This page is dedicated to the Pro Life violence of John Dunkle,
We do not agree, but in the spirit of discourse, here it is,
Please opine.
Call (800) 804-8868
Call (800) 804-8868 for immediate information on Abortion Care.Abortion Blog Stats
- 570,827
Abortion.com FaceBook
-
Join 239.8K other subscribers
Archives
Top Posts
Time To New President
January 20, 2020Twitter Updates
Tweets by abortiondotcomPlease Opine
dameirvolin on This State Is Banning Intersta… Anonymous on The Donohue Show Anonymous on The Donohue Show Helen Johnson Brumba… on The Donohue Show Jonnielyn Velez on Republicans Want 12 Randos to… Emily on Abortion Commenting Category Cloud
Abortion
Abortion Law
Abortion Rights
Blogroll
Late Abortion
morning after pill
pill
Therapeutic Abortion
-
Subscribe
Subscribed
Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
Abortion - Abortion Clinics, Abortion Pill, Abortion Information %d
February 16, 2011 at 10:03 am
This person knows nothing about abortion. Why does he write about it?
LikeLike
February 16, 2011 at 12:35 pm
Because he can
LikeLike
February 16, 2011 at 2:17 pm
He knows even less about the needs of real children.
LikeLike
February 16, 2011 at 10:12 pm
Oh oh, Chuckles is back to “unreal children” again. Please, someone, help me. Come up with a better name for yourself during the nine months someone was carrying you in her womb. And “unreal child” doesn’t cut it with me. What were you then? A frog?
LikeLike
February 25, 2011 at 1:14 pm
Just catching up on these threads…Why do we have to call it anything? Why not let each individual woman decide what to call it?
LikeLike
March 30, 2011 at 7:42 am
Shouldn’t lie, Pat.
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 6:00 pm
Newt Gingrich ROCKED at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans. So did all the speakers. Go watch the on C-Span and you won’t regert it. I’ve been very critical of Newt, especially as far as New York 23 was concerned. He is beginning to redeem himself now.
LikeLike
February 25, 2011 at 3:46 pm
I agree with Sol,
If one does not know what they are talking about they should not be so dogmatic in their opinion. I see this Dunkle guy can’t even answer simple questions.
Just because he can write about, does not mean he should.
He misrepresents facts, lies, and many other horrible things.
Certainly Jesus would never do those things.
LikeLike
February 25, 2011 at 3:40 pm
To Pat in #23: “unreal children”: the so-called “pro-lifers” cannot settle for anything less than granting that a fetus is in fact a child.
Otherwise at best they would be attempting to rescue something that rated only somewhat higher than a puppy. That would be a pretty good PR stance, but not good enough for people who want to be remembered as another Horatio at the bridge or Joan of Arc.
It’s important to them to challenge any attempt to describe the fetus as it actually is.
LikeLike
February 26, 2011 at 11:22 am
Rejoice!
Hallelujah!
Dunkle has a self proclaimed leaving the blog to the intelligent literate part of the world!!
LikeLike
February 26, 2011 at 11:23 am
As a Pro Lifer it will do us good to have the murderer supporters off this site. I am glad he has the good sense to leave, and let the real prolifers work.
LikeLike
April 11, 2011 at 3:11 pm
Mary Ann, are you Mary too?
LikeLike
March 1, 2011 at 9:02 pm
What a joy. This blog is so much more interesting without this maniac blabbing constantly on this site.
I’ll start reading the blog again now that he is gone.
LikeLike
April 10, 2011 at 2:32 pm
He lied again.
He’s back.
LikeLike
February 9, 2014 at 7:20 am
That saves me. Thanks for being so sebisnle!
LikeLike
March 2, 2011 at 6:52 am
Well, in the interests of keeping the true pro-ife spirit alive, I am expropriating this site.
Welcome to the world of RESPONSIBLE Right to Life! We are an association of pro-lifers who pledge to raise to adulthood every “unborn human” we want “rescued.” This means setting aside the price of a Lamborghini for every pregnant woman, so that she will be able to afford all the expenses involved in raising her child.
It’s quite an effective tactic, when you think about it. There’s no need to stand on a sidewalk on a chilly morning, screaming our lungs out at her as she walks past. All we have to do is hold the check out. If she takes it, well, we’ve saved another unborn innocent for Jesus! If she doesn’t, we’re $285,000 ahead. It’s a win-win situation.
