This page is dedicated to the Pro Life violence of John Dunkle,
We do not agree, but in the spirit of discourse, here it is,
Please opine.
Call (800) 804-8868
Call (800) 804-8868 for immediate information on Abortion Care.Abortion Blog Stats
- 574,690
Abortion.com FaceBook
-
Join 239.8K other subscribers
Archives
Top Posts
Time To New President
January 20, 2020Twitter Updates
Tweets by abortiondotcomPlease Opine
dameirvolin on This State Is Banning Intersta… Anonymous on The Donohue Show Anonymous on The Donohue Show Helen Johnson Brumba… on The Donohue Show Jonnielyn Velez on Republicans Want 12 Randos to… Emily on Abortion Commenting Category Cloud
Abortion
Abortion Law
Abortion Rights
Blogroll
Late Abortion
morning after pill
pill
Therapeutic Abortion
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information %d
July 20, 2010 at 11:37 am
Okay, I agree: I’m a hypocritical, pompous fool.
But why wouldn’t you find it more satisfactory in many ways to adopt and raise another child rather than stalk an abortion provider???? What do you see as the relative merits of the rewards engendered by each pursuit?
LikeLike
July 24, 2010 at 3:26 pm
Mr. Dunkle, you will not believe this but I just got a call from the murderer. He was very mean, called me a “kook” and said that if I ever went near his house again he would call the cops. But, watching what you do, I know that I have a right to stand in front of his house so I am going to go there next Friday night!! I am not going to let him kill babies anymore! Bless you, Mr Dunkle, for inspiring me. Together we can stop the kiilling…..
LikeLike
July 24, 2010 at 7:11 pm
Good news! Kick his butt!
LikeLike
July 25, 2010 at 11:42 am
What, no tips for young Bruce? Just what does he do when he gets there in his quest to “stop the killing?”
LikeLike
July 25, 2010 at 6:38 pm
I offered him all my stuff but he didn’t want it!
LikeLike
July 25, 2010 at 6:37 pm
So, Bruce, I still haven’t heard from you whether your new endeavor is more rewarding than caring for another young human life.
LikeLike
July 26, 2010 at 8:16 am
Mr. CG, at this point I cannot tell if my new “endeavor” is more rewarding than adopting another child because I haven’t done it yet. That happens Friday night. As I said in a previous post, I might want to adopt AGAIN (unlike you, who has never adopted0. What do I have to do to assuage you – adopt a child every year?
LikeLike
July 26, 2010 at 11:34 am
Surely, Bruce, you have enough erxperience from thus far raising your first adopted child that you have some data for comparison. I don’t think you should have to base your data on two sample populations.
Abnd by the way, congratulations!
LikeLike
July 25, 2010 at 6:42 pm
Careful here Bruce. Charles is trying to dictate whom you should care for: ignore the kid, says Charles, who’s about to have his arms and legs pulled off; help the kid whose parents won’t buy him a motor bike.
LikeLike
July 26, 2010 at 5:34 am
Yeah, Bruce! No examination of conscience permitted! Don’t take stock of your values and priorities, or the needs of real children.
The law of Dunkle: When they’re unborn, they’re little innocent angels facing torture; when they’re born, they’re greedy little bastards who whine mercilessly for a motor bike.
LikeLike
July 26, 2010 at 6:13 am
Charles is projecting, again.
LikeLike
July 26, 2010 at 7:24 am
To prove that, John, all you have to do is come up with the substantiations to your claim. Until then, “projecting” is just a word.
LikeLike
July 26, 2010 at 8:20 am
“Proof,” of course, is impossible, but here’s why I think it: you raised your son by yourself and the tone whenever you referred to that was one of resentment: “Look what I had to go through because I am a responsible person, unlike those pro-lifers, especially Dunkle.” Maybe you didn’t consider him one of those “greedy little bastards who whine mercilessly for a motor bike,” but I sense a connection.
LikeLike
July 26, 2010 at 11:37 am
Skipt the ad hominem bits, John. If “proof is impossible,” you shouldn’t be arguing from an unprovable premise. Aborticentrism explains that as a deficiency in emortional energy– the energy necessary to risk facing a truth that would destabilize your carefully constructed sense of equanimity.
