial duty rather than an expression of affection. Who cares?
LikeLike
July 18, 2010 at 5:31 pm
Oh, this is the Dunkle,
This guy doesn’t seem like an idiot, he can speak in forked tongue, talented, but his logic is subprimate!
CMcGregor why do you bother?
LikeLike
July 18, 2010 at 5:35 pm
He and I speak to the larger audience. He tells them his story, and I interpret it based on facts.
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 9:08 am
Was that the question? Or was it this: “Why can’t so-called ‘pro-lifers’ pledge themselves to raise to adulthood every ‘unborn human’ they want ‘rescued’?”
You realize, of course, that would be impossible, and you ask it only to divert attention away from the real question: “Why should the stronger be permitted to kill the weaker?”
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 2:26 pm
Why should the strong be allowed to bully the weaker? It’s too bad you cannot persuade yourself that you are indeed favored enough to gain everlasting life and give up the stalking, death threats and harassment.
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 9:11 am
CG points out how pro-lifers are quick to “save” the baby from abortion, but will then abandon that baby once it is born. What I would like to know is what does a pro-lifer (like John) have to do to satiate you, CG? How many kids does he need to adopt, how many children does he need to send to college, etc.?
LikeLike
July 18, 2010 at 5:33 pm
Dunkle needs to stop harassing people, then he can live in his Dunkle hut with his little harassing and stalking fantasies. I just read some of his posts, in opinion, he sounds like one of those ageds that cannot get it up anymore and fixed on some chick, and stands outside her house.
Holy Shit!
He is a RadioHead Creep!
LikeLike
July 20, 2010 at 6:49 pm
who cannot
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 2:20 pm
Pat, when John Dunkle understands what an overstressed pregnant woman feels like, I will be satisfied that he has opened his mind.
To that end, I expect him to take on responsibility for absolutely every “unborn human” he wants to “rescue,” until he reaches the point where he says, “Jesus Christ! I’m not ready for this,” and tells the so-called “pro-lifers” to get out of his face.
The problem is, of course, that since he is trying to deal with his own neurosis, he cannot intellectually come to an understanding of what is involved in caring for human life, rather than merely about it.
LikeLike
July 18, 2010 at 5:36 pm
CMcGregor
WHat if he just stopped his bullshit, and stayed at home and stopped harrassing people.
Why be his psychologist, let him go pay for one.
I’ll even vote for tax dollars to help the demented.
Humanity!
I’m Catholic, I’ll even forgive him, if he does his pentenance and stop harrasing and scaring these people.
Did he really worship a murderer and want him to be his son, and burn a flag.
That sounds just too much like a made up story,
no sane person would do that?
LikeLike
July 18, 2010 at 5:48 pm
Craig, if he stopped being “pro-life” the way he is, he would have to deal with his repressed fear of death in another way.
There are many other ways to do it, but his family (which pays the price for this activity) would wind up paying another price instead.
What so-called “pro-lifers” need is therapy to deal with their attempts to deny death. Most of us have done so successfully, but they haven’t.
What they have chosen to do instead is to make themselves “heroes for life.” This, according to their logic, will prove in their lifetime that they have indeed earned life everlasting. Were they more sufficiently religious, they would already believe that and not have to be so dysfunctional.
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 4:31 pm
OK, time to “out” Charles. He’s a pro-lifer trying to pass for a pro-deather. His bizarre argument — that in order to want legal abortion to end, one has to be willing to adopt and raise all the million kids who would escape the butcher’s knife — is meant to show that all pro-deathers are kookie. Trouble is, Charles, there are some on this blog who don’t get it, who think you’re serious. So, sorry, gotta out you.
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 6:50 pm
Mr. Dunkle, your indifference to the suffering of children goes beyond mere ignorance to pathology. In these blogs AND in our side correspondence, you have consistently displayed two things: 1) a lack of awareness of what can befall a child (remember how I had to coach you through the parking lot abandonment scenario?), and 2) a fixation on anti-abortionism as being the pre-eminent cure for the hazards awaiting a child. The pathology you display is one of the more severe forms of aborticentrism.
If there are readers of this blog who do not get it, you can assure them they are not alone.
LikeLike
July 15, 2010 at 7:09 pm
Huh?