Unfortunately, there are a whole lot of so-called “pro-lifers” who have refused to join. Some names that come to mind are kathy, nancy, jamie, bruce, randy, ralph, wanda and john. We haven’t figured out why they won’t put their money where their mouth is, but they won’t talk about it.
LikeLike
March 2, 2011 at 10:44 am
Interesting perspective.
Sounds better than those losers on the sidewalk protesting.
LikeLike
March 2, 2011 at 8:33 am
Honestly, at this point I dont know how i got to this page, been f…ing around on the web this a.m. I dunt know what Dunkel is but yur post is intresting. But am confused…r u against abortion. I am in favor of choice…
LikeLike
March 2, 2011 at 9:16 am
I am so pro-life that of course I am against abortion, but I cannot disconnect my hatred of abortion from my responsibility to protect and nurture all the children that I want to rescue. These are children whom I insist be born, and for which I therefore bear responsibility.
Therefore, I will only oppose abortion as an option for the woman who agrees to accept from me $285,000.
If I only hate abortion but will not care for the children whom I insist be born, then there is something wrong with my thinking.
LikeLike
March 2, 2011 at 10:47 am
That makes a lot more sense than any pro lifer I have ever heard spew their nonsense.
LikeLike
March 2, 2011 at 11:08 am
Thank you, Glen. Of course, I have a massive problem with the “pro-choicers.” They don’t hold my compatriots to the standards I have. Instead, “pro-choicers” rant about a woman’s right to her body, which allows the so-called “pro-lifers” to call them murderers.
When you consider that “pro-choicers” choose to raise to adulthood every child they want born, you realize there’s no gap at all between what they want and what responsible pro-lifers want. Why they treat the irresponsible pro-lifers as though they’re mentally balanced is beyond me.
LikeLike
September 19, 2011 at 6:02 am
“Thank you, Glen. Of course, I have massive problems . . .” I know, Chuck, I know, and I’m here to help remove some of them.
LikeLike
March 6, 2011 at 1:34 pm
CG, if you “hate” abortion so much, do you “hate” the women who want them?
LikeLike
March 6, 2011 at 2:21 pm
I don’t think question relates to CG
LikeLike
March 7, 2011 at 10:50 am
Well, Pat, of course I have to hate the women who have them!
Why? Because they’re poking me in the eye with a stick: I don’t like abortion, and they are having one!
They should be more considerate of my feelings! God is going to send them to Hell for ignoring me. They cannot be punished enough. If they would only listen to me, then everything would work out according to God’s plan, even if the baby grew up to kill two dozen women or shoot Gabby whatserface in the head. Too bad about her, but I’m just doing God’s work here, and they should accept God’s inscrutable plan for the baby I am not going to take care of.
So, don’t ask me to help them out with their kids. Fighting abortion is much more important.
LikeLike
March 10, 2011 at 10:17 am
I’m just catching up on these posts and am totally shocked at your attitude, CG. You have never come across this way in your other posts. Or is this some kind of joke?
I mean, do you really “hate” these women??? Were you drinking when you wrote this?
LikeLike
March 10, 2011 at 4:10 pm
Oops, sorry; I was channeling a so-called “pro-lifer” there.
Actually, I don’t hate women who have abortions; that would mean hating half the women in America. But I do hate abortion!!!! I hate it so much that I will pay a woman $284,000 not to have one, if she’ll take the money. As soon as I get the first $284,000 scraped up, I’ll start matching my deeds to my words, unlike so-called “pro-lifers.”
Meanwhile, I have pretty much wrapped up trying to help kids without having $284,000; it’s been a long slog. From here on in, it’s all trying to get scpl’s to do what I used to.
LikeLike
March 11, 2011 at 10:29 am
But CG, you say that you first need to scrap up the $284K. Couldn’t that be said for other pro-lifers that you criticize? Dont they have the same issues?
LikeLike
April 10, 2011 at 3:01 pm
They refuse to leave the woman alone before they come up with the money. That’s the difference between so-called “right to life” and RESPONSIBLE Right to Life, which still has only one “pro-life” member.
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 6:51 am
Posted on Do you people have a focabeok fan page? I looked for one on twitter but could not discover one, I would really like to become a fan!
