This page is dedicated to the Pro Life violence of John Dunkle,
We do not agree, but in the spirit of discourse, here it is,
Please opine.
Call (800) 804-8868
Call (800) 804-8868 for immediate information on Abortion Care.Abortion Blog Stats
- 574,687
Abortion.com FaceBook
-
Join 239.8K other subscribers
Archives
Top Posts
Time To New President
January 20, 2020Twitter Updates
Tweets by abortiondotcomPlease Opine
dameirvolin on This State Is Banning Intersta… Anonymous on The Donohue Show Anonymous on The Donohue Show Helen Johnson Brumba… on The Donohue Show Jonnielyn Velez on Republicans Want 12 Randos to… Emily on Abortion Commenting Category Cloud
Abortion
Abortion Law
Abortion Rights
Blogroll
Late Abortion
morning after pill
pill
Therapeutic Abortion
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information %d
August 6, 2010 at 2:43 pm
Sugar Britches, you have to cut John a lot of slack on the sexual orientation issue. After all, he chose to be straight. He’ll tell you all about it.
LikeLike
August 6, 2010 at 5:48 pm
I don’t think I chose to be straight, Charles, just as I don’t think I chose to have full use of both arms and legs.
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 10:31 am
Then you shouldn’t be dumping on gay people about their lives, Dunkle. Or do you think maybe Sugar Britches is gay because God has a twisted sense of humor?
God makes gay children; God performs abortions. It looks like you’re fighting two wrong battles.
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 6:22 pm
Now you’re into the problem of evil, Charles. Deep and difficult. Origin is your best bet here.
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 1:34 am
He didn’t choose to be straight any more than I chose to be gay.
He can’t help it if he is fabulous-challenged.
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 1:30 am
1.
John Dunkle Says:
August 6, 2010 at 6:05 pm
Huh?
=========================================
Well, same sex marriage is accepted within this country more and more everyday. it’s just a matter of time before it’s the law of the land.
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 3:50 am
You’re probably right: during my time I’ve seen child-killing become legal, so anything’s possible.
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 8:46 am
You preferred womankilling?
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 1:37 am
Sugar Britches Says:
August 6, 2010 at 1:01 pm
“Sugar is gay? ”
You obviously have never seen me walk. 😛
Rate This
Quantcast
Reply
1.
John Dunkle Says:
August 6, 2010 at 6:04 pm
If this is a question, SB, you’re ever worse than Charles.
=======================================
LOL
It wasn’t a question, it was simply a comment about Pat asking if I am gay.
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 4:11 am
I just went back to earlier posts to discover that SB had asked me several questions that I’d missed. Sorry, SB. I’ll have to check more often.
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 8:47 am
No worries, I brought them to you.
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 8:44 am
John Dunkle Says:
August 7, 2010 at 4:21 am
I don’t condemn, SB. I’m not God! I warn.
=======================================
You warn children about their mother?
LikeLike
August 7, 2010 at 10:35 am
“People shouldn’t have sex the way I shouldn’t have before I got married.” ?????????? John Dunkle has spoken! And America listens raptly. . .
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 6:38 am
Dunkel at #2: “Evil”? If you had bacon and eggs this morning, John, you benefited from evil done to a pig and and unborn chicken. But any dodge that will steer people away from considering how little you care for real human life is a gambit that works for you.
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 9:01 am
the lower forms of animals are here for our use, Charles.
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 3:25 pm
Slaughter a pig yourself and get back to me on that…
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 3:55 pm
We are not supposed to kill animals for any reason, to prove a point being one of them.
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 6:43 am
Sugar Britches at #1: Dunkle is incapable of enlarging his mind to take in the fullness and complexity of human life. He needs to believe in the tiny little construct dictated by anti-abortionism in order to meet his psychological needs. This is why he cannot understand or relate to the fact that people can see that he win’t care for real babies.
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 3:57 pm
Charles used to call the pre-birth human being a humanoid; now he calls her a fake baby. I don’t know which is worse!
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 11:45 pm
John Dunkle Says:
August 7, 2010 at 6:33 pm
He was gay, and you know what that means — a killers’ helper like yourself.
====================================
Is he hot?
LikeLike
August 8, 2010 at 11:50 pm
Sugar Britches Says:
August 7, 2010 at 8:45 am
You realize that this is why people think that you have no concern for born children, yes?
Rate This
Quantcast
Reply
1.
John Dunkle Says:
August 7, 2010 at 6:19 pm
no
=========================================
Well, it’s one of the reasons.
A lot of antis do as you do and protest abortion, but offer no lasting solution to the problems that women who seek them are facing.
Once the baby is born, that’s it. Your job is finished. But hers has just begun.
The fact that you wouldn’t hesitate to traumatize a child who is already born in order to make a point sure is evidence to that effect.
LikeLike
August 9, 2010 at 9:15 pm
First things first, SB. Save someone’s life; then if you’re a super hero, support her forever.
LikeLike
August 9, 2010 at 10:33 pm
We’re not talking about me, we’re talking about you.