LikeLike
July 18, 2010 at 5:39 pm
Dunkle youare the most prolific retard I have ever seen. You should join the FB page, you are famous over there! You should give your opinion, as in my opinion, what they think of you is not really fair without you there to defend your crazy position.
Did you burna flag?
Did you say that you wouldn’t mond a son that was convicted of murder?
Did you calla convicted murderer a martyr.
Are these things true, please,
I am dying to know.
As stupid as you sound I just can’t believe it, cause part of you seems like your not stupid, it is really weird.
LikeLike
July 18, 2010 at 7:22 pm
Hi Craig, I didn’t understand half the things you said because you haven’t yet learned how to write. But Facebook (FC), I go there and find nothing. People tell me I’m featured, but not so far as I can see. Can you help me out? Tell me what to do when I go to Facebook?
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 8:13 am
John, you first need your own facebook page. Takes five minutes to create, doesn’t have to be too involved. Once you have a page, conduct a search for “Abortion.Com”. When you get to that page, become a “friend” by hitting “list”. Then you can go to the page and see all the conversations that are going on. You will have to scroll down many pages to see some reference to you, but it’s a great forum for you and others, there are about 4,000 people on the site every day.
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 11:30 am
Thanks, Pat.
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 2:42 pm
I’m already a member of Facebook. I go there and type in Abortion.com. I don’t see any “list” to hit! How do I get to that page?
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 9:01 am
Hey Dunkle,
I have a form of dyslexia. Is insulting someone with dyslexia cool in the pro life world?
That was quite rude,
Mostly because you distracted and avoided answering the questions that you do understand.
Please answer, or prove yourself to be what we know you are.
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 11:27 am
My telling Craig to learn to write before he does so in public is not mean; it’s instructive. And you, another “you never answer the question” commenter. I get asked a thousand questions and you never tell me which one you want me to answer.
LikeLike
July 20, 2010 at 6:13 am
One thing I do understand, though, is “Did you calla a convicted murderer a martyr?” Yes.
But that’s the wrong argument to use on me, Craig — someone who believes that the State executed God!
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 9:15 am
Please note:
1) Abortion.com FaceBook
is a public page. That means, among a million other ways just google that phrase and you find it probably as the first return
Abortion.com FaceBook
2) From that page or the others, you can publicly see much of what goes on, but you cannot really participate.
3) Join, as countless thousands have. It is fun, our guess is you will enjoy immensely, and frankly the pro-lifers there, get a severe whooping everyday, so your Intelligent, Sneaky, Evasive, and support of Murderers, will be quite welcomed by your failing compatriots. They really need your erudition. And seriously, our guess is you will have fun also.
4) Point of Vanity – The page is public so actual readership is magnitudes higher than the like list of thousands, higher than most celebrities in fact.
Go for it, if you want we’ll ask to have a proper intro with picture again if you desire.
We aim to please.
LikeLike
September 22, 2010 at 6:42 pm
This is sooooo frustrating. I do just what you say and all I get is ten thousand posts. None mentions me. What else do I care about? (Ask my wife.)
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 11:28 am
Thanks Kate.
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 2:39 pm
I went to Abortion.com Facebook just as you said. I saw an endless number of links to abortion related topics. I tried the first, Allentown Medical, nothing; the second, Abortion North Penn, nothing; the third, Abortion Infor for Teens, nothing. Where do I find the fun?
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 4:26 pm
Did you go to
Abortion.com
or
Abortion.com FaceBook
Search for the latter in google.
Or follow CG instructions,
Just go to
facebook.com
Create an account
Stick you name in there
Search for
Abortion.com
But click on the abortion.com page at face book
Not a link to Abortion.com
LikeLike
July 19, 2010 at 7:10 pm
Holy smokes, don’t you realize you’re dealing with a dummy? OK, I’ll try it anyway.
LikeLike
July 20, 2010 at 1:27 pm
OK, I think I finally got there. Thanks Pat, Kate, and especially you Heally. I went from today back to late June, piles of stuff. I’m featured in two posts in early July. I much prefer this blog, though. Besides, another John (Gagat) argues the pro-life position there and he’s better at it than I (and don’t say “that’s not hard,” Charles).
LikeLike