LikeLike
March 29, 2011 at 5:13 pm
Dunkle,
did you read Mary’s comment.
It is not OK to yell at women.
Do you get it yet after about a thousand times telling you?
LikeLike
March 29, 2011 at 5:14 pm
A pro Life comment as well.
It is nice to know there is a small group of pro Lifers that do get a part of the story!
LikeLike
March 29, 2011 at 6:02 pm
Looks like even the ProLifers find you a bad person for the things you do.
You have been condemned by many of them now.
Do you have anything to say for yourself?
Or are you just going to be like you always are, a worm, sliding through a hole in the ground with your ancient beliefs?
You make me sick that you might belong to humanity – with your lies and misrepresentations of what you say.
God knows where to send you poor sick fellow.
Hopefully, God will take your mental illnesses into account.
Any knows Jesus would never support a murderer, but you must not believe in Jesus or desire to follow his teachings, or that of the Catholic Church.
LikeLike
March 29, 2011 at 6:13 pm
Terri, read up on aborticentrism and look at him more carefully. You’ll be able to answer your own questions.
LikeLike
March 29, 2011 at 9:01 pm
How can Jimmy bear living with this harridan!
LikeLike
March 30, 2011 at 9:46 am
I’m too lazy to look it up. What the heck is a “harridan?”
LikeLike
March 30, 2011 at 10:31 am
like the shrew in “The Taming of the Shrew”
LikeLike
April 10, 2011 at 2:27 pm
Seriously . . .
Is that picture real?
Is the person real?
I find it Very hard to believe that a person could look so bizarre and old and holding weird signs like that.
Or write the things I read in this thread.
Would someone tell me honestly if this is a fictional character?
LikeLike
April 10, 2011 at 2:55 pm
Harrison, in correspondence with him, I have found him to be unable to imagine the needs of a child, to expand his area of concern for children beyond those few of whom he has direct knowledge, to be a bully, to be crafty in concealing his true knowledge and to be very committed in projecting himself as one who protects [imaginary] children from [imaginary] torture.
I believe that like many other so-called “pro-lifers” he does what he does not out of care for real human life, but of a need to punish, to achieve potency and a sense of purpose in the only way he sees possible in our society.
LikeLike
April 11, 2011 at 3:09 pm
Dang, Chuckles, you’ve back to implying that the kids I’m trying to keep alive are “unreal human life.” How can a human life be unreal?
LikeLike
April 11, 2011 at 6:45 pm
Tell me what you have learned about feral children, and you will know enough to have a conversation about “real human life” with me.
LikeLike
April 12, 2011 at 12:46 pm
I know Romulus and Remus were feral. Sometimes they turn out pretty good!
LikeLike
April 12, 2011 at 3:36 pm
Let me know what has been written about feral children in the last twenty years, and you will know enough to have a discussion about this.
LikeLike
April 13, 2011 at 8:17 am
I haven’t read anything about feral children since Mom burned my comic books.
LikeLike
April 19, 2011 at 1:25 am
That old fart Dunkle will never be on par in education to intelligently discuss anything with anyone.
His lack of education is so apparent.
CG I would not even bother with someone as clearly illiterate as Dunkle.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 7:26 am
AortaMan,
Your expectations of that Monkey Brain Dunkle are way too high.
LikeLike
April 11, 2011 at 3:26 pm
And Harrison, that’s my hand made sign and I draw as poorly as I look; but now I have a great big professionally made sign, and one hardly notices me when I am holding it.
LikeLike
April 16, 2011 at 11:09 am
John, I’m telling ya. You should every few days just post something on the page about your pro-life experiences. Just a simple paragragh, kinda like I do but shorter. Talk about how you got involved, your experiences, what you do now. All the inside pro-life poop….IT would be a great way for you to do some kind of informal “memoir”!
LikeLike
April 16, 2011 at 6:09 pm
Pat, OK, you know me better than I do, and that’s usually my line. I grew up in a tough
Catholic neighborhood near Morristown, NJ. We were bad, but we thought we were badder than we were; but, we did come close to killing ourselves and each other, and “them,” lots of times, and it happened only once or twice. Anyway, at 8 or 9 years old we had our eyes open: “You got only two sisters? They do the dirty.” “They” meaning your parents. We knew our religion better then than now. I’ll continue from here, but you gotta remind me.