So out of the babies whose lives you have saved, how many do you currently support?
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 7:51 am
none
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 2:31 pm
Sugar britches, see my exegesis on the context of Dunkle’s care for human life below.
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 2:05 pm
What Dunkle is saying here, Sugar Britches, is that you first have to be a hero before you can be a super-hero. That’s why he’s into “rescuing” “unborn innocents,” and saving them from “torture.” He needs to be a hero. And it’s a lot easier than being a superhero!
\
In a later post, I’ll tell you what happens to babies during the hour he spends stalking his abortion provider.
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 2:38 pm
Sugar Britches, if you check out the story of the Abortion Store and the Baby Store, you will see the pretty well pre-determined fates of born children. Almost ALL of them are preventable. John Dunkle has admitted he cares for none of them. He spends his time as he sees fit trying to get them born. He does so at his convenience, according to his budget, with no sacrifice of time, money or intellectual effort.
During the one hour he spends stalking, children are being born. Here they are, with their preventable futures facing them:
•1 will be born to die within the first year of life
•2 will be born who will go to jail
•8 will be born who will have to receive state custody to protect him from his own parents
•12 will be born who will run away from home. Almost every other child will be running away because of intolerable family conditions
•20 girl babies will be born who will become a pregnant teenager
•20 will live in a household with neither parent present
•27 girl babies will be born whose sexual abuse will begin at about age two and continue until about age 14
•34 will be born at an extremely low birth weight, at risk for school failure and for a felony conviction
•40 will have mothers weren’t “elated about their condition.”
•40 will live in a family which pays more than half of its income for rent- two and a half times the national average
•40 will be born to a child
•40 will experience lifelong depression
•44 will come home after school to an empty house
•57 will be left alone at home unsupervised between the ages of five and fourteen
•80 will live in poverty
•100 will live in a family with an alcoholic parent
•100 will not graduate high school
•100 will receive little if any health care because they will be without health insurance
•133 whose parents never intended for him to exist
•200 will barely, if at all, know his biological father
The Ghost of Christmas to Come pointed to two shivering waifs and said to Scrooge, “Their names are Ignorance and Want.”
They weren’t even real, but Scrooge was more moved by that than Dunkle has been by anything I have said.
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 3:14 pm
Hey, is this #3? Killing babies early is the best way to prevent them from suffering later?
Okay, once and for all, let’s record Charles’s three pro-baby-killing arguments and let’s remember the order:
1. John Dunkle and my father are sickos.
2. Anyone who tries to save a life must be willing to support that person until death.
3. Killing young people is the best way to prevent later suffering.
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 5:35 pm
You misrepresent my argument, John, so that you don’t have to face answering them. Here they are:
1. Underlying much of the so-called “pro-life” attitude is a compulsion to act out the rescue of oneself from Death, with the fetus representing the “pro-lifer” and the “pro-lifer” acting the part of God.
2. So-called “pro-lifers” do not address the responsibility of children whom they want to see born.
3. Their fixation on abortion is so great as to preclude care for real human life. For example, they think that preventing the next Ted Bundy can only happen through an abortion, rather than through good nurture.
LikeLike
August 10, 2010 at 6:43 pm
1) is #1: John Dunkle and my father (and other pro-lifers) are sickos; therefore, baby killing must remain legal.
2) is #2: Anyone who tries to save a life must be willing to support that person until death; therefore, baby-killing must remain legal.
3) is very confused because, Charles, that’s what you, not I, believe. You are the one who wants to keep baby killing legal so the next Ted Bundy will not be born.
LikeLike
August 11, 2010 at 6:16 am
Sorry, but that “response” doesn’t address my previous post, John. It shows your mindset, and I invite other readers here to click on my “name” and see how well it fits the aborticentric’s mindset.
LikeLike
August 11, 2010 at 6:36 am
#1
LikeLike
August 13, 2010 at 10:57 am
Hey, killers, it’s me, Dunkle! The guy you hate! (Nothing’s worse than being ignored.)
LikeLike
August 17, 2010 at 6:37 am
John, in post #12 above, I point out what will be happening to many of the children born during an hour you spend stalking. Now, I know you won’t include care for any of them in your scheme of activities, but if I were to want all of them born (as you do) which ones do you think it’s all right for me to walk away from after they’re born?
LikeLike
August 18, 2010 at 7:34 am
#2
LikeLike
August 18, 2010 at 11:13 am
Quit dodging, John; it makes you look stupid.
You wanted to see all five of your sons born and you didn’t walk away from any of them. Now you want to see more children born, but you don’t stay around to meet their needs. So I assume it’s okay for me to walk away from them, too.
Now, based on the fates awaiting a lot of the babies leaving the Baby Store, which ones is it okay for me to walk away from, especially if I want to see them born? Surely you must have criteria.
LikeLike
August 18, 2010 at 9:29 pm
I think this is #3, but I’m not quite sure because it’s hard to understand.
LikeLike