LikeLike
July 26, 2010 at 5:59 pm
Oh Geeze.
LikeLike
July 26, 2010 at 6:03 pm
Well, you can always prove me wrong simply by researching and producing the proof. But as I say, it’s too risky and too demanding…
LikeLike
July 27, 2010 at 7:52 am
I agree, Mr Dunkle, that Mr CG has a bunch of issues that he is projecting on to us. It sounds like he is/was a loser parent. Is that true, Mr CG? I’m late to the game and am sure you’ve answered this but how many kids do you have and what are they doing now? Are they successful? My kid, by the way, my ADOPTED kid is incredibly bright and successful in many ways. Can you say the same?
LikeLike
July 27, 2010 at 8:44 am
Bruce, I must point out you’re not answering my question about the relative benefits of stalking an abortion provide and raising a child.
I grew up a very lucky child, in that I did not wind up a pervert, insane or a suicide. But it was sheer luck. I could have used a lot more nurturing than I got, and I would not at all mind having been aborted. Still don’t mind, for that matter. It’s too late for me, but it’s not too late for each of the 1.5 other million children you want to see born. I suggest you adopt nine more kids to show me how much better than my parents you are.
Meanwhile, your ducking of the question I posed to you has been noted. It further confirms the nature of aborticentric behavior.
LikeLike
July 27, 2010 at 1:02 pm
“You’re not answering my question” — that’s been Charles’s refrain, Bruce, ever since I met him on this blog months ago. I tricked him into talking to me privately (emails) just to see what would happen. He proceeded to ask me seventy-one questions, questions like, “Would you give a stranger your dog?” I dutifully answered every one. And you know what happened? We came full circle. (I’ll forward you the whole conversation if you’re interested.)
LikeLike
July 28, 2010 at 2:38 pm
I am tending to agree with you, John. I think Bruce has answered the question already. Bruce has said he can raise his kid, may adopt another (he’s asked you if you would adopt) and also stalk someone at the same time. He’s a multi-tasker. What hasn’t he answered??
LikeLike
July 27, 2010 at 6:01 pm
I’m still waiting, Bruce, but you’re probably tied up with paperwork and selecting a layette.
LikeLike
July 28, 2010 at 2:46 pm
Pat, Bruce has NOT answered the question, nor will he, because it would threaten his need to stalk his quarry. He has not mentioned what he’s found loveable or enjoyable about raising a child, has not spoken of the arc of human life, his hopes for his child’s happiness, the rewards he gets from being a father– and he certainly has not contrasted them with his new career as Bruce the Stalker.
That’s aborticentrism for you.
John “tricked” me? But he swore he’d had a vasectomy! I tell you, men will do anything to get into your pants….. Pass that along to Susan.
LikeLike
July 28, 2010 at 3:15 pm
I think Charles is losing it. That’s a question? Here’s Charles’s question: Pro-lifers (the ones he calls aborteelinhams or something) dislike dogs, don’t adopt, don’t enjoy the art of human life, do other bad stuff. Then he tells you to read his book to find out how bad they really are. At least he doesn’t use question marks.
LikeLike
July 29, 2010 at 8:57 am
Yikes, I might agree with John. I totally thought Bruce answered your original question but now you’ve come up with all this other stuff about fathering. The problem, CG, is that you just throw too much stuff out there, I rarely read your entire posts so maybe I miss your actually asking a real question. I suspect Bruce had the same issue.
LikeLike
July 28, 2010 at 3:26 pm
No, I’m saying that so-called “pro-lifers” for the most part walk away from the kids they wanted to see born. You are living proof of that, John. However, if Pat’s son walked away from his kid, you wouldn’t let him off the hook. You’d dump on him the way I feel like dumping on you.
Where it gets confusing for people is that I say their aborticentrism is the reason the so-called “pro-lifers” walk away, and I try to explain what aborticentrism is.
LikeLike
July 28, 2010 at 5:05 pm
“Bruce has NOT answered the question.” What question? All I see is a mini-lecture.
LikeLike