LikeLike
April 18, 2011 at 7:43 am
OK, John, you gotta clarify for me the thing about the two sisters doing the dirty and “they” being your parents. Write it like you’re writing to a group of 15 year olds so everyone can understand. After you clarify that…tell us when you first started thinking about abortion…
LikeLike
April 18, 2011 at 8:38 am
Oh, stop it. Don’t blame my weakness on yourself. Of course what I said was too cryptic. Here’s what I meant. As soon as we learned from each other (about age 7) where we came from and how we got here, we learned that the Church said the sexual act must occur only within marriage and must be open to procreation. So, if your parents were not hypocrites, you’d have lots of brothers and sisters. If not, you were open to attack, and, boy, did we love to attack each other.
I learned what sodomy and abortion were around then too. I learned they were profound disorders and I still think that, age 75.
LikeLike
April 19, 2011 at 1:31 am
What did they teach you about Pedophiles?
Were you molested by your priests?
Were your friends molested by Catholic Pedophiles?
Apparently it was quite a hobby for the priests.
LikeLike
April 19, 2011 at 4:11 am
Well, about the same as for rabbis and a heck of a lot less than for fathers (most of this stuff occurs within the family). But it did happen. Shit happens.
LikeLike
April 19, 2011 at 11:21 am
Are you seriously placing Catholic Priest Pedophilia and Catholic Church conspiratorial cover up of Pedophilia under the category of “Shit Happens?”
LikeLike
April 19, 2011 at 2:07 pm
What catagory would you place it under, Jason, “I got my wish”?
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 7:11 am
How about “Shut down the Catholic Murderous and Pedophile Mill System Down” category?
That sounds more appropriate then “Shit Happens,” to diminish the crimes of Catholisism.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 7:14 am
John,
Did your Priests have sex with you when you were a little boy?
Is that why you are the way you are?
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 7:17 am
John,
Why do Priests tend to be homosexual Pedophiles instead of heterosexual Pedophiles?
Same question about Nuns.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 8:03 am
Three good ones here, Jason. Let me respond in #36.
LikeLike
April 19, 2011 at 11:44 am
Abortion is a “profound disorder.” Hmmmm. Now that is an interesting comment. Care to elaborate just a little? Are you saying that the two people in my family who had abortions had some kind of “disorder?”
LikeLike
April 19, 2011 at 2:21 pm
Oh yes, Pat. The Golden Rule is the essential order. Abortion is so deeply opposite that it calls for the adjective “profound.”
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 7:21 am
Translation please?
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 9:20 am
Donna, The Golden Rule says do to others as you would want them to do to you. Would you want someone to torture you or help torture you to death? That’s what happens in an abortion: someone is tortured to death. See how that is exactly the opposite to The Golden Rule? (You’re playing me, right? You knew this right off, didn’t you.)
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 10:15 am
I can accept living by the Golden Rule: I would rather be aborted than grow up without a modicum of proper nurture and become your murderer.
Yes, I know: I’ve already been born. And you haven’t undertaken to nurture that last child yoiu insisted someone else bear. Nor have you taken the time to learn what happens to children who don’t receive the sort of care you owe them.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 2:19 pm
Will you answer Pat’s question?
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 8:17 am
For Jason:
#1. It might be more appropriate but syntactically it’s abominable.
#2. When I was an older boy, one tried to, but I was too clever for him (and I had a gang to protect me; kids need gangs).
#3 Because a man can enter the priesthood and hide his disorder whereas in this day and age all bachelors are suspect.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 2:23 pm
Older boy?
Did you mean Altar boy?
Would you elaborate on that experience as it might help protect others from Catholic Priest Pedophilia …
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 3:24 pm
Older, 16 or 17, and altar. I could give you details but that would titilate the homosexuals and protect no one.
LikeLike
April 22, 2011 at 11:23 am
You don’t believe that revealing the nefarious techniques Priest Pedophiles use to commit their crimes of pedophilia could help educate parents to protect their children against the Catholic Priest Pedophilia?
I think it would be instructional as do the all of the experts in the field of social services and child safety.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 1:00 pm
For Chuckles: “I can accept living by the Golden Rule: I would rather be aborted than grow up without a modicum of proper nurture and become your murderer.” You’re a strange bird, Chuckles, and I say that affectionately. Other people would rather stay alive, no matter what.
“. . . you haven’t undertaken to nurture that last child you insisted someone else bear.” All that last child wants is someone to save him from the killer’s knife.
“Nor have you taken the time to learn what happens to children who don’t receive the sort of care you owe them.” I have learned this from experience, Chuck, not, like you, from psychology texts. (Remember that I am still caring for a mentally ill son and I know what his world is like.) But one may not kill himself or others just to avoid burdens.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 1:20 pm
No fetus has a concscious desire to avoid anyone’s knife, period. Any reaction to any stimuli is simply an autonomous reflex. Stop fantasizing.
You’ve been taking care of a “mentally ill” son for decades, but you still refuse to take on the next one. That’s not saying much for your desire to care for the children you want others to bear. From 1983 to 2010, I was ready to take on the next one that others had decided to bear without my meddling in their lives.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 3:31 pm
“No fetus has a concscious desire to avoid anyone’s knife” — she certainly would have if you allow her to continue to live, just like someone asleep.
You were doing so well for a while, Chuck, but you just cannot stop patting yourself on the back, can you: “From 1983 to 2010, I was ready to take on the next one that others had decided to bear without my meddling in their lives.”
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 4:11 pm
As I’ve said before, POTENTIALLY the fetus can be anything; ACTUALLY, it is a non-sentient being.
It’s all right to stop fantasizing. You’re in the public eye, and it doesn’t look good.
LikeLike
April 21, 2011 at 11:26 am
Humanoid, unreal child, non-sentient being — anything else,Chuck?
LikeLike
April 21, 2011 at 2:47 pm
It becomes a human life when you stop caring ABOUT it and start caring FOR it.
Suddenly, it looks a lot less sacred, doesn’t it?
LikeLike
April 21, 2011 at 4:13 pm
This is, so far, you silliest of all. Someone is not a human being unles someone else cares for her?
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 2:08 pm
John: Admidst all the blah, blah stuff, I dont think you told me how abortion is a “disorder” Please enlighten me as to what kind of “disorder” my two family members had….(because they had abortions)
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 2:16 pm
Let’s see if he can answer without the need for translation.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 3:44 pm
Here’s another reason it’s a disorder: if you are pregnant, the natural way is to carry the baby to term (I’ve told Kate this about a hundred times, and now she agrees with me). It is not natural to pay someone to cut the baby out of your body. If you go against nature, nature will strike back, and I’m not just talking about breast cancer. (I use “natural” and “orderly” as synonyms here.)
LikeLike
April 22, 2011 at 5:36 pm
Do you feel the mother is more to blame?
I do.
She is choosing to kill her baby, and then hiring a hit person who is indifferent to the situation, or just does it herself with meds.
I believe the Mothers should be punished under law.
Especially now with the Abortion Pill where a mother does not need another person to kill her baby.
What do you think John?
LikeLike
February 8, 2014 at 6:59 am
Hey! This is my 1st comment here so I just wetand to give a quick shout out and tell you I really enjoy reading through your blog posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same topics? Thanks!
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 4:08 pm
It’s also natural to let a baby die for lack of immunizations, to be blinded for life by an STD acquired during birth, to die for having been put to sleep on its stomach or to be fed infant formula prepared with contaminated water or breast milk tainted with HIV.
Parents who are concerned for their children’s well-being do act against what some people consider to be the “natural order.” (The Church of the First Born in Hobart, Oklahoma was one group who would condemn a parent for taking their children to a doctor for any reason.)
It is no more “unnatural” to choose an abortion than it is to deliberately intject into one’s own body an inactivated virus for the purpose of ensuring a good life for oneself and one’s loved ones. You cannot separate the intention from the action.
If you think you can love “unloved ones” any better than the woman who is carrying one, you’re welcome to offer her $284,000 to raise it to adulthood for you.
LikeLike
April 21, 2011 at 6:24 am
I realize I’ve scored when you go into your debate mode, Chuck.
LikeLike
April 21, 2011 at 2:46 pm
Tell me more about feral children, please.
LikeLike
April 20, 2011 at 11:09 pm
With a wine cooler review, you can ultimately choose the best wine refrigerator available. Park your rustic wood display cart outside your establishment and create an autumn display, complete with hay bales and fresh fall produce.
LikeLike